Oxidative Stress in Cell Death and Cardiovascular Diseases

Xu, Tao; Ding, Wei; Ji, Xiaoyu; Ao, Xiang; Liu, Ying; Yu, Wanpeng; Wang, Jianxun

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9030563

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Oxidative Stress in Muscle Diseases: Current and Future Therapy 2019

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 9030563 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9030563

Oxidative Stress in Cell Death and Cardiovascular Diseases

Tao Xu,^1,2Wei Ding,³Xiaoyu Ji,¹Xiang Ao,²Ying Liu,²Wanpeng Yu,¹and Jianxun Wang^1,2

Guest Editor: Andrey J. Serra

Received23 May 2019

Accepted11 Sept 2019

Published04 Nov 2019

Abstract

ROS functions as a second messenger and modulates multiple signaling pathways under the physiological conditions. However, excessive intracellular ROS causes damage to the molecular components of the cell, which promotes the pathogenesis of various human diseases. Cardiovascular diseases are serious threats to human health with extremely high rates of morbidity and mortality. Dysregulation of cell death promotes the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases and is the clinical target during the disease treatment. Numerous studies show that ROS production is closely linked to the cell death process and promotes the occurrence and development of the cardiovascular diseases. In this review, we summarize the regulation of intracellular ROS, the roles of ROS played in the development of cardiovascular diseases, and the programmed cell death induced by intracellular ROS. We also focus on anti-ROS system and the potential application of anti-ROS strategy in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

1. Introduction

ROS refers to a group of small reactive molecules and is produced under both the normal life process and the various pathological conditions. ROS can function as a signaling molecule or a risk factor for the occurrence of diseases [1]. The levels of intracellular ROS are precisely regulated to limit it to a certain level. However, intracellular ROS can be damaged to the cell if ROS level is out of the normal range under the pathological conditions. The intracellular ROS is closely correlated with the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, including the atherosclerosis, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, myocardial hypertrophy, and heart failure [2]. However, the current therapeutic strategies to target the intracellular ROS are unsuccessful in the clinical trial of cardiovascular disease treatment. The reason of the failure is ascribed to the inability to clarify the specific roles of ROS and target the accurate ROS resources under different pathological conditions, and the nonspecific antioxidant approach cannot scavenge ROS properly and effectively [3]. Understanding the precise mechanism of ROS production, ROS-related signaling pathways, and the different roles ROS played under different pathological conditions is essential for increasing the chance of success during cardiovascular disease treatment. Moreover, cell death induced by ROS is closely related with the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Exploration of the mechanisms of cell death and the development of anticell death strategy will also provide opportunity for the cardiovascular disease treatment.

2. ROS Resources in the Cardiovascular Diseases

2.1. Excessive ROS in Vascular Dysfunction

Even though small amounts of intracellular ROS are continuously produced in cells, excessive generation of ROS, caused by pathological stimuli or the failure of ROS clearance system, is the major cause of various vascular dysfunctions. Accumulating evidences suggest that excessive ROS contributes to the altered vascular functions including endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) overgrowth, and structural remodeling. Moreover, oxidative stress could induce vascular inflammation and injury through activation of the transcription factors, upregulation of adhesion molecules, stimulation of chemokine production, and recruitment of inflammatory cells [4, 5]. Considering these important roles of ROS in the pathogenesis of vascular dysfucntion, a clear classification of the ROS resources and the roles it plays under different pathological conditions is urgently needed.

2.1.1. ROS from the NADPH Oxidase Activity

Although the intracellular ROS comes from multiple sources, the activities of NADPH oxidases (NOXs) are the only primary ROS resources (Figure 1) [6, 7]. NOXs could generate a large burst of O₂^- with NADPH serving as electron donor in the VSMC, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts [8]. Moreover, NOX-derived ROS can uncouple the NO synthase and promote O₂^- generation through oxidative degradation of NO synthase cofactor, H4B. There are 5 different NOX isoforms identified until now [8, 9]. NOXs are expressed in a cell- and tissue-specific fashion and are differently regulated under various pathological conditions (Figure 1).

Figure 1

ROS resources during cardiovascular diseases. The NOX-derived ROS are the primary ROS resources. NOX1, NOX2, NOX4, and NOX5 are expressed in the endothelial cell. NOX1 and NOX2 are expressed in the VSMC. NOX2 and NOX4 are abundant in cardiomyocyte. The activity of NOX2 in the immune cells also contributes to the ROS production under pathological condition. NOX-derived ROS can uncouple the NO synthase and promote O₂^- generation. The xanthine dehydrogenase is transformed into xanthine oxidase by oxidation which uses oxygen as an electron acceptor and produces ROS. Ischemia disrupts the oxygen supply and promotes the electron accumulation of electron transport chain. Reperfusion recovers the oxygen and promotes O₂^- production. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) anchored on the mitochondrial outer membrane degrades the monoamines and produces H₂O₂.

The NOX1, NOX2, NOX4, and NOX5 are all expressed in endothelial cells [10]. Other cell types in the vascular wall, including VSMCs and the immune cells, also express NOXs, which also contribute to ROS production under certain conditions (Figure 1) [11–13]. NOX2 is likely to be the most important ROS resource under pathological conditions while NOX4 plays a protective role in contrast through promoting NO bioavailability and suppressing cell death [14]. The remnant lipoprotein particles (RLPs) or oxLDL, which are the coronary risk factors and predictors of cardiovascular events, will increase NOX2 expression and the subsequent ROS production but have no effect on the expression of NOX4 in endothelial cells [15]. It is shown that NOX2 knockout mice protect endothelial cells from ROS damage in the aorta in the atherosclerosis model, suggesting that NOX2-deprvied ROS is the major cause of atherosclerosis [16]. Angiotensin II is a potent inducer of vascular ROS production and promotes the vessel dysfunction. Evidences showed that Ang II could increase the expression of NOX2 and promote the acute assembly of this oxidase complex in the endothelial cells. In contrast, NOX4 could antagonize Ang II-induced endothelial dysfunction. NOX4 knockout mice accelerate the aortic medial hypertrophy and cytokine production in the mouse model [17].

