Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a new type of recombinant insulin Lisargine injection

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 20, Article number: 334 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recombinant insulin Lisargine is a new type of insulin. In this study, we aimed to compare its pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) with Lantus.

Methods

The PD test was performed by exploring the effect of single administration on blood glucose of normal rats and STZ-induced diabetic rats, and the effect of multiple administrations on blood glucose of STZ-induced diabetic rats. Further PD tests include receptor affinity test, receptor autophosphorylation test and adipocyte glucose uptake test. Four IU and 8 IU per dog Lisargine was used for PK test, insulin was measured and area under curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results

With single injection, Lisargine 1.5 IU/kg had significant hypoglycemic effects at 1 and 2 h, similar to that of Lantus. Lisargine 5 IU/kg and 10 IU/kg lowered the blood glucose of STZ-induced diabetic rats at 1, 2, 4 & 6 h significantly. With multiple injections, Lantus lowered blood glucose at 2, 4 & 6 h, Lisargine 2.5 IU/kg, 5 IU/kg, and 10 IU/kg lowered blood glucose at 2 & 4 h significantly, compared with vehicle. There was no difference for receptor affinity test, receptor autophosphorylation test and adipocyte glucose uptake test between Lisargine and Lantus. The PK of Lisargine and Lantus of healthy Beagle dogs was very similar.

Conclusions

This animal study demonstrated that PK and PD of Lisargine and Lantus were similar, suggesting the bioequivalence of these products.

Peer Review reports

Background

Diabetes Mellitus is one of the fast growing non-communicable diseases and a threat to global public health [1]. Many complications such as diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, delayed wound healing, heart attack, peripheral vascular disturbances and diabetic ketoacidosis could happen, jeopardizing the quality of life of the patients and adding great burden to the family and community [2,3,4]. One major pathogenesis is its prevailing condition hyperglycemia. Thus, effective and reliable hypoglycemic agent is very important.

One widely used hypoglycemic agent is insulin and its analogs [5,6,7,8,9]. Lantus (Insulin glargine) was approved by the FDA on April 20, 2000. It is a long-acting, human insulin analogue that has been specifically designed to overcome the deficiencies of traditionally available ‘intermediate-acting’ insulin used for basal insulin supplementation [10].

Lysine lowers blood glucose. At home and abroad, no lysine insulin product is currently available in the market. With recombinant technology, we produced insulin Lisargine injection, a new type of insulin with lysine. It consists of 53 amino acid residues. Its chemical name is 21A-Gly-30Ba-L-Lys-30Bb-L-Arg-human insulin. In this study, by using Lantus as a positive control, we explored the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) of recombinant insulin Lisargine injection.

Methods

Materials

Recombinant insulin Lisargine injection (Lot No. M201605003) (Lisargine) was obtained from Hefei Tianmai Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd. The recombinant human-derived insulin (SLBL1965V/12643) was from Sigma (S-Insulin) (St Louis, Missouri, USA). Lantus (5B005C) was obtained from Sanofi (Paris, France) and used as positive control. Recombinant human insulin injection (H-Insulin) was obtained from Lilly. Human insulin radioimmunoassay kit, Canine C-peptide RIA kit and 3 T3-L1 mouse embryonic fibroblasts were obtained from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.

Test animals

Male specific pathogen free (SPF) grade Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from Beijing Veitong Lihua Co., Ltd., China. All animal experiments were in compliance with the standard operating procedures of laboratory animals specified by WuXi AppTec Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Eight weeks old SD rats were kept at 20–24 °C room temperature, with humidity of 40–70% and on a 12:12 h long light-dark cycle.

Beagle dogs were purchased from Beijing Masi Animal Center. The strains, animal administration and blood collection operations of the experimental animals used in this study was approved by IACUC of Tianjin Pharmaceutical Research Institute New Drug Evaluation Co., Ltd. The dogs were kept separately in the cage with length×width×height of 90 cm × 100 cm × 90 cm. The temperature was set at 16 °C to 26 °C (measured as 18.65 °C to 27.07 °C), humidity 40 to 70% (measured as 28.50 to 94.79%), ventilation frequency of no less than 8 new winds / hour, and on a 12:12 h long light-dark cycle.

