1932

Abstract

This article explores the effects of the state on the creation of social trust. It identifies four theories connecting these two variables. The first and probably most important one stresses the role of the state as a third-party punisher of free-riders, especially in large societies where people have continuous interactions with strangers. The second claims that citizens extrapolate state officers’ corruption levels to ordinary citizens’ trustworthiness. The third claims that the state promotes trust by increasing income equality, and the final one claims that the state fosters trust by providing information about types of people. Finally, the article discusses how the empirical models relating to the state and trust deal with endogeneity problems, how outcomes from experimental analyses question the results obtained from observational data, and how this work affects our ideas about what trust ultimately refers to.

Keyword(s): corruptionsanctionsstatetrust
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102842
2023-06-15
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/26/1/annurev-polisci-051921-102842.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102842&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abramson SF, Carter DB, Ying L 2022. Historical border changes, state building, and contemporary trust in Europe. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 116:3875–95
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alesina A, La Ferrara E. 2002. Who trusts others?. J. Public Econ. 85:207–34
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aristotle 1997. Política transl. J Marías, M Araújo Madrid: Cent. Estud. Políticos Const.
  4. Arrow K. 1974. The Limits of Organization. New York/London: W.W. Norton
  5. Balliet D, Van Lange PAM. 2013. Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 139:51090–112
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bargsted M, Ortiz C, Cáceres I, Somma NM. 2022. Social and political trust in a low trust society. Political Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09762-2
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauer PC, Freitag M 2018. Measuring trust. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust EM Uslaner 15–36. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauer PC, Keusch F, Kreuter F. 2019. Trust and cooperative behavior: evidence from the realm of data-sharing. PLOS ONE 14:8e0220115
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker SO, Boeckh K, Hainz C, Woessmann L. 2016. The Empire is dead, long live the Empire! Long-run persistence of trust and corruption in the bureaucracy. Econ. J. 126:59040–74
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Berg JE, Dickhaut J, McCabe K. 1995. Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10:122–42
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berggren N, Jordahl H. 2006. Free to trust: economic freedom and social capital. KYKLOS 59:2141–69
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bergh A, Bjornskov C. 2013. Trust, welfare states and income equality: What causes what? Work. Pap. 994 Res. Inst. Ind. Econ. Stockholm, Sweden:
  13. Bigoni M, Bortolotti S, Casari M, Gambetta D, Pancotto F. 2016. Amoral familism, social capital, or trust? The behavioral foundations of the Italian North-South divide. Econ. J. 126:5941318–41
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bjørnskov C. 2003. Corruption and social capital Work. Pap. 03–13 Dep. Econ., Aarhus Sch. Bus. Aarhus, Denmark:
  15. Bjørnskov C. 2006. Determinants of generalized trust: a cross-country comparison. Public Choice 130:1–21
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bohem C. 2012. Moral Origins. The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism and Shame. New York: Basic Books
  17. Bohnet I, Baytelman Y. 2007. Institutions and trust. Implications for preferences, beliefs and behavior. Ration. Soc. 19:199–135
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bowles S. 2016. The Moral Economy. Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens. New Haven, CT/London: Yale Univ. Press
  19. Bowles S, Gintis H. 2011. A Cooperative Species. Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  20. Bowles S, Polanía-Reyes S. 2012. Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements?. J. Econ. Lit. 50:2368–425
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Brehm J, Rahn W. 1997. Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. Am. J. Political Sci. 41:3999–1023
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Camerer CF. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  23. Carugati F, Levi M. 2021. A Moral Political Economy: Present, Past and Future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  24. Charron N, Rothstein B 2018. Regions of trust and distrust: how good institutions can foster social cohesion. Bridging the Prosperity Gap in the EU: The Social Challenge Ahead U Bernitz, M Mårtensson, L Oxelheim, T Persson 220–42. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen XP, Dang CT, Keng-Highberger F 2014. Broadening the motivation to cooperate: revisiting the role of sanctions in social dilemmas. Reward and Punishment in Social Dilemmas PAM Van Lange, B Rockenbach, T Yamagishi 115–32. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Coleman JS. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge, MA/London: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press
  27. Cook KS. 2004. Networks, norms and trust: the social capital 2004 Cooley Mead Award address. Soc. Psychol. Q. 68:14–14
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Cook KS, Hardin R, Levi M. 2005. Cooperation Without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Found.
