Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dexmedetomidine pretreatment alleviates ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity via the miR-10b-5p/BDNF axis

BMC Anesthesiology volume 22, Article number: 304 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ropivacaine is commonly applied for local anesthesia and may cause neurotoxicity. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) exhibits neuroprotective effects on multiple neurological disorders. This study investigated the mechanism of DEX pretreatment in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.

Methods

Mouse hippocampal neuronal cells (HT22) and human neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y) were treated with 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 2.5 mM, and 5 mM ropivacaine. Then the cells were pretreated with different concentrations of DEX (0.01 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM) before ropivacaine treatment. Proliferative activity of cells, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and apoptosis rate were measured using CCK-8 assay, LDH detection kit, and flow cytometry, respectively. miR-10b-5p and BDNF expressions were determined using RT-qPCR or Western blot. The binding of miR-10b-5p and BDNF was validated using dual-luciferase assay. Functional rescue experiments were conducted to verify the role of miR-10b-5p and BDNF in the protective mechanism of DEX on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.

Results

Treatment of HT22 or SH-SY5Y cells with ropivacaine led to the increased miR-10b-5p expression (about 1.7 times), decreased BDNF expression (about 2.2 times), reduced cell viability (about 2.5 times), elevated intracellular LDH level (about 2.0–2.5 times), and enhanced apoptosis rate (about 3.0–4.0 times). DEX pretreatment relieved ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity, as evidenced by enhanced cell viability (about 1.7–2.0 times), reduced LDH release (about 1.7–1.8 times), and suppressed apoptosis rate (about 1.8–1.9 times). DEX pretreatment repressed miR-10b-5p expression (about 2.5 times). miR-10b-5p targeted BDNF. miR-10b-5p overexpression or BDNF silencing reversed the protective effect of DEX pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity, manifested as reduced cell viability (about 1.3–1.6 times), increased intracellular LDH level (about 1.4–1.7 times), and elevated apoptosis rate (about 1.4–1.6 times).

Conclusions

DEX pretreatment elevated BDNF expression by reducing miR-10b-5p expression, thereby alleviating ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.

Peer Review reports

Background

Ropivacaine, a long-acting amide-linked local anesthetic, has presented extensive application in clinical anesthesia and pain management [1]. Relative to other local anesthetics, ropivacaine is featured by a better separation of sensory and motor nerve blocking, fewer systemic reactions, and lower cardiotoxicity [2]. Nevertheless, emerging studies have also provided supportive evidence that exposure to ropivacaine in vivo and in vitro can lead to considerable neurotoxicities [3, 4]. Intrathecal injection of ropivacaine is demonstrated as an underlying triggering factor of neuronal injury in rats, resulting in tissue edema as well as morphological alternation and degeneration of neurons [5]. Ropivacaine is also reported to exacerbate rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cell injury and apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner [6]. Since ropivacaine-induced nerve injury has already occurred at clinical concentrations [7], the prevention and management of ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity has become an urgent issue in current research.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a selective a2-adrenoceptor agonist that bears unique pharmacodynamic properties conducive to sedation and anesthesia in perioperative medicine [8]. DEX has drawn extensive attention due to its multi-organ protection advantages, especially in the fields of neuroprotection [9]. DEX is frequently used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics, with proven efficacy in prolonging the duration of peripheral nerve block [10]. The combination of ropivacaine and DEX is the current trend, and DEX may confer protective effects against ropivacaine-induced neuronal injury [11]. The addition of DEX to ropivacaine notably alleviates ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity by repressing sciatic nerve cell apoptosis in rats [12]. DEX also protects PC12 cells from ropivacaine injury by facilitating the proliferation and suppressing apoptosis of PC12 cells [13]. Clarifying the neuroprotective mechanisms of DEX in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity can translate into prominent clinical benefits.

microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small non-coding RNAs with 20–25 nucleotides in length, modulate gene expression post-transcriptionally via binding to the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of their messenger RNAs (mRNAs) [14]. Recently, the crucial implications of miRNAs in local anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity have been identified, suggesting that miRNAs may be novel targets in neurotoxicity prevention [15, 16]. Moreover, differentially expressed miRNAs are also implicated in the neuroprotective mechanisms of DEX [17]. As a member of the miRNA family, miR-10b-5p is reported to be associated with cognitive dysfunction by impairing hippocampal neurogenesis [18]. Knockdown of miR-10b-5p attenuates neuronal apoptosis, alleviates pathological injury, and reduces inflammation responses in rats with Alzheimer's disease (AD) [19]. Importantly, DEX can attenuate neurological injury in ischemic stroke rats and enhance the viability of neurons via inhibition of miR-10b-5p expression [20]. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is one of the most extensively distributed neurotrophins in the central nervous system, which acts as an instructive mediator of functional and structural plasticity in the central nervous system, influencing the adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus [21]. Thus, manipulating BDNF pathways represents a viable treatment approach to a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders [22]. Upregulation of BDNF has been demonstrated to inhibit neuronal apoptosis and alleviate neurotoxicity induced by methamphetamine [23]. Accordingly, we speculated whether DEX pretreatment can upregulate BDNF expression through miR-10b-5p to regulate neuronal viability and protect against ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. In the present study, we treated HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells with ropivacaine to determine the possible protective mechanism of DEX pretreatment in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity, hoping to find therapeutic targets for ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity in clinical anesthesia surgery.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Mouse hippocampal neuronal cell line (HT22) was obtained from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) and human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) was supplied by American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia, USA). All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 IU/mL penicillin G sodium, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin sulfate at 37℃ with 5%CO2.

Cell treatment

For ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity, the experimental cells were added with 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 2.5 mM, and 5 mM ropivacaine in the medium. The medium was not changed until the end of the relevant experiments. The control cells were treated with dimethyl sulphoxide. The cells were subjected to cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay for the detection of cell viability. To determine the protective effect of DEX, the medium was supplemented with 0.01 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM DEX for 2 h of pre-treatment, and then, 2.5 mM ropivacaine was added to the medium, followed by CCK-8 assay.

Cell transfection

24 h before ropivacaine treatment, HT22 or SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with miR-10b-5p-mimic, small interfering (si)-BDNF-1, si-BDNF-2, and their negative controls (NCs) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Human and mouse miR-10b-5p-mimic, si-BDNF-1, si-BDNF-2, and their negative controls were designed and synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China).

CCK-8 assay

The transfected HT22 cells or SH-SY5Y cells were seeded into 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells/well) and then treated with ropivacaine or DEX as mentioned above. After 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation, the cells in each well were treated with 10 μL CCK-8 solution and cultured at 37℃ for 2 h. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Biotek).

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) detection

HT22 cells or SH-SY5Y cells were seeded into 96-well plates and treated as mentioned above. Then, the cells were collected and lysed with cell lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The supernatant was collected after 10 min of centrifugation. LDH release in the supernatant was detected using LDH cytotoxicity kit (ab197004, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) to determine the damage degree of HT22 cells or SH-SY5Y cells.

Apoptosis detection

Cell apoptosis was measured using Annexin V fluorescin isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) apoptosis detection kit and subjected to flow cytometry analysis. Briefly, the treated cells were collected, rinsed with cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS), re-suspended in PBS, and stained with 10 μL Annexin V/FITC in the dark for 30 min. Finally, the filtered cells were placed in PBS and analyzed using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

The total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using TaqMan miRNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). RT-qPCR was performed using Brilliant II Fast SYBR green qPCR master mix (Agilent Technologies) and MyiQ Real-time PCR system. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. The relative expression of genes was calculated using the 2−△△Ct method, with GAPDH and U6 as the internal reference [19]. In each statistical analysis, the first group was set as "1" as the control.

Table 1 qPCR primers
Full size table

Western blot

The total protein was extracted using radio-immunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Invitrogen) and quantified using bicinchoninic acid assay kits (Beyotime). Then, 50 μg protein sample was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h and incubated with anti-BDNF (1:1000, ab108319, Abcam) and anti-GAPDH (1:2500, ab9485, Abcam) at 4℃ overnight. Afterward, the membranes were incubated with peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG and developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent. The gray value was analyzed using Image J software version 1.8.0 (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), with GAPDH as the internal reference. In this experiment, blots were cut prior to hybridisation with antibodies, so the full-length blots could not be obtained, and all replicates performed were shown in the Supplementary Information File.

Bioinformatics

The downstream targets of miR-10b-5p were predicted through the TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) [24] and miRDB (http://mirdb.org/) [25] databases. The binding site of miR-10b-5p and BDNF was predicted through the TargetScan database.

Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay

The wild-type (WT) and mutant-type (MUT) sequences of BDNF 3’UTR containing miR-10b-5p binding site were cloned into pGL3 vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) to generate pGL3-BDNF 3’UTR-WT and pGL3-BDNF 3’UTR-MUT plasmids. The above plasmids were co-transfected with miR-10b-5p-mimic or mimic-NC into HT22 cells and SH-SY5Y cells using Lipofectamine 3000. The relative luciferase activity was measured using the dual-luciferase assay system (Promega).

Statistical analysis

Data analysis and map plotting were performed using the SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Measurement data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The t test was adopted for comparisons between the two groups. One-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed for the comparisons among multiple groups, following Tukey's multiple comparison test. A value of p < 0.05 indicated a statistical difference.

Results

DEX pretreatment reduced ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity

To investigate the protective effect of DEX on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity, we treated HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells with different concentrations of ropivacaine (0.5 mM, 1 mM, 2.5 mM, and 5 mM) and evaluated the cell viability using CCK-8 assay. The results revealed that ropivacaine treatment notably reduced the viability of HT22 cells and SH-SY5Y cells, and the cell viability was decreased with the increase of ropivacaine concentration (p < 0.05, Fig. 1A). When the concentration of ropivacaine was 2.5 mM, the cell viability reached the lowest, and there was no significant difference in the effect of ropivacaine on cell viability when the concentration increased to 5 mM (p > 0.05, Fig. 1A). Hence, we selected ropivacaine at the concentration of 2.5 mM for subsequent experiments. After ropivacaine treatment, HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells had increased LDH release (p < 0.05, Fig. 1C) and elevated apoptosis rate (p < 0.05, Fig. 1D, Supplementary Fig. 1). Then, the cells were pretreated with different concentrations of DEX (0.01 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM). It was found that the viability of HT22 cells and SH-SY5Y cells pretreated with DEX was notably higher than that of cells not pretreated with DEX (p < 0.05, Fig. 1B). When the DEX concentration was 10 μM, the cell viability reached the highest, and when the DEX concentration reached 100 μM, there was no significant difference in the effect of DEX on cell viability (p > 0.05, Fig. 1B). Hence, we used 10 μM DEX for cell pretreatment and 2.5 mM ropivacaine to induce neurotoxicity. After DEX pretreatment, LDH release in HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells was decreased (p < 0.05, Fig. 1C) and apoptosis rate was declined (p < 0.05, Fig. 1D). All these indicated that DEX pretreatment reduced ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dexmedetomidine pretreatment reduced ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells were treated with different concentrations of ropivacaine (Ropi), with DMSO as negative control. A The cell viability was measured using CCK-8 assay. The cells were pretreated with different concentrations of dexmedetomidine (Dex) and then treated with 2.5 mM Ropi. B Cell viability was measured using CCK-8 assay, and the optimal concentration of Dex was determined as 10 μM. Then, 10 μM Dex-pretreated cells (Dex group) and 2.5 mM Ropi-treated cells (Ropi group) were subjected to LDH release detection using LDH detection kit (C) and apoptosis detection using flow cytometry (D). The cell experiment was repeated 3 times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data in panels A-B were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, and data in panels C-D were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, &p < 0.05, compared with the Blank group, ^p < 0.05, compared with the Ropi group, *p < 0.05

Full size image

DEX pretreatment suppressed miR-10b-5p expression

Then, the mechanism of DEX pretreatment reducing ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity was explored. miR-10b-5p is highly expressed in hippocampal tissues of rats with stroke and Alzheimer's disease [19, 26]. Hence, we speculated that miR-10b-5p was related to ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity and DEX protected ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity by regulating miR-10b-5p expression. RT-qPCR results demonstrated that miR-10b-5p expression in ropivacaine-treated HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells was evidently elevated, and 2.5 mM ropivacaine led to the highest miR-10b-5p expression (p < 0.05, Fig. 2A). DEX pretreatment significantly inhibited miR-10b-5p expression, and 10 μM DEX produced the most significant inhibitory effect (p < 0.05, Fig. 2B). Briefly, DEX pretreatment suppressed miR-10b-5p expression.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dexmedetomidine pretreatment suppressed miR-10b-5p expression. A-B miR-10b-5p expression in HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells under different treatments was detected using RT-qPCR. The cell experiment was repeated 3 times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data in panels A-B were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, *p < 0.05

Full size image

miR-10b-5p overexpression reversed the protection of DEX pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity

Thereafter, we verified whether DEX pretreatment protected ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity by regulating miR-10b-5p. HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with miR-10b-5p-mimic (p < 0.05, Fig. 3A), followed by combined treatment with DEX pretreatment. miR-10b-5p overexpression notably reduced the viability of HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 3B), increased LDH release (p < 0.05, Fig. 3C), and elevated apoptosis rate (p < 0.05, Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 2). These results demonstrated that miR-10b-5p overexpression reversed the protection of DEX pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.