After the experiments done, the animals were euthanized with carbon dioxide, as follows:

  1. a.

    Place an animal in the chamber. Turn on CO2 at a low flow rate of less than 1 l per minute.

  2. b.

    Place tubing through hole in the lid and leave CO2 running for 2 min or until the animal stops breathing or all movements stop.

  3. c.

    Turn off CO2. Leave the lid on to expose the animals to CO2 gas for another 5 min. Check heartbeat and respiration to verify death.

  4. d.

    Perform cervical dislocation, then place the animals in the bags for disposal.

  5. e.

    Remove animals, appropriately label and place in the carcass freezer.

Modeling of STZ rats

SD rats were fasted overnight for 16 h and were injected with streptozotocin 65 mg/kg intraperitoneally. After 1 h, the animals resumed eating. Fasting blood glucose was measured 5 days after the injection. The rats with fasting blood glucose greater than 16.7 mmol/L were selected as the successful type 1 diabetes model.

Effect of single administration on blood glucose in normal rats and diabetic rats

Grouping: a total of 6 groups included 5 groups of diabetic rats and a normal control group. Normal rats were randomly assigned into 5 groups, namely vehicle group, positive control group (Lantus 1.5 IU/Kg), Lisargine of 0.5 IU/Kg, 1.5 IU/Kg, and 4.5 IU/Kg groups, 10 for each. Diabetic rats included vehicle control group, positive control group (Lantus 5 IU/Kg), Lisargine of 2.5 IU/Kg, 5 IU/Kg, and 10 IU/Kg groups, 10 for each. The subcutaneous administration volume was 2 ml/Kg. After dosing, the animals were fasted. Tail blood of normal rats were collected at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h after dosing, and diabetic rats at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h. Blood glucose was measured using a glucometer, according to the instructions of the kit.

Effect of multiple administrations on blood glucose in diabetic rats

Grouping: a total of 6 groups included 5 groups of diabetic rats and a normal control group. Diabetic rats included vehicle control group, positive control group (Lantus 5 IU/Kg), Lisargine of 2.5 IU/Kg, 5 IU/Kg, and 10 IU/Kg groups, 10 for each. Before administration, there is no fasting. Insulin was injected subcutaneously for 7 consecutive days, and the same volume of vehicle was used in control group. After the administration on the 7th day, the animals were fasted for a whole course. Tail blood of STZ rats were collected at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h after dosing. Blood glucose was measured using a glucometer, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Receptor affinity test of type a insulin receptor, type B insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor IGR-1 receptor

The 100 μL reaction system was used, including 58 μL cell membrane, 2 μL test sample and 40 μL isotope, in duplicates. All test samples were diluted 10-points 3-fold, starting at a concentration of 300 nM. The cell membrane solution and [125I] labeled insulin with the detection buffer were prepared, the final concentration of the cell membrane was 1–3 μg, and the final concentration of [125I] labeled insulin was 100 pM. Along with a high-signal control well and a low-signal control well, the 96-well plate was sealed, and then incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Meaning while, soak the GF/C filter plate with 0.3% PEI. After the incubation, collect the cells from GF/C filter plate with a cell collector, wash four times with the plate washing buffer, and dry in an oven at 50 °C for 1 h. The bottom of the dried GF/C filter plate was sealed, and 50 μL of scintillation liquid was added to each well. It was sealed and read with Microbeta.

Receptor autophosphorylation test of type a insulin receptor, type B insulin receptor

The cells were cultured in Corning 384-well plate with 50 μL/well and placed in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C overnight. A high-signal control well and a low-signal control well are provided. On the second day, all samples were diluted in a 10-point 3-fold gradient with F12 medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) with an initial concentration of 1 μM. The cell plate was removed from the incubator, the medium was shaken off with a plate washer, 25 μL of the gradient diluted samples were added and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The medium was shaken off and 25 μL of 1 × cell lysis buffer was added. The lysate obtained in the previous step 10 times with 1× cell lysis buffer was diluted, 10 μL of lysate was added to Optiplate 384-well plate. Add 5 μl of the Acceptor mixture in the phosphorylation detection kit, seal the plate with foil, and incubate at room temperature for 1 h. Add 5 μL of the Donor mixture in the phosphorylation detection kit (protected from light) and incubate at room temperature for 1 h. Envision was used to read the plate.

