Skip to main content
Download PDF

Tau Ser208 phosphorylation promotes aggregation and reveals neuropathologic diversity in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies

Acta Neuropathologica Communications volume 8, Article number: 88 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Tau protein abnormally aggregates in tauopathies, a diverse group of neurologic diseases that includes Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In early stages of disease, tau becomes hyperphosphorylated and mislocalized, which can contribute to its aggregation and toxicity. We demonstrate that tau phosphorylation at Ser208 (pSer208) promotes microtubule dysfunction and tau aggregation in cultured cells. Comparative assessment of the epitopes recognized by antibodies AT8, CP13, and 7F2 demonstrates that CP13 and 7F2 are specific for tau phosphorylation at Ser202 and Thr205, respectively, independently of the phosphorylation state of adjacent phosphorylation sites. Supporting the involvement of pSer208 in tau pathology, a novel monoclonal antibody 3G12 specific for tau phosphorylation at Ser208 revealed strong reactivity of tau inclusions in the brains of PS19 and rTg4510 transgenic mouse models of tauopathy. 3G12 also labelled neurofibrillary tangles in brains of patients with AD but revealed differential staining compared to CP13 and 7F2 for other types of tau pathologies such as in neuropil threads and neuritic plaques in AD, tufted astrocytes in progressive supranuclear palsy and astrocytic plaques in corticobasal degeneration. These results support the hypothesis that tau phosphorylation at Ser208 strongly contributes to unique types of tau aggregation and may be a reliable marker for the presence of mature neurofibrillary tangles.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of age-related dementia and affects over 25 million people worldwide [66]. AD is pathologically defined by the presence of two major types of pathologic brain inclusions: 1) extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) deposits in the form of plaques and cerebral amyloid angiopathy and 2) intracellular aggregates of tau protein that comprise neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and neuropil threads [11, 40]. The amyloid cascade hypothesis suggests that the accumulation and deposition of Aβ is the primary cause of AD [70]. However as the density of tau inclusions strongly correlates with cognitive decline [63], the “tau hypothesis” proposes that pathogenic tau is the main toxic factor that drives neurodegeneration in AD and other related diseases [43]. Mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene cause different familial forms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) including Pick’s disease (PiD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and globular glial tauopathy (GGT) [23, 39, 80].

Tau is a microtubule-associated protein that is highly expressed in the distal axons of neurons in the central nervous system [9, 80]. Physiologically, tau binds directly to microtubules (MTs) and is important for regulating MT assembly, dynamics, and stability, which are all important for normal axonal transport of vesicles and other molecules [42, 44, 83]. Tau protein can be alternatively spliced into six major isoforms found in the brains of humans and rodents [30, 31]. Variations in insertion of two N-terminal inserts of 29 amino acids generate 0 N, 1 N and 2 N isoforms. The presence or absence of exon 10 can lead to either three or four MT binding repeats to generate either 3R or 4R isoforms.

In AD, all six major tau isoforms aggregate to form pathological inclusions in a hyperphosphorylated state [29, 80]. Over 45 out of 85 total potential phosphorylation sites have been identified in AD brains by mass spectrometry and other methods [34,35,36,37, 60]. This aberrant hyperphosphorylation can cause tau to dissociate from MTs and decrease its ability to assemble and regulate MTs [22, 47, 49, 71]. Hyperphosphorylated tau may also be more prone to be mislocalized and to promote tau aggregation [2, 12, 32, 75]. Phosphorylation-specific tau antibodies such as AT8 are widely used to survey the distribution of tau pathology in AD brains, which follows a stereotypical pattern of progression as described in Braak staging – with NFT appearing to start in the entorhinal cortex and extending into the hippocampus and more distant cortical regions in late stage disease [10, 11].

Although the AT8 antibody is very useful diagnostic tool, the exact epitope recognized by this antibody has not been completely resolved, since AT8 was originally created by immunizing mice with paired helical filaments of tau (PHF-tau) purified from AD brains [58]. Early characterization of the AT8 epitope indicated that it requires phosphorylation at Ser202 (pSer202) and Thr205 (pThr205) [8, 28]; however, AT8 also has some reactivity to tau phosphorylation at Ser199 [8]. Recent epitope mapping has revealed that tau pSer208 may also be a part of the classic AT8 epitope and the addition of pSer208 to pSer202/pThr205 can enhance AT8 binding [53, 65]. Phosphorylation of Ser208 has separately been found in mass spectrometry analysis of PHF-tau purified from AD brains [34, 60]. In the cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients, pSer208 levels were three times more elevated compared to healthy controls [6]. Recent in vitro studies have indicated that triple phosphorylation of Ser202/Thr205/Ser208 promotes tau aggregation [19]; however, this has not been confirmed in cell culture, mouse models, or and human postmortem studies.

In this study, we modeled tau phosphorylation at Ser208 and nearby phosphorylation sites with phosphomimetics to determine its role in tau aggregation and MT binding in cultured cells. To confirm the in vivo relevance of pSer208, we also created a novel monoclonal antibody 3G12 specific for pSer208 and demonstrated its strong reactivity for tau inclusions in transgenic mouse models of tauopathies and in postmortem brain samples of patients with AD and other tauopathies.

Materials and methods

K18 tau protein purification

The K18 tau fragment consists of the MT binding repeats of the 2N4R human tau protein isoform, which includes amino acid residues Q244 to E372. An additional N-terminal methionine was added to K18 protein and expressed under the bacterial plasmid pRK172 in BL21 (DE3)/RIL Escherichia coli (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Recombinant K18 tau protein was purified as previous described [17, 72, 84]. Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and albumin for the standard curve.

Fibrillization of tau K18 seeds

Purified K18 tau protein was dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and 50 μM of heparin and was placed in a shaking incubator at 1050 RPM and 37 °C for at least 2 days. As previously described, the presence of polymerized amyloidogenic K18 fibrils structure was confirmed by K114 or thioflavin T assays [17]. To remove heparin, K18 tau fibrils were centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 min and re-dissolved in PBS followed by water bath sonication for 60 min resulting in shorter tau fibrils [72, 81, 84].

Mammalian tau expression plasmids and site-directed mutagenesis

The 2N4R human tau isoform cDNA was cloned into the pcDNA3.1 mammalian expression vector. Phosphomimetic mutations were introduced by QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) with customized oligonucleotides. The sequence of all constructs with the entire tau sequence was verified by Sanger sequencing performed by Genewiz (South Plainfield, NJ).

HEK293T cultured cells and calcium phosphate transfection

HEK293T cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) supplemented with antibiotics (100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin). Calcium phosphate precipitation was used to transfect HEK293T cells with various plasmid constructs. Cells were split into 12-well plates at 20–40% confluency. For each well, 1.5 μg of DNA was mixed with 18.75 μL of 0.25 M CaCl2. This mixture was added to an equivalent of 2X BES buffer (50 mM BES, 280 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Na2HPO4, pH 6.96) and incubated at room temperature for 15–20 min. The final solution was placed dropwise to each well. For tau seeding experiments, 1 μM of purified K18 tau fibrils was added an hour post-transfection [72, 84]. 16 h after transfection, cells were washed with PBS and placed in 3% FBS until they were harvested at 48 h after the media change.

Cellular tau aggregation assay

HEK293T cells were harvested in 200 μL of Triton Lysis Buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 20 mM NaF) with a mix of different protease inhibitors as previously described [72, 84]. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 g and 4 °C for 30 min to separate into a soluble and insoluble fraction. The insoluble fraction was washed in additional buffer and centrifuged again at 100,000 g and 4 °C for 30 min. The pellets were resuspended in Triton Lysis Buffer. Both fractions were boiled for 10 min after adding SDS- sample buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 1 mM EDTA, 40 mM DTT, 0.005% bromophenol blue, 0.0025% pyronin yellow, 1% SDS, 10% sucrose). The insoluble fraction was sonicated and boiled again for 10 min to completely dissolve the pellet.

