The Tonoplast Intrinsic Protein Gene <i>KvTIP3</i> is Responsive to Different Abiotic Stresses in <i>Kosteletzkya virginica</i>

Liu, Xiaohua; Cheng, Jieshan; Jiang, Fudong; Liang, Meixia; Han, Junjie; Zhang, Juan; Zhang, Hongxia; Tang, Xiaoli

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2895795

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 2895795 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2895795

The Tonoplast Intrinsic Protein Gene KvTIP3 is Responsive to Different Abiotic Stresses in Kosteletzkya virginica

Xiaohua Liu,^1,2Jieshan Cheng,^1,2Fudong Jiang,³Meixia Liang,^1,2Junjie Han,³Juan Zhang,^1,2Hongxia Zhang,^1,2,4and Xiaoli Tang^1,2

Academic Editor: Maxim Golovkin

Received28 Jul 2019

Revised18 Nov 2019

Accepted04 Dec 2019

Published08 Jan 2020

Abstract

In higher plants, aquaporin proteins (AQPs) play important roles in the uptake of water across cell membranes. However, their functions in halophytes are still largely unknown. In this work, we isolated, cloned, and identified KvTIP3, a tonoplast intrinsic protein gene from Kosteletzkya virginica. Bioinformatic analyses demonstrated that KvTIP3 encoded a tonoplast protein with the common properties of AQPs. Further multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses showed that KvTIP3 shared 65%–82% homology with other AQPs from Arabidopsis, cotton, polar, and cocoa. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses revealed that KvTIP3 was ubiquitously expressed in various tissues such as leaves, stems, and roots, with a predominant expression in roots. In addition, KvTIP3 transcript was strongly induced by NaCl, low temperature, and ABA in K. virginica. Our findings suggest that KvTIP3 encodes a new AQP possibly involved in multiple abiotic stress responses in K. virginica, and KvTIP3 could be used as a potential candidate gene for the improvement of plants resistant to various abiotic stresses.

1. Introduction

Water is one of the essential requirements for all the organisms living on Earth [1, 2]. As a principal member of the biological kingdom, plants have evolved a series of mechanisms to absorb, transport, and utilize water. Unlike animals, plants cannot escape away from the adverse environment, such as drought and salt stress. Therefore, they must ensure the balance of water at both cellular and whole plant levels. AQPs are a family of channel proteins existing in all living organisms and play crucial roles in regulating the movement of water across the cell membrane [3]. For example, 13 AQPs were identified in human genome [4]. 35 and 36 AQPs were identified in Arabidopsis and maize, respectively [5, 6]. In addition, the number of AQPs isolated was 28 in Vitis vinifera L. [7], 28 in Beta vulgaris [8], 55 in Populus trichocarpa [9], 41 in Solanum lycopersicum [10], 63 in bamboo [11], 66 in Glycine max [12], and 71 in cotton [13].

AQPs are integral membrane proteins working in the form of tetramers and each monomer acts as an independent water channel [14]. According to the phylogenetic positions and subcellular localizations, plant AQPs are subdivided into four groups: plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs), tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs), nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs), and small basic intrinsic proteins (SIPs) [15]. PIPs and TIPs are the most abundant proteins located in the plasma membrane and tonoplast, respectively [15]. Recently, three more groups, uncharacterized intrinsic proteins (XIPs), GlpF-like intrinsic proteins (GIPs), and hybrid intrinsic proteins (HIPs), were also proposed [16, 17]. Therefore, AQPs consist of seven subfamilies. TIPs are AQPs predominantly located at the tonoplast [15]. Structurally, TIPs possess the conserved domains and motifs of AQPs, the six transmembrane helices with N-terminus and C-terminus located in the cytosol, and two NPA (asparagine-proline-alanine) motifs [7, 12]. The transmembrane helices constitute the channel for water and other substrate molecules. The conserved NPA motifs determine the substrate specificity [18]. In addition to transporting water across the membrane, TIPs can also facilitate the transport of other small molecules such as CO₂, glycerol, NH₃, arsenite, and silicon [19, 20]. Therefore, TIPs not only play a key role in water uptake but also function in many other aspects during the growth and development of plant.