Adipocyte glucose uptake test

The 3 T3-L1 mouse embryonic fibroblasts were cultured for induction of adipogenesis, and lysate of 3 T3-L1 adipocytes were plated for glucose uptake. Krebs-Ringer-Phosphate-HEPES (KRPH) buffer was used to prepare 10-point 3-fold gradient diluted samples. After starvation, the adipocytes were rinsed with KRPH buffer. Ninety μL of gradient-diluted samples of different concentrations were added to each well with high- and low-signal control wells and incubated in a CO2 incubator for 30 min. Add 10 μL/well of KRPH buffer containing 0.25 μCi1- [3H] -deoxyglucose and 50 μM 2-deoxyglucose and incubate in a CO2 incubator for 20 min. Wash the cells with DPBS containing 10 mM glucose at 4 °C. Lysate fat cells with sodium hydroxide solution, transfer to scintillation tube, add scintillation fluid, and count with TriCarb.

PK test in beagle dogs

The PK test of the double-dose test preparation for subcutaneous injection of animals was 4 IU and 8 IU per dog, respectively. The subcutaneous injection dose of the reference control Lantus injection was 4 IU per dog. Animals were fasted after dinner at about 21:00 on the night before the experiment administration (the second meal was 8 h after administration). At about 9:00 the next morning, the test drug or reference preparation were administrated separately, and about 2.5 mL blood from 0 h before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24 h after administration were taken, heparin anticoagulation was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min, plasma was separated, and it was immediately frozen at − 80 °C to be tested. Using high-sensitivity radioimmunoassay, the total insulin and canine C-peptide concentrations of plasma samples collected at various time points were measured. The background deduction formula of the exogenous insulin drug concentration was: Exogenous insulin concentration at time T = total insulin concentration at time T-(Insulin concentration at time 0 × C peptide concentration at time T/C peptide concentration at time 0). Human insulin and canine C peptide radioimmunoassay kits were all products of Merck, USA.

DAS2.0 PK calculation program software was used for PK parameter calculation and bioequivalence analysis. While blood was collected at each time point, a drop of whole blood was taken immediately and the blood glucose value of the animal at each time point was measured with a Roche blood glucose meter and test paper.

Safety assessment

Hypoglycemia, death, bleeding, and other adverse events were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed by Graphpad Prism 6.0 software, using t-test (two-tailed, equal variance), one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparison method, with P < 0.05 as the criterion of significant difference. The main PK parameters (AUC (0-∞) and Cmax) were analyzed by ANOVA two-way, one-sided t-test and 90% confidence interval analysis, and the Tmax was tested by nonparametric test (paired Wilcoxon test).

Results

The effect of single administration on blood glucose in normal rats and diabetic rats and the effect of multiple administrations on blood glucose in diabetic rats.

After a single subcutaneous administration of 1.5 IU/kg Lantus, the blood glucose significantly reduced at 1 h and 2 h, most significant at 2 h. With 0.5 IU/kg Lisargine, there was no change of blood glucose. With 1.5 IU/kg Lisargine, there were significant hypoglycemic effects at 1 and 2 h, most significant at 2 h, similar as same dose of Lantus. The hypoglycemic effects of the 4.5 IU/kg dose group were more significant (Fig. 1a and b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Blood glucose change curve (a) and basal blood glucose change curve (b) of SD rats after administration. The blood glucose change curve (c) and basal blood glucose change curve (d) of diabetic rats after administration. The blood glucose change curve (e) and basal blood glucose change curve (f) of diabetic rats after multiple administrations. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.001, compared with vehicle group

Full size image

The trend of fluctuations in glucose level was similar between Lantus and Lisargine of same dose. The blood glucose levels of Lantus group were significantly different from that of vehicle control group at 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after administration, and the hypoglycemic effect at 4 h was the most significant at diabetic rats. For 5 IU/kg and 10 IU/kg Lisargine groups, the blood glucose levels at 1, 2, 4, and 6 h were significantly lower than those in vehicle control group, and the hypoglycemic effect was most significant at 4 h for diabetic rats (Fig. 1c and d). The blood glucose level of the Lantus group was significantly different from that of vehicle control group at 2, 4, and 6 h after multiple administrations. For 2.5 IU/kg and 5 IU/kg Lisargine groups, the blood glucose levels at the 2 and 4 h were significantly lower than that of vehicle control group, and the hypoglycemic effect was most significant at 4 h (Fig. 1e and f).

Receptor affinity test of type a receptor, type B insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor IGR-1 receptor

S-Insulin was used as a standard control. All samples were repeated 3 times. The IC50 was repeated 3 times, and the data were consistent, confirming that the experimental system was reliable and repeatable. For the binding ability to type A insulin receptor and type B insulin receptor, the recombinant insulin Lisargine injection (Lisargine) produced by Tianmai, the recombinant human-derived insulin produced by Sigma (S-Insulin, a regular insulin), Human insulin injection (H-Insulin, a regular insulin) and the Lantus obtained by Sanofi (Lantus) were similar, with no statistical difference (Tables 1, 2, and 3). Insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor binding was lower in both Lantus and Lisargine, compared with S-Insulin (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Summary of experimental data of type A insulin receptor binding
Full size table
Table 2 Summary of experimental data of type B insulin receptor binding
Full size table
Table 3 Summary of experimental data of insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor binding
Full size table

Receptor autophosphorylation test of type a insulin receptor, type B insulin receptor

The autophosphorylation ability for insulin receptors of type A and B of Lisargine was similar to the recombinant human-derived insulin (H-Insulin) and Lantus, with no statistical difference (Table 4 and 5).

Table 4 Summary of experimental data of autophosphorylation of type A insulin receptor
Full size table
Table 5 Summary of experimental data on autophosphorylation of type B insulin receptor
Full size table

Adipocyte glucose uptake test

With Lisargine, adipocytes’ glucose uptake was similar to that with H-Insulin, S-Insulin and Lantus (Table 6).

Table 6 Summary of experimental data of fat cell glucose uptake
Full size table

PK test in beagle dogs

For PK test, subcutaneous injection of 4 IU and 8 IU Lisargine per dog was used and the dose of 4 IU Lisargine was used as reference (control). The results showed that after the high and low doses of Lisargine, T1/2 of the high-dose group was significantly shorter than that of the low-dose group with Lisargine. The Tmax of the two groups was close. There was no statistical difference for PK parameters between Lisargine and Lantus, 4 U/dog, except a slight right shift of Lantus for peak time. The relative bioavailability of the test drug Lisargine to the control drug Lantus was 94.5%. It showed that the PK behavior of the two drugs on healthy Beagle dogs were similar (Fig. 2). For area under curve (AUC), as shown in Table 7, there was no difference for 4 IU of Lantus and Lisargine, but it is higher with Lisargine 8 IU (P < 0.05 compared with Lisargine 4 IU or Lantus 4 IU).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Curve of average exogenous insulin administration time after cross-SC Lisargine and Lantus (4 U) in 8 Beagle dogs (a). Curve of average exogenous insulin administration time after SC Lisargine (4 U and 8 U) in 8 Beagle dogs (b). The average blood glucose concentration-time curve after cross-SC Lisargine and Lantus (4 U) in 8 Beagle dogs (c). The average blood glucose concentration-time curve after SC Lisargine (4 U and 8 U) in 8 Beagle dogs (d)

Full size image
Table 7 Area Under Curve (AUC) for Lisargine and Lantus within 24 h
Full size table

Safety

No adverse event was reported in any group.

Discussion

Diabetes is a chronic disease [11], a major harm to human health in the twenty-first century [12, 13]. Blood glucose control is the key for diabetes treatment and prevention of its complications [14]. Exogenous insulin is mainly used in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with diet and oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD). Medium-acting insulin have the disadvantages of high variability, obvious peak effect, shorter duration, and high risk of hypoglycemia at night [15, 16]. Long-acting insulin is needed so that patients can control their blood glucose with single injection only once a day [17].