Cellular MT binding assay

HEK293T cells were lysed in 200 μL of PEM buffer (80 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2) supplemented with 0.1% Triton X-100, 2 mM GTP, 20 μM paclitaxel, and protease inhibitors as previously described [77, 84]. Cell lysates were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 min to isolate MTs. Supernatants were transferred to a new tube and the pellet (MT fraction with bound proteins) were resuspended in PEM buffer. The pellet fraction was homogenized and SDS-sample buffer was added to both fractions. Equivalent amounts of supernatant and pellet were loaded on SDS polyacrylamide gels for Western Blot analysis. Percentage of MT-bound tau was calculated with pellet / (supernatant + pellet) * 100.

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

96-well ELISA plates (Corning Life Sciences, Corning, NY) were coated with 100 ng in 100 μL PBS per well of each peptide (see Table 1). All wells were washed with PBS four times and blocked with PBS with 5% FBS. Primary antibodies were added to blocking solution and incubated for 1 h. After PBS washes, plates were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Vector Labs Inc., Burlingame, CA) in blocking solution for an hour. Plates were washed with PBS and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB substrate, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was added to each well. The reactions were stopped with 0.2 M HCl and the optical density was measured at 450 nm with a plate reader. All ELISA experiments were performed in quadruplicates.

Table 1 Table of synthetic peptides used for ELISAs
Full size table

Generation of monoclonal antibody to tau phosphorylated at Ser208

BALC/c mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were immunized with a synthetic peptide Cys-202SPGTPGpSRSRTP213 (synthesized and purified by GenScript USA Inc., Piscataway, NJ), which corresponds to tau phosphorylated at Ser208, conjugated to KLH as previously described [16, 73, 74]. Hybridoma clones were screened for their specificity by ELISA [16, 73]. Monoclonal antibody 3G12 was found to be specific for tau phosphorylated at Ser208 by ELISA and was useful for immunohistochemistry and western blotting. All of the synthetic peptides used are listed in Table 2 and were synthesized and purified by GenScript USA Inc. (Piscataway, NJ).

Table 2 List of Tau Antibodies
Full size table

Western blot and semi-quantitative analysis

Protein samples were loaded on 10% polyacrylamide gels for SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked in 5% milk in TBS for 1 h at room temperature and incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C at 1:1000 dilutions for 3026 total tau antibody [73], β-tubulin antibody (Clone TUB 2.1 from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and tau antibody 3G12 specific for pSer208. After TBS washes, the membranes were added to anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 h. After TBS washes, the membranes were reacted with Western Lightning Plus ECL reagents (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Waltham, MA) and the signal was captured by chemiluminescence imaging (PXi, Syngene, Frederick, MD). The specific signals in each lane were quantified based on densitometric analysis with ImageJ software. Statistical tests were calculated on GraphPad Prism for one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc analysis by Dunnett’s test for group comparison.

Generation of Triton X-100 insoluble fractionations of mouse brain tissue

Brain samples from non-transgenic (nTG), tau knockout (KO) [18] and rTg4510 transgenic tau [67, 69] mice were lysed in TBS buffer (50 mM Tris base, 274 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, pH  8.0) supplemented with 1% Triton X-100 and protease and phosphatase inhibitors and probed sonicated until the solution is homogenous. The brain lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The Triton-insoluble pellets fractions were resuspended in the same buffer and SDS-sample buffer was added with heated at 100 °C for 10 min before loading for SDS-PAGE.

Immunohistochemistry of human and mouse brain tissue

Formalin-fixed brain samples of patients with AD, PSP, and CBD were provided by the University of Florida Neuromedicine Human Brain and Tissue Bank (UF HBTB) following institutional regulations. See Table 3 for details on human cases used for this study. Ethanol-fixed and formalin-fixed brain samples were obtained from PS19 transgenic mice that overexpress 1N4R human tau isoform with the P301S mutation [85] and rTg4510 transgenic mice that overexpress 0N4R human tau isoform with the P301L mutation, respectively [67, 69]. Paraffin-embedded tissue on slides were rehydrated in xylene and series of ethanol solutions (100, 90, and 70%). For standard heat antigen retrieval, slides were placed in a steam bath for 30 min to an hour in water supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched by submerging slides in PBS solutions with 1.5% hydrogen peroxide and 0.005% Triton-X-100. After washing, slides were blocked in 2% FBS/0.1 M Tris, pH 7.6 and were incubated in primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibody dilutions were 1:500 for AT8 antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), 1:1000 for 7F2 antibody [73], 1:250 for CP13 antibody [82] (Dr. Peter Davies), and 1:1000 for antibody 3G12 against Tau phosphorylated Ser208. After washes with 0.1 M Tris, pH 7.6, slides were sequentially incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1 h and streptavidin-conjugated HRP (Vectastain ABC kit from Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1 h. All slides were developed in 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB kit; KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) and counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Slides were dehydrated in ethanol solutions (70, 90, and 100%) and xylene before they were covered with Cytoseal (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).

Table 3 Demographic data of clinical cases, diagnoses and pathologic findings
Full size table

Semi-quantitative analysis of pathological counts

For AD and dementia with Lewy body (DLB) cases (details in Table 3), three different raters (YX, SP and ZAS) scored NFT, neuritic plaques, and neuropil threads in the hippocampus and surrounding regions for phosphorylation-specific antibodies AT8 and 3G12. Pathologic hallmarks were counted in randomly selected 20X fields in CA4, CA3, CA2, CA1, subiculum, entorhinal cortex and adjacent inferior temporal cortex accounting for seven total regions scored per case. The number of NFT and tau-positive neurons were counted per 20X field, and the percent of mature tangles were calculated as a ratio of mature NFT to tau-positive neurons. Similarly, neuritic plaques were counted in the same randomly selected 20x fields. Neuropil threads were scored on a graded scale from 1 to 3 based on relative density. Between the three different raters, 168 different data points were calculated for statistical analysis of each type of brain pathology.

Using IBM SPSS Statistics program (IBM, Armonk, New York), interrater reliability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a two-way mixed model for consistency between three different raters [33]. For counting of NFT, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.822 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.757 to 0.873. For counting of neuritic plaques, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.696 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.584 to 0.782. For scoring of neuropil threads, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.534 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.362 to 0.666. Based on these results, counting of NFT and neuritic plaques had good reliability for consistency between the three raters. Scoring of neuropil threads was moderately reliable between different raters.

Results

Triple tau phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E promotes aggregation of wild type (WT) tau in cultured cells

A previous in vitro study indicated that the combined phosphorylation of Ser202, Thr205, and Ser208 residues promotes the polymerization of tau into filaments [19]. To assess if this phosphorylation pattern could also promote aggregation in a cell model, site-specific tau phosphomimetics of Ser or Thr to Glu substitutions were created at these sites (Fig. 1a). Tau aggregation was assessed in the absence and presence of exogenous K18 tau amyloid seeds. Tau mutant P301L is prone to K18 seeded aggregation and was used as a positive control [25, 72, 84]. All types of tau including WT, P301L, and phosphomimetics were expressed at comparable levels (Supplemental Figure 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Triple phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E promotes aggregation of WT tau. a Schematic of 2N4R human tau protein depicting the major domains and the expanded 199–208 amino acid region within the proline-rich domain. Ser202, Thr205, and Ser208 were mutated to Glu residues to model site-specific tau phosphorylation. b HEK293T cells were transfected to express 2N4R human WT tau (b), P301L tau mutant (c), or the indicated tau phosphomimetics (d-g) and were biochemically assessed for tau aggregation with or without the addition of K18 seeds as described in “Materials and Methods.” S = supernatant fraction, P = pellet fractions. Immunoblots were probed with total tau antibody 3026. c As a positive control for seeding with K18 seeds the tau P301L mutant was used. Similar aggregation and seeding studies were performed with the single phosphomimetic S208E (d), the double phosphomimetic S202E/T205E (e), and the triple phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E (f). g Triple phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E in the context of the P301L mutation was also assessed. The relative molecular masses of protein markers are indicated on the left. h Quantification of percent tau aggregation was determined as described in “Materials and Methods.” One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Test was performed with N = 6 for WT tau and N = 3 for each tau mutant. **** is p < 0.0001, *** is p < 0.001, * is p < 0.05 and ns = not statistically significant. Error bars show standard error of the mean

Full size image

As previously shown [72, 84], WT tau does not significantly aggregate with or without K18 induced seeding (Fig. 1b, h), while P301L tau robustly aggregate in the presence of seeds (Fig. 1c, h). Single tau phosphomimetic S208E and double tau phosphomimetic S202E/T205E did not significantly aggregate with or without seeding (Fig. 1d, e, h). In contrast, the triple tau phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E showed some aggregation without seeding but this was not enhanced by the addition exogenous K18 tau seeds (Fig. 1f, h). Combining the triple tau phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E with the P301L mutation did not have an additive effect on tau aggregation more than P301L by itself (Fig. 1g).