Fig. 3
figure 3

miR-10b-5p overexpression reversed the protection of dexmedetomidine pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. miR-10b-5p-mimic (miR-mimic) was transfected into HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells, with mimic-NC as negative control. A Transfection efficiency was measured using RT-qPCR, followed by a combined experiment with Dex-pretreated cells. B Cell viability was measured using CCK-8 assay. C LDH release was measured using LDH detection kit. D Apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry. The cell experiment was repeated 3 times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data in panel A were analyzed using t test; data in panel B were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, and data in panels C-D were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, &p < 0.05, compared with the Ropi + DEX group, *p < 0.05

Full size image

miR-10b-5p targeted BDNF

Next, the downstream mechanism of miR-10b-5p was investigated. The downstream targets of miR-10b-5p were predicted and screened through the TargetScan and miRDB databases (Fig. 4A), among which we focused on BDNF. BDNF is poorly expressed in sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity [27]. Hence, we speculated that BDNF was the target of miR-10b-5p in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. Dual-luciferase assay verified the binding relationship between miR-10b-5p and BDNF (p < 0.05, Fig. 4B). RT-qPCR and Western blot results revealed that BDNF expression was decreased in ropivacaine-induced HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells but increased after DEX pretreatment, while miR-10b-5p overexpression notably reduced BDNF expression (p < 0.05, Fig. 4C-D). Briefly, miR-10b-5p targeted BDNF expression.

Fig. 4
figure 4

BDNF was the downstream target of miR-10b-5p. A The downstream targets of miR-10b-5p were predicted and screened through the TargetScan and miRDB database. B The binding relationship between miR-10b-5p and BDNF was verified using dual-luciferase assay. C-D BDNF expression in HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells was detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot. The cell experiment was repeated 3 times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data in panel B were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, and data in panels C-D were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, *p < 0.05

Full size image

BDNF silencing reversed the protection of DEX pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity

Finally, we further investigated whether BDNF was involved in the protection of DEX pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. si-BDNF-1 and si-BDNF-2 were transfected into HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 5A-B). si-BDNF-1 with a better inhibitory effect was used for a combined experiment with DEX pretreatment. BDNF silencing notably reduced the viability of HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 5C), increased LDH release (p < 0.05, Fig. 5D), and elevated apoptosis rate (p < 0.05, Fig. 5E, Supplementary Fig. 3). Briefly, BDNF silencing reversed the protection of DEX pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

BDNF silencing reversed the protection of dexmedetomidine pretreatment on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. si-BDNF-1 and si-BDNF-2 were transfected into HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells, with si-NC as negative control. A-B Transfection efficiency was measured using RT-qPCR and Western blot. si-BDNF-1 with a better silencing effect was selected for combined experiment with Dex-pretreated cells. C Cell viability was measured using CCK-8 assay. D LDH release was measured using LDH detection kit. E Apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry. The cell experiment was repeated 3 times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data in panel C were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, and data in panels A-B/D-E were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, &p < 0.05, compared with the Ropi + DEX group, *p < 0.05

Full size image

Discussion

It has been recognized that ropivacaine can cause neurotoxicity during the perioperative period, especially at a high concentration and/or for prolonged use [6]. DEX, a kind of α2 adrenergic receptor agonist, has been commonly used as an adjuvant of ropivacaine and has shown neuroprotective properties in multiple experimental models [28,29,30]. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first-of-its-kind to demonstrate that DEX pretreatment alleviated ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity via the miR-10b-5p/BDNF axis.

