Re-Examining Phonetic Variability in Native and Non-Native Speech

References

1 Babel M (2012): Evidence for phonetic and social se lectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. J Phon 40:177-189.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001Search in Google Scholar

2 Baese-Berk MM, Bradlow AR, Wright BA (2013): Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. J Acoust Soc Am 133:EL174-EL180.10.1121/1.4789864Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3 Baese-Berk MM, Morrill TH (2015): Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English. J Acoust Soc Am 138:EL223-EL228.10.1121/1.4929622Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4 Bakeman R (2005): Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 37:379-384.10.3758/BF03192707Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5 Baker RE, Baese-Berk MM, Bonnasse-Gahot L, Kim M, Van Engen KJ, Bradlow AR (2011): Word durations in non-native English. J Phon 39:1-17.10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6 Barlow JA (2014): Age of acquisition and allophony in Spanish-English bilinguals. Front Psychol 5:288.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00288Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Bell A (1984): Language style as audience design. Lang Soc 13:145-204.10.1017/S004740450001037XSearch in Google Scholar

8 Bell A, Brenier JM, Gregory M, Girand C, Jurafsky D (2009): Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. J Mem Lang 60(1):92-111.10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003Search in Google Scholar

9 Bent T, Atagi E, Akbik A, Bonifield E (2016a): Classification of regional dialects, international dialects, and nonnative accents. J Phon 58:104-117.10.1016/j.wocn.2016.08.004Search in Google Scholar

10 Bent T, Baese-Berk MM, Borrie SA, McKee M (2016b): Individual differences in the perception of regional, nonnative, and disordered speech varieties. J Acoust Soc Am 140:3775-3786.10.1121/1.4966677Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Best CT (1995): A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception; in Strange W (ed): Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, York Press, pp 171-204.Search in Google Scholar

12 Boersma P, Weenink D (2015): Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Software version 5.2.18.Search in Google Scholar

13 Bradlow AR, Bent T (2008): Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition 106:707-729.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14 Bradlow AR, Pisoni DB, Akahane-Yamada R, Tohkura YI (1997): Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/. IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. J Acoust Soc Am 101:2299-2310.10.1121/1.418276Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15 Buz E, Tanenhaus MK, Jaeger TF (2016): Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations. J Mem Lang 89:68-86.10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16 Chan KY, Vitevitch MS (2015): The influence of neighborhood density on the recognition of Spanish-accented words. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 41:69.10.1037/a0038347Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17 Chang CB (2012): Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. J Phon 40:249-268.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.007Search in Google Scholar

18 Chang CB (2013): A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. J Phon 41:520-533.10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.006Search in Google Scholar

19 Chang CB, Bowles AR (2015): Context effects on second-language learning of tonal contrasts. J Acoust Soc Am 138:3703-3716.10.1121/1.4937612Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20 Chao KY, Chen LM (2008): A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. Comput Linguist Chin Lang Processing 13:215-232.Search in Google Scholar

21 Cho T, Ladefoged P (1999): Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. J Phon 27:207-229.10.1006/jpho.1999.0094Search in Google Scholar

22 Clopper CG, Pisoni DB (2004): Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Lang Speech 47:207-239.10.1177/00238309040470030101Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23 Cristia A, Seidl A, Vaughn CR, Schmale R, Bradlow AR, Floccia C (2012): Linguistic processing of accented speech across the lifespan. Front Psychol 3:479.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00479Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24 Davidson L (2006): Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: influences on the production of non-native sequences. J Phon 34:104-137.10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004Search in Google Scholar

25 Davidson L (2016): Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. J Phon 54:35-50.10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003Search in Google Scholar

26 Durham M (2014): The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Competence in a Lingua Franca Context. Bristol, Multilingual Matters, vol 75.10.1111/weng.12241Search in Google Scholar

27 Escudero P, Boersma P (2002): The subset problem in L2 perceptual development: multiple-category assimilation by Dutch learners of Spanish; in Skarabela B, Fish S, Do AH-J (eds): Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, Cascadilla, pp 208-219.Search in Google Scholar

