Comparison of Traditional Chinese Exercises and Nontraditional Chinese Exercise Modalities on Cognitive and Executive Function in Community Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Ye, Mingzhu; Xiong, Jian; Zhao, Fang; Sun, Shanshan; Wang, Lecong; Zheng, Guohua

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4380805

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 4380805 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4380805

Comparison of Traditional Chinese Exercises and Nontraditional Chinese Exercise Modalities on Cognitive and Executive Function in Community Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Mingzhu Ye,¹Jian Xiong,¹Fang Zhao,²Shanshan Sun,²Lecong Wang,¹and Guohua Zheng^2,3

Academic Editor: Changmin Hu

Received14 Jun 2020

Revised21 Sept 2020

Accepted09 Nov 2020

Published23 Nov 2020

Abstract

Background. Current evidence indicates that regular exercise can have a positive impact on cognitive function in older adults, but whether different exercise modalities may induce differential protective effects in different cognitive domains is uncertain. Objective. To compare the effect of traditional Chinese exercise (TCE) modalities and non-traditional Chinese exercise (non-TCE) modalities on cognitive and executive function in community middle-aged and older adults through a cross-sectional study. Methods. A total of 350 community middle-aged and older adults aged over 55 years participated in this study. Information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle and behavioural habits, and regular exercise was collected by a self-designed questionnaire. Global cognitive ability and executive function were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale, the clock drawing test (CDT), the animal naming test (ANT), and the trail making test (TMT). Eligible subjects were categorized into the no regular exercise (no-RE), non-TCE, or TCE groups according to their self-reported exercise information. Comparisons of global cognitive and executive function among the three groups were conducted using ANOVA or the general linear model with adjustment for potential confounding factors. Results. The results showed that for the non-TCE or TCE groups, the MoCA and CDT scores were significantly higher, and the TMT-A test time was significantly shorter than those in the no-RE group (all ), but no significant difference was observed for the TMT-B and ANT tests. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, the MoCA, the CDT, and TMT-A scores in the TCE group were significant compared to those in the no-RE group. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that in the TCE group, the MoCA scores were significantly higher than those in the non-TCE group. Furthermore, in the TCE group, the CDT scores for those with an exercise duration of <5 years were higher and the TMT-A test time for those with an exercise duration of ≥5 years was shorter than those in the non-TCE group. Conclusions. Both TCE and non-TCE have potential protective effects on global cognitive and executive function in community middle-aged and older adults. Compared to the non-TCE modality, the TCE modality may have a more positive association with these protective effects. Furthermore, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

1. Introduction

Due to increased human life expectancy, the burden of age-associated disorders or diseases will also increase exponentially in the coming decades. Cognitive disorders, or dementia, are one of the major causes of disability in the ageing population. At present, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most dominant form of dementia, has become the fifth leading cause of death in the world and has become an important public health problem globally [1]. As an important component of cognitive function, executive function is a kind of advanced cognitive process that involves the ability to self-monitor, plan, organize, reason, be mentally flexible, and problem-solve and is usually categorized into several subdimensions, such as inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility [2, 3]. Executive function declines with age, especially after 70, when it drops sharply [4]. The study found that execution deficit can be used as an effective indicator to distinguish those with presymptomatic AD from those who remain nondemented and participate in the process of age-related cognitive decline [5–8]. Furthermore, the decrease of early executive function state is associated with subsequent cognitive decline and is a powerful predictor of death, frailty, and disability in older adults [9]. It has been reported that the accuracy of predicting the transition from mild cognitive impairment to dementia within 3 years is as high as 86% through executive function deficit combined with language memory decline [10]. And the risk of death, frailty, and disability among older adults increased by 7%, 13%, and 11%, respectively, when the cumulative index of executive dysfunction was increased by one unit [11]. Therefore, determining the appropriate methods to enhance executive function is of great significance in slowing cognitive decline and reducing the risk of frailty and disability among the elderly.