Excessive use of ropivacaine impairs the central nervous system and causes neurotoxicity in the perioperative period of local anesthesia effects [31]. Seizures induced by ropivacaine are related to hippocampal neurons [32]. Therefore, we deemed that excessive use of ropivacaine affected the central nervous system and was related to the hippocampus. In the present study, we selected the hippocampal neurons HT22 and SH-SY5Y cell lines to test our hypothesis. HT22 cell is a kind of mouse hippocampal neuron, which is widely used for an in vitro neuron model related to neurotoxicity [33]. SH-SY5Y is a neural cell line widely used in neurotoxicity research, and its toxicity sensitivity is similar to that of primary neuronal cells. SH-SY5Y cells have been commonly used for the establishment of a cell model of ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity [34]. The concentrations of ropivacaine and DEX used in this study were determined according to the previous literature reports [35,36,37]. Specifically, HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells were subjected to ropivacaine insult (0.5 mM, 1 mM, 2.5 mM, and 5 mM) for reproducing its damage characteristics. Then, the cells were pretreated with different concentrations of DEX (0.01 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM). The clinical doses of ropivacaine are 0.5% and 1% [38], about 1.8 mM and 3.6 mM. The clinical doses of DEX are 2.7 μM, 11.7 μM, and 34.1 μM [39]. The concentrations of ropivacaine and DEX used in our in vitro experiments were similar to the clinically relevant doses. The concentrations of ropivacaine (2.5 mM) and DEX (10 μM) with optimal effects were screened by CCK-8 assay. The results showed that the viability of HT22 cells and SH-SY5Y cells was decreased with the increase of ropivacaine concentration. The cell viability reached the lowest when the concentration of ropivacaine was 2.5 mM, but no longer decreased with the increase of ropivacaine concentration. Hence, we used 2.5 mM ropivacaine for subsequent experimentation. As a key enzyme of anaerobic metabolism, LDH released from degenerated neurons can reflect the degree of nerve injury [40]. Accumulating studies have confirmed that neurotoxicity induced by local anesthetics is related to apoptosis [36, 41, 42]. Local anesthetics induce the activation of apoptotic neuronal cell death and finally determine the degree of nerve injury [43]. Our results showed that ropivacaine treatment elevated LDH release in HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells and enhanced the cell apoptosis, suggesting that ropivacaine treatment induced neurotoxicity, which is consistent with the relevant results of anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity reported in the previous literature [44]. DEX has wide application in the clinic as an adjuvant to local anesthetics, which can ameliorate neuronal injury and improve functional outcomes in some preclinical models of anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity [11]. Also, DEX pretreatment has been demonstrated to attenuate propofol-induced neurotoxicity in neurons from the rat hippocampus [37]. Consistently, our results revealed that DEX pretreatment notably reduced LDH release and repressed cell apoptosis. DEX combined with ropivacaine potently alleviates postoperative pain and improves cognitive function in patients receiving craniocerebral surgery [30]. DEX combined with ropivacaine not only prolongs the sensory and motor block duration of sciatic nerve in rats but also mitigates ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity by suppressing caspase-3-dependent apoptosis of sciatic nerve cells [12]. Accordingly, we found that DEX pretreatment relieved ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity in HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells, as evidenced by reduced LDH release and suppressed apoptosis rate.

Thereafter, we determined the protective mechanism of DEX in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. miR-10b-5p is highly expressed in hippocampal tissues of AD rats, and miR-10b-5p knockdown abates neuronal injury in AD rats [19]. Importantly, DEX has been demonstrated to suppress miR-10b-5p expression, thereby reducing neuronal apoptosis and enhancing neuronal viability in ischemia-anoxia-mediated neurological injury [20]. Hence, we speculated that DEX pretreatment protected HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells from ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity by regulating miR-10b-5p. Our results demonstrated that miR-10b-5p expression in ropivacaine-treated HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells was dramatically elevated, while DEX pretreatment reversed the aberrant elevation of miR-10b-5p. In functional rescue experiments, miR-10b-5p overexpression led to significantly reduced viability of HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells, elevated LDH release, and enhanced apoptosis, suggesting that miR-10b-5p overexpression reversed the protective effect of DEX on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.

