Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 1069 No. 1: 25 Oct. 2005
Type: Articles
Published: 2005-10-25
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1069.1.1
Page range: 1-32
Abstract views: 30
PDF downloaded: 3

Molecular systematics and geographical distribution of the Drosophila longicornis species complex (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA Department of Biology, University of Vermont, VT, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA
Diptera Drosophila longicornis complex molecular systematics species concept conflict host cactus

Abstract

Here we examine the phylogenetic relationships of eleven species previously hypothesized to be members of the Drosophila longicornis complex (repleta group, mulleri subgroup) using combined analyses of four mitochondrial genes. This complex, as currently redefined, is composed of the longicornis cluster (D. longicornis, D. pachuca, D. propachuca, and D. mainlandi), the ritae cluster (D. desertorum, D. mathisi, and D. ritae), and several miscellaneous species (D. hamatofila, D. hexastigma, D. spenceri, and an undescribed species “from Sonora”). A maximum likelihood inference also includes the huckinsi cluster (D. huckinsi and D. huichole) as the most distant members in the longicornis complex, a condition not recovered using maximum parsimony. We were unable to diagnose species in the triad of sibling species D. longicornis, D. pachuca, and D. propachuca using rapidly evolving mitochondrial DNA data, and we discuss possible species concept conflict for this triad. Comprehensive distribution information for these species, gathered over the past 60 years, is synthesized and displayed in range maps. Available information about the ecology and host plants of each species is also included.

References

  1. Axelrod, D.I. (1979) Age and Origin of the Sonoran Desert vegetation. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, 132, 1–74.

    Beckenbach, A.T., Wei, W. & Liu, H. (1993) Relationships in the Drosophila obscura species group, inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 619–634.

    Bremer, K. (1988) The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42, 795–803.

    Cracraft, J. (1989) Speciation and its ontogeny: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts and processes of differentiation. In: Otte, D. & Endler, J. A. (Eds.), Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp. 28–59.

    Clary, D.O. & Wolstenholme, D.R. (1985) The mitochondrial DNA molecular of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 22, 252–257.

    Davis, J.I. & Nixon, K.C. (1992) Populations, genetic variation, and the delineation of phylogenetic species. Systematic Biology, 41, 421–435.

    Durando, C.M., Baker, R.H., Etges, W.J., Heed, W.B., Wasserman, M. & DeSalle, R. (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophila using multiple sources of characters. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 16, 296–307.

    Etges, W.J., Armella, M.A., O’Grady, P.M. & Heed W.B. (2001) Two new species of Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the repleta group from Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 94, 16–20.

    Etges, W.J. & Heed W.B. (2004) A new geographical record for Drosophila desertorum and a review of the D. ritae cluster in the repleta group of Drosophila. Drosophila Information Service, 87, 30–32.

    Farris, J.S., Albert, V., Kallersjo, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A.G. (1996) Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics, 12, 99–124.

    Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791.

    Felsenstein, J. (1988) Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annual Review of Genetics, 22, 521–565.

    Heed, W.B. (1982) The origin of Drosophila in the Sonoran Desert. In: Barker, J. S. F. & Starmer, W. T. (Eds.), Ecological Genetics and Evolution: The Cactus–Yeast–Drosophila Model System. Academic Press, Sydney, pp. 65–80.

    Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. (2000) MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.0, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Maddison, D.R., Swofford, D.L. & Maddison, W.P. (1997) Nexus: An extensible file format for systematic information. Systematic Biology, 46, 590–621.

    Mitchell, S.E., Cockburn, A.F. & Seawright, J.A. (1993) The mitochondrial genome of Anopheles quadrimaculatus species A: complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization. Genome, 36, 1058–1073.

    Patterson, J.T. (1943) The Drosophilidae of the Southwest. The University of Texas Publications, 4313, 7–203.

    Patterson, J.T. & Mainland, G. B. (1944) The Drosophilidae of Mexico. The University of Texas Publications, 4445, 9–101.

    Patterson, J.T. & Wagner, R.P. (1943) Geographical distribution of species of the genus Drosophila in the United States and Mexico. The University of Texas Publications, 4313, 217–281.

    Patterson, J.T. & Wheeler M.R. (1942) Description of new species of the sub-genus Hirtodrosophila and Drosophila. The University of Texas Publications, 4213, 67-109.

    Posada, D & Crandall, K.A. (1988) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817–818.

    Remsen, J. & O'Grady, P.M. (2002) Phylogeny of Drosophilinae (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with comments on combined analysis and character support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24, 249–264.

    Richardson, R.H., Richardson, M.E. & Smouse, P.E. (1975) Evolution of electrophoretic mobility in the Drosophila mulleri complex. In: Markert, C. L. (Ed.). Isozymes IV: Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, New York, pp. 533–545.

    Richardson, R.H. & Smouse, P.E. (1976) Patterns of molecular variation. I. Interspecific comparison of electromorphs in the Drosophila mulleri complex. Biochemical Genetics, 14, 447–465.

    Ruiz, A. & Fontdevila, A. (1981) Ecologia y evolucion del subgroupo mulleri en Drosophila de Venezuala y Colombia. Acta Cientifica Venezolana 32, 338–345.

    Ruiz, A. & Heed, W. B. (1988) Host–Plant specificity in the cactophilic Drosophila mulleri species complex. Journal of Animal Ecology, 57: 237–249.

    Sorenson, M.D. (1999) TreeRot, version 2. Boston University, Boston, MA.

    Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0 beta. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC.

    Vilela, C.R. (1983) A revision of the Drosophila repleta species group (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 27, 1–114.

    Wasserman, M. (1962) Cytological studies of the repleta group of the genus Drosophila. V. The mulleri subgroup. The University of Texas Publications, 6205, 85–117.

    Wasserman, M. (1982) Evolution of the repleta group. In: Ashburner, M., Carson, H.L. & Thompson, J.N. (Eds.), The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 3b. Academic Press, London, pp. 61–139.

    Wasserman, M. (1992) Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group. In: Krimbas, C. B. & Powell, J. R. (Eds.), Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 455–552.

    Wasserman, M. & Koepfer, H.R. (1977) Phylogenetic relationships among Drosophila longicornis, Drosophila propachuca, Drosophila pachuca, a triad of sibling species. Genetics, 87, 557–568.