2.1.2. Xanthine Oxidase

The activity of xanthine oxidase (XO) is another major source of intracellular ROS. There are two forms of XOs with different substrates. The dehydrogenase form uses both NAD+ and oxygen as an electron acceptor, with a preference to NAD+. The oxidase form of XO using the molecular oxygen as electron acceptor produces ROS without reducing NAD+. Evidences show that Ang II could increase the protein levels of XO. XO knockout dramatically decreases the ROS production during Ang II-induced vascular dysfunction, suggesting that XO activity is a major ROS resource under this condition [18]. NOX inhibition can prevent the Ang II-induced superoxide from XO, suggesting that the activation of XO by Ang II needs the activity of NOX [19]. Cytokines can also stimulate the expression of XO, and XO is involved in ROS production induced by vascular inflammation [20, 21]. The activity of endothelial XO is also observed to be increased in the coronary disease patients. All these evidences support the application of targeting XOs during the cardiovascular disease treatment.

The protective roles of XO inhibitors have been tested in the animal models of cardiovascular diseases. Tungsten, an inhibitor of XO, can prevent the development of atherosclerosis in ApoE^-/- mice [22]. Allopurinol, another inhibitor of XO, can attenuate endothelial dysfunction in HF patients [23]. In addition, the product of XO is a biomarker during the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases [24]. These evidences suggest the important roles of XO in the vascular dysfunction, and targeting XO may represent an important way for disease treatment.

2.2. ROS in Cardiac Remodeling and Heart Failure

The cardiac pathological conditions including cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, dysregulation of cell death, and remodeling of the extracellular matrix contribute to the final heart failure. Accumulating evidences demonstrate that intracellular ROS and its related signaling pathways are actively involved in these cardiac functional abnormalities.

2.2.1. ROS from Enzymatic Activity

NOXs are also involved in the myocardial ROS production process (Figure 1). Both in the experimental models of the left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and in the end-stage failing human myocardium, the increased NOX activity is found to be closely correlated with these pathogenic processes [25, 26]. NOX2 and NOX4 are abundantly expressed in the cardiomyocytes. In the mouse model of LVH induced by angiotensin II or atrial natriuretic factor, ROS production is inhibited and cardiac function is improved by NOX2 knockout, indicating that NOX2-derived ROS plays a critical role in Ang II-induced hypertrophy [27, 28]. However, cardiac pressure overload-induced hypertrophy cannot be inhibited by NOX2 knockout, suggesting that NOX2 is not important in this process. In contrast, NOX4 promotes the LVH induced by pressure overload [29, 30]. Adverse remodeling of the left ventricle caused by myocardial infarction will develop into the final chronic heart failure (CHF) in patients. ROS generated from the NOXs activates the matrix metalloproteinase, which drives matrix turnover and promotes the left ventricle dilatation [31]. The NOX-derived ROS activity also plays an important role in myocardial infarction both in the mouse model and in the patients [25, 32]. The activity of xanthine oxidase (XO) also contributes to the cardiac adverse left ventricle remodeling after myocardial infarction in the mouse model. Inhibitor of XO improves the cardiac function in the mouse model of myocardial infarction (MI) [33]. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is another ROS resource anchored in the outer membrane of mitochondria [34]. The activity of MAO increases the levels of H₂O₂ both in the mitochondria and the cytosol (Figure 1), which impairs the autophagy process, leading to the accumulation of damaged organelles and the final myocardial necrosis [35]. MAO is also involved in the pathogenesis of heart failure and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury [36, 37].

2.2.2. ROS from Mitochondria

The activity of mitochondria electron transport chain (ETC) produces ATP for the cellular energy demand with the oxygen as the electron acceptor (Figure 1), which is another ROS resource [38]. Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction during the pathological process can lead to the ROS burst which activates multiple cell death signaling pathways. Evidences show that mitochondrial ROS is produced in both the ischemia stage and the reperfusion stage during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Ischemia disrupts the oxygen supply and induces the collapse of electron transport chain (ETC), with the accumulation of electron. The O₂ and ATP depletion during ischemia also sets the condition for the ROS production during reperfusion stage [39, 40]. Reestablishment of oxygen at the reperfusion stage acutely increases the generation of ROS, which leads to subsequent myocardial cell death [41]. Moreover, mitochondrial ROS will lead to the inactivation of iron-sulfur (Fe-S) centers, releasing free iron and leading to subsequent lipid oxidation through Fenton reaction [42].

3. ROS and Programed Cell Death

A direct outcome of excessive ROS production is the induction of cell death, which is the major cause of various cardiovascular diseases under different pathological conditions [43]. Programmed cell death is the important therapeutic target during disease treatment as it is regulated by the gene products [44]. Apoptosis is the first established programmed cell death and has been studied intensively in the past 2 decades. In addition to the apoptotic cell death, other modes of programed cell death have recently been identified and are demonstrated to contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases (Figure 2) [45]. Understanding the roles of different cell death processes in cardiovascular diseases and the underlying signaling pathways will improve the therapeutic strategy.

3.1. Apoptosis

Apoptosis is the firstly coined and mostly studied programmed cell death process. Numerous studies show that apoptosis contributes to both the acute loss of cardiomyocytes in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and the chronic loss of cardiomyocytes in the chronic heart failure [46]. ROS is closely related with cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Both the extrinsic death receptor pathways and the intrinsic mitochondrial pathways are involved in the myocardial apoptosis induced by ROS. The binding of ligands with death receptor induces lipid raft formation and NOX assembly and activation, which leads to the ROS generation. ROS will promote the formation of lipid raft-derived signaling platforms, activating the death receptor-mediated apoptosis [47].

During the activation of the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis pathways, excessive ROS promotes the permeabilization of the mitochondrial outer membrane through activation of the proapoptotic Bcl-2 superfamily proteins [48]. Increased mitochondrial permeability will lead to the release of apoptosis activators, triggering the activation of apoptosis [49]. What is more, ROS can induce apoptosis through the activation of apoptosis initiation signaling pathways or inhibition of the protective mechanisms of the cell [50, 51].