S208E tau phosphomimetic modulates MT binding

Prior in vitro studies have suggested that phosphorylation of Ser202 and Thr205 can decrease tau’s ability to promote MT polymerization [78], but the effects of phosphorylated Ser208 have not been investigated. Therefore, MT binding of different phosphomimetics was assessed using a cell-based assay [1, 38, 77, 84]. In this assay, paclitaxel is used to stabilize MT and proteins that bind to MT such as tau can be pulled down by high-speed centrifugation. When paclitaxel is added to cell lysates, stable MT are formed and are present in the pellet fraction. As a MT binding protein, tau is also increased in the pellet fraction. In WT control samples, where the same cell lysates were not treated with paclitaxel, most of the unpolymerized tubulin is present in the soluble fraction where also the majority of tau is found, with only ~ 10% in the pellet fraction (Fig. 2a). In the presence of paclitaxel, tubulin polymerized as MT is predominantly present in the pellet fraction and WT 2N4R tau binds MTs at about 30% (Fig. 2b, f). In contrast, S208E tau shows increased MT binding at ~ 41% compared to WT tau (Fig. 2c, f). Surprisingly, tau phosphomimetics S202E/T205E and S202E/T205E/S208E did not show significant changes in MT binding relative to WT tau (Fig. 2d, e, f).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tau phosphomimetic S208E increased MT binding compared to WT tau and other tau phosphomimetics. a, b Cell-based MT binding assays were performed on HEK293T cells transfected to express 2N4R WT human tau without (a) or with (b) Paclitaxel added as described in “Material and Methods”. The same assay with Paclitaxel added as performed for cells expressing 2N4R human tau with the (c) S208E, (d) S202E/T205E or (e) S202E/T205E/S208E phosphomimetics. Immunoblots were probed with antibody specific for β-tubulin (clone TUB 2.1) to confirm tubulin polymerization or with 3026, a polyclonal antibody against total tau. S = supernatant fraction; P = pellet fractions. The relative molecular masses of protein markers are indicated on the left. f Quantification of percent tau associated with MTs. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Test was performed with N = 3 for WT tau and N = 3 for each of these tau mutants. ** = p < 0.01, ns = not statistically significant. Error bars show standard error of the mean

Full size image

Generation and characterization of novel monoclonal antibody 3G12 specific for tau phosphorylated at Ser208

To study tau phosphorylation of Ser208 (pSer208) in human tauopathies, a new monoclonal antibody specific for pSer208 was generated by immunizing mice as described in Material and Methods using the synthetic pSer208 peptide (Table 2). By ELISA, monoclonal antibody 3G12 strongly reacted with the pSer208 peptide but not with the corresponding non-phosphorylated peptide (Fig. 3a). Since the Thr205 residue is in proximity with Ser208, we tested if phosphorylation of Thr205 could interfere with 3G12 binding. 3G12 bound to the dual phosphorylated pThr205/pSer208 peptide with a similar efficiency as the phosphorylated Ser208 peptide, suggesting Thr205 phosphorylation does not block 3G12 antibody from binding to the pSer208 epitope (Fig. 3a). For comparison, the AT8 antibody did not react with any of these peptides (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Characterization of the specificity of a new monoclonal antibody 3G12 against pSer208. a ELISA was performed to assess the specificity of 3G12 monoclonal antibody compared to AT8 and PBS controls. Peptides used in ELISA are shown in Table 1. b Brain Triton X-100 insoluble fractions from tau knockout mice (tau KO), nontransgenic mice (nTG), and 6 month old rTg4510 tau transgenic mice were loaded on 10% polyacrylamide gels for immunoblotting analysis. Membranes were probed with (b) 3G12 monoclonal antibody or (c) rabbit polyclonal antibody 3026. The relative molecular masses of protein markers are indicated on the left

Full size image

To test the specificity of antibody 3G12 and the presence of tau Ser208 phosphorylation within aggregated tau in disease models, immunoblot analysis was performed using the Triton-insoluble fraction of brain lysates of tau KO, nTG mice, and rTg4510 transgenic mice that overexpress 0N4R isoform of P301L tau mutation [67, 69]. 3G12 antibody detected aggregated tau in rTg4510 transgenic mice and shows no major nonspecific bands in nTG mice or tau KO mice (Fig. 3b). A total tau antibody 3026 was used to confirm the presence of aggregated human tau in rTg4510 transgenic mice (Fig. 2c).

Using ELISA and different synthetic phosphorylated peptides (Table 2), the epitope specificity of antibody 3G12 was compared to other phospho-specific antibodies with nearby or overlapping epitopes (Fig. 4). As expected, antibody AT8 reacted with the synthetic pSer199/pS202/pSer205 peptide and not with any of the singly phosphorylated peptides (Fig. 4b). Based on previous studies, the AT8 antibody binding likely requires double phosphorylation preferentially at Ser202 and Thr205 [28]. Antibody CP13 is widely used and reported to be specific for tau phosphorylated at Ser202 [82], but limited published data is available about its properties. We confirmed that CP13 reacted with the synthetic peptide with pSer202, but it did not bind single pSer199, pThr205 or pSer208 peptides (Fig. 4c). However, CP13 also equivalently reacted with the pS199/pS202/pT205 peptide (Fig. 4c) showing that phosphorylation of these 2 amino acids in proximity of Ser202 did not influence its binding. 7F2 was reported as a monoclonal antibody that required phosphorylation of Thr205 for binding [73]; 7F2 bound to only the pThr205 peptide and not the pSer199, pSer202 or pSer208 peptide, but it can also bind when pSer199 and pSer202 are also phosphorylated (Fig. 4d). These additional studies further showed that antibody 3G12 only required tau peptide phosphorylated at Ser208 and not Ser199, Ser202 or Thr205 (Fig. 4e).

Fig. 4
figure 4

ELISA analysis of phospho-tau specific antibodies with different peptides near the AT8 Epitope. ELISA was used to assess the specificity of tau monoclonal antibodies AT8, CP13, 7F2, 3G12 and 2D1 with the indicated synthetic peptide with sequences detailed in Table 1. All ELISA experiments were replicated with N = 4 and error bars show standard error of the mean

Full size image

We previously made antibody 2D1 against the pSer199/pSer202/pThr205 peptide, but it was not phosphorylation specific [73]. We confirmed that 2D1 bound to this peptide sequence regardless of the specific phosphorylation state, but it prefers mono-phosphorylated peptide over the triple phosphorylated peptide (Fig. 4f). In addition, 2D1 did not bind to pSer208 or unphosphorylated Ser208 peptide, which begins at amino acid 202 indicating that the epitope of 2D1 antibody likely includes the 193–201 amino acid residues.