In recent years, exercise has been increasingly recognized as an important strategy to improve cognitive and executive function. Evidence from epidemiological studies and randomized control trials demonstrated that regularly engaging in physical exercise could reduce cognitive decline at various stages of life, from younger ages to middle age and late life [12]. It has been acknowledged that physical exercise may generate substantial benefits on cognitive or executive function, but its effect mainly depends on exercise type and dose parameters (i.e., exercise intensity, frequency, and duration) [13]. It has been suggested that physical exercise with enough dose parameters (i.e., moderate-intensity aerobic exercise with a frequency of not less than 3 sessions a week and at least 20 min per session for 3 months) can contribute to the optimization of brain plasticity by triggering neurogenesis and is therefore beneficial to cognitive function [14]. A meta-analysis showed that exercise of at least moderate-intensity lasting 45–60 min per session with a frequency of 3 sessions per week for at least 3 months can improve global cognition, attention, and executive function in healthy adults over 50. Exercise type refers to the modality of exercise training, and the most common modalities of exercise training are aerobic training, resistance training, and multicomponent training (incorporating both aerobic and resistance training). Previous studies have shown that aerobic exercise, resistance training, or multicomponent training with enough exercise volume would have a positive association with improvement in cognitive or executive performance for older individuals with/without cognitive impairment [15]. For example, Dustman RE et al. reported that after aerobic exercise intervention three times per week for four months, the executive function of older sedentary adults was significantly improved [16]. Liu-Ambrose T and Nagamatsu L S’ also showed that resistance exercise once or twice a week for 60 min and lasting for 12 months was associated with the executive function of elderly women [17]. However, Young J, Snowden M and other scholars conducted a systematic evaluation of previous studies and found that there was not enough evidence to prove that exercise could improve cognitive and executive function [18, 19]. As special aerobic exercises, traditional Chinese exercises emphasize the importance of the harmony and unity of the human essence, qi, and spirit by regulating spirit, breath, and mind while performing physical exercise. These are mind-body exercises aimed at creating effective positive interactions among the brain, mind, and body [20, 21]. Several systematic studies have suggested that traditional Chinese exercise (TCE) (i.e., Baduanjin and Tai Chi) has positive effects on the cognitive and executive function (i.e., inhibition control and cognitive flexibility) of older adults [22–24]. However, not all meta-analyses found this positive effect in older adults. Zhang Q and Hu J examined 5 studies of TCE interventions ranging from 12 to 24 weeks and found that TCE promoted improvement of visuospatial function, not global cognitive or executive function, in older adults [25]. Therefore, the exercise modality has been utilized in different studies with varying effects, but the improvement of cognitive and executive function with different exercise modalities remains uncertain [26]. The present study, therefore, aimed to investigate the influence of different exercise modalities on cognitive and executive function for middle-aged and older people in the community.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 350 subjects were recruited by a free clinic and via word of mouth from the communities in Yuchen County, Henan Province, China, from 10 July 2018 to 31 August 2018. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences. Community middle-aged and older adults aged over 55 years were included in this study, but those who met the following conditions, which were assessed based on medical records, were excluded: ① suffering from diseases or disorders that affect cognitive and executive functions (such as depression, schizophrenia, dementia, stroke, or epilepsy), ② MoCA scale score <15, and ③ suffering from motor dysfunction (i.e., movement vertigo and exercise anaemia). Forty-six subjects were excluded because they met the exclusion criteria. Ultimately, a total of 304 subjects were included in the final analysis.

2.2. Investigation of Demographic Characteristics and Lifestyle and Behavioural Habits

The demographic characteristics and lifestyle and behavioural habits of the participants were investigated using a self-designed questionnaire. The questionnaire included the following components: ① sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, height, weight, education, marital status, occupation, and educational status); ② lifestyle and behavioural habits (smoking, drinking, sleep status, taste preferences, social activities, and physical activity level); and ③ physical condition (whether suffering from diabetes or hypertension). The above data were obtained by participant self-report, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated based on height and weight.

2.3. Cognitive Assessment

Global cognitive function was assessed using the MoCA scale (Beijing version), which contains 8 items addressing visuospatial/executive function, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. If the subject’s length of education was ≤12 years, the total score on the test included an additional point. The highest score was 30 points, and higher scores indicated higher global cognitive function [27].

Executive function and its subdimensions (i.e., working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control) were assessed using the clock drawing test (CDT), the animal naming test (ANT), and the trail making test (TMT). The CDT was used to measure executive function. In the experiment adopting the CDT four-point method, subjects were asked to draw a closed circle; 12 Arabic numerals were marked on the circle; the numbers had the correct position and order, and the pointer was placed at the position of 11 : 10. One point was awarded for each correct action, with a maximum score of 4 points [28]. Inhibitory control and working memory were assessed using the ANT: the subjects were required to name as many animals as possible within 60 s, with 1 point awarded for each kind of animal and repeated animals earning no points [29]. TMT were used to assess cognitive flexibility. This test consists of two parts (i.e., TMT-A and TMT-B) [30]. The TMT-A requires the subjects to connect the numbers 1–25 in order from smallest to largest with a line as quickly as possible. The TMT-B requires the subjects to accurately switch between numbers and letters as quickly as possible. Ultimately, statisticians recorded the time in seconds required for the subjects to complete the TMT-A and TMT-B tests, and a longer time indicated greater impairment [31, 32].