Although the myocardial apoptosis signaling pathways have been intensively studied and therapeutic targeting of apoptotic pathways shows potential in the treatment of heart failure, it is still not convincing to say that the inhibition of apoptosis can efficiently prevent heart failure in the patients. One reason may be that inhibition of apoptosis may activate the necrotic cell death, which is a major cell death process during the heart failure. Another important thing may be that it is important to initiate treatment at the most suitable time. For example, cell death may occur in a certain stage, such as the beginning of reperfusion stage.

3.2. Myocardial Necrosis

It is considered that myocardial necrosis has a stronger effect on the loss of cardiomyocyte than apoptosis [52]. Recent evidences demonstrate that some necrosis can also be regulated by multiple signaling pathways rather than a passive cell death process [53]. There are two major signaling pathways regulating the myocardial necrosis, the RIP-mediated necrosis pathway and the mitochondrial necrosis pathway [54]. The burst of intracellular ROS during the myocardial I/R injury through XO activity or mitochondria ROS formation leads to myocardial necrosis and promotes myocardial damage [55]. The role of ROS in the induction of myocardial necrosis can also be demonstrated from several recent works. Wang et al. showed that ROS will elevate the protein levels of RIP1 and RIP3, promoting the H₂O₂-induced necrosis in H9c2 cells. These results are also confirmed in the mouse model of ischemia/reperfusion injury [56]. Another study by Zhang et al. demonstrates that RIP3 can promote the activity of CAMK II under the doxorubicin or H/R-induced oxidative stress through phosphorylation and oxidation of CAMK II. CAMK II activation increases the mitochondrial calcium, which induces myocardial necrosis [57]. Evidences show that MPTP (mitochondrial permeability transition pore) opening at the beginning of the reperfusion stage contributes to almost 50% of the infarct size while ROS is the potent inducer of MPTP. Cypd is the most important component of MPTP. Cypd-deficient mice subject to ischemia/reperfusion injury lead to the smaller infarcted size than the wild-type mice. The inhibitor of Cypd, cyclosporin A (CsA), can also decrease infarcted size in the in vivo mouse model [58]. Another study shows that apoptosis repressor with card domain (ARC) can inhibit MPTP opening by interacting with Cypd and blocking the MPTP complex assembly. Under the oxidative condition, p53 is upregulated and represses the expression of ARC at transcriptional level, which releases the Cypd from binding with ARC and promotes the opening of MPTP [59].

Nec-1 is a specific RIP1 inhibitor and could markedly reduce infarct size in the cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Nec-1 can also prevent the cardiac adverse remodeling after ischemia/reperfusion in the mouse model [60]. However, Nec-1 has been reported to cause cell death in some cases during the clinical trial. Fortunately, the Nec-1 analogue, Nec-1s, had been developed and the promotion of cell death is not observed [61]. There are also some other inhibitors of RIP-1 that have recently been developed. GSK963 is a new RIP1 inhibitor and is more effective than Nec-1 in inhibiting RIP1-dependent cell death. The clinical application of CsA is validated only in a small number of patients, and these results are doubted by several studies and a larger clinical trial is required for the further confirmation [62, 63]. A present work reports that a modified mtCsA (mitochondria-targeted CsA) with a much-improved Cypd binding affinity yields better cardioprotective role than CsA in a mouse model of I/R [64]. Although these necrosis inhibitors show great potential in the treatment of heart diseases, its clinical significance is still under debate and needs to be further verified [65].

3.3. Autophagic Cell Death

A basal level of autophagy is essential for removal and renewal of dysfunctional organelles and damaged proteins. The cardiomyocytes also depend on autophagy to maintain intracellular homeostasis. Autophagy has also been linked to cardiovascular diseases under the oxidative stress [66]. Intense investigation of the role of autophagy under pathological conditions has currently been carried out. However, evidences show that autophagy seems to play dual roles in cardiovascular diseases caused by excessive ROS. On one side, there are numerous evidences showing that autophagy could protect the cardiomyocytes from injury in the cardiac dysfunction. During the ischemia/reperfusion injury, researchers find that autophagy flux is markedly reduced in cardiomyocytes with downregulation of LAMP2 and BECN1 [67, 68]. Upregulation of autophagy through rapamycin treatment can attenuate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury [69, 70]. In the models of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity, doxorubicin blocks cardiomyocyte autophagic flux accompanied by robust accumulation of undegraded autolysosomes. This impaired autophagy process is harmful to the cardiomyocytes, and clearance of these undegraded autolysosomes will relieve the doxorubicin cardiotoxicity [71]. On another side, there are also evidences supporting the negative roles of autophagy in the survival of cardiomyocytes under oxidative stress from several studies. In the high-glucose-induced ROS generation and cardiomyocyte dysfunction, autophagy flux is also inhibited. However, researchers show that this autophagy inhibition is only an adaptive response. Conversely, rapamycin treatment or BECN1 or ATG7 overexpression could increase autophagy and promote cardiomyocyte death induced by high glucose [72]. In another study, Liu et al. found that autophagy promotes the H₂O₂ and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiomyocyte injury which is attenuated by inhibition of autophagy through a LncRNA, a cardiac autophagy inhibitory factor (CAIF) [73]. These evidences support the roles of autophagy in promoting myocardial cell death. In summary, the role of autophagy in cardiomyocyte death depends on the specific situation. Moderate autophagy may promote survival by removing damaged organelles caused by ROS and recycling macromolecules to maintain energy levels. However, prolonged ischemia and subsequent reperfusion result in excessive autophagy which contributes to the self-digestion and ROS production.

