Objective: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the number of 2 lymphoid subpopulations, CD8+ cells and FOXP3+, in the duodenum mucosa from pediatric celiac patients. Methods: Tissue sections prepared from paraffin-embedded biopsies of the descending duodenum of 61 celiac patients with Marsh grade 1 (M1), M2 and M3 disease and biopsies from 21 age-matched non-celiac (NC) patients were immunohistostained with anti-CD8 or FOXP3 antibodies. Results: The histological Marsh grade correlated with the mean number of FOXP3+ cells in the lamina propria (LP) mucosa (8.9 ± 1.1, 6.8 ± 2.4, 24.5 ± 2.6 and 31.1 ± 2.8 for NC, M1, M2 and M3 biopsies, respectively; p < 0.001). Using a cutoff point of 15 cells, 95% of NC and 88% of M1 biopsies had a mean of <15 FOXP3+ cells compared with 14% for M2 and 13% for M3 biopsies. The number of FOXP3+ cells in the epithelial mucosa also correlated with transglutaminase type 2 serum levels from the celiac patients. Unlike the FOXP3+ cells, CD8+ lymphocytes were present in both LP and surface epithelial mucosa and significantly different only in the LP mucosa of the M2 and M3 groups. Conclusion: The number of FOXP3+ cells is substantially increased in the mucosa of celiac patients at advanced stages. Characterization of the activity of these cells in celiac and in other inflammatory bowel diseases will enable us to understand the significance of these cells in celiac disease.

Keywords:
Regulatory T cells, Immunohistochemistry, Celiac disease, FOXP3
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.