Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of a laboratory and a production coating spray gun with respect to scale-up

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A laboratory spray gun and a production spray gun were investigated in a scale-up study. Two Schlick spray guns, which are equipped with a new antibearding cap, were used in this study. The influence of the atomization air pressure, spray gun-to tablet bed distance, polymer solution viscosity, and spray rate were analyzed in a statistical design of experiments. The 2 spray guns were compared with respect to the spray width and height, droplet size, droplet velocity, and spray density. The droplet size, velocity, and spray density were measured with a Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer.

A successful scale-up of the atomization is accomplished if similar droplet sizes, droplet velocities, and spray densities are achieved in the production scale as in the laboratory scale. This study gives basic information for the scale-up of the settings from the laboratory spray gun to the production spray gun. Both spray guns are highly comparable with respect to the droplet size and velocity. The scale-up of the droplet size should be performed by an adjustment of the atomization air pressure. The scale-up of the droplet velocity should be performed by an adjustment of the spray gun to tablet bed distance. The presented statistical model and surface plots are convenient and powerful tools for scaling up the spray settings if the spray gun is changed from laboratory spray gun to the production spray gun.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lefebvre AH.Atomization and Sprays. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing Corp; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aulton ME, Twitchell AM. Solution properties and atomization in film coating. In: Cole G, ed.Pharmaceutical Coating Technology. London, UK: Taylor & Francis: 1995:65–117.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aulton ME, Twitchell AM. Film coat quality. In: Cole GC, ed.Pharmaceutical Coating Technology. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995:363–408.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Missaghi S, Fassihi R. A novel approach in the assessment of polymeric film formation and film adhesion on different pharmaceutical solid substrates.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5:E29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebey DG. A thermodynamic model for aqueous film-coating.Pharm Technol. 1987;5:40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. am Ende MT, Berchielli A. A thermodynamic model for organic and aqueous tablet film coating.Pharm Dev Technol. 2005;10: 47–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Porter SC. Scale-up of film coating. In: Levin M, ed.Pharmaceutical Process Scale-up. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2001: 259–310.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerstner S. Keine Schwächen—Mehr Betriebssicherheit beim Tablettencoating.Pharma Food. 2001;5:62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ruck B. Laser Doppler Anemometry—a nonintrusive optical measuring technique for fluid velocity.Part Charact. 1987;4:26–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitschke M.PDA-relevante Streulichteigenschaften: Phänomene, Parameterwahl und mathematische Korrektur. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI Verlag GmbH; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Z, Ziada S. PDA measurements of droplet size and mass flux in the three-dimensional atomization region of water jet in air cross-flow.Exp Fluids. 2000;28:29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Müller R, Kleinebudde P. Comparison study of laboratory and production spray guns in film coating: effect of pattern air and nozzle diameter.Pharm Dev Technol. 2006;11:425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nukiyama S, Tanasawa Y. Experiments on the atomization of liquids in an airstream.Trans Soc Mech Eng Japan. 1939;5:68–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Twitchell AM.Studies on the role of atomization in aqueous tablet film coating [PhD thesis]. Leicester, UK: De Montfort University; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turton R, Cheng XX. The scale-up of spray coating processes for granular solids and tablets.Powder Technol. 2005;150:78–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandey P, Turton R. Movement of different-shaped particles in a pan-coating device using novel video-imaging techniques.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6:E237-E244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Kleinebudde.

Additional information

Published: January 19, 2007

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller, R., Kleinebudde, P. Comparison of a laboratory and a production coating spray gun with respect to scale-up. AAPS PharmSciTech 8, 3 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1208/pt0801003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/pt0801003

Keywords

Navigation