The above tests were administered by strictly trained researchers using paper versions.

2.4. Categorization of Exercise Modality

The exercise modality was investigated by self-designed questionnaires, which included the following information: regular exercise or not, type of exercise, and duration and frequency of exercise. Here, we defined regular exercise as engagement in any type of exercise for at least three months with a frequency of at least three sessions per week and at least twenty minutes per section [14, 33]. Subjects were divided into three groups according to their reported exercise information: (1) TCE group: regularly performing one or more traditional Chinese exercises (such as Tai Chi, Baduanjin, Wuqinxi, or Yijinjing); (2) nontraditional Chinese exercise (non-TCE) group: regularly performing one or a variety of nontraditional Chinese exercises (e.g., walking, aerobic running, or square dancing); and (3) no regular exercise (no-RE) group: not regularly engaged in a certain type of exercise for at least three months, or exercise volume not meeting the criteria of regular exercise.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted by SPSS 24.0 software, and a 2-sided was considered to be statistically significant. The missing data were filled in using the multiple imputation method. The means and standard deviations (SDs) were used to present a summary of the continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages were used for the categorical variables. The demographic characteristics and lifestyle and behavioural habits among the three groups were analysed using one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Comparisons of cognitive and executive function among the three groups were performed using a one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test, and post hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons if group differences were examined. To address the adjusted effect, generalized linear models (GLMs) were constructed, with cognitive or executive function score as the dependent variable, exercise modality as the independent variable, and demographic factors or other bias factors as covariates. In addition, subgroup analysis for cognitive and executive function between the TCE and non-TCE groups was performed using a 2-sample t-test according to the exercise duration.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

Among 304 eligible subjects, 94 (30.92%) were categorized into the no-RE group, 119 (39.14%) into the non-TCE group, and 91 (29.94%) into the TCE group. The mean age of the participants was 66.7 (SD = 7.46) years, with ages ranging from 55 to 87 years. The comparison of basic characteristics among the three groups is shown in Table 1. Significant differences among groups were observed for gender, the education level, occupation, smoking, and the physical activity level .

3.2. Comparison of Cognitive and Executive Function among Groups

Comparisons of cognitive and executive function among the three groups are shown in Table 2. Significant differences in MoCA scores, CDT scores, and the TMT-A test among the three groups were found . In the two exercise groups, MoCA and CDT scores were significantly higher, and TMT-A test times were significantly shorter than in the no-RE group (all ), while the MoCA and CDT scores in the TCE group were significantly higher than those in the non-TCE group . There were no significant differences in ANT scores or TMT-B test times among the three groups.

A significant association was observed between the non-TCE group and MoCA and CDT, and between the TCE group and MoCA, CDT, and TMT-A by using multivariate general model analysis. We included a variety of potential confounders in the model. However, the results did not change substantially even after adjustment for these confounders except for the non-TCE group. In the crude model, we observed a significant association between the non-TCE group and MoCA scores and CDT scores, even after adjustment for gender and the education level, but after adjustments were made for all potential confounders, this association became nonsignificant. In the final model, compared to no-RE, regular TCE may improve MoCA scores by 2.28 (95% CI:1.28–3.28), improve CDT scores by 0.72 (95% CI: 0.32–1.12), and shorten TMT-A times by 17.91 s (95% CI: 5.43–30.38) (Table 3).