Tau pSer208 is present in tau inclusions of different mouse models of tauopathies

In the brains of two transgenic tau mouse models, 3G12 immunoreactivity was compared to other antibodies (AT8, CP13 and 7F2) against adjacent or overlapping phospho-epitopes. Adjacent brain sections from two mouse models were stained: rTg4510 transgenic mice that overexpress 0N4R human tau isoform with the P301L mutation specifically in the forebrain [67, 69] and PS19 transgenic mice that globally overexpress 1N4R human tau isoform with the P301S mutation in CNS neurons [85]. In aged 6-month-old rTg4510 mice, antibody 3G12 detected abundant tau inclusions in the cortex and hippocampus similar to antibodies AT8, CP13 and 7F2 on adjacent sections (Fig. 5a, b). This suggests that the tau inclusions in this model contain abundant pSer208 in a similar distribution. In the brains of aged PS19 mice, 3G12 antibody also detected tau inclusions in the thalamus and brainstem similarly to phosphorylation-specific antibodies AT8, CP13, and 7F2 (Fig. 5c, d).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Tau phosphorylated at Ser208 is present in pathological inclusions of PS19 and rTg4510 transgenic mouse models of tauopathies. Staining of pSer208 specific antibody 3G12 is abundant in tau inclusions within the (a) hippocampus and (b) cortex of 6 month old rTg4510 tau transgenic mice compared to other phospho-tau specific antibodies AT8, CP13, and 7F2. Staining of pSer208 specific antibody 3G12 is abundant in tau inclusions within the (c) thalamus and (d) brainstem/pons of 12 month old PS19 tau transgenic mice compared to other phospho-tau specific antibodies AT8, CP13, and 7F2. Scale bar shows 50 μm

Full size image

Tau Ser208 phosphorylation is a marker of mature NFT in AD patients

Next, we assessed if pSer208 is found in tau inclusions of post-mortem human brains from patients with different tauopathies. Brain tissue sections containing pathological tau inclusions from a series of patients with either AD or dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) with AD-tau pathology (summary of patients is shown in Table 3) were used. Hippocampal sections of these cases were stained with antibodies AT8, CP13, 7F2 and 3G12. AT8, CP13, and 7F2 showed similar staining for NFT, dystrophic neurites around neuritic plaques, and neuropil threads (Fig. 6). This is likely because these antibodies detect either pSer202, pThr205, or a combination of these 2 sites. 3G12 antibody against pSer208 showed preference for mature NFT as opposed to pre-tangles. 3G12 also detected less dystrophic neurites around neuritic plaques and fewer neuropil threads, suggesting that pSer208 may be a marker of late-stage aggregation specifically in NFT.

Fig. 6
figure 6

3G12 anti-tau pSer208 immunoreactivity for tau AD pathological inclusions compared to other phospho-tau specific antibodies with adjacent epitopes. Representative images of (a) NFT, (b) neuritic plaques, and (c) neuropil threads in the hippocampal formation of an AD patient with monoclonal antibodies AT8, CP13, 7F2 and 3G12. Scale bars represent 50 μm. (d) Quantification of percent of mature tangles over tau positive neurons stained by AT8 and 3G12 antibodies. Clear circles show individual data points. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals as represented by red bars. e Quantification of neuritic plaques stained by AT8 and 3G12. f Scoring of neuropil threads between AT8 and 3G12 staining

Full size image

To further validate the qualitative differences between 3G12 and AT8 staining, we performed semi-quantitative counting of neuropil threads, neuritic plaques, and NFT in different microscopic fields across the hippocampal formation as described in “Materials and Methods.” The 3G12 antibody preferentially labeled mature NFT over less structured tau aggregates compared to AT8 (Fig. 6d). Similarly, 3G12 antibody demonstrated less reactivity both neuritic plaques and neuropil threads (Fig. 6e, f).

In PSP and CBD brain samples, pSer208 immunoreactivity is selective for neuronal and oligodendroglial pathology over astrocytic pathology

In addition to AD and DLB cases, tau phosphorylation patterns were investigated for other tauopathies such as PSP and CBD. In the brain tissue of patients with CBD, AT8, CP13, and 7F2 antibodies stained astrocytic plaques in a similar manner (Fig. 7a). The 3G12 antibody showed significantly less staining for astrocytic plaques and many of these plaques were not captured. In PSP brains, a similar selectiveness was observed where 3G12 revealed limited staining of tufted astrocytes (Fig. 7b). In fact, barely any tufted astrocytes were detected with 3G12, while AT8, CP13, and 7F2 abundantly stained tufted astrocytes. Interestingly, 3G12 antibody stained neuronal globose tangles and oligodendroglial coiled bodies with the same distribution as AT8, CP13, and 7F2 antibodies (Fig. 7c, d). Although staining intensity was less, 3G12 antibody appeared to capture most of the neuronal and oligodendroglial pathology labeled by the other antibodies. These data suggest that pSer208 in PSP is more prominent in neuronal and oligodendroglial inclusions than in astrocytic inclusions.

Fig. 7
figure 7

3G12 anti-tau pSer208 immunoreactivity for pathological inclusions in patients with PSP and CBD compared to other phospho-tau specific antibodies with adjacent epitopes. a Staining of astrocytic plaques in the striatum of CBD patients with monoclonal antibodies AT8, CP13, 7F2 and 3G12. Staining of (b) tufted astrocytes, (c) coiled bodies, and (d) globose tangles in the striatum of PSP patients. Scale bar shows 25 μm

Full size image

Discussion

Elevated tau phosphorylation at over 45 sites is a hallmark of AD brain PHF-tau and many of these post-translational modifications occur within the proline-rich region of tau including Ser202, Thr205 and Ser208 [34]. Phosphorylation-specific antibodies such as AT8 can react with multiple combinations of pSer202, pThr205, and pSer208 [53, 65] and these antibodies are important for postmortem Braak staging of AD [11]. Nevertheless, tau phosphorylation at Ser208 remains poorly studied, although recent in vitro studies have indicated that Ser202/Thr205/Ser208 combined phosphorylation can promote tau aggregation without the addition of typical chemical inducers [19].

Due to difficulties with studying single phosphorylation specificity by kinases in vivo, phosphomimetic alterations were used to model site-specific phosphorylation of Ser202, Thr205, and Ser208 in cell culture. Specific Ser or Thr residues were mutated to Glu that act to mimic pSer or pThr respectively, in terms of size and charge. Previous studies have shown that tau phosphomimetics can adopt pro-aggregative conformations like in AD [7, 41]. From our phosphomimetic experiments, we found that triple phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E promoted tau aggregation in cell culture, but phosphomimetic of combined S202E/T205E and only S208E did not by themselves (Fig. 1). This finding indicated that Ser208 phosphorylation can be an enhancer of tau aggregation when Ser202/Thr205 are also phosphorylated. These results are congruent with previous in vitro experiments [19].

The studies were extended to assess the role of prion-like seeding on tau aggregation by adding recombinant K18 tau seeds to different phosphomimetics, since it has been suggested that tau may propagate in a prion-like mechanism [5, 27]. None of the phosphomimetics including triple phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/208E were modulated by K18 seeding. Since P301L can be enhanced by K18 seeding as previously demonstrated (Fig. 1c) [72, 84], we added the triple phosphomimetic S202E/T205/S208E to P301L. Surprisingly, there was not an additive or enhanced aggregation in this quadruple mutation of S202E/T205E/S208E/P301L. Based on these results, P301L may represent a different tau aggregation species that is distinctively enhanced by seeding and operates in a different mechanism separate from this phosphorylation change. In our prior screenings of more than 31 different tau mutants [72, 84], we demonstrated that P301L and related mutations in the P301 position are uniquely prone to aggregation induced by K18 tau seeds. Therefore, our findings indicate that two types of modifications that individually enhance aggregation are not necessarily additive if the molecular alterations and conformations are not compatible to promote further misfolding.

A major function of tau is to bind and stabilize MTs [42, 83], which can be regulated by the phosphorylation of amino acid residues like serine, threonine, or tyrosine [22, 47, 49, 71]. Using a cell-based assay [84], the effects on MT binding of different phosphomimetics studies were assessed. S208E was found to display increased MT binding, which acts similar to disease-causing tau mutants R5H and R5L [84]. Abnormal MT binding may impair the ability of tau to properly regulate MT assembly and dynamics. Surprisingly, the double phosphomimetic S202E/T205E and triple phosphomimetic S202E/T205E/S208E did not significantly alter MT binding. This may be a limitation of using multiple phosphomimetics to model MT function, because it has been previously demonstrated that the effects are not necessarily additive [26, 47], likely due to complex changes in protein structure/folding.

