Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Embryo Transfer Catheter Contamination With Intravaginal Progesterone Preparations in a Simulated Embryo Transfer Model Impairs Mouse Embryo Development: Are There Implications for Human Embryo Transfer Technique?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To study the effect of embryo transfer (ET) catheter contact with intravaginal progesterone preparations on mouse embryo development.

Study Design

In a simulated ET model, ET catheters were loaded with culture medium, placed in contact with intravaginal progesterone gel (Crinone 8%) or micronized progesterone intravaginal inserts (Endometrin 100 mg), and the intracatheter culture medium flushed. Embryos were cultured in the flushed culture medium at variable dilutions for variable lengths of time. Proportion of embryos progressing to blastocyst, embryo cell number, and apoptotic index was analyzed.

Results

None of the embryos cultured in undiluted progesterone-exposed medium progressed to blastocyst. The likelihood of achieving blastocyst status and the average embryo cell number increased significantly as culture media exposed to intravaginal progesterone was diluted. A significant decrease in cell number became apparent between 1 and 2 hours of exposure. Interestingly, the apoptotic index was significantly higher in progesterone-exposed embryos as compared to unexposed embryos.

Conclusion

The contamination of ET catheter with intravaginal progesterone significantly impairs mouse embryo development, likely due in part to increased programmed cell death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devoto L, Fuentes A, Kohen P, Cespedes P, et al. The human corpus luteum: life cycle and function in natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(3):1067–1079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Csapo AI, Pulkkinen MO, Wiest WG. Effects of luteectomy and progesterone replacement therapy in early pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;115(6):759–765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams M, et al. An insight into early reproductive processes through the in vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72(2):408–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenwaks Z. Donor eggs: their application in modern reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(6):895–909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lelaidier C, de Ziegler D, Freitas S, Olivennes F, Hazout A, Frydman R. Endometrium preparation with exogenous estradiol and progesterone for the transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(4):919–921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Acosta AA, Elberger L, Borghi M, et al. Endometrial dating and determination of the window of implantation in healthy fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(4):788–798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wanggren K, Stavreus-Evers A, Olsson C, Andersson E, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Regulation of muscular contractions in the human Fallopian tube through prostaglandins and progestagens. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(10):2359–2368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulletti C, de Ziegler D. Uterine contractility and embryo implantation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18(4):473–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nosarka S, Kruger T, Siebert I, Grove D. Luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;60(2):67–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nyboe Andersen A, Popovic-Todorovic B, Schmidt KT, et al. Progesterone supplementation during early gestations after IVF or ICSI has no effect on the delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):357–361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daya S, Gunby J. Luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD004830.

  12. Zarutskie PW, Phillips JA. A meta-analysis of the route of administration of luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):163–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yanushpolsky E, Hurwitz S, Greenberg L, Racowsky C, Hornstein M. Crinone vaginal gel is equally effective and better tolerated than intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2596–2599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Propst AM, Hill JA, Ginsburg ES, Hurwitz S, Politch J, Yanushpolsky EH. A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(6):1144–1149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Silverberg K, Vaughn TC, Hansard L, Burger NZ, Minter T. Progesterone vaginal gel vs. intramuscular progesterone in oil for luteal support in IVF: a large, prospective trial. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):344–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tavaniotou A, Smitz J, Bourgain C, Devroey P. Comparison between different routes of progesterone administration as luteal phase support in infertility treatments. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(2):139–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blake EJ, Norris PM, Dorfman SF, Longstreth J, Yankov VI. Single and multidose pharmacokinetic study of a vaginal micronized progesterone insert (Endometrin) compared with vaginal gel in healthy reproductive-aged female subjects. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(4):1296–1301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fanchin R, De Ziegler D, Bergeron C, Righini C, Torrisi C, Frydman R. Transvaginal administration of progesterone. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(3):396–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang X, Zhang XH, Han BC, et al. Progesterone and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor regulate the expression of tight junction protein Claudin-3 during early pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1410–1418. doi:10.1016/j.fertn-stert.2013.07.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu N, Zhou C, Chen Y, Zhao J. The involvement of osteopontin and β3 integrin in implantation and endometrial receptivity in an early mouse pregnancy model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):171–176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Herrler A, von Rango U, Beier HM. Embryo–maternal signalling: how the embryo starts talking to its mother to accomplish implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6(2):244–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeman M, Novakova P. Gestational progesterone suppresses embryotoxic action of the complement system to chick embryo. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2001;22(1):33–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi BC, Polgar K, Xiao L, Hill JA. Progesterone inhibits in-vitro embryotoxic Th1 cytokine production to trophoblast in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2000;15 suppl 1:46–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harini C, Sainath SB, Reddy PS. Progesterone administration induces preimplantation embryonic loss in mice. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(5 suppl):2137–2141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mains L, Van Voorhis BJ. Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3):785–790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore DE, Soules MR, Klein NA, Fujimoto VY, Agnew KJ, Eschenbach DA. Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(6): 1118–1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Egbase PE, Al-Sharhan M, al-Othman S, al-Mutawa M, Udo EE, Grudzinskas JG. Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(8):1687–1689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, USF IVF and Reproductive Endocrinology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 2 Tampa General Circle, 6th Floor (6025), 33606, Tampa, FL, USA

    Luke Y. Ying BS, Ying Ying PhD, James Mayer MD, Anthony N. Imudia MD & Shayne M. Plosker MD

Authors
  1. Luke Y. Ying BS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Ying PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Mayer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anthony N. Imudia MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shayne M. Plosker MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shayne M. Plosker MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ying, L.Y., Ying, Y., Mayer, J. et al. Embryo Transfer Catheter Contamination With Intravaginal Progesterone Preparations in a Simulated Embryo Transfer Model Impairs Mouse Embryo Development: Are There Implications for Human Embryo Transfer Technique?. Reprod. Sci. 21, 1000–1005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114522522

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114522522

Keywords

Search

Navigation