3.3. Comparison of Cognitive and Executive Function between the Non-TCE Group and TCE Group

We conducted a stratified analysis between the non-TCE and TCE groups according to their exercise duration (Table 4). The MoCA scores in the TCE group were significantly higher than those in the non-TCE group regardless of total years of exercise (i.e., less than 5 years or over 5 years). The CDT scores of the TCE group were higher than those of the non-TCE group when the exercise duration was less than 5 years, but no significant difference was found when the exercise duration was over 5 years. The TMT-A test time in the TCE group was shorter than that in the non-TCE group when the exercise duration was over 5 years. After stratified analysis, there were no significant differences in AND and TMT-B between the non-TCE and TCE groups.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to observe the effect of different exercise modalities on cognitive and executive function in community middle-aged and older people. The results of the present study showed that compared with no-RE, TCE can increase MoCA scores and CDT scores and reduce TMT-A test times for community middle-aged and older adults. Furthermore, compared with the non-TCE group, the TCE group had higher MoCA and CDT scores and shorter TMT-A test times. The findings suggest that TCE can improve global cognitive ability, executive function, and more subdimensions of executive function for middle-aged and older adults in the community. TCE was superior to non-TCE in improving global cognitive ability and some subdimensions of executive function.

It is well known that physical activity or exercise can have a positive impact on cognitive function and the possible mechanism associated with the processes of neurogenesis, vascularization, and increased blood flow in the brain, as well as changes in the secreted levels of some biomarkers in the neurochemical system [34]. However, different exercise modalities may impact different cognitive functions and distinct brain regions [35]. Aerobic exercise induces metabolic, respiratory, and cardiovascular changes in the body, while resistance training affects metabolic and energetic processes and, to some extent, intramuscular coordination [36]. Although mind-body exercise may induce less energy metabolism than aerobic or resistance training, it emphasizes coordination of the body and mind, including the breath, body movement, and mind, which require perceptual and higher-level cognitive processes, such as attention and executive ability. Thus, changes induced by TCE are likely to be related to changes in cognitive processing [22–24]. The current investigation classified community middle-aged and older adults engaging in regular exercise into either the TCE group or the non-TCE group according to the type of exercise they practised. In the non-TCE group, the exercise type practised was mainly aerobic exercise, such as walking, aerobic running, and square dancing. This study found that aerobic exercise could have a positive benefit on global cognitive ability and CDT test performance, compared with no-RE training, but this positive effect was not significant after adjustments were made for confounders, such as gender and education. These findings suggest that non-TCE may have a weak beneficial effect on the global cognitive ability and executive function of community middle-aged and older adults. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses supported that regular aerobic exercises could improve global cognitive function in older adults with cognitive impairment [37, 38]. However, this effect is controversial for older adults without cognitive impairment. A Cochrane systematic review from 12 randomized controlled trials did not find a beneficial effect of aerobic exercise on any cognitive function, including global cognitive ability, memory, and executive function, in cognitively healthy older adults [18]. However, a recent study in rodents showed that aerobic exercise could improve spatial working memory and hippocampal plasticity in ageing rats via the molecular mechanisms of increased glutamatergic signalling and reduced DNA damage [39]. Another review indicated that moderate-intensity aerobic exercise practised for at least 6 months may have a protective effect on the cognitive function of healthy older adults [40]. Therefore, an increasing number of studies are needed to confirm whether aerobic training improves cognition in healthy middle-aged and older adults. In this study, we found that the TCE could increase MoCA and CDT scores and lower TMT-A test times in community middle-aged and older adults even after adjustment for several confounding factors, including sex, education, occupation, smoking, and the physical activity level, but no significant improvements were found for the ANT and TMT-B. These findings may indicate that TCE could have a protective effect on global cognitive ability and a positive benefit on the executive function of community middle-aged and older adults. Our findings are in line with previous studies. At least four systematic reviews reported that TCEs such as Tai Chi and Baduanjin showed positive protective effects on global cognitive ability and executive function in healthy middle-aged or older adults [23–25, 41]. TCEs such as Tai Chi and Baduanjin are complex holistic mind-body exercises with the obvious characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine, which involves the cooperation of physical postures and movement, breathing, and relaxation [42]. Most TCEs consist of many complex postures and movements, such as Tai Chi exercise, which includes 24 forms, 48 forms, or 108 forms. Therefore, they demand more attention, execution, and memory throughout their practice, as well as high-level balance control and fast reaction time, which in turn could facilitate further cognitive processing such as memory and executive function. The relaxation effect of TCEs may also play a part in promoting cognitive and executive function [43]. In this study, our subanalysis showed that the MoCA scores in the TCE group were higher than those in the non-TCE group regardless of whether the exercise duration was less than 5 years or more than 5 years, and this finding suggests that TCE may be superior to non-TCE in improving the global cognitive ability of community middle-aged and older adults. This superiority in cognitive function may be related to the exercise characteristics of TCE. In addition, we also found that the CDT scores in the TCE group were higher than those in the non-TCE group when the exercise duration was less than 5 years, while the TMT-A test time was shorter than that in the non-TCE group when the exercise duration was more than 5 years. The CDT was originally developed to assess visuo-constructional ability, and it is reliable to explore executive functions because of the demands for visuospatial attention, motor skills, conceptualization, and planning [44]. The TMT test, including part A and part B, is a well-established test sensitive to impairment in multiple cognitive domains. This test requires coordination of motor speed and agility, and its performance of TMT-B is more indicative of executive function, especially cognitive flexibility of execution, than TMT-A [45]. The current study showed that the performances of both the TMT-A and TMT-B tests in the TCE group were better than those in the non-TCE group, but only the difference between groups on the TMT-A test at exercise durations over 5 years was significant. These findings indicate that TCE may have a better effect on the executive function of community middle-aged and older adults than non-TCE.