A monoclonal antibody (3G12) specific to tau phosphorylated at Ser208 was generated to allow to monitor this modification in animal models and human brain tissue. The specificity of the 3G12 antibody was compared to the AT8 antibody and other related antibodies against nearby sites. Although AT8 antibody binds around the center of pSer202/pThr205 [24, 28], past studies have shown that AT8 can also react with pS199 and pSer208 but is highly selective for dual amino acid phosphorylation within its binding site [53, 65] consistent with the data here. This specificity of AT8 is likely because it was created by immunizing mice with purified PHF-tau from AD brains which is phosphorylated at many of these residues within the binding interaction of AT8 [58]. CP13 is a widely used tau monoclonal antibody with reported specificity for tau phosphorylated at pSer202 [82], but little experimental data is actually available on the characterization of this epitope. Using synthetic peptides, it is confirmed that CP13 recognizes tau phosphorylated at Ser202 and not Ser199 or Thr205, but in addition phosphorylation at both Ser199 and Thr205 do not interfere with CP13 binding which is also probably because this antibody was also raised against PHF-tau from AD brains [82].

In two different mouse models of tauopathies, our 3G12 antibody robustly stained tau inclusions in cortex and hippocampus of rTg4510 mice, and in thalamus and brainstem of PS19 mice. These two mouse models expressed different tau mutations and variants: PS19 mice overexpress the 1N4R human isoform with the P301S mutation [85] and rTg4510 transgenic mice overexpressed the 0N4R human isoform with the P301L mutation [67, 69]. These findings indicate that Ser208 is phosphorylated within the pathological inclusion that accumulated in these different animal models similarly to AT8, CP13, and 7F2 antibody staining, which correspond to phosphorylation at Ser202 and Thr205.

In AD and DLB patients with AD-tau pathology, it is shown that 3G12 antibody reveals strong preference for mature tangles relative to pre-tangles and other unstructured aggregates of tau compared to AT8. This observation was consistent across multiple regions of the medial temporal lobe. pSer208 is unique as a marker of aggregation and mature NFT compared to the other phosphorylation sites that stain all forms of tau. Phosphorylation at Ser208 might occur sequentially after Ser202 and Thr205 phosphorylation as the S208E phosphomimetic significantly reduces phosphorylation of these sites as determined by phosphorylation-specific antibodies AT8, CP13, and 7F2, at least in HEK293T cells (Supplemental Figure 2). Since Braak staging is based on the distribution of mature NFT [10, 11], pSer208 will be useful for both early and late stage AD to track all Braak stages I to VI. An aggregation-specific marker like pSer208 could make diagnosis easier, since it does not pick up extraneous staining of uncertain significance. The other antibodies CP13 and 7F2 revealed similar staining patterns as AT8, but might be more specific for pathological tau aggregates, as AT8 has been shown to cross-react with MAP 2C [54, 73].

To further investigate phosphorylation differences in other tauopathies, PSP and CBD cases were also selected for histopathologic analysis (Table 3). 3G12 immunoreactivity showed a distinct preference for neuronal and oligodendroglial pathology in PSP and detected less astrocytic pathology in either CBD or PSP. There were no major differences in AT8, CP13, or 7F2 staining in PSP and CBD, which suggests that Ser208 may be phosphorylated at different levels in different types of PSP and CBD pathology. It is not entirely surprising that different types of tau pathology can have variations in phosphorylation patterns; however, many phosphorylation-specific antibodies like AT8 and PHF-1 do not stain PSP and CBD pathology differently [21]. Recent cryo-EM studies suggest that CBD tau filaments may have different structures compared to AD tau filaments [86]. PSP tau filaments likely also adopt a different structural conformation [4]. Experimentally, PSP and CBD tau pathology can be propagated as distinctively different strains when injected into the brains of different transgenic tau mouse models [14, 61, 62]. Since post-translational modifications can differentiate CBD from AD [3], it is possible that CBD or PSP pathology represent different tau conformations with distinctively different phosphorylation patterns that define their structure and properties.

Based on our results and previous studies, we propose a model for how tau hyperphosphorylation near the AT8 epitope might lead to tau aggregation (Fig. 8). Normally, most tau protein is predominantly found in axons and associated with MTs. Phosphorylation of Ser202 and Thr205 may promote tau to mislocalize from the axon to the soma and dendrites, often detected as pre-tangles by the AT8 antibody [10, 11]. Combined phosphorylation of Ser202, Thr205, and Ser208 forms a unique post-translational modification configuration that promotes tau aggregation, accelerating the formation of tau filaments, and eventually resulting in NFT.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Triple phosphorylation of Ser202, Thr205, and Ser208 promotes tau mislocalization and aggregation, leading to the formation of NFT. 1) Physiologically, most tau protein is found in neuronal axons. 2) Tau phosphorylation at Ser202 and Thr205 leads to tau mislocalization to the soma and dendrites. 3) Combined phosphorylation of tau at Ser202, Thr205, and Ser208 enhances formation of tau filaments that lead to neurofibrillary tangles. Figure was created with Biorender

Full size image

Phosphorylation of Ser202 and Thr205 is likely regulated by different types of kinases compared to phosphorylation of Ser208. Ser202 and Thr205 have been shown to be phosphorylated by proline-directed kinases such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) [68], cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) [46] and glycogen stimulated kinase-3β (GSK-3β) when primed with protein kinase A (PKA) [50, 51]. In contrast, non-proline directed kinases like checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) [57], casein kinase 1 delta (CK-1) [36] and tau-tubulin kinases (TTK) [76] have been shown to phosphorylate Ser208, but none of these kinases reportedly phosphorylate Ser202 and Thr205. This suggests that two distinct groups of kinases phosphorylate Ser202 and Thr205 compared to Ser208. Phosphorylation of Ser208 likely occurs at a different disease stage from phosphorylation of Ser202 and Thr205. It is also possible that different tauopathies may have variations in phosphorylation patterns that define different tau conformations and species.

Besides histopathological diagnosis, an antibody specific for mature tangles such as 3G12 might provide high potential diagnostic value as a blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker for NFT progression in AD patients, as pSer208 was reported to be distinctively elevated in the CSF of AD patients compared to healthy controls [6]. Antibody 3G12 could also be used as immunotherapy for specific targeting of mature tangles in AD as several phosphorylation-specific antibodies have shown efficacy in different tau mouse models and in developing clinical trials [15, 45, 56, 79].

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ADNC:

Alzheimer’s disease with neuropathologic change

Aβ:

Beta-amyloid

ABC:

Avidin-biotin complex

ARTAG:

Aging-related tau astrogliopathy

CAA:

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy

CBD:

Corticobasal degeneration

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CTRND:

Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease

DAB:

3,3′-diaminobenzidine

DLB:

Dementia with Lewy bodies

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

FTLD-tau:

Frontotemporal lobar dementia-tau

HEK293T:

Human embryonic kidney 293 cell line with SV40 large T antigen

KO:

Knockout

LATE:

Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy

MAPT:

Microtubule-associated protein tau

MT:

Microtubules

NFT:

Neurofibrillary tangles

nTG:

Nontransgenic

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PHF:

Paired helical filaments

PSP:

Progressive supranuclear palsy

TMB:

3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine

UF HBTB:

University of Florida Neuromedicine Human Brain and Tissue Bank

WT:

Wild type

References

  1. Alberico EO, Duan AR, Goodson HV (2017) Measuring tau–microtubule affinity through cosedimentation assays. In: Methods in Cell Biology, pp 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso A d C, Zaidi T, Novak M, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K (2001) Hyperphosphorylation induces self-assembly of into tangles of paired helical filaments/straight filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:6923–6928. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.121119298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arakhamia T, Lee CE, Carlomagno Y, Duong DM, Kundinger SR, Wang K, Williams D, DeTure M, Dickson DW, Cook CN, Seyfried NT, Petrucelli L, Fitzpatrick AWP (2020) Posttranslational modifications mediate the structural diversity of Tauopathy strains. Cell 180:633–644.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arima K (2006) Ultrastructural characteristics of tau filaments in tauopathies: immuno-electron microscopic demonstration of tau filaments in tauopathies. Neuropathology 26:475–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2006.00669.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayers JI, Giasson BI, Borchelt DR (2018) Prion-like spreading in Tauopathies. Biol Psychiatry 83:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.04.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barthélemy NR, Mallipeddi N, Moiseyev P, Sato C, Bateman RJ (2019) Tau phosphorylation rates measured by mass spectrometry differ in the intracellular brain vs. extracellular cerebrospinal fluid compartments and are differentially affected by Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 11:121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bibow S, Ozenne V, Biernat J, Blackledge M, Mandelkow E, Zweckstetter M (2011) Structural impact of proline-directed pseudophosphorylation at AT8, AT100, and PHF1 epitopes on 441-residue tau. J Am Chem Soc 133:15842–15845. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja205836j