Recently, an increasing number of researches revealed that TIPs played important functions in plant response to abiotic stresses. In Arabidopsis, TIP3;1, TIP3;2, and TIP4;1 were found to be involved in seed dormancy and germination in response to water stress [21]. In the halophyte Thellungiella salsuginea (salt cress), TsTIP1;2 was involved in multiple stresses responses [22]. Recently, AQPs were reported to be involved in abiotic stress response in the halophyte Eutrema salsugineum [23]. In Mesembryanthemum crystallinum, osmotic stress can induce the relocation of McTIP1;2 from the tonoplast to other membranes [24]. Consistently, expression of CsTIP2;1 from citrus in tobacco improved the growth and antioxidant capacity of transgenic plants under stress conditions [25]. Similarly, expression of tomato SlTIP2;2 and jojoba ScPIP1 enhanced the tolerance of transgenic plants to various abiotic stresses [26]. However, the functions of TIPs are multifaceted. The same environmental stimulus can lead to both upregulated and downregulated expression of different TIPs. Similarly, overexpression of TIPs does not always cause a positive effect on transgenic plants. For example, expression of GsTIP2;1, which was responsive to abiotic stresses, depressed salt and dehydration resistance in Arabidopsis [27]. Therefore, AQPs could function in various environmental stress responses.

K. virginica, a typical halophyte, is a new species with fine salt-tolerant characteristics at both physiological and molecular levels [28]. As an extremophile plant, K. virginica is very tolerant to adverse environmental stresses. It could grow and reproduce successfully in soil containing 0.3 to 2.5% sodium [29]. Previously, we examined the global gene expression profiles of K. virginica in response to salt stress [28]. Many gene expressions and pathways showed discrepancy. In this work, we isolated and identified a tonoplast aquaporin encoding gene KvTIP3 from K. virginica, which showed the most significant gene expression variation as exhibited by transcriptomic analyses. Our results demonstrate that KvTIP3 is a typical TIP encoding gene with a responsive expression to different abiotic stresses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

K. virginica seeds were collected from the Yellow River Delta, Shandong Province, China. Seeds were surface sterilized and seedlings were cultivated as described before [30]. Two-week-old seedlings with the same morphology were collected and used for the following experiments as described previously [31, 32].

2.2. Abiotic Stress Treatments

Two-week-old seedlings were subjected to high temperature, low temperature, high salinity, osmotic stress, and ABA treatments as described previously [30, 33].

2.3. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted and analyzed as described previously [30]. The RNA samples were used to synthesize cDNA with TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Transgen, China). Primers used for cDNA synthesis were random primer and anchored oligo (dT)₁₈. Reaction was carried out by incubating the reaction mixture at 42°C for 30 min, and then at 85°C for 5 min. Finally, cDNA was examined with Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer to confirm its quality and quantity.

2.4. Cloning and Bioinformatic Analyses of KvTIP3

The full length of KvTIP3 gene was amplified by RACE technique according to the user’s manual (SMART^™ RACE cDNA Amplification Kit). Gene-specific primers (GSP-F: 5′-TAGTAAACCG CACGGACCACAGA-3′ and GSP-R: 5′-CCAACATCTTAGTAGGCGGACCATT -3′) and nested primers (NGSP-F: 5′-TTCCTCCAAGCAAGGCACCGAAG-3′ and NGSP-R: 5′-GCCTTGGTAGGTTGGAGGTGGGA-3′) were designed according to the sequence of cDNA fragments in our previous transcriptomic sequencing data, which was deposited in Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly (TSA) Sequence Database with the accession number-GCJL00000000 [29]. The obtained gene fragment was ligated into the pEASY-T5 Zero Cloning Vector (Transgen, China) after purification and sequencing.