3.4. Ferroptosis

Ferroptosis is a newly corned programmed cell death process. The distinct feature of ferroptosis is the iron-dependent lipid peroxide accumulation [74]. Ferroptosis also participates in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. In an ex vivo heart model of ischemia/reperfusion injury, inhibition of ferroptosis by treatment with glutaminolysis inhibitor compound 968 or iron chelator DFO could improve the heart function and reduce the infarct sizes [75]. Doxorubicin is a traditional antitumor drug whose clinical application is limited by its cardiotoxicity. Doxorubicin’s cardiotoxicity is usually attributed to its role in myocardial apoptosis initiation [76]. However, the recent work by Fang et al. shows that ferroptosis occurs in the doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. In this study, researchers find that doxorubicin can elevate the mitochondria iron level and cause mitochondrial lipid peroxide accumulation, which promotes an oxidative stress and the subsequent ferroptotic cell death [77]. Although the roles of ferroptosis have been partially delineated in the cardiomyocytes, the regulatory mechanism of ferroptosis remains largely unknown. Myocardial ferroptosis may occur in some other human pathological conditions. For example, high levels of heme iron in the diet will increase the iron levels in the circulation, which can be taken up by the cardiomyocyte. A fraction of the circulating iron is redox-active, and the excessive uptake of iron may contribute to oxidant-mediated ferroptotic cell death [78]. Until now, the cardioprotective role of ferroptosis is only tested in a mouse model. The application of ferroptosis inhibitors in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases needs to be further explored.

4. Anti-ROS Systems and Clinical Application

4.1. Endogenous Antioxidant System

4.1.1. GSH-Linked Enzymatic Defense Systems

To protect against the damaging effects of ROS, cells have developed multiple antioxidant systems to guarantee the timely removal of ROS. One of the most important is the tripeptide glutathione, GSH, and the GSH-linked enzymatic defense systems. GSH functions as a cofactor for the GSH-peroxidase families. GPX4 is one of the GSH-peroxidases and can interact with lipid hydroperoxides efficiently and catalyze the degradation of peroxides. The mitochondrial GPX4 is the first defense system to avoid ROS damage. The deletion of mitochondria GSH is closely correlated with the ROS toxicity-related cell death process (Figure 3). Although GSH also exists in the cytosol, it seems that cytosolic GSH is less important than that in the mitochondria [79]. Overexpression of mitochondrial GPX4 attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury [79]. Recent experiments have also shown that GPX4 is an inhibitor of ferroptosis through the clearance of lipid peroxides (Figure 3). As ferroptosis also promotes the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, the inhibition of ferroptosis by GPX4 will improve the cardiac function under certain pathological conditions [80]. GPX4 can also maintain the vascular homeostasis through its ROS clearance activity. Evidences show that overexpression of GPX4 could suppress the atherosclerosis in ApoE^-/- mice [81].

Figure 3

The anti-ROS system. SOD could transform the O₂^- into H₂O₂ and then could be reduced to water by catalase. There are three forms of SODs: EC-SOD (extracellular matrix), CuZn-SOD (cytoplasm), and Mn-SOD (mitochondria). Mitochondrial O₂^- inactivates iron-sulfur (Fe-S) centers and releases free iron, leading to subsequent lipid oxidation through Fenton reaction. GPX4 could catalase the lipid peroxides into alcohol. Antioxidant NAC could promote the synthesis of GSH which is a cofactor of GPX4. ROS will also activate a series of transcription factors (AP-1, Foxo3a, HSF-1, and Nrf2) whose target genes defend against the oxidative stress-related damage.

4.1.2. Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and Catalase

SODs are another antioxidant systems and protect against superoxide-mediated cytotoxicity. There are three forms of SODs that have different intracellular localization. O₂⁻ is the main form of superoxide and is generated by complex I and complex III. SOD could transform the O₂⁻ into H₂O₂, which is a relatively stable and diffusible compared with many other ROS, and then could be reduced to water by catalase (Figure 3). Another role of SODs is to maintain the NO level in the endothelial cell which plays a major role in maintaining the basal vasodilator tone of the vessel. Superoxide could react with NO efficiently and make NO unavailable. Moreover, reaction of NO with superoxide will produce peroxynitrite, a potent oxidant with potential cytotoxicity (Figure 3) [82]. Thus, timely clearance of superoxide by SODs determines the bioactivity of NO. Overexpression of SODs in the mouse model of I/R exposed to ischemia/reperfusion injury can decrease levels of superoxide and infarcted size and improve cardiac function. Similarly, specific overexpression of catalase in cardiomyocyte is also found to reduce the adverse remodeling and prevent heart failure in a mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Overexpression of SODs or catalase can also retard the atherosclerosis in the ApoE^-/- mice [83]. All these results demonstrated the protective role of SODs against the ROS-induced cardiovascular diseases.

4.1.3. The Thioredoxin (Trx) System

The thioredoxin (Trx) system defends against oxidative stress through its disulfide reductase activity. The removal of ROS though the Trx system also plays important roles in defensing the oxidative stress under pathological conditions. Overexpression of thioredoxin 2 attenuates Ang II-induced vascular dysfunction [84]. Loss of mitochondrial Trx reductase causes the inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [85]. Thioredoxin is also actively involved in the protection of cardiac function. Evidences show that the thioredoxin activity, which is regulated by thioredoxin-interacting protein, controls cardiac hypertrophy [86]. Inactivation of nitrative thioredoxin promotes cardiomyocyte injury induced by high glucose and cardiac ischemia/reperfusion [87]. Thioredoxin activity can also be inhibited by methylglyoxal, aggravating cardiomyocyte ischemia/reperfusion injury [88]. All these evidences show the close correlation of the thioredoxin with the cardiovascular homeostasis.