Several limitations should be considered in the interpretation of our findings. First, this is a cross-sectional study, and most of the data obtained were based on self-report responses; thus, no causal relationships can be unambiguously established. Second, the cross-sectional study with an observational design does not allow us to control the exercise volume for participants, which is a key factor in evaluating the effect of different exercise modes on cognitive ability. The type, frequency, and duration of exercise in this study mainly depend on the self-report of participants; therefore, recall bias from participants is inevitable. Finally, although we adjusted for the influence of many potential confounders, we also did not exclude the confounding possibility of the uninvestigated factors. These methodological limitations warrant caution in interpreting results and exemplify the need for prospective studies in this research area.

5. Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that regular non-TCE or TCE is potentially beneficial to protect global cognitive or executive function decline among community middle-aged and older adults, while TCE is more positively associated with this protective effect of global cognitive ability and executive function than non-TCE. However, prospective studies are needed to further confirm these findings.

Abbreviations

TCE:	Traditional Chinese exercise
Non-TCE:	Nontraditional Chinese exercise
No-RE:	No regular exercise
MoCA:	Montreal cognitive assessment
CDT:	Clock drawing test
ANT:	Animal naming test
TMT:	Trial making test
AD:	Alzheimer’s disease
SD:	Standard deviations
GLMs:	Generalized linear models
BMI:	Body mass index.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the first author upon request.

Ethical Approval

Approval for this study was provided by Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences.

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

ZGH and XJ conceived and designed the study. XJ, ZF, SSS, YMZ, and WLC conducted and supervised data collection and participated in the discussion. YMZ and ZGH contributed in data analysis and made the manuscript preparation. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Mingzhu Ye and Jian Xiong contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.

