Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the amount of aspirated debris during distal balloon-protected carotid artery stenting (CAS) and the pre-intervention plaque composition, as assessed by Virtual Histology™ (VH) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods: The study subjects were 25 consecutive patients (mean age, 73.0 ± 5.2 years; 20 males and 5 females) who underwent CAS under distal balloon protection. The average rate of carotid stenosis was 74.6 ± 12.9% by North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. We assessed culprit plaque components by VH-IVUS before CAS. Aspirated debris was filtered, stained with HE and mounted onto glass slides. The quantity of debris was evaluated by measuring its surface area. We evaluated the relationship between the quantity of aspirated debris and VH-IVUS measurements before CAS. Results: The amount of debris during CAS was positively correlated with the total plaque volume in grayscale IVUS (Rs = 0.480, p = 0.015) and fibro-fatty volumes over the entire lesion length in VH-IVUS (Rs = 0.561, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Culprit lesions with large plaque volumes, especially larger fibro-fatty volumes, as imaged by VH-IVUS, are associated with large amounts of debris during balloon-protected CAS.

Keywords:
Virtual Histology™, Intravascular ultrasound, Carotid artery stenting, Debris, Plaque characterization
1.
Henry M, Polydorou A, Henry I, Polydorou A, Hugel M: Carotid angioplasty under cerebral protection with the PercuSurge GuardWire system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:293–305.
2.
Henry M, Henry I, Klonaris C, Masson I, Hugel M, Tzvetanov K, Ethevenot G, Le BE, Kownator S, Luizi F, Folliguet B: Benefits of cerebral protection during carotid stenting with the PercuSurge GuardWire system: midterm results. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:1–13.
3.
Tübler T, Schlüter M, Dirsch O, Sievert H, Bösenberg I, Grube E, Waigand J, Schofer J: Balloon-protected carotid artery stenting: relationship of periprocedural neurological complications with the size of particulate debris. Circulation 2001;104:2791–2796.
4.
Zahn R, Ischinger T, Mark B, Gass S, Zeymer U, Schmalz W, Haerten K, Hauptmann KE, von Leitner ER, Kasper W, Tebbe U, Senges J; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK): Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices? J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1769–1774.
5.
Casserly IP, Abou-Chebl A, Fathi RB, Lee DS, Saw J, Exaire JE, Kapadia SR, Bajzer CT, Yadav JS: Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1466–1472.
6.
Reid DB, Diethrich EB, Marx P, Wrasper R: Intravascular ultrasound assessment in carotid interventions. J Endovasc Surg 1996;3:203–210.
7.
Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE, Vince DG: Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation 2002;106:2200–2206.
8.
Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Vince DG, Virmani R, Surmely JF, Murata A, Takeda Y, Ito T, Ehara M, Matsubara T, Terashima M, Suzuki T: Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment: a validation study of in vivo virtual histology compared with in vitro histopathology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2405–2412.
9.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators: Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Eng J Med 1991;325:445–453.
10.
Adav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, Whitlow P, Strickman NE, Jaff MR, Popma JJ, Snead DB, Cutlip DE, Firth BG, Ouriel K; Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators: Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493–1501.
11.
Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfield K, Siegel RJ, Tuzcu EM, Yock PG: American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS): a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478–1492.
12.
Hayashi K, Kitagawa N, Morikawa M: Observing the carotid debris aspirated during carotid stenting: technical note. Neurol Res 2005;27:22–26.
13.
Diethrich EB, Pauliina Margolis M, Reid DB, Burke A, Ramaiah V, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Wheatley G, Olsen D, Virmani R: Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of carotid artery disease: the Carotid Artery Plaque Virtual Histology Evaluation (CAPITAL) study. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:676–686.
14.
Moreno PR, Falk E, Palacios IF, Newell JB, Fuster V, Fallon JT: Macrophage infiltration in acute coronary syndromes: implications for plaque rupture. Circulation 1994;90:775–778.
15.
Davies MJ, Richardson PD, Woolf N, Katz DR, Mann J: Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content. Br Heart J 1993;69:377–381.
16.
Pasterkamp G, Schoneveld AH, Hijnen DJ, de Kleijn DP, Teepen H, van der Wal AC, Borst C: Atherosclerotic arterial remodeling and the localization of macrophages and matrix metalloproteases 1, 2 and 9 in the human coronary artery. Atherosclerosis 2000;150:245–253.
17.
Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, Crowe TD, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM: Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000;101:598–603.
18.
Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, Wijns W, Colombo A, Böse D, Erbel R, de Ribamar Costa J Jr, Kimura M, Sano K, Costa RA, Lui J, Stone GW, Moses JW, Leon MB: Association of plaque characterization by intravascular ultrasound virtual histology and arterial remodeling. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1476–1483.
19.
Bae JH, Kwon TG, Hyun DW, Rihal CS, Lerman A: Predictors of slow flow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: an intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology study. Heart 2008;94:1559–1564.
20.
Uetani T, Amano T, Ando H, Yokoi K, Arai K, Kato M, Marui N, Nanki M, Matsubara T, Ishii H, Izawa H, Murohara T: The correlation between lipid volume in the target lesion, measured by integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound, and post-procedural myocardial infarction in patients with elective stent implantation. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1714–1720.
21.
Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P, Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Setacci C: Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:135–141.
22.
Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M, Brückmann H: Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE Trial. Stroke 2009;40:841–846.
23.
Kwee RM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Hofstra L, Teule GJ, van Engelshoven JM, Mess WH, Kooi ME: Identifying vulnerable carotid plaques by noninvasive imaging. Neurology 2008;70:2401–2409.
24.
Chalela JA: Evaluating the carotid plaque: going beyond stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27(suppl 1):19–24.
25.
Rosenkranz M, Wittkugel O, Waiblinger C, Thomalla G, Krutzelmann A, Havemeister S, Zeumer H, Gerloff C, Fiehler J: Cerebral embolism during carotid artery stenting: role of carotid plaque echolucency. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:443–449.
26.
Biasi GM, Froio A, Diethrich EB, Deleo G, Galimberti S, Mingazzini P, Nicolaides AN, Griffin M, Raithel D, Reid DB, Valsecchi MG: Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation 2004;110:756–762.
27.
Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Vince DG, Margolis PM, Virmani R, Surmely JF, Ehara M, Kinoshita Y, Fujita H, Kimura M, Asakura K, Asakura Y, Matsubara T, Terashima M, Suzuki T: Impact of intramural thrombus in coronary arteries on the accuracy of tissue characterization by in vivo intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1079–1083.
28.
Hishikawa T, Iihara K, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Nagatsuka K, Yamada N, Miyamoto S: Virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound in assessment of carotid plaques: ex vivo study. Neurosurgery 2009;65:146–152.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.