4.1.4. Transcription Factors Activated in Defensing the Oxidative Stress

Cells could also activate a series of transcription factors whose target genes strongly defends against the oxidative stress through different ways. These transcriptional factors include the AP-1, HSF1, Nrf2, and the FOXO3a (Figure 3). These transcriptional factors are very sensitive to the intracellular oxidative stress and can drive the expression of target genes rapidly which will protect the cells from damage or kill the cells to avoid further damage. Ap-1 is a leucine zipper transcription factor and is activated by the H₂O₂ or JNK [89, 90]. AP-1 can bind to the promoter region of SOD in response to the oxidative stress and promote the expression of SOD to defend against the oxidative stress damage [91, 92]. However, the role of AP-1 during the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases is still under debate. Heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) could translocate into the nuclear and assemble into a homotrimer, which can bind to the DNA and drive the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs), in response to the oxidative stress [93]. The HSPs are considered to protect the cardiomyocytes from oxidative damage in the ischemic cardiac diseases [94, 95]. FOXO3a is another transcriptional factor exerting a strong protective role in the ROS-related cardiovascular diseases. FOXO3a can increase the expression of p27 and inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation which promotes the vascular dysfunction under oxidative stress [96]. FOXO3a is the most abundant isoform expressed in the heart among the Foxo transcription factors. FOXO3a knockout will exacerbate the myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury with decreased expression of catalase or SOD [97]. FOXO3a also participates in myocardial autophagy regulation. Evidences showed that overexpression of FOXO3a will increase the autophagy level and prevent the cardiac hypertrophy [98]. Nrf2 has recently been found to prevent the ferroptotic cell death. One of the important targets of Nrf2 is the GSH-linked enzyme, GPX4, which is an active ROS antagonist as mentioned above [99]. Nrf2 can also regulate the iron metabolism genes and attenuate ferroptosis through preventing free iron availability.

4.2. Exogenous Antioxidant Strategy

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a potent antioxidant which promotes the synthesis of GSH, attenuates oxidative stress, and prevents cell death. Evidences from the animal models show that NAC can attenuate cardiac injury, prevent cardiac fibrosis and remodeling, and improve the cardiac function during the heart failure [100]. Moreover, NAC can also inhibit maladaptive autophagy, which promotes the pathogenesis, in pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling in rats [101]. The role of NAC has also been validated in the myocardial infarction patients, although these results need to be further explored in a larger population [102]. Vitamin E is another antioxidant with the clinical potential to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Evidences from several experimental animal models show that vitamin E treatment is demonstrated to improve cardiac function [103]. However, vitamin E fails to prevent the atherosclerotic disease in the clinical trial. What is more, vitamin E is also proved to have no effect on both the acute myocardial injury and chronic heart failure patients [104, 105]. Recently, researchers found that high levels of NAD+ could improve cardiac function in a mouse model of heart failure. The role of NAD+ in defensing oxidative stress is also validated in several other works, showing the potential application in the anti-ROS strategy [106].

However, the inappropriate application of antioxidant strategy is also harmful to our body. ROS may function as a second messenger and participate in cell signaling transduction and redox regulation. These signalings mediated by mild ROS may even benefit cellular repair processes and improve protective systems [107]. However, the antioxidants cannot distinguish among the ROS with a beneficial physiological role and those that cause oxidative damage to the cell. The antioxidant may clear the most harmful ROS while on another side leave not enough ROS for their useful purposes. The direct outcome of anomaly low ROS may interfere with the immune system and essential defensive mechanisms for removal of damaged components of the cell, including those that are precancerous [108]. Thus, the overtaking of antioxidant may be harmful to our body.

4.3. Anti-ROS Strategy in Clinical Trial

In the clinical trials, researchers get disappointing results in cardiovascular disease treatment through oxidative stress inhibition strategy. The reason for these failure remains largely unknown. One reason may be that the inadequate understanding of the ROS production stage and the myocardial injury during different pathological conditions. In the myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, the ROS is largely produced at the beginning of reperfusion stage and mass myocardial cell death accrued at this stage. However, the current antioxidant therapies are not able to combat these ROS and cell death. Another reason may be that the ROS resources during the pathogenesis of heart failure are more complex than we now know. There are more complex ROS producers functioning in different pathological conditions. For example, oxypurinol, inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, has been shown to improve heart failure in a specific subset of patients with elevated uric acid. Thus, in these patients, targeting the xanthine oxidase may represent a better therapeutic strategy [109].

5. Conclusion

Excessive ROS production is the major cause of oxidative stress and cardiovascular diseases. Understanding the ROS production processes and the mechanism of anti-ROS systems in the cell will benefit the clinical practice in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Although the current antioxidants seem unsuccessful in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, anti-ROS strategy still represents the most important ways for cardiovascular disease treatment. Efforts are still needed to illustrate the mechanisms of ROS production and how ROS promotes the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases under different conditions. Intracellular ROS is closely correlated with the myocardial cell death process, which takes an active role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Until now, there are several programmed cell death processes that are identified. However, whether all these cell death processes contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases and the major cell mode under different conditions in cardiovascular diseases are still needed to be illustrated. The revelation of the roles of different modes of cell death plays in the cardiovascular diseases will provide the precise drug target during disease treatment. Moreover, the exploration of ROS-related cell death signaling pathways will also help to develop the therapeutic strategy and protect cell death from oxidative stress.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

TX, JW, and WD provided direction and guidance throughout the preparation of this manuscript. TX and WD collected and prepared the related literature. TX, JW, WD, XA, and XJ drafted the manuscript. XJ, YL, WY, and JW reviewed and made significant revisions to the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Tao Xu and Wei Ding contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all laboratory members for ongoing discussions. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81622005 and 81770232), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (JQ201815), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M602095). The authors acknowledge all financial supports for this work.