2.5. Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR (qPCR) Analyses

qPCR was carried out with the instrument ABI PrismSYMBOL 0 \f “Times New Roman” \s 127500 FAST (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The reaction system was performed using the SYBR Green Real-Time Selected Master Mix (Applied Biosystems by Life technologies), and the reaction condition was performed following the user’s manual. cDNA was diluted to the required concentration (<50 ng/μL), and gene-specific primers were designed with the Beacon Designer (BD) 7.0 software based on the RACE results. Gene-specific primers used for qPCR are 5′-ATGCCAACTCGTAGATAC-3′ and 5′-CTAGTAATCTTCAGGAG C-3′. The reaction volume was 20 μL with a composition of 2 μL diluted cDNA template, 10 μL 2 × SYBR Master Mix, 1.5 μL primers, and 6.5 μL double distilled water. A reference gene, 18SrRNA, which was the most stably expressed gene among the four selected reference genes (18SrRNA, ACT, TUA, and EF) under salt stress condition, was used as an internal control [34]. qPCR amplification was performed as following: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C for denaturation, and 1 min at 60°C for annealing and extension. Fluorescence signal was conducted at the temperature between 60°C and 90°C. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiment, was strictly followed throughout our experiment [35]. In addition, to guarantee the accuracy of the experiment, the primer specificity of qPCR was insured by the typical melting curve, amplification plot, and the single product of RT-PCR. cDNA was diluted to suitable concentrations to guarantee the Cq values in the optimum range. For all the experiments, each sample was performed in triplicates and three biological replicates were performed.

2.6. Data Analysis

All the data were mean values ± SD of three experiments. For qPCR analysis, the ΔΔCq method was used. ANOVA was applied to analyze the significant differences, and the value was kept below 0.05. Sigma Plot 12.0 was used for plotting.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Sequence Analysis of KvTIP3

To understand the possible function of AQPs in abiotic stress tolerance in halophyte, a K. virginica homolog of tonoplast intrinsic protein gene, KvTIP3, was isolated (GenBank accession no. KT732779). The 1084-bp KvTIP3 consists of a 154-bp 5′ untranslated region (UTR), a 768-bp encoding region, and a 161-bp 3′ UTR, encoding a 256 amino acid protein (KvTIP3) with a calculated molecular mass of 27 kD and isoelectric point of 6.58, as predicted by ProtParam (http://www.expasy.org/tools/).

3.2. Bioinformatic Analysis of KvTIP3

We further performed bioinformatic analyses. PsortII (http://www.psort.org/) prediction revealed that KvTIP3 protein was located in the secreted pathway with a probability of 94.4%. Further topological prediction with TMHHM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/) and TMPred (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html) demonstrated that KvTIP3 contained six transmembrane helices with its N-terminus and C-terminus located in the cytoplasm (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). It is well known that the activities of AQPs are regulated by their phosphorylation status. For example, the Snf1-related protein kinase 2.6 (SnRK2.6) was able to phosphorylate a cytosolic PIP2;1 peptide at Ser-121 to regulate the response of guard cells to ABA signaling [36]. Similarly, Cys116 and Cys118 have been proved to be the phosphorylation sites in TIP proteins [37]. We also examined the possible phosphorylation sites in KvTIP3 with NetPhos 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/) and found that KvTIP3 also contained 7 potential phosphorylation sites, including 4 Ser, 2 Thr, and 1 Tyr (Figure 1(c)). Moreover, we constructed a phylogenetic tree including the typical TIPs in Arabidopsis and other closely related organisms. We observed that KvTIP3 was clustered to the Arabidopsis AtTIP3 subgroup and was 82% homologous to TIP3-2 in Gossypium hirsutum, one of the most closely related organisms to K. virginica (Figure 2(d)). In addition, KvTIP3 shared 65%–78% amino acid sequence homology with tonoplast aquaporins from other higher plants (Figure 2). KvTIP3, like TIPs from other higher plant, contained two NPA motifs and formed the cavity of AQPs to act as a selective barrier for the transport of water or small molecules [38].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. KvTIP3 Was Induced by Salt Stress in K. virginica Seedlings

As a first step to know the expression profile of KvTIP3 in K. virginica, we examined its relative expression levels in different tissues of two-week-old seedlings under normal growth condition by qPCR (Figure 3(a)). KvTIP3 was ubiquitously expressed in various tissues including leaves, stems, and roots, with a predominant expression in the roots (Figure 3(b)). Based on the information extracted from the transcriptomic sequencing database (accession number-GCJL00000000) that KvTIP3 cDNA fragments were significantly accumulated upon salt stress treatment, we performed qPCR to investigate the transcript levels of KvTIP3 in K. virginica under both normal and salt stress conditions. Two-week-old seedlings were treated with 0, 200, 300, or 400 mM NaCl for 24 h. Although no significant phenotype change was observed after different treatments, salt stress significantly induced the expression of KvTIP3 in a concentration-dependent manner, with the most significant induction with 300 mM NaCl (Figure 3(c)). When treated with 300 mM NaCl for different time periods, the transcript level of KvTIP3 increased after 6 h and reached a maximum level at 12 h followed by a gradual decrease at 24 h (Figure 3(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3