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biernat J, Mandelkow EM, Schröter C, Lichtenberg-Kraag B, Steiner B, Berling B, Meyer H, Mercken M, Vandermeeren A, Goedert M (1992) The switch of tau protein to an Alzheimer-like state includes the phosphorylation of two serine-proline motifs upstream of the microtubule binding region. EMBO J 11:1593–1597. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05204.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Black MM, Slaughter T, Moshiach S, Obrocka M, Fischer I (1996) Tau is enriched on dynamic microtubules in the distal region of growing axons. J Neurosci 16:3601–3619. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-11-03601.1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K (2006) Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol 112:389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82:239–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang E, Kim S, Schafer KN, Kuret J (2011) Pseudophosphorylation of tau protein directly modulates its aggregation kinetics. Biochim Biophys Acta - Proteins Proteomics 1814:388–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.10.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Charidimou A, Martinez-Ramirez S, Shoamanesh A, Oliveira-Filho J, Frosch M, Vashkevich A, Ayres A, Rosand J, Gurol ME, Greenberg SM, Viswanathan A (2015) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy with and without hemorrhage. Neurology 84:1206–1212. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavaguera F, Akatsu H, Fraser G, Crowther RA, Frank S, Hench J, Probst A, Winkler DT, Reichwald J, Staufenbiel M, Ghetti B, Goedert M, Tolnay M (2013) Brain homogenates from human tauopathies induce tau inclusions in mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:9535–9540. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301175110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Congdon EE, Sigurdsson EM (2018) Tau-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 14:399–415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0013-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Croft CL, Moore BD, Ran Y, Chakrabarty P, Levites Y, Golde TE, Giasson BI (2018) Novel monoclonal antibodies targeting the microtubule-binding domain of human tau. PLoS One 13:e0195211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Crystal AS, Giasson BI, Crowe A, Kung MP, Zhuang ZP, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY (2003) A comparison of amyloid fibrillogenesis using the novel fluorescent compound K114. J Neurochem 86:1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01949.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson HN, Ferreira A, Eyster MV, Ghoshal N, Binder LI, Vitek MP (2001) Inhibition of neuronal maturation in primary hippocampal neurons from tau deficient mice. J Cell Sci 114:1179–1187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Despres C, Byrne C, Qi H, Cantrelle F-X, Huvent I, Chambraud B, Baulieu E-E, Jacquot Y, Landrieu I, Lippens G, Smet-Nocca C (2017) Identification of the tau phosphorylation pattern that drives its aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:9080–9085. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708448114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dickson DW (1999) Neuropathologic differentiation of progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol 246:s006–s015. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrer I, López-González I, Carmona M, Arregui L, Dalfó E, Torrejón-Escribano B, Diehl R, Kovacs GG (2014) Glial and neuronal tau pathology in tauopathies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 73:81–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0000000000000030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer D, Mukrasch MD, Biernat J, Bibow S, Blackledge M, Griesinger C, Mandelkow E, Zweckstetter M (2009) Conformational changes specific for pseudophosphorylation at serine 262 selectively impair binding of tau to microtubules. Biochemistry 48:10047–10055. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi901090m

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Forrest SL, Kril JJ, Stevens CH, Kwok JB, Hallupp M, Kim WS, Huang Y, McGinley CV, Werka H, Kiernan MC, Götz J, Spillantini MG, Hodges JR, Ittner LM, Halliday GM (2018) Retiring the term FTDP-17 as MAPT mutations are genetic forms of sporadic frontotemporal tauopathies. Brain 141:521–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gandhi NS, Landrieu I, Byrne C, Kukic P, Amniai L, Cantrelle F-X, Wieruszeski J-M, Mancera RL, Jacquot Y, Lippens G (2015) A phosphorylation-induced turn defines the Alzheimer’s disease AT8 antibody epitope on the tau protein. Angew Chemie Int Ed 54:6819–6823. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201501898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Giasson BI, Forman MS, Higuchi M, Golbe LI, Graves CL, Kotzbauer PT, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY (2003) Initiation and synergistic fibrillization of tau and alpha-synuclein. Science 300:636–640. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082324

  26. Gilley J, Ando K, Seereeram A, Rodríguez-Martín T, Pooler AM, Sturdee L, Anderton BH, Brion J-P, Hanger DP, Coleman MP (2016) Mislocalization of neuronal tau in the absence of tangle pathology in phosphomutant tau knockin mice. Neurobiol Aging 39:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.11.028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goedert M, Eisenberg DS, Crowther RA (2017) Propagation of tau aggregates and neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 40:189–210. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goedert M, Jakes R, Vanmechelen E (1995) Monoclonal antibody AT8 recognises tau protein phosphorylated AT both serine 202 and threonine 205. Neurosci Lett 189:167–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(95)11484-e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goedert M, Spillantini MG, Cairns NJ, Crowther RA (1992) Tau proteins of alzheimer paired helical filaments: abnormal phosphorylation of all six brain isoforms. Neuron 8:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(92)90117-V

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goedert M, Spillantini MG, Jakes R, Rutherford D, Crowther RA (1989) Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 3:519–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(89)90210-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goedert M, Spillantini MG, Potier MC, Ulrich J, Crowther RA (1989) Cloning and sequencing of the cDNA encoding an isoform of microtubule-associated protein tau containing four tandem repeats: differential expression of tau protein mRNAs in human brain. EMBO J 8:393–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Haase C, Stieler JT, Arendt T, Holzer M (2004) Pseudophosphorylation of tau protein alters its ability for self-aggregation. J Neurochem 88:1509–1520. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02287.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8:23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanger DP, Anderton BH, Noble W (2009) Tau phosphorylation: the therapeutic challenge for neurodegenerative disease. Trends Mol Med 15:112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2009.01.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hanger DP, Betts JC, Loviny TLF, Blackstock WP, Anderton BH (2002) New phosphorylation sites identified in hyperphosphorylated tau (paired helical filament-tau) from Alzheimer’s disease brain using nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry. J Neurochem 71:2465–2476. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71062465.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanger DP, Byers HL, Wray S, Leung K-Y, Saxton MJ, Seereeram A, Reynolds CH, Ward MA, Anderton BH (2007) Novel phosphorylation sites in tau from Alzheimer brain support a role for casein kinase 1 in disease pathogenesis. J Biol Chem 282:23645–23654. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M703269200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hasegawa M, Morishima-Kawashima M, Takio K, Suzuki M, Titani K, Ihara Y (1992) Protein sequence and mass spectrometric analyses of tau in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. J Biol Chem 267:17047–17054

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huda MN, Erdene-Ochir E, Pan C-H (2017) Assay for phosphorylation and microtubule binding along with localization of tau protein in colorectal cancer cells. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/55932

