Phonetica was published by Karger Publishers up to and including 2020. If you or your institution subscribed to Phonetica during that period, you might still have access to the full text of this article on the Karger platform if you cannot access it here.
Abstract
For more than a century it has been noted that the adult human vocal tract differs from that of other mammals, in that the resting position of the larynx is much lower in humans. While animals habitually breathe with the larynx inserted into the nasal cavity, adult humans are unable to do this. This anatomical difference has been cited as an important factor limiting the vocal potential of nonhuman animals, because the low larynx of humans allows a wider range of vocal tract shapes and thus formant patterns than is available to other species. However, it is not clear that the static anatomy of dead animals provides an accurate guide to the phonetic potential of the living animal’s vocal tract. Here I present X-ray video observations of four mammal species (dogs Canis familiaris, goats Capra hircus, pigs Sus scrofa and cotton-top tamarins Sagunius oedipus). In all four species, the larynx was lowered from the nasopharynx, and the velum was closed, during loud calls. In dogs this temporary lowering was particularly pronounced. Although preliminary, these results suggest that the nonhuman vocal tract is more flexible than previously supposed, and that static postmortem anatomy provides an incomplete guide to the phonetic potential of nonhuman animals. The implications of these findings for theories of speech evolution are discussed.
verified
References
1 Andrew, R.J.: Use of formants in the grunts of baboons and other nonhuman primates. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 280: 673–693 (1976).10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25530.xSearch in Google Scholar
2 Arvola, A.: Vocalization in the guinea-pig, C. porcellus L. Annls. zool. fenn. 11: 1–96 (1974).Search in Google Scholar
3 Bauer, H.R.: Frequency code: orofacial correlates of fundamental frequency. Phonetica 44: 173–191 (1987).10.1159/000261793Search in Google Scholar
4 Fitch, W.T.: Vocal tract length perception and the evolution of language; PhD thesis, Brown University (1994).Search in Google Scholar
5 Fitch, W.T.: Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 102: 1213–1222 (1997).10.1121/1.421048Search in Google Scholar
6 Fitch, W.T.: Acoustic exaggeration of size in birds by tracheal elongation: comparative and theoretical analyses. J. Zool., Lond., 248: 31–49 (1999).Search in Google Scholar
7 Fitch, W.T.; Giedd, J.: Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 106: 1511–1522 (1999).10.1121/1.427148Search in Google Scholar
8 Goldstein, U.G.: An articulatory model for the vocal tracts of growing children; DSc thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1980).Search in Google Scholar
9 Gould, S.J.; Vrba, E.S.: Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15 (1982).10.1017/S0094837300004310Search in Google Scholar
10 Hast, M.: The larynx of roaring and non-roaring cats. J. Anat. 163: 117–121 (1989).Search in Google Scholar
11 Hauser, M.D.; Evans, C.S.; Marler, P.: The role of articulation in the production of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) vocalizations. Anim. Behav. 45: 423–433 (1993).10.1006/anbe.1993.1054Search in Google Scholar
12 Hauser, M.D.; Schön-Ybarra, M.: The role of lip configuration in monkey vocalizations: experiments using xylocaine as a nerve block. Brain Lang. 46: 232–244 (1994).10.1006/brln.1994.1014Search in Google Scholar
13 Laitman, J.T.; Crelin, E.S.: Postnatal development of the basicranium and vocal tract region in man; in Bosma, Symp. on Dev. Basicranium (US Government Printing Office, Washington 1976).Search in Google Scholar
14 Lieberman, P.: Primate vocalization and human linguistic ability. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 44: 1574–1584 (1968).10.1121/1.1911299Search in Google Scholar
15 Lieberman, P: The biology and evolution of language (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1984).Search in Google Scholar
16 Lieberman, P.: Eve spoke: human language and human evolution (Norton, New York 1998).Search in Google Scholar
17 Lieberman, P.; Crelin, E.S.; Klatt, D.H.: Phonetic ability and related anatomy of the newborn and dult human, Neanderthal man, and the chimpanzee. Am. Anthrop. 74: 287–307 (1972).Search in Google Scholar
18 Lieberman, P.; Klatt, D.H.; Wilson, W.H.: Vocal tract limitations on the vowel repertoires of rhesus monkeys and other nonhuman primates. Science 164: 1185–1187 (1969).10.1126/science.164.3884.1185Search in Google Scholar
19 Negus, V.E.: The mechanism of the larynx (Mosby, St. Louis 1929).Search in Google Scholar
20 Negus, V.E.: The comparative anatomy and physiology of the larynx (Hafner, New York 1949).Search in Google Scholar
21 Ohala, J.J.: Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica 40: 1–18 (1983).10.1159/000261678Search in Google Scholar
22 Ohala, J.J.: An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of Fø of voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16 (1984).10.1159/000261706Search in Google Scholar
23 Owren, M.J.: Acoustic classification of alarm calls by vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) and humans. II. Synthetic calls. J. comp. Psychol. 104: 29–40 (1990).10.1037/0735-7036.104.1.29Search in Google Scholar
24 Owren, M.J.; Seyfarth, R.M.; Cheney, D.L.: The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): implications for production processes and functions. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 2951–2963 (1997).10.1121/1.418523Search in Google Scholar
25 Pocock, R.I.: On the hyoidean apparatus of the lion (F. leo) and related species of Felidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 8: 222–229 (1916).10.1080/00222931608693839Search in Google Scholar
26 Richman, B.: Some vocal distinctive features used by gelada monkeys. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 60: 718–724 (1976). Riede, T.; Fitch, W.T.: Vocal tract length and acoustics of vocalization in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). J. exp. Biol. 202: 2859–2867 (1999).Search in Google Scholar
27 Sasaki, C.T.; Levine, P.A.; Laitman, J.T.; Crelin, E.S.: Postnatal descent of the epiglottis in man. Archs. Otolar. 103: 169–171 (1977).10.1001/archotol.1977.00780200095011Search in Google Scholar
28 Sommers, M.S.; Moody, D.B.; Prosen, C.A.; Stebbins, W.C.: Formant frequency discrimination by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). J. acoust. Soc. Am. 91: 3499–3510 (1992).10.1121/1.402839Search in Google Scholar
29 White, S.S.: Movements of the larynx during crowing in the domestic cock. J. Anat. 103: 390–392 (1968).Search in Google Scholar
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