Subsequently, we sought to explore the downstream mechanism of miR-10b-5p in ropivacaine-induced HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells. After transcription, miRNAs interact with the complementary sequences of their target mRNAs at the posttranscriptional level to regulate their expression [14]. The downstream targets of miR-10b-5p were predicted through the databases, in which we focused on BDNF. BDNF, one of the most widely distributed neurotrophins in the mammalian brain, is a critical regulator of neurite growth, synaptic plasticity, and functional neuronal connection selection in the central nervous system [45]. BDNF can stimulate and promote the growth and differentiation of nerve cells and prevent neuronal injury and death [46]. BDNF reduces the apoptosis of neurons submitted to oxygen–glucose deprivation/reoxygenation [47] and promotes neuronal survival after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy [48]. Moreover, the manipulation of the BDNF/TrkB pathway contributes to reversing neuronal apoptosis and alleviating neurotoxicity induced by methamphetamine [23] and propofol [49]. The upregulation of miR-10b-5p results in the decrease of BDNF levels in mouse hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive impairment model [18]. Based on the above findings, we speculated that DEX pretreatment regulated neuronal viability by upregulating BDNF through miR-10b-5p, thereby preventing neuronal apoptosis and protecting against ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. Our results verified that BDNF was the downstream target gene of miR-10b-5p in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. DEX can attenuate sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity in developing rats [50] and alleviate propofol-induced hippocampal neuronal apoptosis by upregulating BDNF [51]. We found that BDNF was poorly expressed in ropivacaine-induced HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells, while DEX pretreatment notably increased BDNF expression. BDNF represses apoptosis of neurons and alleviates ropivacaine-induced neuronal injury by activating the Akt signaling pathway [52]. Similarly, our results revealed that BDNF silencing reduced HT22 and SH-SY5Y cell viability, enhanced LDH release, and elevated apoptosis rate, indicating that BDNF silencing reversed the protective effect of DEX on ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity in HT22 and SH-SY5Y cells. Notably, our study found for the first time that miR-10b-5p protected hippocampal neurons in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity, and DEX attenuated ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity by regulating the miR-10b-5p/BDNF axis.