  39. Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, Baker M, Froelich S, Houlden H, Pickering-Brown S, Chakraverty S, Isaacs A, Grover A, Hackett J, Adamson J, Lincoln S, Dickson D, Davies P, Petersen RC, Stevens M, de Graaff E, Wauters E, van Baren J, Hillebrand M, Joosse M, Kwon JM, Nowotny P, Che LK, Norton J, Morris JC, Reed LA, Trojanowski J, Basun H, Lannfelt L, Neystat M, Fahn S, Dark F, Tannenberg T, Dodd PR, Hayward N, Kwok JB, Schofield PR, Andreadis A, Snowden J, Craufurd D, Neary D, Owen F, Oostra BA, Hardy J, Goate A, van Swieten J, Mann D, Lynch T, Heutink P (1998) Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 393:702–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/31508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, Holtzman DM, Jagust W, Jessen F, Karlawish J, Liu E, Molinuevo JL, Montine T, Phelps C, Rankin KP, Rowe CC, Scheltens P, Siemers E, Snyder HM, Sperling R, Contributors (2018) NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 14:535–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jeganathan S, Hascher A, Chinnathambi S, Biernat J, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E (2008) Proline-directed pseudo-phosphorylation at AT8 and PHF1 epitopes induces a compaction of the paperclip folding of tau and generates a pathological (MC-1) conformation. J Biol Chem 283:32066–32076. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M805300200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kadavath H, Hofele RV, Biernat J, Kumar S, Tepper K, Urlaub H, Mandelkow E, Zweckstetter M (2015) Tau stabilizes microtubules by binding at the interface between tubulin heterodimers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:7501–7506. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504081112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kametani F, Hasegawa M (2018) Reconsideration of amyloid hypothesis and tau hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci 12:25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kellogg EH, Hejab NMAA, Poepsel S, Downing KH, DiMaio F, Nogales E (2018) Near-atomic model of microtubule-tau interactions. Science 360:1242–1246. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kfoury N, Holmes BB, Jiang H, Holtzman DM, Diamond MI (2012) Trans-cellular propagation of tau aggregation by fibrillar species. J Biol Chem 287:19440–19451. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.346072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kimura T, Ishiguro K, Hisanaga S (2014) Physiological and pathological phosphorylation of tau by Cdk5. Front Mol Neurosci 7:65. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2014.00065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kiris E, Ventimiglia D, Sargin ME, Gaylord MR, Altinok A, Rose K, Manjunath BS, Jordan MA, Wilson L, Feinstein SC (2011) Combinatorial tau pseudophosphorylation: markedly different regulatory effects on microtubule assembly and dynamic instability than the sum of the individual parts. J Biol Chem 286:14257–14270. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.219311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kovacs GG, Ferrer I, Grinberg LT, Alafuzoff I, Attems J, Budka H, Cairns NJ, Crary JF, Duyckaerts C, Ghetti B, Halliday GM, Ironside JW, Love S, Mackenzie IR, Munoz DG, Murray ME, Nelson PT, Takahashi H, Trojanowski JQ, Ansorge O, Arzberger T, Baborie A, Beach TG, Bieniek KF, Bigio EH, Bodi I, Dugger BN, Feany M, Gelpi E, Gentleman SM, Giaccone G, Hatanpaa KJ, Heale R, Hof PR, Hofer M, Hortobágyi T, Jellinger K, Jicha GA, Ince P, Kofler J, Kövari E, Kril JJ, Mann DM, Matej R, McKee AC, McLean C, Milenkovic I, Montine TJ, Murayama S, Lee EB, Rahimi J, Rodriguez RD, Rozemüller A, Schneider JA, Schultz C, Seeley W, Seilhean D, Smith C, Tagliavini F, Takao M, Thal DR, Toledo JB, Tolnay M, Troncoso JC, Vinters HV, Weis S, Wharton SB, White CL, Wisniewski T, Woulfe JM, Yamada M, Dickson DW (2016) Aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG): harmonized evaluation strategy. Acta Neuropathol 131:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1509-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lindwall G, Cole RD (1984) Phosphorylation affects the ability of tau protein to promote microtubule assembly. J Biol Chem 259:5301–5305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu F, Liang Z, Shi J, Yin D, El-Akkad E, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K, Gong CX (2006) PKA modulates GSK-3β- and cdk5-catalyzed phosphorylation of tau in site- and kinase-specific manners. FEBS Lett 580:6269–6274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.10.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Llorens-Marítin M, Jurado J, Hernández F, Ãvila J (2014) GSK-3β, a pivotal kinase in Alzheimer disease. Front Mol Neurosci 7:46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2014.00046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mackenzie IRA, Neumann M, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Alafuzoff I, Kril J, Kovacs GG, Ghetti B, Halliday G, Holm IE, Ince PG, Kamphorst W, Revesz T, Rozemuller AJM, Kumar-Singh S, Akiyama H, Baborie A, Spina S, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, Mann DMA (2009) Nomenclature for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus recommendations. Acta Neuropathol 117:15–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-008-0460-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Malia TJ, Teplyakov A, Ernst R, Wu S-J, Lacy ER, Liu X, Vandermeeren M, Mercken M, Luo J, Sweet RW, Gilliland GL (2016) Epitope mapping and structural basis for the recognition of phosphorylated tau by the anti-tau antibody AT8. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 84:427–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Matsuo ES, Shin RW, Billingsley ML, Van deVoorde A, O’Connor M, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (1994) Biopsy-derived adult human brain tau is phosphorylated at many of the same sites as Alzheimer’s disease paired helical filament tau. Neuron 13:989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(94)90264-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Halliday G, Taylor J-P, Weintraub D, Aarsland D, Galvin J, Attems J, Ballard CG, Bayston A, Beach TG, Blanc F, Bohnen N, Bonanni L, Bras J, Brundin P, Burn D, Chen-Plotkin A, Duda JE, El-Agnaf O, Feldman H, Ferman TJ, Ffytche D, Fujishiro H, Galasko D, Goldman JG, Gomperts SN, Graff-Radford NR, Honig LS, Iranzo A, Kantarci K, Kaufer D, Kukull W, Lee VMY, Leverenz JB, Lewis S, Lippa C, Lunde A, Masellis M, Masliah E, McLean P, Mollenhauer B, Montine TJ, Moreno E, Mori E, Murray M, O’Brien JT, Orimo S, Postuma RB, Ramaswamy S, Ross OA, Salmon DP, Singleton A, Taylor A, Thomas A, Tiraboschi P, Toledo JB, Trojanowski JQ, Tsuang D, Walker Z, Yamada M, Kosaka K (2017) Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 89:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Medina M (2018) An overview on the clinical development of tau-based therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci 19:1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041160

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Mendoza J, Sekiya M, Taniguchi T, Iijima KM, Wang R, Ando K (2013) Global analysis of phosphorylation of tau by the checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2 in vitro. J Proteome Res 12:2654–2665. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr400008f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Mercken M, Vandermeeren M, Lübke U, Six J, Boons J, Van de Voorde A, Martin J-J, Gheuens J (1992) Monoclonal antibodies with selective specificity for Alzheimer tau are directed against phosphatase-sensitive epitopes. Acta Neuropathol 84:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Mirra SS, Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, Vinters HV, Hyman BT, Aging NI on, Association A (2012) National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol 123:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Morishima-Kawashima M, Hasegawa M, Takio K, Suzuki M, Yoshida H, Titani K, Ihara Y (1995) Proline-directed and non-proline-directed phosphorylation of PHF-tau. J Biol Chem 270:823–829. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.2.823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Narasimhan S, Changolkar L, Riddle DM, Kats A, Stieber A, Weitzman SA, Zhang B, Li Z, Roberson ED, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY (2020) Human tau pathology transmits glial tau aggregates in the absence of neuronal tau. J Exp Med 217. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20190783

  62. Narasimhan S, Guo JL, Changolkar L, Stieber A, McBride JD, Silva LV, He Z, Zhang B, Gathagan RJ, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY (2017) Pathological tau strains from human brains recapitulate the diversity of tauopathies in nontransgenic mouse brain. J Neurosci 37:11406–11423. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1230-17.2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Nelson PT, Alafuzoff I, Bigio EH, Bouras C, Braak H, Cairns NJ, Castellani RJ, Crain BJ, Davies P, Del Tredici K, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Haroutunian V, Hof PR, Hulette CM, Hyman BT, Iwatsubo T, Jellinger KA, Jicha GA, Kövari E, Kukull WA, Leverenz JB, Love S, Mackenzie IR, Mann DM, Masliah E, McKee AC, Montine TJ, Morris JC, Schneider JA, Sonnen JA, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, Troncoso JC, Wisniewski T, Woltjer RL, Beach TG (2012) Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 71:362–381. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e31825018f7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Nelson PT, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, Jack CR, Boyle PA, Arfanakis K, Rademakers R, Alafuzoff I, Attems J, Brayne C, Coyle-Gilchrist ITS, Chui HC, Fardo DW, Flanagan ME, Halliday G, Hokkanen SRK, Hunter S, Jicha GA, Katsumata Y, Kawas CH, Keene CD, Kovacs GG, Kukull WA, Levey AI, Makkinejad N, Montine TJ, Murayama S, Murray ME, Nag S, Rissman RA, Seeley WW, Sperling RA, White Iii CL, Yu L, Schneider JA (2019) Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report. Brain 142:1503–1527. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz099