  29. Cook KS, State B 2017. Trust and social dilemmas: a selected review of evidence and applications. Trust in Social Dilemmas PAM Van Lange, B Rockenbach, T Yamagishi 9–30. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Cooper DJ, Kagel JH 2016. Other-regarding preferences: a selective survey of experimental results. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Vol. 2 JH Kagel, AE Roths 217–89. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Daniele G, Geys B 2015. Interpersonal trust and welfare state support. Eur. J. Political Econ. 39:1–12
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dasgupta P. 1988. Trust as a commodity. See Gambetta 1988 49–72
  33. Dinesen PT. 2012. Parental transmission of trust or perceptions of institutional fairness. Generalized trust of non-western immigrants in a high-trust society. Comp. Politics 44:3273–89
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dinesen PT. 2013. Where you come from or where you live? Examining the cultural and institutional explanation of generalized trust using migration as a natural experiment. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 29:1114–28
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dinesen PT, Sønderskov KM 2021. Quality of government and social trust. Oxford Handbook of Quality of Government M Grimes, A Bagenholm, B Rothstein, M Bauhr 539–58. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Dinesen PT, Sønderskov KM, Sohlberg J, Esaiasson P. 2022. Close (causally connected) cousins? Evidence on the causal relationship between political trust and social trust. Public Opin. Q. 86:3708–21
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ermisch J, Gambetta D. 2010. Do strong family ties inhibit trust?. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 75:3365–76
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Farrell H. 2009. The Political Economy of Trust. Institutions, Interests, and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  39. Fehr E, Gaechter S. 2000. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90:4980–94
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fehr E, Rockenbach B. 2003. Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422:137–40
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fox J, Eisenstein M, Breslawski J. 2022. State support for religion and social trust. Political Stud. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Freitag M, Bühlmann M. 2009. The role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. Comp. Political Stud. 42:121537–66
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gambetta D. 1988.. “ Can we trust trust?”. See Gambetta 1988 213–37
  44. Gambetta D 1988. Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  45. Gambetta D. 2009. Codes of the Underworld. How Criminals Communicate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  46. Gelissen JPT, Van Oorschot WJH, Finsveen EM. 2012. How does the welfare state influence individuals’ social capital? Eurobarometer evidence on individuals’ access to informal help. Eur. Soc. 14:3416–40
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gellner E. 1988. Trust, cohesion and the social order. See Gambetta 1988 142–57
  48. Gintis H, Van Schaik C, Boehm C. 2015. Zoon Politikon: the evolutionary origins of human political systems. Curr. Anthropol. 56:3327–53
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Graafland J, Lous B. 2019. Income inequality, life satisfaction, inequality and trust: a cross country panel analysis. J. Happiness Stud. 20:1717–37
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Graeff P, Svendsen GT. 2013. Trust and corruption: the influence of positive and negative social capital on the economic development in the European Union. Q. Quantity 47:52829–46
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Greene J. 2014. Moral Tribes. Emotion, Reason, and Gap Between Us and Then. London: Penguin
  52. Greif A. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  53. Güemes C, Herreros F. 2019. Education and trust. A tale of three continents. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 40:5676–93
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hardin R. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness New York: Russell Sage Found.