28 Evans BG, Iverson P (2007): Plasticity in vowel perception and production: a study of accent change in young adults. J Acoust Soc Am 121(6):3814-3826.10.1121/1.2722209Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29 Flege JE (1981): The phonological basis of foreign accent: a hypothesis. Tesol Q 15:443-455.10.2307/3586485Search in Google Scholar

30 Flege JE (1987): The production of new and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. J Phon 15:47-65.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6Search in Google Scholar

31 Flege JE (1995): Second language speech learning: theory, findings, and problems; in Strange W (ed): Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Baltimore, York Press, pp 229-273.Search in Google Scholar

32 Flege JE, Davidian RD (1984): Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Appl Psycholinguist 5:323-347.10.1017/S014271640000521XSearch in Google Scholar

33 Flege JE, Munro MJ, MacKay IRA (1995): Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Commun 16:1-26.10.1016/0167-6393(94)00044-BSearch in Google Scholar

34 Flynn N (2011): Comparing vowel formant normalisation procedures. York Work Pap Linguist Ser 2 11:1-28.Search in Google Scholar

35 Fujisaki H, Nakamura K, Imoto T (1975): Auditory perception of duration of speech and non-speech stimuli; in Fant G, Tatham MAA (ed): Auditory Analysis and Perception of Speech. London, Academic Press, pp 197-219.Search in Google Scholar

36 Gahl S (2008): Time and thyme are not homophones: the effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84:474-496.10.1353/lan.0.0035Search in Google Scholar

37 Guion S, Flege JE, Liu HM, Yeni-Komshian G (2000): Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. J Acoust Soc Am 21:205-228.10.1017/S0142716400002034Search in Google Scholar

38 Goldrick M, Vaughn C, Murphy A (2013): The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation. J Acoust Soc Am 134: EL172-EL177.10.1121/1.4812821Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39 Gustafson E, Engstler C, Goldrick M (2013): Phonetic processing of non-native speech in semantic vs non-semantic tasks. J Acoust Soc Am 134:EL506-EL512.10.1121/1.4826914Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40 Harada T (2007): The production of voice onset time (VOT) by English-speaking children in a Japanese immersion program. IRAL Int Rev Appl Linguist Lang Teach 45:353-378.10.1515/IRAL.2007.015Search in Google Scholar

41 Heald SL, Nusbaum HC (2015): Variability in vowel production within and between days. PLoS One 10:e0136791.10.1371/journal.pone.0136791Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42 Hieke AE (1980): Aspects of Native and Non-Native Fluency Skills; PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.Search in Google Scholar

43 Hillenbrand J, Getty LA, Clark MJ, Wheeler K (1995): Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 97:3099-3111.10.1121/1.411872Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44 Hirata Y, Tsukada K (2009): Effects of speaking rate and vowel length on formant frequency displacement in Japanese. Phonetica 66:129-149.10.1159/000235657Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45 Hirata Y (2015): L2 phonetics and phonology; in Kubozono H (ed): Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology. Berlin, de Gruyter, vol 2, pp 719-762.Search in Google Scholar

46 Homma Y (1981): Durational relationship between Japanese stops and vowels. J Phon 9:273-281.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30971-4Search in Google Scholar

47 Idemaru K, Wei P, Gubbins L (2018): Acoustic sources of accent in second language Japanese speech. Lang Speech. DOI: 0023830918773118.10.1177/0023830918773118Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48 Johnson K (2004): Massive reduction in conversational American English; in Yoneyama K, Maekawa K (eds): Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium. Tokyo, The National International Institute for Japanese Language, pp 29-54.Search in Google Scholar

49 Jongman A, Wade T (2007): Acoustic variability and perceptual learning; in Bohn OS, Munro MJ (eds): Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp 135-150.Search in Google Scholar

50 Kartushina N (2015): Second Language Phonological Acquisition in Adults: The Interplay between the Native and Non-Native Languages; PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

51 Kartushina N, Frauenfelder UH (2014): On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Front Psychol 5:1-17.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01246Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52 Kartushina N, Hervais-Adelman A, Frauenfelder UH, Golestani N (2015): The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 138:817-832.10.1121/1.4926561Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53 Keating PA (1984): Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60:286-319.10.2307/413642Search in Google Scholar