Expression analyses of KvTIP3. (a) Phenotype of a two-week-old K. virginica seedling used for salt stress or ABA treatment. (b) Expression analysis of KvTIP3 in the leaves, stems, and roots of two-week-old K. virginica seedlings grown under normal growth condition. The expression level in leaves was set as the standard value 1. (c) Expression profiles of KvTIP3 under different salt stress conditions. Two-week-old K. virginica seedlings were treated with 0, 200, 300, and 400 mM NaCl for 24 hours. (d) Expression profiles of KvTIP3 under salt stress condition. Two-week-old K. virginica seedlings were treated with 300 mM NaCl for 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours. The mean values of three biological replicates were used for data analysis. The results of qPCR were normalized with the internal control gene, 18SrRNA. Error bar indicates SD (n = 3).

3.4. Effects of Various Abiotic Stresses on the Expression of KvTIP3

For the past few years, an increasing number of reports have revealed the important roles of AQPs in abiotic stress responses [39–41]. Thus, we tested the expression of KvTIP3 under a few abiotic stresses and ABA treatments (Figures 4(a)–4(d)). Similar to the salt stress treatment, both low temperature and ABA treatments upregulated the expression of KvTIP3. The expression of KvTIP3 increased after the seedlings were kept at 4°C for 24 hours (Figure 4(a)), whereas the expression of KvTIP3 increased within 6 hours after the seedlings were treated with 100 μM ABA (Figure 4(b)). Different from these observations, the expression of KvTIP3 was downregulated when the seedlings were kept at 42°C or treated with 15% PEG (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). All these results suggest that KvTIP3 is an abiotic stress and ABA inducible or responsive gene.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

4. Discussion

Previous studies have demonstrated that AQPs play important roles in plant growth, development, and in plant resistance to adverse environmental stresses. In Tulip (Tulipa gesneriana), both TgTIP1;1 and TgTIP1;2 were involved in petal development by regulating the absorption and transport of water [42]. Under osmotic or salt stress condition, AQPs in cucumber seedlings were able to regulate root and leaf hydraulic properties to respond to the environmental stimulus [41]. In this work, we isolated a novel AQP encoding gene KvTIP3 from K. virginica. Acting as multifunctional membrane channels, AQPs have very highly conserved structure [7, 18]. Sequence analyses of KvTIP3 revealed that it was one of the homologs of AQPs. The molecular weights of the reported AQPs ranged from 23 to 31 kDa (243–302 amino acid residues). We found that KvTIP3 gene encoded a 27 kDa AQP that consisted of 256 amino acid residues.

Similar to the AQPs from other plant species, KvTIP3 also contained six membrane-spanning α-helices, as predicted with both TMHHM and TMPred software programs (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The water channel activities of AQPs were activated and deactivated via the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of their phosphorylation sites [43]. The Snf1-related protein kinase 2.6 (SnRK2.6) was reported to be able to phosphorylate AQPs [36]. The C-termini of several PIPs were also discovered to be phosphorylated by a sugar-induced receptor kinase [44]. We found that KvTIP3 contained 7 potential phosphorylation sites, implying that it may also play its functions via phosphorylation mechanism (Figure 1(c)). Further analyses indicated that KvTIP3 was homologous to and shared amino acid sequence homology with other plant AQPs (Figure 1(d)). It is well known that the conserved NPA motif in AQPs functions as a selective filter for the substrate specificity [44]. Sequence analysis showed that KvTIP3 contained two NPA motifs, indicating that the KvTIP3 was a typical AQP (Figure 2).

The expression pattern of AQPs may affect their biological functions in the growth, development, and response to environmental stress of plants. We observed that the expression level of KvTIP3 in roots was over 270-folds higher than in leaves and stems (Figure 3(b)). Similar expression pattern of AQPs was also observed in Arabidopsis [45], rice [46], grape [47], and barley [48]. In addition, the KvLEA gene which we reported previously also showed a similar expression pattern, indicating that these genes play important roles in roots of plants to improve salt resistance [30]. Staying the same with our transcriptome analysis, KvTIP3 could be induced obviously by NaCl treatment [28]. However, different from KvLEA gene [30], 300 mM NaCl led to the most drastic accumulation to KvTIP3 rather than 400 mM (Figure 3(c)). As for the different time of duration treatments, KvTIP3 gave the same expression profiles with KvLEA, proving that both KvTIP3 and KvLEA were salt stress responsive genes of K. virginica (Figure 3(d)).