  55. Hardin R. 2006. Trust Cambridge, UK: Polity
  56. Hargreaves SP, Tan JHW, Zizzo DJ. 2013. Trust, inequality and the market. Theory Decis. 74:311–33
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Herreros F. 2007. Size and virtue. Eur. J. Political Theory 6:4465–84
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Herreros F. 2008. The state and the creation of an environment for the growing of trust. Ration. Soc. 20:4497–521
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Herreros F. 2012. The state counts. State efficacy and the development of trust. Ration. Soc. 24:4483–509
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Hoskings G. 2014. Trust. A History Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  61. Irwin K, Mulder L, Simpson B. 2014. The detrimental effects of sanctions on intragroup trust: comparing punishment and rewards. Soc. Psychol. Q. 77:3253–72
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Jensen JL, Ramey AJ. 2020. Early investments in state capacity promote persistently higher levels of social capital. PNAS 117:2010755–61
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Johnson ND, Mislin AA. 2011. Trust games: a meta-analysis. J. Econ. Psychol. 32:865–89
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kanitsar G. 2022. The inequality-trust nexus revisited: At what level of aggregation does income inequality matter for social trust?. Soc. Indic. Res. 163:1171–195
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. 2003. Governance matters III: governance indicators for 1996–2002 Policy Res. Work. Pap. 3106 World Bank Dev. Res. Group Washington, DC:
  66. Knack S. 2000. Social capital and the quality of government. Evidence from the United States Policy Res. Work. Pap. 2504 World Bank Dev. Res. Group Washington, DC:
  67. Knack S, Keefer P. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff?. Q. J. Econ. 112:41251–88
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Larsen CA. 2007. How welfare state regimes generate and erode social capital: the impact of underclass phenomena. Comp. Politics 40:183–101
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Levi M 1998. A state of trust. Trust and Governance V Braithwaite, M Levi 77–101. New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Levi M, Moe M, Buckley T. 2004. The transaction costs of distrust: labor and management at the National Labor Relations Board. Distrust R Hardin 106–35. New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Lo Iacono S. 2019. Law-breaking, fairness, and generalized trust: the mediating role of trust in institutions. PLOS ONE 14:8e0220160
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Malhotra D, Murnighan JK. 2002. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Adm. Res. Q. 47:534–59
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Mewes H, Fairbrother M, Giordano GN, Wu C, Wilkes R. 2021. Experiences matter: a longitudinal study of individual-level sources of declining social trust in the United States. Soc. Sci. Res. 95:102537
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Milanovic B. 2019. Capitalism Alone. The Future of the System that Rules the World. Cambridge, MA/London: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press
  75. Milgrom PR, North DC, Weingast BR. 1990. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the Law Merchant, private judges, and the Champagne fairs. Econ. Politics 2:11–23
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Mulder LB, Van Dijk E, De Cremer D, Wilke HAM. 2006. Undermining trust and cooperation: the paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42:147–62
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Nannestad P. 2008. What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything?. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 11:413–36
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Nannestad P, Svendsen GT, Dinesen PT, Sønderskov KM. 2014. Do institutions or culture determine the level of trust? The natural experiment of migration from non-Western countries. J. Ethnic Migr. Stud. 40:4544–65
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Newton K, Zmerli S. 2011. Three forms of trust and their association. Eur. Political Sci. Rev. 3:2169–200
    [Google Scholar]
  80. North DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  81. Olivera J. 2015. Changes in inequality and generalized trust in Europe. Soc. Indic. Res. 124:21–41
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Olson M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  83. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  84. Ostrom E, Ahn TK 2009. The meaning of social capital and its links to collective action. Handbook of Social Capital. The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics GT Svendsen, GLH Svendsen 17–35. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Piketty T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA/London: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press
  86. Putnam RD. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  87. Putnam RD. 2000. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community New York: Simon and Schuster
  88. Putnam RD. 2020. The Upswing. How Americans Came Together a Century Ago and How We Can Do It Again. New York: Simon and Schuster
  89. Putterman L 2014. When punishment supports cooperation: insights from voluntary cooperation experiments. Reward and Punishment in Social Dilemmas PAM Van Lange, B Rockenbach, T Yamagishi 17–33. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Rahn WM, Rudolph TJ. 2005. A tale of political trust in American cities. Public Opin. Q. 69:4530–60
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Raihani N. 2021. The Social Instinct. How Cooperation Shaped the World. London: Jonathan Cape