54 Kendall T, Thomas E (2009): Vowels: vowel manipulation, normalization, and plotting in R. R package, version 1.0-2. http:/cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vowels/.Search in Google Scholar

55 Kingston J (2003): Learning foreign vowels. Lang Speech 46:295-349.10.1177/00238309030460020201Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56 Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RC (1997): Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:1395-1405.10.1044/jslhr.4006.1395Search in Google Scholar PubMed

57 Kong EJ, Beckman ME, Edwards J (2012): Voice onset time is necessary but not always sufficient to describe acquisition of voiced stops: the cases of Greek and Japanese. J Phon 40:725-744.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.07.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58 Labov W (1972): Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, No 4.Search in Google Scholar

59 Lawrence MA (2013): ez: easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. R package version 4.2-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez.Search in Google Scholar

60 Liljencrants J, Lindblom B (1972): Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language 48:839-862.10.2307/411991Search in Google Scholar

61 Lisker L, Abramson AS (1964): A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20:384-422.10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830Search in Google Scholar

62 Lobanov BM (1971): Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. J Acoust Soc Am 49:606-608.10.1121/1.1912396Search in Google Scholar

63 Logan JS, Lively SE, Pisoni DB (1991): Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. J Acoust Soc Am 89:874-886.10.1121/1.1894649Search in Google Scholar PubMed

64 Maye J, Werker JF, Gerken L (2002): Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82:B101-B111.10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

65 McCullough EA (2013): Acoustic Correlates of Perceived Foreign Accent in Non-Native English; PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

66 McCullough EA, Clopper CG (2016): Perceptual subcategories within non-native English. J Phon 55:19-37.10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.002Search in Google Scholar

67 Moon SJ, Lindblom B (1994): Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 96(1):40-55.10.1121/1.410492Search in Google Scholar

68 Morrill TH, Baese-Berk MM, Bradlow AR (2016): Speaking rate consistency and variability in spontaneous speech by native and non-native speakers of English. Proc Speech Prosody 8:1119-1123.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-230Search in Google Scholar

69 Newman RS, Clouse SA, Burnham JL (2001): The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production. J Acoust Soc Am 109:1181-1196.10.1121/1.1348009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70 Nielsen K (2011): Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. J Phon 39:132-142.10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007Search in Google Scholar

71 Nishi K, Strange W, Akahane-Yamada R, Kubo R, Trent-Brown SA (2008): Acoustic and perceptual similarity of Japanese and American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 124:576-588.10.1121/1.2931949Search in Google Scholar PubMed

72 Nissen SL, Dromey C, Wheeler C (2007): First and second language tongue movements in Spanish and Korean bilingual speakers. Phonetica 64:201-216.10.1159/000121373Search in Google Scholar PubMed

73 Oyama S (1982): The sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system; in Krashen S, Scarcella R, Long M (eds): Child-Adult Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Newbury House, pp 20-38.Search in Google Scholar

74 Pajak B, Fine AB, Kleinschmidt DF, Jaeger TF (2016): Learning additional languages as hierarchical probabilistic inference: insights from first language processing. Lang Learn 66:900-944.10.1111/lang.12168Search in Google Scholar PubMed

75 Pardo J (2006): On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2382-2393.10.1121/1.2178720Search in Google Scholar PubMed

76 Patterson D, Connine CM (2001): Variant frequency in flap production. Phonetica 58:254-275.10.1159/000046178Search in Google Scholar PubMed

77 Perrachione TK, Lee J, Ha LYY, Wong PCM (2011): Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. J Acoust Soc Am 130:461-472.10.1121/1.3593366Search in Google Scholar PubMed

78 Peterson GE, Barney HL (1952): Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 24:175-184.10.1121/1.1906875Search in Google Scholar

79 Piske T, MacKay IR, Flege JE (2001): Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: a review. J Phon 29:191-215.10.1006/jpho.2001.0134Search in Google Scholar

80 Recasens D, Espinosa A (2009): An articulatory investigation of lingual coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for consonants and vowels in Catalan. J Acoust Soc Am 125:2288-2298.10.1121/1.3089222Search in Google Scholar PubMed

81 Riney TJ, Takagi N, Ota K, Uchida Y (2007): The intermediate degree of VOT in Japanese initial voiceless stops. J Phon 35:439-443.10.1016/j.wocn.2006.01.002Search in Google Scholar