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Porzig R, Singer D, Hoffmann R (2007) Epitope mapping of mAbs AT8 and Tau5 directed against hyperphosphorylated regions of the human tau protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358:644–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Qiu C, Kivipelto M, von Strauss E (2009) Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: occurrence, determinants, and strategies toward intervention. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 11:111–128

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Ramsden M, Kotilinek L, Forster C, Paulson J, McGowan E, SantaCruz K, Guimaraes A, Yue M, Lewis J, Carlson G, Hutton M, Ashe KH (2005) Age-dependent neurofibrillary tangle formation, neuron loss, and memory impairment in a mouse model of human tauopathy (P301L). J Neurosci 25:10637–10647. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3279-05.2005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Reynolds CH, Betts JC, Blackstock WP, Nebreda AR, Anderton BH (2002) Phosphorylation sites on tau identified by nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry. J Neurochem 74:1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0741587.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Santacruz K, Lewis J, Spires T, Paulson J, Kotilinek L, Ingelsson M, Guimaraes A, DeTure M, Ramsden M, McGowan E, Forster C, Yue M, Orne J, Janus C, Mariash A, Kuskowski M, Hyman B, Hutton M, Ashe KH (2005) Tau suppression in a neurodegenerative mouse model improves memory function. Science 309:476–481. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Selkoe DJ, Hardy J (2016) The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med 8:595–608. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201606210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Sengupta A, Kabat J, Novak M, Wu Q, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K (1998) Phosphorylation of tau at both Thr 231 and Ser 262 is required for maximal inhibition of its binding to microtubules. Arch Biochem Biophys 357:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1998.0813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Strang KH, Croft CL, Sorrentino ZA, Chakrabarty P, Golde TE, Giasson BI (2018) Distinct differences in prion-like seeding and aggregation between tau protein variants provide mechanistic insights into tauopathies. J Biol Chem 293:2408–2421. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.815357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Strang KH, Goodwin MS, Riffe C, Moore BD, Chakrabarty P, Levites Y, Golde TE, Giasson BI (2017) Generation and characterization of new monoclonal antibodies targeting the PHF1 and AT8 epitopes on human tau. Acta Neuropathol Commun 5:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-017-0458-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Strang KH, Sorrentino ZA, Riffe CJ, Gorion K-MM, Vijayaraghavan N, Golde TE, Giasson BI (2019) Phosphorylation of serine 305 in tau inhibits aggregation. Neurosci Lett 692:187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.11.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sun Q, Gamblin TC (2009) Pseudohyperphosphorylation causing AD-like changes in tau has significant effects on its polymerization. Biochemistry 48:6002–6011. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi900602h

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Tomizawa K, Omori A, Ohtake A, Sato K, Takahashi M (2001) Tau-tubulin kinase phosphorylates tau at Ser-208 and Ser-210, sites found in paired helical filament-tau. FEBS Lett 492:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02256-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Vogelsberg-Ragaglia V, Bruce J, Richter-Landsberg C, Zhang B, Hong M, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y (2000) Distinct FTDP-17 missense mutations in tau produce tau aggregates and other pathological phenotypes in transfected CHO cells. Mol Biol Cell 11:4093–4104. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.12.4093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Wada Y, Ishiguro K, Itoh TJ, Uchida T, Hotani H, Saito T, Kishimoto T, Hisanaga S (1998) Microtubule-stimulated phosphorylation of tau at Ser202 and Thr205 by cdk5 decreases its microtubule nucleation activity. J Biochem 124:738–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Walls KC, Ager RR, Vasilevko V, Cheng D, Medeiros R, LaFerla FM (2014) P-tau immunotherapy reduces soluble and insoluble tau in aged 3xTg-AD mice. Neurosci Lett 575:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.05.047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Wang Y, Mandelkow E (2016) Tau in physiology and pathology. Nat Rev Neurosci 17:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Waxman EA, Giasson BI (2011) Induction of intracellular tau aggregation is promoted by α-synuclein seeds and provides novel insights into the hyperphosphorylation of tau. J Neurosci 31:7604–7618. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0297-11.2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Weaver CL, Espinoza M, Kress Y, Davies P (2000) Conformational change as one of the earliest alterations of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 21:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00157-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Weingarten MD, Lockwood AH, Hwo SY, Kirschner MW (1975) A protein factor essential for microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72:1858–1862. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.5.1858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Xia Y, Sorrentino ZA, Kim JD, Strang KH, Riffe CJ, Giasson BI (2019) Impaired tau-microtubule interactions are prevalent among pathogenic tau variants arising from missense mutations. J Biol Chem 294:18488–18503. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.010178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Yoshiyama Y, Higuchi M, Zhang B, Huang S-M, Iwata N, Saido TC, Maeda J, Suhara T, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y (2007) Synapse loss and microglial activation precede tangles in a P301S tauopathy mouse model. Neuron 53:337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang W, Tarutani A, Newell KL, Murzin AG, Matsubara T, Falcon B, Vidal R, Garringer HJ, Shi Y, Ikeuchi T, Murayama S, Ghetti B, Hasegawa M, Goedert M, Scheres SHW (2020) Novel tau filament fold in corticobasal degeneration. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2043-0

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Florida Department of Health (7AZ25 and 9AZ17) and the National Institute on Aging (P50 AG047266). ZAS was supported by grant F30AG063446 from the National Institute on Aging.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Florida Department of Health (7AZ25 and 9AZ17) and the National Institute on Aging (P50 AG047266). ZS was supported by grant F30AG063446 from the National Institute on Aging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, USA

    Yuxing Xia, Kimberly-Marie M. Gorion, Justin D. Kim, Zachary A. Sorrentino, Brach M. Bell, Alyssa N. Manaois, Paramita Chakrabarty & Benoit I. Giasson

  2. Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, USA

    Yuxing Xia, Stefan Prokop, Kimberly-Marie M. Gorion, Justin D. Kim, Zachary A. Sorrentino, Brach M. Bell, Alyssa N. Manaois, Paramita Chakrabarty & Benoit I. Giasson

  3. McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, USA

    Stefan Prokop, Paramita Chakrabarty & Benoit I. Giasson

  4. Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA

    Stefan Prokop

  5. Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA

    Stefan Prokop

  6. Litwin-Zucker Center for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA

    Peter Davies

Authors
  1. Yuxing Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Prokop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kimberly-Marie M. Gorion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Justin D. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zachary A. Sorrentino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Brach M. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alyssa N. Manaois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paramita Chakrabarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peter Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Benoit I. Giasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YX, SP, and BG co-wrote the manuscript and designed experiments. PC and PT edited manuscript and provided feedback on experimental design. YX, KG, JK, ZS, BB, and AM performed experiments and collected data. All authors read and approved manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoit I. Giasson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Staining of human tissue samples was performed with approval of the University of Florida institutional review board.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained according to guidelines of the University of Florida institutional review board.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Soluble fractions of WT tau, tau mutant P301L, and tau phosphomimetics have similar expression levels. Soluble fractions of WT tau, P301L, and phosphomimetics S208E, S202E/T205E, S202E/T205E/S208E, S202E/T205E/S208E/ P301L were immunoblotted with a total tau antibody 3026. The relative molecular masses of protein markers are indicated on the left.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Tau S208E phosphomimetic presents significantly reduced phosphorylation of nearby sites Ser202 and Thr205. HEK293T cells were transfected to express WT tau or S208E tau phosphomimetic 2N4R isoform. Whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with a total tau antibody 3026 and phosphorylation specific antibodies CP13, 7F2, and AT8. The relative molecular masses of protein markers are indicated on the left.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Y., Prokop, S., Gorion, KM.M. et al. Tau Ser208 phosphorylation promotes aggregation and reveals neuropathologic diversity in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. acta neuropathol commun 8, 88 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-00967-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-00967-w

Keywords

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

ISSN: 2051-5960

Contact us