References

GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators, “Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 88–106, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Diamond, “Executive functions,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 135–168, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Banich, “Executive function,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 89–94, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. N. Harada, M. C. Natelson Love, and K. L. Triebel, “Normal cognitive aging,” Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 737–752, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chen, G. Ratcliff, S. H. Belle, J. A. Cauley, S. T. DeKosky, and M. Ganguli, “Cognitive tests that best discriminate between presymptomatic AD and those who remain nondemented,” Neurology, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1847–1853, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bäckman, S. Jones, A. K. Berger, E. J. Laukka, and B. J. Small, “Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis,” Neuropsychology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 520–531, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Troyer, R. E. Graves, and C. M. Cullum, “Executive functioning as a mediator of the relationship between age and episodic memory in healthy aging,” Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Crawford, J. Bryan, M. A. Luszcz, M. C. Obonsawin, and L. Stewart, “The executive decline hypothesis of cognitive aging: do executive deficits qualify as differential deficits and do they mediate age-related memory decline?” Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–31, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Clark, D. M. Schiehser, G. H. Weissberger, D. P. Salmon, D. C. Delis, and M. W. Bondi, “Specific measures of executive function predict cognitive decline in older adults,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 118–127, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Tabert, J. J. Manly, X. Liu et al., “Neuropsychological prediction of conversion to Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 916–924, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Rosado-Artalejo, J. A. Carnicero, J. Losa-Reyna et al., “Global performance of executive function is predictor of risk of frailty and disability in older adults,” The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 980–987, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Greene, H. Lee, and S. Thuret, “In the long run: physical activity in early life and cognitive aging,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 884, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lippi, C. Mattiuzzi, and F. Sanchis-Gomar, “Updated overview on interplay between physical exercise, neurotrophins, and cognitive function in humans,” Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–81, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. El-Sayes, D. Harasym, C. V. Turco, M. B. Locke, and A. J. Nelson, “Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: a mechanistic model and prospects for promoting plasticity,” The Neuroscientist, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–85, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Northey, N. Cherbuin, K. L. Pumpa, D. J. Smee, and B. Rattray, “Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 154–160, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Dustman, R. O. Ruhling, E. M. Russell et al., “Aerobic exercise training and improved neuropsychological function of older individuals,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Liu-Ambrose, L. S. Nagamatsu, P. Graf, B. L. Beattie, M. C. Ashe, and T. C. Handy, “Resistance training and executive functions,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 170–178, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Young, M. Angevaren, J. Rusted, and N. Tabet, “Aerobic exercise to improve cognitive function in older people without known cognitive impairment,” Cochrane Database Systematic Review, vol. 22, no. 4, Article ID CD005381, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Snowden, L. Steinman, K. Mochan et al., “Effect of exercise on cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults: review of intervention trials and recommendations for public health practice and research,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 704–716, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Jiang and J. Zou, “Analysis of the TCM theory of traditional Chinese health exercise,” Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 14–18, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Y. Kwok, K. C. Choi, and H. Y. L. Chan, “Effects of mind-body exercises on the physiological and psychosocial well-being of individuals with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine, vol. 29, pp. 121–131, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zou, Z. Pan, A. Yeung et al., “A review study on the beneficial effects of Baduanjin,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 324–335, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zheng, F. Liu, S. Li, M. Huang, J. Tao, and L. Chen, “Tai Chi and the protection of cognitive ability,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Miller and R. E. Taylor-Piliae, “Effects of Tai Chi on cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults: a review,” Geriatric Nursing, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, J. Hu, L. Wei et al., “Effects of traditional Chinese exercise on cognitive and psychological outcomes in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 98, no. 7, Article ID e14581, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Nagamatsu, L. Flicker, A. F. Kramer et al., “Exercise is medicine, for the body and the brain,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 943-944, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang and L. Wang, “Application of montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA) in screening patients with mild cognitive impairment,” Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 414–416, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
B. J. Mainland, S. Amodeo, and K. I. Shulman, “Multiple clock drawing scoring systems: simpler is better,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Campagna, S. Montagnese, L. Ridola et al., “The animal naming test: An easy tool for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy,” Hepatology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 198–208, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
T. N. Tombaugh, “Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education,” Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 203–214, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Reitan, “The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 393-394, 1955.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Marshall, D. M. Rentz, M. T. Frey, J. J. Locascio, K. A. Johnson, and R. A. Sperling, “Executive function and instrumental activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” Alzheimers Dement, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 300–308, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Garber, B. Blissmer, M. R. Deschenes et al., “Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1334–1359, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Tsai and W. L. Wang, “Exercise-mode-related changes in task-switching performance in the elderly,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 56, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Voelcker-Rehage and C. Niemann, “Structural and functional brain changes related to different types of physical activity across the life span,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 2268–2295, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. K. Chang, C. Y. Pan, F. T. Chen, C. L. Tsai, and C. C. Huang, “Effect of resistance-exercise training on cognitive function in healthy older adults: a review,” Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 497–517, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zheng, R. Xia, W. Zhou, J. Tao, and L. Chen, “Aerobic exercise ameliorates cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 50, no. 23, pp. 1443–1450, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhu, Q. Zhong, J. Ji et al., “Effects of aerobic dance on cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 679–690, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Vilela, A. P. Muller, A. P. Damiani et al., “Strength and aerobic exercises improve spatial memory in aging rats through stimulating distinct neuroplasticity mechanisms,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 7928–7937, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. I. Erickson and A. F. Kramer, “Aerobic exercise effects on cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 22–24, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, C. Li, L. Zou, X. Liu, and W. Song, “The effects of mind-body exercise on cognitive performance in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. K. Cheng, “Effects of Baduanjin on mental health: a comprehensive review,” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 19, pp. 138–149, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Wayne and T. J. Kaptchuk, “Challenges inherent to T’ai Chi research: part I-T’ai Chi as a complex multicomponent intervention,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Wang, L. Shi, Q. Zhao, Z. Hong, and Q. Guo, “Longitudinal changes in clock drawing test (CDT) performance before and after cognitive decline,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e97873, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Kortte, M. D. Horner, and W. K. Windham, “The trail making test, part B: cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set?” Applied Neuropsychology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 106–109, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Mingzhu Ye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

378

Downloads

699

Citations