One common long-acting insulin is glargine, Lantus. After being injected, its solubility reduces and it forms into small precipitate. These particles slowly dissolve into monomers and release into blood. The 24 h insulin level is similar to the basal insulin in healthy people. It lowers blood sugar smoothly, steadily and for longer durations.

Lisargine is a new type of insulin lysine injection. In this study, through comparing PD and PK of Lisargine and Lantus, we explored their bioequivalence, with the hope that Lisargine would be an effective addition to Lantus.

Our study suggested that with the 1.5 IU/kg dose of Lisargine, there was significant hypoglycemic effect after 1 and 2 h of administration, and the hypoglycemic effect was most significant at 2 h, which was similar to the same dose of Lantus. The blood glucose levels of diabetic rats were significantly reduced by Lisargine 5 IU/Kg and 10 IU/Kg at 2, 4, and 6 h, and by Lisargine 2.5 IU/Kg at 1 h and 2 h. With 5 IU/Kg, Lisargine reduced blood glucose similar to reference drug Lantus.

The binding abilities of Lisargine, S-Insulin, H-Insulin, and Lantus to type A insulin receptor and type B insulin receptor were similar. But Lantus and Lisargine have lower binding effect to IGF-1, compared with S-Insulin. Possibly, their action may not mainly through activating IGF-1. There was no difference for receptor autophosphorylation of test-type A insulin receptor and type B insulin receptor between Lisargine and reference drug (H-Insulin and Lantus). Glucose uptake of adipocytes was similar for all. This supported that Lisargine was as effective as Lantus.

In comparing PK and PD of glargine and Lantus, smiliar resutls were found across studies [18]. The primary PK parameters (area under curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0–24]) and PD parameters were not statistically different between Lisargine and Lantus. No safety concern was noted with either drug. PK and PD parameters for glargine and Luntas were comparable following single doses [19]. Yet, in this reference study, 0.3 and 0.6 U/kg Lantus were effective while Lisargine 0.5 U/kg was not effective in our study. It may be due to the fact that Lisargine has a lysine in both chains while Lantus has a glycine.

The Tmax of Lisargine showed no statistical difference from Lantus. The PK parameters of Lisargine group were comparable with Lantus at the same dose. Lantus did have a slight right shift of the peak time. As lysine is a key amino acid for Lisargine while glycine for Lantus, this may be because lysine takes action faster than glycine. Our results showed that the PK behavior of the two drugs on healthy Beagle dogs was similar and the relative bioavailability of Lisargine to Lantus was 94.5%. Another study found the bioequivalence of Glargine to Lantus with 90% confidence interval within 0.80–1.25 [20], indicating PK equivalence between the biosimilar and reference Lantus [21]. This study was limited to animals. Further study will focus on healthy volunteers and diabetic patients to verify the bioequivalence of Lisargine with Lantus and its safety.

Conclusions

In a conclusion, the hypoglycemic effects and PD of Lisargine in diabetic rats were comparable with those of Lantus, and PK parameters of Lisargine were similar with that of Lantus in Beagle dogs.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

PD:

Pharmacodynamic

PK:

Pharmacokinetic

IACUC:

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

References

  1. Hallit S. Knowledge and practice of patients with diabetes mellitus in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Das S. Phytochemicals and their effective role in the treatment of diabetes mellitus: a short review. Phytochem Rev. 2018;17:1111–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Syamsurizal D. Type-2 diabetes mellitus of degenerative disease. Bioscience. 2018;2:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chellappan DK, Yap WS, Bt Ahmad Suhaimi NA, Gupta G, Dua K. Current therapies and targets for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Panminerva Med. 2018;60:117–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergenstal R. Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual Care in Patients with Type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:365–74.

