Published online Mar 30, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2013.26.1.25
Difference of Second to Fourth Digit Ratio according to the Methods of Measuring Length
Abstract
The 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D : 4D) reflects exposure level of sex hormones in fetal period and there are various methods for finger length measurement. The aim of this study is to identify an accurate and effective method for finger length measurement.
This study was done on 272 individuals (115 males, 157 females). Data were collected by measuring index and ring finger length on both hands by calipers, ruler, photocopy, and radiography. The data were analyzed through independent t-test, paired t-test, Pearson correlation analysis using SPSS win 19.0.
This study showed that the 2nd and 4th finger measured by radiography were the longest finger both of males and females and revealed the largest length difference between 2nd and 4th finger. There were significant sex differences all of 4 measurement methods in 2D : 4D, especially remarkable sex difference by radiography and photography. The 2D : 4D by indirect measurement was lower than that of direct measurement. Correlation between digit ratio by radiography and by photocopy was 0.590 and correlation between digit ratio by radiography and by calipers was 0.586.
The results of this study suggest that indirect measurement by radiography can be alternated by photocopy primarily and by calipers secondarily.
Fig. 1
Second and fourth finger length by radiography was measured from proximl end of proximal phalanx to distal end of distal phalanx.
Table 1
Differences of second and fourth finger length according to measurement method (N=272)
Table 2
Sex differences of second to fourth digit ratio according to measurement method (N=272)
Table 3
Differences of measurement method in second to fourth digit ratio (N=272)
Table 4
Correlation among digit ratios according to measurement method of finger length (N=272)
References
-
Choi KH, Kwon SO. Sex differences in ratio of the lengths of the second to fourth digits (2D : 4D). Korean J Growth Dev 2007;15:155–159.Korean.
-
-
Hönekopp J, Watson S. Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D : 4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. Am J Hum Biol 2010;22:619–660.
-
-
Manning JT, Bundred PE. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length and age at first myocardial infarction in men: a link with testosterone? Br J Cardiol 2001;12:720–723.
-
-
Park SW, Kim JK. The utility of the 2nd-4th digit ratio (2D : 4D) for body composition, physical fitness and exercise training effects in children. Korean J Growth Dev 2010;18(1):1–10.Korean.
-
-
Cho HJ. In: The relationship between the putative marker of prenatal androgen exposure and physical fitness in elementary school students. Seoul National University of Education; 2010.Thesis of graduate school, Korean.
-
-
Manning JT, Fink B. Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and aggregate personality scores across nations: Data from the BBC internet study. Pers Indiv Differ 2011;51:387–391.
-
-
Manning JT, Trivers RL, Thornhill R, Singh D. The 2nd : 4th digit ratio and asymmetry of hand performance in Jamaican children. Laterality 2000;5(2):121–132.
-
-
Lee HS. In: Correlation between directly measured and photocopy measured 2D : 4D with TCI scales. Hanyang University; 2009.Thesis of Graduate school, Korean.
-
-
Rammsayer TH, Troche SJ. Sexual dimorphism in second-to-fourth digit ratio and its relation to gender-role orientation in males and females. Pers Indiv Differ 2007;42:911–920.
-
-
Coyne SM, Manning JT, Ringer L, Bailey L. Directional asymmetry (right-left differences) in digit ratio (2D : 4D) predict indirect aggression in women. Pers Indiv Differ 2007;43:865–872.
-
-
McIntyre MH, Barrett ES, McDermott R, Johnson DDP, Cowden J, Rosen SP. Finger length ratio (2D : 4D) and sex differences in aggression during a simulated war game. Pers Indiv Differ 2007;42:755–764.
-
-
Lee YJ. In: Surface anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical examination (Lumley JSP). 3rd ed. Seoul: Panmun Book Co.; 2003. pp. 79.
-