  92. Richey S. 2010. The impact of corruption on social trust. Am. Politics Res. 38:4676–90
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Robbins BG. 2011. Neither government nor community alone: a test of state-centered models of generalized trust. Ration. Soc. 23:3304–46
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Robbins BG. 2012a. A blessing and a curse? Political institutions in the growth and decay of generalized trust: a cross national panel analysis, 1980–2009. PLOS ONE 7:4e35120
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Robbins BG. 2012b. Institutional quality and generalized trust: a nonrecursive causal model. Soc. Indic. Res. 107:235–58
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Robbins BG. 2016. When social constraints increase trust: considering causal attributions as a source of treatment effect heterogeneity. Socius 2: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116667360
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Rothstein B. 2005. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  98. Rothstein B, Eek D. 2009. Political corruption and social trust: an experimental approach. Ration. Soc. 21:181–112
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Rothstein B, Stolle D 2003. Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: an institutional approach. Generating Social Capital M Hooghe, D Stolle 191–209. New York: Palgrave
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Rothstein B, Uslaner E. 2005. All for all. World Politics 58:41–72
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Scheidel W. 2017. The Great Leveller. Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  102. Seifert N. 2018. Yet another case of Nordic exceptionalism? Extending existing evidence for a causal relationship between institutional and social trust to the Netherlands and Switzerland. Soc. Indic. Res. 136:539–55
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Serritzlew S, Sønderskov KM, Svendsen GT. 2014. Do corruption and social trust affect economic growth? A review. J. Comp. Anal. Res. Pract. 16:2121–39
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Sønderskov KM. 2011. Explaining large-N cooperation: generalized social trust and the social exchange heuristic. Ration. Soc. 23:151–74
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Sønderskov KM, Dinesen PT. 2014. Danish exceptionalism: explaining the unique increase in social trust over the past 30 years. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 30:6782–95
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Sønderskov KM, Dinesen PT. 2016. Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Political Behav. 38:179–202
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Spadaro G, Gangl K, Van Prooijen JW, Van Lange PAM, Mosso CO. 2020. Enhancing feelings of security: how institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust. PLOS ONE 15:9e0237934
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Stolle D 2003. The sources of social capital. Generating Social Capital M Hooghe, D Stolle 19–42. New York: Palgrave
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Sutherland CAM, Burton NS, Wilmer JB, Blokland GAM, Germine L et al. 2020. Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environment, not genes. PNAS 117:1910218–24
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Svendsen GLH, Svendsen GT. 2016. Trust, Social Capital and the Scandinavian Welfare State. Explaining the Flight of the Bumblebee. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
  111. Sztompka P. 1999. Trust. A Sociological Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  112. Uslaner E. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  113. Uslaner E. 2008. Corruption, Inequality and the Rule of Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  114. Van Dijk E, Mulder LB, Kwaadsteniet EW 2014. For the common good? The use of sanctions in social dilemmas. Reward and Punishment in Social Dilemmas PAM Van Lange, B Rockenbach, T Yamagishi 70–84. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Van Lange PAM, Rockenbach B, Yamagishi T 2017. Trust. Introduction and trending topics. Trust in Social Dilemmas PAM Van Lange, B Rockenbach, T Yamagishi 1–8. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang L, Gordon P. 2011. Trust and institutions: a multilevel analysis. J. Socio-Econ. 40:5583–93
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Williamson OE. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism New York/London: Free Press
  118. Wilson DS. 2015. Does Altruism Exist? Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others. New Haven, CT/London: Yale Univ. Press
  119. Wrangham R. 2019. The Goodness Paradox. How Evolution Made Us More and Less Violent. London: Profile Books
  120. Yamagishi T. 2011. Trust. The Evolutionary Game of Mind and Society London: Springer
  121. You JS. 2012. Social trust: fairness matters more than homogeneity. Political Psychol. 33:5701–21
    [Google Scholar]
  122. You JS 2018. Trust and corruption. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust EM Uslaner 473–96. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Zak PJ. 2013. The Moral Molecule. How Trust Works. New York: Penguin
  124. Ziller C, Andreß HJ. 2022. Quality of local government and social trust in European cities. Urban Stud. 59:91909–25
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Zmerli S, Newton K. 2008. Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opin. Q. 74:4706–24
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102842
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102842
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error