Conclusions

To conclude, our results suggested that ropivacaine induced neurotoxicity by reducing cell viability, promoting apoptosis, and increasing LDH release, and DEX pretreatment reversed these effects. We also demonstrated that the protection of DEX pretreatment against ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity was achieved via the miR-10b-5p/BDNF axis. These results may provide a new theoretical basis for DEX in the treatment of ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity. However, this study also has some limitations. Firstly, we did not verify the protective mechanism of DEX pretreatment in animal models. Secondly, there are many other downstream targets of miR-10b-5p, and we merely selected BDNF for analysis. Thirdly, whether DEX pretreatment can regulate other miRNAs in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity remains unclear. In the future, we will investigate more potential miRNA mechanisms of DEX in ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity, select other downstream targets of miR-10b-5p for analysis, and verify the mechanism of DEX in animal models.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Xu P, Zhang S, Tan L, Wang L, Yang Z, Li J. Local Anesthetic Ropivacaine Exhibits Therapeutic Effects in Cancers. Front Oncol. 2022;12: 836882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.836882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Li M, Wan L, Mei W, Tian Y. Update on the clinical utility and practical use of ropivacaine in Chinese patients. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014;8:1269–76. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S57258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wen X, Liang H, Li H, Ou W, Wang HB, Liu H, et al. In vitro neurotoxicity by ropivacaine is reduced by silencing Cav3.3 T-type calcium subunits in neonatal rat sensory neurons. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46:1617–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun Z, Liu H, Guo Q, Xu X, Zhang Z, Wang N. In vivo and in vitro evidence of the neurotoxic effects of ropivacaine: the role of the Akt signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6:1455–9. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun ZH, Xu XP, Song ZB, Zhang Z, Wang N, Guo QL. Repeated intrathecal administration of ropivacaine causes neurotoxicity in rats. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:825–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X1204000427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo Z, Zhang Z, Zhang F, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Sun X, et al. Ropivacaine mesylate exerts neurotoxicity via up-regulation of Fas/FasL expression in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11:1626–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Verlinde M, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Hermanns H, Werdehausen R, Lirk P. Local Anesthetic-Induced Neurotoxicity. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Weerink MAS, Struys M, Hannivoort LN, Barends CRM, Absalom AR, Colin P. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:893–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0507-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao Y, He J, Yu N, Jia C, Wang S. Mechanisms of Dexmedetomidine in Neuropathic Pain. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirksey MA, Haskins SC, Cheng J, Liu SS. Local Anesthetic Peripheral Nerve Block Adjuvants for Prolongation of Analgesia: A Systematic Qualitative Review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0137312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Unchiti K, Leurcharusmee P, Samerchua A, Pipanmekaporn T, Chattipakorn N, Chattipakorn SC. The potential role of dexmedetomidine on neuroprotection and its possible mechanisms: Evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;54:7006–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xue X, Fan J, Ma X, Liu Y, Han X, Leng Y, et al. Effects of local dexmedetomidine administration on the neurotoxicity of ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in rats. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22:4360–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xue Y, Xu T, Jiang W. Dexmedetomidine protects PC12 cells from ropivacaine injury through miR-381/LRRC4 /SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling pathway. Regen Ther. 2020;14:322–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2020.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu TX, Rothenberg ME. MicroRNA. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141:1202–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.08.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Twaroski D, Bosnjak ZJ, Bai X. MicroRNAs: New Players in Anesthetic-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity. Pharm Anal Acta. 2015;6:357. https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-2435.1000357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahmad HF, Darwish B, Dargham KB, Machmouchi R, Dargham BB, Osman M, et al. Role of MicroRNAs in Anesthesia-Induced Neurotoxicity in Animal Models and Neuronal Cultures: a Systematic Review. Neurotox Res. 2020;37:479–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-019-00135-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang X, Chen H, Chen Y, Birnbaum Y, Liang R, Ye Y, et al. Circulating miRNA Expression Profiling and Target Prediction in Patients Receiving Dexmedetomidine. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;50:552–68. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ke X, Huang Y, Fu Q, Lane RH, Majnik A. Adverse Maternal Environment Alters MicroRNA-10b-5p Expression and Its Epigenetic Profile Concurrently with Impaired Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Male Mouse Hippocampus. Dev Neurosci. 2021;43:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruan Z, Li Y, He R, Li X. Inhibition of microRNA-10b-5p up-regulates HOXD10 to attenuate Alzheimer’s disease in rats via the Rho/ROCK signalling pathway. J Drug Target. 2021;29:531–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2020.1864739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang L, Liu W, Zhang Y, Hu Z, Guo H, Lv J, et al. Dexmedetomidine had neuroprotective effects on hippocampal neuronal cells via targeting lncRNA SHNG16 mediated microRNA-10b-5p/BDNF axis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2020;469:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-020-03726-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Colucci-D’Amato L, Speranza L, Volpicelli F. Neurotrophic Factor BDNF, Physiological Functions and Therapeutic Potential in Depression, Neurodegeneration and Brain Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7777. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu B, Nagappan G, Lu Y. BDNF and synaptic plasticity, cognitive function, and dysfunction. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2014;220:223–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45106-5_9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu L, Liu M, Zhao W, Zhao YL, Wang Y. Tetrahydropalmatine Regulates BDNF through TrkB/CAM Interaction to Alleviate the Neurotoxicity Induced by Methamphetamine. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2021;12:3373–86. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Agarwal V, Bell GW, Nam JW, Bartel DP. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife. 2015;4: e05005. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05005.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen Y, Wang X. miRDB: an online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D127–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cai L, Li WT, Zhang LL, Lu XQ, Chen M, Liu Y. Long noncoding RNA GAS5 enhanced by curcumin relieves poststroke depression by targeting miR-10b/BDNF in rats. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34:815–23. https://doi.org/10.23812/20-113-A-25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang X, Zhao Y, Zhou Z, Yan J, Zhou B, Chi X, et al. Resveratrol Mitigates Sevoflurane-Induced Neurotoxicity by the SIRT1-Dependent Regulation of BDNF Expression in Developing Mice. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:9018624. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9018624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaur S, Attri JP, Kaur G, Singh TP. Comparative evaluation of ropivacaine versus dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8:463–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.140838.