We also examined the expression levels of KvTIP3 in response to different abiotic stresses and ABA treatment. KvTIP3 was upregulated by low temperature and ABA but downregulated by high temperature and osmotic stress (Figures 4(a)–4(d)). This is consistent with previous studies that the responses of AQPs under adverse environment were diverse [49]. The responses of KvTIP3 under high temperature and osmotic stress were not obvious (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). Therefore, we speculated that KvTIP3 may not be involved in high temperature response. However, TIPs were reported to take part in the response to osmotic stress [12]. In this research, the result showed that there should be other KvTIPs that participate in osmotic stress response in K. virginica rather than KvTIP3. Besides, ABA treatment gave rise to the most drastic accumulation to KvTIP3 among these treatments (Figure 4(b)). For instance, the expression of KvTIP3 reached as much as 180-fold after 6h ABA treatment. And the expression of KvTIP3 increased rapidly as soon as after 2 h ABA treatment; hence, we speculated that KvTIP3 may be involved in ABA-mediated stress responses in K. virginica. Actually, the intersections between ABA and AQPs have already been reported in other species. In Arabidopsis, AQPs functioned in ABA-triggered stomatal closure [36], and the vacuolar aquaporins were able to maintain seed longevity under the control of ABA [50]. In addition, ABA also could influence the phosphorylation of PIPs to regulate their activities [51]. Therefore, the exact mechanisms between KvTIP3 and ABA deserve further investigation in the following research.

5. Conclusions

In this report, we characterized a novel tonoplast intrinsic protein gene KvTIP3 from K. virginica. Bioinformatic analyses revealed that KvTIP3 is a typical AQP with conserved transmembrane helices and NPA motifs. Gene expression profiles displayed that it was predominately expressed in roots and was responsive to various abiotic stresses. Our study on KvTIP3 will enrich the gene resources and lay foundation for further study on AQPs. KvTIP3 could be used as a potential candidate gene for the improvement of plants resistant to various abiotic stresses in the future.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaohua Liu and Jieshan Cheng contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Jessie Zhang (Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Canada) for her critical reading and editing of this paper. This work has been jointly supported by the following grants: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901987); the Key R&D Project of Shandong Province (2017NC210012 and 2018GNC110007); the National Mega Project of GMO Crops of China (2016ZX08004-002-006); the Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System Innovation Team of Shandong Province of China (SDAIT-02-05); and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870576).