References

M. Valko, D. Leibfritz, J. Moncol, M. T. Cronin, M. Mazur, and J. Telser, “Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 44–84, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Elahi, Y. X. Kong, and B. M. Matata, “Oxidative stress as a mediator of cardiovascular disease,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 259–269, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Afanas'ev, “ROS and RNS signaling in heart disorders: could antioxidant treatment be successful?” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2011, Article ID 293769, 13 pages, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Thomas, P. K. Witting, and G. R. Drummond, “Redox control of endothelial function and dysfunction: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1713–1765, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Förstermann, “Oxidative stress in vascular disease: causes, defense mechanisms and potential therapies,” Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 338–349, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. R. Drummond, S. Selemidis, K. K. Griendling, and C. G. Sobey, “Combating oxidative stress in vascular disease: NADPH oxidases as therapeutic targets,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 453–471, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Lassegue, A. San Martin, and K. K. Griendling, “Biochemistry, physiology, and pathophysiology of NADPH oxidases in the cardiovascular system,” Circulation Research, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 1364–1390, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. K. Griendling, D. Sorescu, and M. Ushio-Fukai, “NAD(P)H oxidase: role in cardiovascular biology and disease,” Circulation Research, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 494–501, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sumimoto, K. Miyano, and R. Takeya, “Molecular composition and regulation of the Nox family NAD(P)H oxidases,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 338, no. 1, pp. 677–686, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Montezano and R. M. Touyz, “Reactive oxygen species and endothelial function – role of nitric oxide synthase uncoupling and Nox family nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases,” Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Arruda and C. Barja-Fidalgo, “NADPH oxidase activity: in the crossroad of neutrophil life and death,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 14, pp. 4546–4556, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Lassegue and R. E. Clempus, “Vascular NAD(P)H oxidases: specific features, expression, and regulation,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 285, no. 2, pp. R277–R297, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dharmarajah, J. F. Arthur, C. G. Sobey, and G. R. Drummond, “The anti-platelet effects of apocynin in mice are not mediated by inhibition of NADPH oxidase activity,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 382, no. 4, pp. 377–384, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rivera, C. G. Sobey, A. K. Walduck, and G. R. Drummond, “Nox isoforms in vascular pathophysiology: insights from transgenic and knockout mouse models,” Redox Report, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 50–63, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rouhanizadeh, J. Hwang, R. E. Clempus et al., “Oxidized-1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine induces vascular endothelial superoxide production: implication of NADPH oxidase,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1512–1522, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Judkins, H. Diep, B. R. Broughton et al., “Direct evidence of a role for Nox2 in superoxide production, reduced nitric oxide bioavailability, and early atherosclerotic plaque formation in ApoE^−/− mice,” American Journal of Physiology Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 298, no. 1, pp. H24–H32, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schröder, M. Zhang, S. Benkhoff et al., “Nox4 is a protective reactive oxygen species generating vascular NADPH oxidase,” Circulation Research, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1217–1225, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Landmesser, S. Spiekermann, C. Preuss et al., “Angiotensin II induces endothelial xanthine oxidase activation: role for endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 943–948, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Isabelle, A. Vergeade, F. Moritz et al., “NADPH oxidase inhibition prevents cocaine-induced up-regulation of xanthine oxidoreductase and cardiac dysfunction,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 326–332, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, “The role of inflammatory cytokines in endothelial dysfunction,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 398–406, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Page, D. Powell, M. Benboubetra et al., “Xanthine oxidoreductase in human mammary epithelial cells: activation in response to inflammatory cytokines,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1381, no. 2, pp. 191–202, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schröder, C. Vecchione, O. Jung et al., “Xanthine oxidase inhibitor tungsten prevents the development of atherosclerosis in ApoE knockout mice fed a Western-type diet,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1353–1360, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Doehner, N. Schoene, M. Rauchhaus et al., “Effects of xanthine oxidase inhibition with allopurinol on endothelial function and peripheral blood flow in hyperuricemic patients with chronic heart failure,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 22, pp. 2619–2624, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Grassi, L. Ferri, G. Desideri et al., “Chronic hyperuricemia, uric acid deposit and cardiovascular risk,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 2432–2438, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Heymes, J. K. Bendall, P. Ratajczak et al., “Increased myocardial NADPH oxidase activity in human heart failure,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2164–2171, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Byrne, D. J. Grieve, J. K. Bendall et al., “Contrasting roles of NADPH oxidase isoforms in pressure-overload versus angiotensin II–induced cardiac hypertrophy,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 802–805, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Valente, R. A. Clark, J. M. Siddesha, U. Siebenlist, and B. Chandrasekar, “CIKS (Act1 or TRAF3IP2) mediates angiotensin-II-induced interleukin-18 expression, and Nox2-dependent cardiomyocyte hypertrophy,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 113–124, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Looi, D. J. Grieve, A. Siva et al., “Involvement of Nox2 NADPH oxidase in adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 319–325, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. C. Henderson, U. Sen, C. Reynolds et al., “Reversal of systemic hypertension-associated cardiac remodeling in chronic pressure overload myocardium by ciglitazone,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 385–392, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Frazziano, I. Al Ghouleh, J. Baust, S. Shiva, H. C. Champion, and P. J. Pagano, “Nox-derived ROS are acutely activated in pressure overload pulmonary hypertension: indications for a seminal role for mitochondrial Nox4,” American Journal of Physiology Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. H197–H205, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kelly, S. Q. Khan, M. Thompson et al., “Plasma tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-9: novel indicators of left ventricular remodelling and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction,” European Heart Journal, vol. 29, no. 17, pp. 2116–2124, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Qin, M. Simeone, and R. Patel, “Inhibition of NADPH oxidase reduces myocardial oxidative stress and apoptosis and improves cardiac function in heart failure after myocardial infarction,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 271–281, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Sagor, N. Tabassum, M. A. Potol, and M. A. Alam, “Xanthine oxidase inhibitor, allopurinol, prevented oxidative stress, fibrosis, and myocardial damage in isoproterenol induced aged rats,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 478039, 9 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kaludercic, J. Mialet-Perez, N. Paolocci, A. Parini, and F. Di Lisa, “Monoamine oxidases as sources of oxidants in the heart,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 73, pp. 34–42, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Santin, P. Sicard, F. Vigneron et al., “Oxidative stress by monoamine oxidase-A impairs transcription factor EB activation and autophagosome clearance, leading to cardiomyocyte necrosis and heart failure,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 10–27, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kaludercic, A. Carpi, T. Nagayama