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdallah FW, Brull R. Facilitatory effects of perineural dexmedetomidine on neuraxial and peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:915–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Y, Zhang H, Zhang W. Effect of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine on Cognitive Dysfunction and Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Craniocerebral Surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:4968300. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4968300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kimura Y, Kamada Y, Kimura A, Orimo K. Ropivacaine-induced toxicity with overdose suspected after axillary brachial plexus block. J Anesth. 2007;21:413–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-007-0518-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zou Y, He X, Peng QY, Guo QL. Inhibition of CD38/Cyclic ADP-ribose Pathway Protects Rats against Ropivacaine-induced Convulsion. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130:2354–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.215333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Guan F, Zhou X, Li P, Wang Y, Liu M, Li F, et al. MG53 attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation via inhibiting TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway in vitro and in vivo. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;95: 109684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109684.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Malet A, Faure MO, Deletage N, Pereira B, Haas J, Lambert G. The comparative cytotoxic effects of different local anesthetics on a human neuroblastoma cell line. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:589–96. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang S, Lin Q, Wang Z, Pan X. Ropivacaine induces neurotoxicity by activating MAPK/p38 signal to upregulate Fas expression in neurogliocyte. Neurosci Lett. 2019;706:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.04.048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang W, Zhou H, Sun L, Li M, Gao F, Sun A, et al. Osthole-Mediated Inhibition of Neurotoxicity Induced by Ropivacaine via Amplification of the Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Signaling Pathway. Dose Response. 2022;20:15593258221088092. https://doi.org/10.1177/15593258221088092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei Y, Hu J, Liang Y, Zhong Y, He D, Qin Y, et al. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment attenuates propofolinduced neurotoxicity in neuronal cultures from the rat hippocampus. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14:3413–20. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5628.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Yan L, Zhang Y, Yang X. The role of DRP1 in ropivacaine-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and neurotoxicity. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:1788–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2019.1594858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brummett CM, Padda AK, Amodeo FS, Welch KB, Lydic R. Perineural dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine causes a dose-dependent increase in the duration of thermal antinociception in sciatic nerve block in rat. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:1111–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bbcc26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lin H, Muramatsu R, Maedera N, Tsunematsu H, Hamaguchi M, Koyama Y, et al. Extracellular Lactate Dehydrogenase A Release From Damaged Neurons Drives Central Nervous System Angiogenesis. EBioMedicine. 2018;27:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.10.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lucchinetti E, Awad AE, Rahman M, Feng J, Lou PH, Zhang L, et al. Antiproliferative effects of local anesthetics on mesenchymal stem cells: potential implications for tumor spreading and wound healing. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:841–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824babfe.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mete M, Aydemir I, Tuglu IM, Selcuki M. Neurotoxic effects of local anesthetics on the mouse neuroblastoma NB2a cell line. Biotech Histochem. 2015;90:216–22. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520295.2014.979439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lin EP, Soriano SG, Loepke AW. Anesthetic neurotoxicity. Anesthesiol Clin. 2014;32:133–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2013.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu Q, Shang Y, Shen T, Liu F, Xu Y, Wang H. Neuroprotection of miR-214 against isoflurane-induced neurotoxicity involves the PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway in human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2019;678: 108181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2019.108181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Leal G, Bramham CR, Duarte CB. BDNF and Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity. Vitam Horm. 2017;104:153–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.vh.2016.10.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chao MV. Neurotrophins and their receptors: a convergence point for many signalling pathways. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hu JJ, Qin LJ, Liu ZY, Liu P, Wei HP, Wang HY, et al. miR-15a regulates oxygen glucose deprivation/reperfusion (OGD/R)-induced neuronal injury by targeting BDNF. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2020;36:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Xue LL, Du RL, Hu Y, Xiong LL, Su ZY, Ma Z, et al. BDNF promotes neuronal survival after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy by up-regulating Stx1b and suppressing VDAC1. Brain Res Bull. 2021;174:131–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.05.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang Y, Yi J, Pan M, Hu B, Duan H. Edaravone alleviated propofol-induced neural injury in developing rats by BDNF/TrkB pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25:4974–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Dong Y, Hong W, Tang Z, Gao Y, Wu X, Liu H. Dexmedetomidine Attenuates Neurotoxicity in Developing Rats Induced by Sevoflurane through Upregulating BDNF-TrkB-CREB and Downregulating ProBDNF-P75NRT-RhoA Signaling Pathway. Mediators Inflamm. 2020;2020:5458061. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5458061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Tu Y, Liang Y, Xiao Y, Lv J, Guan R, Xiao F, et al. Dexmedetomidine attenuates the neurotoxicity of propofol toward primary hippocampal neurons in vitro via Erk1/2/CREB/BDNF signaling pathways. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:695–706. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S188436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhai Y, Ma Y, Liu J, Zhu Y, Xie K, Yu L, et al. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Alleviates Ropivacaine-Induced Neuronal Damage by Enhancing the Akt Signaling Pathway. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:10154–63. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.918479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the efforts and efforts of all members of our team.

Funding

This project was supported by grants from the Health Bureau (2018KY211, 2022KY501) of Zhejiang Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China

    Weicai Xu, Xiaojun Li, Long Chen, Xiaopan Luo & Sheliang Shen

  2. Department of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

    Jing Wang

Authors
  1. Weicai Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaojun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Long Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaopan Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sheliang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Guarantor of integrity of the entire study: SLS; Study concepts: WCX, XPL; Study design: WCX, XPL; Experimental studies: XJL, LC; Data analysis: JW; Statistical analysis: JW; Manuscript preparation: WCX; Manuscript editing: WCX, JW; Manuscript review: WCX, SLS, JW. “The authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Li, X., Chen, L. et al. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment alleviates ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity via the miR-10b-5p/BDNF axis. BMC Anesthesiol 22, 304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01810-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01810-6

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us