  6. Völk M. Oral hypoglycemic agents: insulin secretagogues, α-glucosidase inhibitors and insulin sensitizers. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001;109:S265–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Naim MJ, Alam O, Alam MJ, Shaquiquzzaman M, Alam MM, Naidu VGM. Synthesis, docking, in-vitro and in-vivo antidiabetic activity of pyrazole based 2,4-thiazolidinedione derivatives as PPARγ modulator. Arch Pharm. 2018;351:e1700223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore LE. In: Moore LE, editor. Oral hypoglycemic agents. In: diabetes in pregnancy: the complete guide to management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 103–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abbasi MY, Ali A, Almehlasi M. A prospective study on prescribing patterns of anti-diabetic drugs. World J Pharm Pharm Sciences. 2018;3:45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Griffiths S. Insulin glargine (Lantus®). Int J Clin Pract. 2002;56:460–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Levitt NS. Diabetes in south African older adults: prevalence and impact on quality of life and functional disability – as assessed using SAGE wave 1 data. Glob Health Action. 2018;11:1449924.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ng R, Sutradhar R, Yao Z, Wodchis W, Rosella L. Smoking, drinking, diet and physical activity-modifiable lifestyle risk factors and their associations with age to first chronic disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;49:113–30.

  13. Yohonu DT. Ethnobotanical study of herbal medicines for management of diabetes mellitus in Dangme West District of southern Ghana. J Herb Med. 2016;6:204–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salzsieder E. Glycemic Key Metrics and the Risk of Diabetes-Associated Complications. Rom J Diabetes Nutr Met Dis. 2016;23:403–13.

  15. Gregory E. Intermediate and long-acting insulins: a review of NPH insulin, insulin glargine and insulin detemir. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:2613–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ooi CP, Ting TH, Loke SC. Ultra-long acting insulin versus long-acting insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:CD011102.

  17. Scavini M. Effects of structured versus unstructured self-monitoring of blood glucose on glucose control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12:183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Linnebjerg H, Lam E, Seger M, Coutant D, Chua L, Chong C, Ferreira M, Soon D, Zhang X. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LY2963016 insulin Glargine and European Union- and U.S.-approved versions of Lantus insulin Glargine in healthy subjects: three randomized Euglycemic clamp studies. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:2226–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Lam E, Seger M, Coutant D, Chua L, Tan L, Soon D, Linnebjerg H. LY2963016 insulin Glargine and insulin Glargine (Lantus) produce comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at two dose levels: clinical pharmacology in drug development. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017;6:556–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prasanna Kumar KM. Comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glargine (Glaritus?) and Lantus? In healthy subjects: a double-blind, randomized clamp study. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55:461–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sethi JK. Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Major New Drug Development Project (No. 2014ZX09101045003). The sponsors didn’t participate in preparing the article, and they just funded the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hefei Tianmai Biotechnology Development Co,. Ltd., Hefei, 230601, Anhui Province, China

    Jiangjie Lu, Lixin Jiang, Jing Li, Wei Zhou, Hong Zhu & Aijun Xiong

  2. TIPR Drug Assessment Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300452, China

    Yong Zeng & Xiulin Yi

  3. WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd (Headquarters), Shanghai, 200131, China

    Hongmei Zhang

  4. WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd (Suzhou), Suzhou, 215104, Jiangsu Province, China

    Lin Zhu

Authors
  1. Jiangjie Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiulin Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongmei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lixin Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wei Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Aijun Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JJL is responsible for the guarantor of integrity of the entire study, study concepts; YZ and HMZ are responsible for the experimental studies; XLY is responsible for the study design, experimental studies; LZ is responsible for the study design, literature research, experimental studies; LXJ, WZ and HZ are responsible for the literature research; JL is responsible for the literature research, manuscript preparation & editing; AJX is responsible for the manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aijun Xiong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by our IACUC. Recombinant insulin Lisargine injection (Lot No. M201605003) was obtained from Hefei Tianmai Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd., and it was used as test particle. Male SPF grade SD rats were purchased from Beijing Veitong Lihua Co., Ltd. All animal experiments were in compliance with the standard operating procedures for laboratory animals and laboratory animals specified by WuXi AppTec Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) Feeding and use guidelines and laboratory animal welfare requirements.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, J., Zeng, Y., Yi, X. et al. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a new type of recombinant insulin Lisargine injection. BMC Complement Med Ther 20, 334 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03110-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03110-3

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us