et al., “Monoamine oxidase B prompts mitochondrial and cardiac dysfunction in pressure overloaded hearts,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 267–280, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Costiniti, I. Spera, R. Menabo et al., “Monoamine oxidase-dependent histamine catabolism accounts for post-ischemic cardiac redox imbalance and injury,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1864, no. 9, pp. 3050–3059, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Murphy, “How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 417, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Chen, S. Moghaddas, C. L. Hoppel, and E. J. Lesnefsky, “Ischemic defects in the electron transport chain increase the production of reactive oxygen species from isolated rat heart mitochondria,” American journal of physiology Cell physiology, vol. 294, no. 2, pp. C460–C466, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Raedschelders, D. M. Ansley, and D. D. Y. Chen, “The cellular and molecular origin of reactive oxygen species generation during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 230–255, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Granger and P. R. Kvietys, “Reperfusion injury and reactive oxygen species: the evolution of a concept,” Redox Biology, vol. 6, pp. 524–551, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dhanasekaran, S. Kotamraju, C. Karunakaran et al., “Mitochondria superoxide dismutase mimetic inhibits peroxide-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis: role of mitochondrial superoxide,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 567–583, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tan, D. Schubert, and P. Maher, “Oxytosis: a novel form of programmed cell death,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 497–506, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zheng, S. E. Gardner, and M. C. H. Clarke, “Cell death, damage-associated molecular patterns, and sterile inflammation in cardiovascular disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2781–2786, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Xu, W. Ding, M. A. Tariq et al., “Molecular mechanism and therapy application of necrosis during myocardial injury,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2547–2557, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Freude, T. N. Masters, S. Kostin, F. Robicsek, and J. Schaper, “Cardiomyocyte apoptosis in acute and chronic conditions,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 85–89, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Y. Zhang, F. Yi, G. Zhang, E. Gulbins, and P. L. Li, “Lipid raft clustering and redox signaling platform formation in coronary arterial endothelial cells,” Hypertension, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Martin, “Neuronal death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is apoptosis: possible contribution of a programmed cell death mechanism,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 459–471, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. W. Tait and D. R. Green, “Mitochondria and cell death: outer membrane permeabilization and beyond,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 621–632, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Li, W. Ding, M. A. Tariq et al., “A circular transcript of ncx1 gene mediates ischemic myocardial injury by targeting miR-133a-3p,” Theranostics, vol. 8, no. 21, pp. 5855–5869, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Li, J. Zhang, L. L. Sun et al., “Celastrol induces apoptosis and autophagy via the ROS/JNK signaling pathway in human osteosarcoma cells: an in vitro and in vivo study,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 6, p. e1604, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Adameova, E. Goncalvesova, A. Szobi, and N. S. Dhalla, “Necroptotic cell death in failing heart: relevance and proposed mechanisms,” Heart Failure Reviews, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 213–221, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. He, L. Wang, L. Miao et al., “Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-α,” Cell, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1100–1111, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Linkermann, J. H. Brasen, M. Darding et al., “Two independent pathways of regulated necrosis mediate ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 29, pp. 12024–12029, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Pacher, A. Nivorozhkin, and C. Szabó, “Therapeutic effects of xanthine oxidase inhibitors: renaissance half a century after the discovery of allopurinol,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 87–114, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-X. Wang, X.-J. Zhang, Q. Li et al., “MicroRNA-103/107 regulate programmed necrosis and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through targeting FADD,” Circulation Research, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 352–363, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zhang, Y. Zhang, M. Cui et al. et al., “CaMKII is a RIP3 substrate mediating ischemia- and oxidative stress-induced myocardial necroptosis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Nakagawa, S. Shimizu, T. Watanabe et al., “Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death,” Nature, vol. 434, no. 7033, pp. 652–658, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Xu, W. Ding, X. Ao et al., “ARC regulates programmed necrosis and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through the inhibition of mPTP opening,” Redox Biology, vol. 20, pp. 414–426, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. F. J. Oerlemans, J. Liu, F. Arslan et al., “Inhibition of RIP1-dependent necrosis prevents adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial ischemia–reperfusion in vivo,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 107, no. 4, p. 270, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Szobi, T. Rajtik, and A. Adameova, “Effects of necrostatin-1, an inhibitor of necroptosis, and its inactive analogue Nec-1i on basal cardiovascular function,” Physiological Research, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 861–865, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
L. O. Karlsson, A. X. Zhou, E. Larsson et al., “Cyclosporine does not reduce myocardial infarct size in a porcine ischemia-reperfusion model,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 182–189, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. De Paulis, P. Chiari, G. Teixeira et al., “Cyclosporine A at reperfusion fails to reduce infarct size in the in vivo rat heart,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 108, no. 5, p. 379, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dube, D. Selwood, S. Malouitre, M. Capano, M. I. Simone, and M. Crompton, “A mitochondrial-targeted cyclosporin A with high binding affinity for cyclophilin D yields improved cytoprotection of cardiomyocytes,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 441, no. 3, pp. 901–907, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Berger, P. Harris, R. Nagilla et al., “Characterization of GSK963: a structurally distinct, potent and selective inhibitor of RIP1 kinase,” Cell Death Discovery, vol. 1, p. 15009, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, X. Cheng, L. Yu et al., “MCOLN1 is a ROS sensor in lysosomes that regulates autophagy,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 12109, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ma, H. Liu, S. R. Foyil, R. J. Godar, C. J. Weinheimer, and A. Diwan, “Autophagy is impaired in cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Autophagy, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1394–1396, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, D. Sun, Y. Hu et al., “The roles of oxidative stress and Beclin-1 in the autophagosome clearance impairment triggered by cardiac arrest,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 136, pp. 87–95, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dutta, J. Xu, J. S. Kim, W. A. Dunn Jr., and C. Leeuwenburgh, “Upregulated autophagy protects cardiomyocytes from oxidative stress-induced toxicity,” Autophagy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 328–344, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shirakabe, P. Zhai, Y. Ikeda et al., “Drp1-dependent mitochondrial autophagy plays a protective role against pressure overload–induced mitochondrial dysfunction and heart failure,” Circulation, vol. 133, no. 13, pp. 1249–1263, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Li, Z. V. Wang, G. Ding et al., “Doxorubicin blocks cardiomyocyte autophagic flux by inhibiting lysosome acidification,” Circulation, vol. 133, no. 17, pp. 1668–1687, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kobayashi, X. Xu, K. Chen, and Q. Liang, “Suppression of autophagy is protective in high glucose-induced cardiomyocyte injury,” Autophagy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 577–592, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-Y. Liu, Y.-H. Zhang, R.