References

F. Chaumont and S. D. Tyerman, “Aquaporins: highly regulated channels controlling plant water relations,” Plant Physiology, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 1600–1618, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kaldenhoff and M. Fischer, “Aquaporins in plants,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 187, no. 1-2, pp. 169–176, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shekoofa and T. R. Sinclair, “Aquaporin activity to improve crop drought tolerance,” Cells, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID 7090123, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
A. R. Fox, L. C. Maistriaux, and F. Chaumont, “Toward understanding of the high number of plant aquaporin isoforms and multiple regulation mechanisms,” Plant Science, vol. 264, pp. 179–187, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Chaumont, F. Barrieu, E. Wojcik, M. J. Chrispeels, and R. Jung, “Aquaporins constitute a large and highly divergent protein family in maize,” Plant Physiology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 1206–1215, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Johanson, M. Karlsson, I. Johansson et al., “The complete set of genes encoding major intrinsic proteins in Arabidopsis provides a framework for a new nomenclature for major intrinsic proteins in plants,” Plant Physiology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 1358–1369, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Fouquet, C. Léon, N. Ollat, and F. Barrieu, “Identification of grapevine aquaporins and expression analysis in developing berries,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1541–1550, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Kong, S. Yang, Y. Wang, M. Bendahmane, and X. Fu, “Genome-wide identification and characterization of aquaporin gene family in Beta vulgaris,” PeerJ, vol. 5, Article ID e3747, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gupta and R. Sankararamakrishnan, “Genome-wide analysis of major intrinsic proteins in the tree plant Populus trichocarpa: characterization of XIP subfamily of aquaporins from evolutionary perspective,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 134–150, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Reuscher, M. Akiyama, C. Mori, K. Aoki, D. Shibata, and K. Shiratake, “Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of aquaporins in tomato,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79052, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Sun, S. N. Wang, Y. F. Lou et al., “Whole-genome and expression analysis of bamboo aquaporin genes reveal their functions involved in maintaining diurnal water balance in bamboo shoots,” Cells, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID 7110195, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Y. Zhang, M. Kumar, L. Xu et al., “Genome-wide identification of Major Intrinsic Proteins in Glycine soja and characterization of GmTIP2;1 function under salt and water stress,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 4106, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Park, B. E. Scheffler, P. J. Bauer, and B. T. Campbell, “Identification of the family of aquaporin genes and their expression in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.),” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 142–150, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Berny, D. Gilis, M. Rooman, and F. Chaumont, “Single mutations in the transmembrane domains of maize plasma membrane aquaporins affect the activity of monomers within a heterotetramer,” Molecular Plant, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 986–1003, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Maurel, Y. Boursiac, D. T. Luu, V. Santoni, Z. Shahzad, and L. Verdoucq, “Aquaporins in plants,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1321–1358, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
G. P. Bienert, M. D. Bienert, T. P. Jahn, M. Boutry, and F. Chaumont, “Solanaceae XIPs are plasma membrane aquaporins that facilitate the transport of many uncharged substrates,” The Plant Journal, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 306–317, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lopez, M. B. Amira, D. Brown et al., “The Hevea brasiliensis XIP aquaporin subfamily: genomic, structural and functional characterizations with relevance to intensive latex harvesting,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 91, no. 4-5, pp. 375–396, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kapilan, M. Vaziri, and J. J. Zwiazek, “Regulation of aquaporins in plants under stress,” Biological Research, vol. 1, no. 4, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. He, H. Yan, Y. Chen et al., “An aquaporin PvTIP4;1 from Pteris vittata may mediate arsenite uptake,” New Phytologist, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 746–761, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Q. Zhao, N. Mitani, N. Yamaji, R. F. Shen, and J. F. Ma, “Involvement of silicon influx transporter OsNIP2;1 in selenite uptake in rice,” Plant Physiology, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 1871–1877, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Footitt, R. Clewes, M. Feeney, W. E. Finch-Savage, and L. Frigerio, “Aquaporins influence seed dormancy and germiantion in response to stress,” Plant Cell and Environment, vol. 2019, pp. 1–15, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
L.-L. Wang, A.-P. Chen, N.-Q. Zhong et al., “The Thellungiella salsuginea tonoplast aquaporin TsTIP1;2 functions in protection against multiple abiotic stresses,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 148–161, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Qian, X. Yang, J. Li, R. Luo, X. Yan, and Q. Pang, “Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of aquaporins in salt cress (Eutrema salsugineum),” PeerJ, vol. 7, Article ID 7664, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Vera-Estrella, B. J. Barkla, H. J. Bohnert, and O. Pantoja, “Novel regulation of aquaporins during osmotic stress,” Plant Physiology, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 2318–2329, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. S. Martins, D. M. Neves, L. C. Cidade et al., “Expression of the citrus CsTIP2;1 gene improves tobacco plant growth, antioxidant capacity and physiological adaptation under stress conditions,” Planta, vol. 245, no. 5, pp. 951–963, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, F. Gao, J. Bing et al., “Overexpression of the jojoba aquaporin gene, ScPIP1, enhances drought and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 153, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, Y. Li, W. Ji et al., “A novel Glycine soja tonoplast intrinsic protein gene responds to abiotic stress and depresses salt and dehydration tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana,” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 168, no. 11, pp. 1241–1248, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. L. Tang, H. Y. Wang, C. Y. Shao, and H. B. Shao, “Global gene expression of Kosteletzkya virginica seedlings responding to salt stress,” Plos One, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0124421, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Wang, X. L. Tang, H. L. Wang, and H. B. Shao, “Physiological responses of Kosteletzkya virginica to coastal wetland soil,” Scientific World Journal, vol. 2015, Article ID 354581, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
