Skip to main content
Log in

Case Formulation in Psychotherapy: Revitalizing Its Usefulness as a Clinical Tool

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Case formulation has been recognized to be a useful conceptual and clinical tool in psychotherapy as diagnosis itself does not focus on the underlying causes of a patient’s problems. Case formulation can fill the gap between diagnosis and treatment, with the potential to provide insights into the integrative, explanatory, prescriptive, predictive, and therapist aspects of a case. Despite the acknowledgment that case formulation is a basic, necessary, and key clinical skill, it is still largely under-taught and underlearned. Some of the issues faced in the development of a case formulation include that of immediacy versus comprehensiveness, complexity versus simplicity, observation versus organization, and the need for cultural sensitivity toward each individual patient.

Methods

The authors propose five aspects of case formulation beneficial to therapists and residents in training.

Conclusions

The authors argue that case formulation remains an important and indispensable integrative tool for therapists and residents in training who are involved in psychotherapeutic interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Denman C: What is the point of a formulation, in The Art and Science of Assessment in Psychotherapy. Edited by Mace C. London, Routledge, 1994, pp 167–181

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perry JC: Scientific progress in psychodynamic formulation. Psychiatry 1989; 52: 245–249

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger RM: Characteristics of optimal clinical case formulations: the linchpin concept. Am J Psychotherapy 1998; 52: 287–300

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barber JP, Crits-Christoph P: Advances in measures of psychodynamic formulations. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61: 574–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Persons JB, Mooney KA, Padesky CA: Inter-rater reliability of cognitive behavioural case formulations. Cogn Ther Res 1995; 19: 21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Margison FR, Barkham M, Evans C, et al: Measurement and psychotherapy: evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177: 123–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro T: The psychodynamic formulation in child and adolescent psychiatry. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989; 28: 675–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiner IB: Principles of Psychotherapy. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman RS, Lister P: The current status of psychodynamic formulation. Psychiatry 1987; 50: 126–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldsmith SR, Mandell AJ: The dynamic formulation. Am J Psychiatry 1969; 125: 152–157

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sperry L, Gudeman JE, Blackwell B, et al: Psychiatric case formulations. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wolpe J, Turkat ID: Behavioural formulations of clinical cases, in Behavioural Case Formulation. Edited by Turkat ID. New York, Plenum Press, 1985, pp 5–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Persons JB: Case conceptualisation in cognitive-behavior therapy, in Cognitive Therapies in Action: Evolving Innovative Practice. Edited by Kuehlwein KT, Rosen H. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1993, pp 33–53

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beck AT: Cognitive therapy and the Emotional Disorders. New York, International Universities Press, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perry S, Cooper AM, Michels R: The psychodynamic formulation. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144: 543–550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Aron M, McCormick WO: The teaching of formulation: facts and deficiencies. Can J Psychiatry 1980; 25: 163–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fleming JA, Patterson PG: The teaching of case formulation in Canada. Can J Psychiatry 1993; 38: 345–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weerasekera P: Formulation: a multiperspective model. Can J Psychiatry 1993; 38: 351–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Riesenberg-Malcolm C: Conceptualisation of clinical facts in the analytic process. Int J Psychoanal 1994; 75: 1031–1040

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haynes SN, O’Brien WH: Functional analysis in behaviour therapy. Clin Psychol Rev 1990; 10: 649–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Persons JB: The advantages of studying psychological phenomena rather than psychiatric diagnoses. Am Psychologist 1986; 41: 1252–1260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergner RM: Characteristics of optimal clinical case formulations: the linchpin concept. Am J Psychotherapy 1998; 52: 287–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Curtis JT, Silberschatz G: The plan formulation method, in Handbook of Psychotherapy Case Formulation. Edited by Eells TD. New York, Guilford, 1997, pp 116–136

    Google Scholar 

  24. Summers RF: The psychodynamic formulation updated. Am J Psychotherapy 2003; 57: 39–51

    Google Scholar 

  25. Horowitz MJ: Configurational analysis for case formulation. Psychiatry 1997; 60: 111–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eells TD, Kendjelic EM, Lucas CP: What’s in a case formulation? development and use of a content coding manual. J Psychother Pract Res 1998; 7: 144–153

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Horowitz LM, Rosenberg SE, Ureno G, et al: Psychodynamic formulation, consensual response method, and interpersonal problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 57: 599–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lo HT, Fung KP: Culturally competent psychotherapy. Can J Psychiatry 2003; 48: 161–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanfer FH: Target selection for clinical change programs. Behav Assess 1985; 7: 7–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kang Sim M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sim, K., Gwee, K.P. & Bateman, A. Case Formulation in Psychotherapy: Revitalizing Its Usefulness as a Clinical Tool. Acad Psychiatry 29, 289–292 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.3.289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.3.289

Keywords

Navigation