Abstract
Objective
Case formulation has been recognized to be a useful conceptual and clinical tool in psychotherapy as diagnosis itself does not focus on the underlying causes of a patient’s problems. Case formulation can fill the gap between diagnosis and treatment, with the potential to provide insights into the integrative, explanatory, prescriptive, predictive, and therapist aspects of a case. Despite the acknowledgment that case formulation is a basic, necessary, and key clinical skill, it is still largely under-taught and underlearned. Some of the issues faced in the development of a case formulation include that of immediacy versus comprehensiveness, complexity versus simplicity, observation versus organization, and the need for cultural sensitivity toward each individual patient.
Methods
The authors propose five aspects of case formulation beneficial to therapists and residents in training.
Conclusions
The authors argue that case formulation remains an important and indispensable integrative tool for therapists and residents in training who are involved in psychotherapeutic interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Denman C: What is the point of a formulation, in The Art and Science of Assessment in Psychotherapy. Edited by Mace C. London, Routledge, 1994, pp 167–181
Perry JC: Scientific progress in psychodynamic formulation. Psychiatry 1989; 52: 245–249
Berger RM: Characteristics of optimal clinical case formulations: the linchpin concept. Am J Psychotherapy 1998; 52: 287–300
Barber JP, Crits-Christoph P: Advances in measures of psychodynamic formulations. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61: 574–585
Persons JB, Mooney KA, Padesky CA: Inter-rater reliability of cognitive behavioural case formulations. Cogn Ther Res 1995; 19: 21–34
Margison FR, Barkham M, Evans C, et al: Measurement and psychotherapy: evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177: 123–130
Shapiro T: The psychodynamic formulation in child and adolescent psychiatry. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989; 28: 675–680
Weiner IB: Principles of Psychotherapy. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1998
Friedman RS, Lister P: The current status of psychodynamic formulation. Psychiatry 1987; 50: 126–141
Goldsmith SR, Mandell AJ: The dynamic formulation. Am J Psychiatry 1969; 125: 152–157
Sperry L, Gudeman JE, Blackwell B, et al: Psychiatric case formulations. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000
Wolpe J, Turkat ID: Behavioural formulations of clinical cases, in Behavioural Case Formulation. Edited by Turkat ID. New York, Plenum Press, 1985, pp 5–36
Persons JB: Case conceptualisation in cognitive-behavior therapy, in Cognitive Therapies in Action: Evolving Innovative Practice. Edited by Kuehlwein KT, Rosen H. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1993, pp 33–53
Beck AT: Cognitive therapy and the Emotional Disorders. New York, International Universities Press, 1976
Perry S, Cooper AM, Michels R: The psychodynamic formulation. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144: 543–550
Ben-Aron M, McCormick WO: The teaching of formulation: facts and deficiencies. Can J Psychiatry 1980; 25: 163–166
Fleming JA, Patterson PG: The teaching of case formulation in Canada. Can J Psychiatry 1993; 38: 345–350
Weerasekera P: Formulation: a multiperspective model. Can J Psychiatry 1993; 38: 351–358
Riesenberg-Malcolm C: Conceptualisation of clinical facts in the analytic process. Int J Psychoanal 1994; 75: 1031–1040
Haynes SN, O’Brien WH: Functional analysis in behaviour therapy. Clin Psychol Rev 1990; 10: 649–668
Persons JB: The advantages of studying psychological phenomena rather than psychiatric diagnoses. Am Psychologist 1986; 41: 1252–1260
Bergner RM: Characteristics of optimal clinical case formulations: the linchpin concept. Am J Psychotherapy 1998; 52: 287–300
Curtis JT, Silberschatz G: The plan formulation method, in Handbook of Psychotherapy Case Formulation. Edited by Eells TD. New York, Guilford, 1997, pp 116–136
Summers RF: The psychodynamic formulation updated. Am J Psychotherapy 2003; 57: 39–51
Horowitz MJ: Configurational analysis for case formulation. Psychiatry 1997; 60: 111–119
Eells TD, Kendjelic EM, Lucas CP: What’s in a case formulation? development and use of a content coding manual. J Psychother Pract Res 1998; 7: 144–153
Horowitz LM, Rosenberg SE, Ureno G, et al: Psychodynamic formulation, consensual response method, and interpersonal problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 57: 599–606
Lo HT, Fung KP: Culturally competent psychotherapy. Can J Psychiatry 2003; 48: 161–170
Kanfer FH: Target selection for clinical change programs. Behav Assess 1985; 7: 7–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sim, K., Gwee, K.P. & Bateman, A. Case Formulation in Psychotherapy: Revitalizing Its Usefulness as a Clinical Tool. Acad Psychiatry 29, 289–292 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.3.289
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.3.289