X. L. Tang, H. Y. Wang, L. Y. Chu, and H. B. Shao, “KvLEA, a new isolated late embryogenesis abundant protein gene from Kosteletzkya virginica responding to multiabiotic stresses,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 9823697, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Ye, G. Zhu, Y. Liu, Y. Li, and J. Zhang, “ABA controls H2O2 accumulation through the induction of OsCATB in rice leaves under water stress,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 689–698, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Cui, K. S. Yoo, S. Hyoung et al., “An Arabidopsis R2R3‐MYB transcription factor, AtMYB20, negatively regulates type 2C serine/threonine protein phosphatases to enhance salt tolerance,” FEBS Letters, vol. 587, no. 12, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Y. Ni, Z. Hu, Q. Y. Jiang, and H. Zhang, “GmNFYA3, a target gene of miR169, is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 113–129, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tang, H. Wang, C. Shao, and H. Shao, “Reference gene selection for qPCR normalization ofKosteletzkya virginicaunder salt stress,” Biomed Research International, vol. 2015, pp. 1–8, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Bustin, V. Benes, J. A. Garson et al., “The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 611–622, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Grondin, O. Rodrigues, L. Verdoucq, S. Merlot, N. Leonhardt, and C. Maurel, “Aquaporins contribute to ABA-triggered stomatal closure through OST1-mediated phosphorylation,” The Plant Cell, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1945–1954, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Daniels, F. Chaumont, T. E. Mirkov, and M. J. Chrispeels, “Characterization of a new vacuolar membrane aquaporin sensitive to mercury at a unique site,” The Plant Cell, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 587–599, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Mut, C. Bustamante, G. Martínez et al., “A fruit-specific plasma membrane aquaporin subtype PIP1;1 is regulated during strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruit ripening,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 538–551, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Moshelion, O. Halperin, R. Wallach, R. Oren, and D. A. Way, “Role of aquaporins in determining transpiration and photosynthesis in water-stressed plants: crop water-use efficiency, growth and yield,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1785–1793, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pou, H. Medrano, J. Flexas, and S. D. Tyerman, “A putative role for TIP and PIP aquaporins in dynamics of leaf hydraulic and stomatal conductances in grapevine under water stress and re-watering,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 828–843, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-J. Qian, J.-J. Song, F. Chaumont, and Q. Ye, “Differential responses of plasma membrane aquaporins in mediating water transport of cucumber seedlings under osmotic and salt stresses,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 461–473, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Azad, R. Hanawa, T. Ishikawa, Y. Sawa, and H. Shibata, “Expression profiles of aquaporin homologues and petal movement during petal development inTulipagesneriana,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 397–407, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wei, E. Alexandersson, D. Golldack, A. J. Miller, P. O. Kjellbom, and W. Fricke, “HvPIP1;6, a barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) plasma membrane water channel particularly expressed in growing compared with non-growing leaf tissues,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1132–1147, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. N. Wu, C. Sanchez Rodriguez, H. Pertl-Obermeyer, G. Obermeyer, and W. X. Schulze, “Sucrose-induced receptor kinase SIRK1 regulates a plasma membrane aquaporin in Arabidopsis,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2856–2873, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Alexandersson, L. Fraysse, S. Sjövall-Larsen et al., “Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 469–484, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sakurai, F. Ishikawa, T. Yamaguchi, M. Uemura, and M. Maeshima, “Identification of 33 rice aquaporin genes and analysis of their expression and function,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1568–1577, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Vandeleur, G. Mayo, M. C. Shelden, M. Gilliham, B. N. Kaiser, and S. D. Tyerman, “The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine,” Plant Physiology, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 445–460, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Knipfer, M. Besse, J.-L. Verdeil, and W. Fricke, “Aquaporin-facilitated water uptake in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) roots,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4115–4126, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Madrid-Espinoza, N. Brunel-Saldias, F. P. Guerra, A. Gutiérrez, and A. Del Pozo, “Genome-wide identification and transcriptional regulation of aquaporin genes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water stress,” Gene, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID 497, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Mao and W. Sun, “Arabidopsisseed-specific vacuolar aquaporins are involved in maintaining seed longevity under the control ofABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 66, no. 15, pp. 4781–4794, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. G. Kline, G. A. Barrett-Wilt, and M. R. Sussman, “In planta changes in protein phosphorylation induced by the plant hormone abscisic acid,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 36, pp. 15986–15991, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Xiaohua Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1173

Downloads

1286

Citations