-B. Li et al., “LncRNA CAIF inhibits autophagy and attenuates myocardial infarction by blocking p53-mediated myocardin transcription,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 29, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Dixon, K. M. Lemberg, M. R. Lamprecht et al., “Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death,” Cell, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 1060–1072, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gao, P. Monian, N. Quadri, R. Ramasamy, and X. Jiang, “Glutaminolysis and transferrin regulate ferroptosis,” Molecular Cell, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 298–308, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wan, T. Xu, W. Ding et al., “miR-499-5p attenuates mitochondrial fission and cell apoptosis via p21 in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 9, p. 734, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Fang, H. Wang, D. Han et al., “Ferroptosis as a target for protection against cardiomyopathy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 2672–2680, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Fleming and P. Ponka, “Iron overload in human disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 4, pp. 348–359, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. R. Dabkowski, C. L. Williamson, and J. M. Hollander, “Mitochondria-specific transgenic overexpression of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (GPx4) attenuates ischemia/reperfusion-associated cardiac dysfunction,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 855–865, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Yang, R. SriRamaratnam, M. E. Welsch et al., “Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4,” Cell, vol. 156, no. 1-2, pp. 317–331, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Guo, Q. Ran, L. J. Roberts 2nd et al., “Suppression of atherogenesis by overexpression of glutathione peroxidase-4 in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 343–352, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Beckman and W. H. Koppenol, “Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 271, no. 5, pp. C1424–C1437, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yang, L. J. Roberts, M. J. Shi et al., “Retardation of atherosclerosis by overexpression of catalase or both Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase and catalase in mice lacking apolipoprotein E,” Circulation Research, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 1075–1081, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Widder, D. Fraccarollo, P. Galuppo et al., “Attenuation of angiotensin II–induced vascular dysfunction and hypertension by overexpression of thioredoxin 2,” Hypertension, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 338–344, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kirsch, H. Schneider, J.-I. Pagel et al., “Endothelial dysfunction, and a prothrombotic, proinflammatory phenotype is caused by loss of mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in endothelium,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1891–1899, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yoshioka, P. C. Schulze, M. Cupesi et al., “Thioredoxin-interacting protein controls cardiac hypertrophy through regulation of thioredoxin activity,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 21, pp. 2581–2586, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Luan, S. Liu, T. Yin et al., “High glucose sensitizes adult cardiomyocytes to ischaemia/reperfusion injury through nitrative thioredoxin inactivation,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 294–302, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. L. Wang, W. B. Lau, Y. X. Yuan et al., “Methylglyoxal increases cardiomyocyte ischemia-reperfusion injury via glycative inhibition of thioredoxin activity,” American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 299, no. 2, pp. E207–E214, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Keller, C. Dreyer, J. Medin, A. Mahfoudi, K. Ozato, and W. Wahli, “Fatty acids and retinoids control lipid metabolism through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-retinoid X receptor heterodimers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 2160–2164, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Marx, T. Bourcier, G. K. Sukhova, P. Libby, and J. Plutzky, “PPARγ activation in human endothelial cells increases plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 expression,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 546–551, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Ho, A. J. Howard, and J. D. Crapo, “Molecular structure of a functional rat gene for manganese-containing superoxide dismutase,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 278–286, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. B. Warner, L. Stuart, S. Gebb, and J. R. Wispe, “Redox regulation of manganese superoxide dismutase,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 271, no. 1, pp. L150–L158, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Ahn and D. J. Thiele, “Redox regulation of mammalian heat shock factor 1 is essential for Hsp gene activation and protection from stress,” Genes & Development, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 516–528, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kalmar and L. Greensmith, “Induction of heat shock proteins for protection against oxidative stress,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 310–318, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Marber, D. S. Latchman, J. M. Walker, and D. M. Yellon, “Cardiac stress protein elevation 24 hours after brief ischemia or heat stress is associated with resistance to myocardial infarction,” Circulation, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1264–1272, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Abid, K. Yano, S. Guo et al., “Forkhead transcription factors inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 33, pp. 29864–29873, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sengupta, J. D. Molkentin, J. H. Paik, R. A. DePinho, and K. E. Yutzey, “FoxO transcription factors promote cardiomyocyte survival upon induction of oxidative stress,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 9, pp. 7468–7478, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sengupta, J. D. Molkentin, and K. E. Yutzey, “FoxO transcription factors promote autophagy in cardiomyocytes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 41, pp. 28319–28331, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Singh, T. Rangasamy, R. K. Thimmulappa et al., “Glutathione peroxidase 2, the major cigarette smoke–inducible isoform of GPX in lungs, is regulated by Nrf2,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 639–650, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Giam, P. Y. Chu, S. Kuruppu et al., “N-acetylcysteine attenuates the development of cardiac fibrosis and remodeling in a mouse model of heart failure,” Physiological Reports, vol. 4, no. 7, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Li, Y. Sun, J. P. Wang et al., “Antioxidant N-acetylcysteine inhibits maladaptive myocyte autophagy in pressure overload induced cardiac remodeling in rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 839, pp. 47–56, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Talasaz, H. Khalili, F. Fahimi et al., “Effects of N-acetylcysteine on the cardiac remodeling biomarkers and major adverse events following acute myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial,” American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sethi, N. Takeda, M. Nagano, and N. S. Dhalla, “Beneficial effects of vitamin E treatment in acute myocardial infarction,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Jialal and S. Devaraj, “Vitamin E supplementation and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342, no. 25, pp. 1917-1918, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Riccioni, A. Frigiola, S. Pasquale, D. G. Massimo, and N. D'Orazio, “Vitamin C and E consumption and coronary heart disease in men,” Frontiers in Bioscience (Elite Edition), vol. E4, pp. 373–380, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Hershberger, A. S. Martin, and M. D. Hirschey, “Role of NAD⁺ and mitochondrial sirtuins in cardiac and renal diseases,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 213–225, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and G. J. Dusting, “NADPH oxidase-mediated redox signaling: roles in cellular stress response, stress tolerance, and tissue repair,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 218–242, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. I. Salganik, “The benefits and hazards of antioxidants: controlling apoptosis and other protective mechanisms in cancer patients and the human population,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 20, 5 Suppl, pp. 464S–472S, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Steinhubl, “Why have antioxidants failed in clinical trials?” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 14D–19D, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Tao Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3355

Downloads

1648

Citations