82 Romero-Rivas C, Martin CD, Costa A (2015): Processing changes when listening to foreign-accented speech. Front Hum Neurosci 9:1-15.10.3389/fnhum.2015.00167Search in Google Scholar PubMed

83 Schmale R, Hollich G, Seidl A (2011): Contending with foreign accent variability in early lexical acquisition. J Child Lang 38:1096-1108.10.1017/S0305000910000619Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84 Schwartz G, Aperliński G, Jekiel M, Malarski K (2016a): Spectral dynamics in L1 and L2 vowel perception. Res Lang 14:61-77.10.1515/rela-2016-0004Search in Google Scholar

85 Schwartz G, Aperliński G, Kaźmierski K, Weckwerth J (2016b): Dynamic targets in the acquisition of L2 English vowels. Res Lang 14:181-202.10.1515/rela-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

86 Shea CE (2014): Second language learners and the variable speech signal. Front Psychol 5:1338.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01338Search in Google Scholar PubMed

87 Shea CE, Curtin S (2011): Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones. Second Lang Res 27:229-250.10.1177/0267658310375753Search in Google Scholar

88 Sommers MS, Nygaard LC, Pisoni DB (1994): Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. I. Effects of variability in speaking rate and overall amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 96:1314-1324.10.1121/1.411453Search in Google Scholar PubMed

89 Sonderegger M, Bane M, Graff P (2017): The medium-term dynamics of accents on reality television. Language 93:598-640.10.1353/lan.2017.0054Search in Google Scholar

90 Tajima K, Kitahara M, Yoneyama K (2015): Production of a non-contrastive sound in a second language; in The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed): Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, University of Glasgow, paper No 0802.Search in Google Scholar

91 Tarone E, Parrish B (1988): Task-related variation in interlanguage: the case of articles. Lang Learn 38:21-44.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00400.xSearch in Google Scholar

92 Tobin SJ (2015): Phonetic Accommodation in Spanish-English and Korean-English Bilinguals: A Dynamical Account; unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Search in Google Scholar

93 Tomlin RS, Villa V (1994): Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Stud Second Lang Acquis 16:183-203.10.1017/S0272263100012870Search in Google Scholar

94 Trude AM, Tremblay A, Brown-Schmidt S (2013): Limitations on adaptation to foreign accents. J Mem Lang 69:349-367.10.1016/j.jml.2013.05.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

95 Van Engen KJ, Baese-Berk MM, Baker RE, Choi A, Kim M, Bradlow AR (2010): The Wildcat Corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Lang Speech 53:510-540.10.1177/0023830910372495Search in Google Scholar PubMed

96 Van Engen KJ, Peelle JE (2014): Listening effort and accented speech. Front Hum Neurosci 8:577.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577Search in Google Scholar PubMed

97 Van Patten B (1990): Attending to form and content in the input. Stud Second Lang Acquis 12:287-301.10.1017/S0272263100009177Search in Google Scholar

98 Vance TJ (2008): The Sounds of Japanese. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar

99 Vokic G (2010): L1 allophones in L2 speech production: the case of English learners of Spanish. Hispania 93:430-452.Search in Google Scholar

100 Wade T, Jongman A, Sereno J (2007): Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-nativeaccented speech sounds. Phonetica 64:122-144.10.1159/000107913Search in Google Scholar PubMed

101 Warner N, Tucker BV (2011): Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech. J Acoust Soc Am 130:1606-1617.10.1121/1.3621306Search in Google Scholar PubMed

102 Watt D, Fabricius A, Kendall T (2011): More on vowels: plotting and normalization; in di Paolo M, Yaeger-Dror M (eds): Sociophonetics: A Student's Guide. London, Routledge, pp 107-118.Search in Google Scholar

103 Wilcox RR (1995): Comparing two independent groups via multiple quantiles. Statistician 44:91-99.10.2307/2348620Search in Google Scholar

104 Witteman MJ, Weber A, McQueen JM (2014): Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech. Psychonom Bull Rev 21:512-519.10.3758/s13423-013-0519-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed