How Distortions Alter the Impacts of International Trade in Developing Countries

Literature Cited

1. Abeberese AB. 2017. Electricity cost and firm performance: evidence from India. Rev. Econ. Stat. 99:839–52
   [Google Scholar]
2. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J 2005. The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change, and economic growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:546–79
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ahn J, Amiti M, Weinstein DE 2011a. Trade finance and the great trade collapse. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:298–302
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ahn J, Khandelwal AK, Wei SJ 2011b. The role of intermediaries in facilitating trade. J. Int. Econ. 84:73–85
   [Google Scholar]
5. Allcott H, Collard-Wexler A, O'Connell SD 2016. How do electricity shortages affect industry? Evidence from India. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:587–624
   [Google Scholar]
6. Allen T. 2014. Information frictions in trade. Econometrica 82:2041–83
   [Google Scholar]
7. Allen T, Atkin D. 2016. Volatility and the gains from trade NBER Work. Pap 22276
8. Amiti M, Konings J. 2007. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: evidence from Indonesia. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1611–38
   [Google Scholar]
9. Antràs P. 2016. Global Production: Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
10. Antràs P, Costinot A. 2011. Intermediated trade. Q. J. Econ. 126:1319–74
    [Google Scholar]
11. Antràs P, Foley CF. 2015. Poultry in motion: a study of international trade finance practices. J. Political Econ. 123:853–901
    [Google Scholar]
12. Artuc E, Lederman D, Porto G 2015. A mapping of labor mobility costs in the developing world. J. Int. Econ. 95:28–41
    [Google Scholar]
13. Atkin D. 2016. Endogenous skill acquisition and export manufacturing in Mexico. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:2046–85
    [Google Scholar]
14. Atkin D, Chaudhry A, Chaudhry S, Khandelwal AK, Verhoogen E 2015. Markup and cost dispersion across firms: direct evidence from producer surveys in Pakistan. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:537–44
    [Google Scholar]
15. Atkin D, Donaldson D. 2016. Who's getting globalized? The size and implications of intra-national trade costs NBER Work. Pap 21439
16. Atkin D, Faber B, Gonzalez-Navarro M 2018. Retail globalization and household welfare: evidence from Mexico. J. Political Econ. 126:1–73
    [Google Scholar]
17. Atkin D, Khandelwal A, Osman A 2017. Exporting and firm performance: evidence from a randomized experiment. Q. J. Econ. 132:1101–64
    [Google Scholar]
18. Baccini L, Impullitti G, Malesky EJ 2019. Globalization and state capitalism: assessing Vietnam's accession to the WTO. J. Int. Econ. 119:75–92
    [Google Scholar]
19. Banerjee AV, Duflo E. 2000. Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: a study of the Indian software industry. Q. J. Econ. 115:989–1017
    [Google Scholar]
20. Banerjee AV, Duflo E. 2005. Growth theory through the lens of development economics. Handbook of Economic Growth 1A P Aghion, S Durlauf 473–552 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bardhan P, Mookherjee D, Tsumagari M 2013. Middlemen margins and globalization. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 5:81–119
    [Google Scholar]
22. Bartelme D, Costinot A, Donaldson D, Rodriguez-Clare A 2019. The textbook case for industrial policy: Theory meets data NBER Work. Pap 26193
23. Bergquist LF, Dinerstein M 2019. Competition and entry in agricultural markets: experimental evidence from Kenya Work. Pap., Univ. Mich Ann Arbor:
24. Bernard AB, Moxnes A. 2018. Networks and trade. Annu. Rev. Econ. 10:65–85
    [Google Scholar]
25. Bertrand M, Hsieh CT, Tsivanidis N 2017. Contract labor and firm growth in India Booth Sch. Bus., Univ. Chicago Chicago, IL:
26. Bertrand M, Mehta P, Mullainathan S 2002. Ferreting out tunneling: an application to Indian business groups. Q. J. Econ. 117:121–48
    [Google Scholar]
27. Besley T, Ghatak M. 2010. Property rights and economic development. Handbook of Development Economics 5 D Rodrik, M Rosenzweig 4525–95 Amsterdam: North-Holland
    [Google Scholar]
28. Bhagwati J. 1964. On the underinvoicing of imports. Bull. Oxf. Univ. Inst. Econ. Stat. 27:389–97
    [Google Scholar]
29. Bhagwati J, Ramaswami V. 1963. Domestic distortions, tariffs, and the theory of optimum subsidy. J. Political Econ. 71:44–50
    [Google Scholar]
30. Bigsten A, Collier P, Dercon S, Fafchamps M, Gauthier B et al. 2004. Do African manufacturing firms learn from exporting. J. Dev. Stud. 40:115–41
    [Google Scholar]
31. Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J 2013. Does management matter? Evidence from India. Q. J. Econ. 128:1–51
    [Google Scholar]
32. Bloom N, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J 2020. Do management interventions last? Evidence from India. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 12:198–219
    [Google Scholar]
33. Bloom N, Manova K, Sun ST, Van Reenen J, Yu Z 2018. Managing trade: evidence from China and the US NBER Work. Pap 24718
34. Bloom N, Van Reenen J 2007. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Q. J. Econ. 122:1351–408
    [Google Scholar]
35. Boudreau L. 2019. Workplace safety and employment decisions: evidence from a pilot information experiment with Bangladeshi garment workers Work. Pap., Grad. Sch. Bus., Columbia Univ New York:
36. Brandt L, Van Biesebroeck J, Wang L, Zhang Y 2017. WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:2784–820
    [Google Scholar]
37. Bustos P. 2011. Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: evidence on the impact of Mercosur on Argentinian firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:304–40
    [Google Scholar]
38. Cage J, Gadenne L. 2018. Tax revenues and the fiscal cost of trade liberalization, 1792–2006. Explor. Econ. Hist. 70:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
39. Caliendo L, Rossi-Hansberg E. 2012. The impact of trade on organization and productivity. Q. J. Econ. 127:1393–467
    [Google Scholar]
40. Chalendard C, Raballand G, Rakotoarisoa A 2019. The use of detailed statistical data in customs reforms: the case of Madagascar. Dev. Policy Rev. 37:546–63
    [Google Scholar]
41. Chaudhuri S, Goldberg PK, Gia P 2006. Estimating the effects of global patent protection in pharmaceuticals: a case study of quinolones in India. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:1477–514
    [Google Scholar]
42. Cherniwchan J, Copeland BR, Taylor MS 2017. Trade and the environment: new methods, measurements, and results. Annu. Rev. Econ. 9:59–85
    [Google Scholar]
43. Clerides S, Lach S, Tybout JR 1998. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Q. J. Econ. 113:903–47
    [Google Scholar]
44. Coşar AK, Fajgelbaum PD. 2016. Internal geography, international trade, and regional specialization. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 8:24–56
    [Google Scholar]
45. Couture V, Faber B, Gu Y, Liu L 2020. Connecting the countryside via e-commerce: evidence from China NBER Work. Pap 24384
46. Das S, Roberts MJ, Tybout JR 2007. Market entry costs, producer heterogeneity, and export dynamics. Econometrica 75:837–73
    [Google Scholar]
47. De Loecker J. 2007. Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. J. Int. Econ. 73:69–98
    [Google Scholar]
48. De Loecker J, Goldberg PK, Khandelwal AK, Pavcnik N 2016. Prices, markups, and trade reform. Econometrica 84:445–510
    [Google Scholar]
49. Dhingra S, Tenreyro S. 2017. Piggy-back exporting, intermediation, and the distributional gains from trade in to small farmers in developing economies Work. Pap., London Sch. Econ London, UK:
50. Dix-Carneiro R. 2014. Trade liberalization and labor market dynamics. Econometrica 82:825–85
    [Google Scholar]
51. Dix-Carneiro R, Goldberg P, Meghir C, Ulyssea G 2019. Trade and informality in the presence of labor market frictions and regulations Work. Pap., Duke Univ Durham, NC:
52. Dix-Carneiro R, Kovak BK. 2019. Margins of labor market adjustment to trade. J. Int. Econ. 117:125–42
    [Google Scholar]
53. Djankov S, McLiesh C, Shleifer A 2007. Private credit in 129 countries. J. Financ. Econ. 12:77–99
    [Google Scholar]
54. Donaldson D. 2015. The gains from market integration. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7:619–47
    [Google Scholar]
55. Dragusanu R, Giovannucci D, Nunn N 2014. The economics of fair trade. J. Econ. Perspect. 28:217–36
    [Google Scholar]
56. Dragusanu R, Nunn N. 2018. The effects of fair trade certification: evidence from coffee producers in Costa Rica NBER Work. Pap 24260
57. Duranton G, Venables AJ. 2019. Place-based policies for development NBER Work. Pap 24562
58. Edmond C, Midrigan V, Xu DY 2015. Competition, markups, and the gains from international trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:3183–221
    [Google Scholar]
59. Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N. 2005. The effect of trade liberalization on child labor. J. Int. Econ. 65:401–19
    [Google Scholar]
60. Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N. 2006. International trade and child labor: cross-country evidence. J. Int. Econ. 68:115–40
    [Google Scholar]
61. Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N, Topalova P 2010. Trade adjustment and human capital investments: evidence from Indian tariff reform. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:42–75
    [Google Scholar]
62. Fafchamps M, Hill RV. 2008. Price transmission and trader entry in domestic commodity markets. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 56:729–66
    [Google Scholar]
63. Fajgelbaum PD, Redding S. 2018. Trade, structural transformation and development: evidence from Argentina, 1869–1914 NBER Work. Pap 20217
    [Google Scholar]
64. Feenstra RC, Hanson GH. 1996. Globalization, outsourcing, and wage inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 86:240–45
    [Google Scholar]
65. Fernandes AP, Tang H. 2014. Learning to export from neighbors. J. Int. Econ. 94:67–84
    [Google Scholar]
66. Finan F, Olken B, Pande R 2017. Personnel economics of the state. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments 2 AV Banerjee, E Duflo 20–24 Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
67. Fisman R, Wei SJ. 2004. Tax rates and tax evasion: evidence from missing imports in China. J. Political Econ. 112:471–96
    [Google Scholar]
68. Foley CF, Manova K. 2015. International trade, multinational activity, and corporate finance. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7:119–46
    [Google Scholar]
69. Freeman RB. 2010. Labor regulations, unions, and social protection in developing countries: market distortions or efficient institutions?. Handbook of Development Economics 5 D Rodrik, M Rosenzweig 4657–702 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
70. Gadenne L, Nandi TK, Rathelot R 2019. Taxation and supplier networks: evidence from India Work. Pap., Univ. Warwick Coventry, UK:
71. Goldberg PK, Khandelwal A, Pavcnik N, Topalova P 2009. Trade liberalization and new imported inputs. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 99:494–500
    [Google Scholar]
72. Goldberg PK, Pavcnik N. 2003. The response of the informal sector to trade liberalization. J. Dev. Econ. 72:463–96
    [Google Scholar]
73. Goldberg PK, Pavcnik N. 2007. Distributional effects of globalization in developing countries. J. Econ. Lit. 45:39–82
    [Google Scholar]
74. Goldberg PK, Pavcnik N. 2016. The effects of trade policy. Handbook of Commercial Policy 1A K Bagwell, RW Staiger 161–206 Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland
    [Google Scholar]
75. Gopinath G. 2015. The international price system NBER Work. Pap 21646
76. Gopinath G, Itskhoki O, Rigobon R 2010. Currency choice and exchange rate pass-through. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:304–36
    [Google Scholar]
77. Gopinath G, Neiman B. 2014. Trade adjustment and productivity in large crises. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:793–831
    [Google Scholar]
78. Guadalupe M, Wulf J. 2010. The flattening firm and product market competition: the effect of trade liberalization on corporate hierarchies. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:105–127
    [Google Scholar]
79. Halpern L, Koren M, Szeidl A 2015. Imported inputs and productivity. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:3360–703
    [Google Scholar]
80. Hansman C, Hjort J, León G, Teachout M 2020. Vertical integration, supplier behavior, and quality upgrading among exporters. J. Political Econ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
81. Harrison A. 1994. Productivity, imperfect competition and trade reform: theory and evidence. J. Int. Econ. 36:53–73
    [Google Scholar]
82. Harrison A, Rodriguez-Clare A. 2010. Trade, foreign investment, and industrial policy for developing countries. Handbook of Development Economics 5 D Rodrik, M Rosenzweig 4039–214 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
83. Harrison A, Scorse J. 2010. Multinationals and anti-sweatshop activism. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:247–73
    [Google Scholar]
84. Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ. 2009. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q. J. Econ. 124:1403–48
    [Google Scholar]
85. Hsieh CT, Olken BA. 2014. The missing ‘missing middle. J. Econ. Perspect. 28:89–108
    [Google Scholar]
86. Huneeus F. 2019. Production network dynamics and the propagation of shocks Work. Pap., Yale Univ New Haven, CT:
87. Iacovone L, Javorcik BS, Keller W, Tybout JR 2015. Supplier responses to Walmart's invasion in Mexico. J. Int. Econ. 95:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
88. Ilias N. 2006. Families and firms: agency costs and labor market imperfections in Sialkot's surgical industry. J. Dev. Econ. 80:329–49
    [Google Scholar]
89. Irwin DA. 2019. Does trade reform promote economic growth? A review of recent evidence NBER Work. Pap 25927
90. Javorcik BS. 2004. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:605–27
    [Google Scholar]
91. Javorcik BS, Li Y. 2013. Do the biggest aisles serve a brighter future? Global retail chains and their implications for Romania. J. Int. Econ. 90:348–63
    [Google Scholar]
92. Javorcik BS, Narciso G. 2017. WTO accession and tariff evasion. J. Dev. Econ. 125:59–71
    [Google Scholar]
93. Javorcik BS, Narciso G. 2008. Differentiated products and evasion of import tariffs. J. Int. Econ. 76:208–22
    [Google Scholar]
94. Jensen R. 2010. The (perceived) returns to education and the demand for schooling. Q. J. Econ. 125:515–48
    [Google Scholar]
95. Jha S. 2015. Financial asset holdings and political attitudes: evidence from revolutionary England. Q. J. Econ. 130:1485–545
    [Google Scholar]
96. Juhász R, Steinwender C. 2018. Spinning the web: the impact of ICT on trade in intermediates and technology diffusion NBER Work. Pap 24590
97. Khandelwal AK, Schott PK, Wei SJ 2013. Trade liberalization and embedded institutional reform: evidence from Chinese exporters. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:2169–95
    [Google Scholar]
98. Khandelwal AK, Teachout M. 2016. Special economic zones for Myanmar Work. Pap., Int. Growth Cent London, UK:
99. Khanna T, Yafeh Y. 2007. Business groups in emerging markets: paragons or parasites. J. Econ. Lit. 45:331–72
    [Google Scholar]
100. Kovak BK. 2013. Regional effects of trade reform: What is the correct measure of liberalization. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:1960–76
     [Google Scholar]
101. Kremer M, Rao G, Schilbach F 2019. Behavioral development economics. Handbook of Behavioral Economics 2: BD Bernheim, S DellaVigna, D Laibson 345–458 Amsterdam: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
102. Krishna K, Sheveleva Y. 2017. Wheat or strawberries? Intermediated trade with limited contracting. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 9:28–62
     [Google Scholar]
103. Krueger AO. 1984. Trade policies in developing countries. Handbook of International Economics 1 RW Jones, PB Kenen 519–69 Amsterdam: North-Holland
     [Google Scholar]
104. Kugler M, Verhoogen E. 2012. Prices, plant size, and product quality. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79:307–39
     [Google Scholar]
105. La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW 1998. Law and finance. J. Political Econ. 106:1113–55
     [Google Scholar]
106. Lagakos D. 2016. Explaining cross-country productivity differences in retail trade. J. Political Econ. 124:579–620
     [Google Scholar]
107. Levchenko AA. 2007. Institutional quality and international trade. Rev. Econ. Stud. 74:791–819
     [Google Scholar]
108. Levchenko AA. 2013. International trade and institutional change. J. Law Econ. Organ. 29:1145–81
     [Google Scholar]
109. Levinsohn J. 1993. Testing the imports-as-market-discipline hypothesis. J. Int. Econ. 35:1–22
     [Google Scholar]
110. Liu E. 2019. Industrial policies in production networks. Q. J. Econ. 134:1883–948
     [Google Scholar]
111. Macchiavello R. 2011. Development uncorked: reputation acquisition in the new market for Chilean wines in the UK Work. Pap., Univ. Warwick Coventry, UK:
112. Macchiavello R, Miquel-Florensa J. 2017. Vertical integration and relational contracts: evidence from the Costa Rica coffee chain Discuss. Pap. 11874, Cent. Econ. Policy Res Washington, DC:
113. Macchiavello R, Miquel-Florensa J. 2019. Improving export quality: the case of the sustainable quality program in Columbian coffee Work. Pap., Toulouse Sch. Econ Toulouse, Fr.:
114. Macchiavello R, Morjaria A. 2015. The value of relationships: evidence from a supply shock to Kenyan rose exports. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:2911–45
     [Google Scholar]
115. Macchiavello R, Morjaria A. 2019. Competition and the relational contracts in the Rwanda coffee chain Discuss. Pap. 13607, Cent. Econ. Policy Res Washington, DC:
116. Manova K. 2013. Credit constraints, heterogeneous firms, and international trade. Rev. Econ. Stud. 80:711–44
     [Google Scholar]
117. Manova K, Zhang Z. 2012. Export prices across firms and destinations. Q. J. Econ. 127:379–436
     [Google Scholar]
118. McCaig B, Pavcnik N. 2018. Export markets and labor allocation in a low-income country. Am. Econ. Rev. 108:1899–941
     [Google Scholar]
119. McMillan J, Woodruff C. 1999. Interfirm relationships and informal credit in Vietnam. Q. J. Econ. 114:1285–320
     [Google Scholar]
120. McMillan M, Horn Welch K, Rodrik D, Elbadawi I, O'Connell S 2003. When economic reform goes wrong: cashew in Mozambique. Brookings Trade Forum 2003:97–165
     [Google Scholar]
121. Mishra P, Subramanian A, Topalova P 2008. Tariffs, enforcement, and customs evasion: evidence from India. J. Public Econ. 92:1907–25
     [Google Scholar]
122. Mobarak AM, Purbasari D. 2006. Corrupt protection for sale to firms: evidence from Indonesia Work. Pap., Yale Sch. Manag., Yale Univ New Haven, CT:
123. Mrázová M, Neary JP. 2018. Selection effects with heterogeneous firms. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 17:1294–334
     [Google Scholar]
124. Naidu S, Robinson JA, Young LE 2017. Social origins of dictatorships: elite networks and political transitions in Haiti Work. Pap., Columbia Univ New York:
125. Nataraj S. 2011. The impact of trade liberalization on productivity: evidence from India's formal and informal manufacturing sectors. J. Int. Econ. 85:292–301
     [Google Scholar]
126. Nunn N. 2007. Relationship-specificity, incomplete contracts, and the pattern of trade. Q. J. Econ. 122:569–600
     [Google Scholar]
127. Nunn N, Trefler D. 2014. Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. Handbook of International Economics 4 G Gopinath, E Helpman, K Rogoff 263–315 Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland
     [Google Scholar]
128. Paravisini D, Rappoport V, Schnabl P, Wolfenzon D 2015. Dissecting the effect of credit supply on trade: evidence from matched credit-export data. Rev. Econ. Stud. 82:333–59
     [Google Scholar]
129. Pascali L. 2017. The wind of change: maritime technology, trade, and economic development. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:2821–54
     [Google Scholar]
130. Pavcnik N. 2017. The impact of trade on inequality in developing countries. The Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium Proceedings: Fostering a Dynamic Global Economy Kansas City, MO: Fed. Reserve Bank
     [Google Scholar]
131. Puga D, Trefler D. 2014. International trade and institutional change: medieval Venice's response to globalization. Q. J. Econ. 129:753–821
     [Google Scholar]
132. Rijkers B, Baghdadi L, Raballand G 2015. Political connections and tariff evasion: evidence from Tunisia Policy Res. Work. Pap. 7336, World Bank Washington, DC:
133. Rodrik D. 1988. Imperfect competition, scale economies, and trade policy in developing countries. Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis RE Baldwin 109–44 Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
134. Rodrik D. 2018a. New technologies, global value chains, and the developing economies Backgr. Pap. 1, Pathw. Prosper. Comm Oxford, UK:
135. Rodrik D. 2018b. What do trade agreements really do. J. Econ. Perspect. 32:73–90
     [Google Scholar]
136. Ruggieri A. 2019. Trade and labor market institutions: a tale of two liberalizations Work. Pap., Univ. Nottingham Nottingham, UK:
137. Sequeira S. 2016. Corruption, trade costs, and gains from tariff liberalization: evidence from southern Africa. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:3029–63
     [Google Scholar]
138. Sequeira S, Djankov S. 2014. Corruption and firm behavior: evidence from African ports. J. Int. Econ. 94:277–94
     [Google Scholar]
139. Startz M. 2018. The value of face-to-face: search and contracting problems in Nigerian trade Work. Pap., Stanford Univ Stanford, CA:
140. Steinwender C. 2018. Real effects of information frictions: when the states and the kingdom became united. Am. Econ. Rev. 108:657–96
     [Google Scholar]
141. Tanaka M. 2019. The impact of exporting on factory working conditions in Myanmar Work. Pap., Hitotsubashi Univ Tokyo:
142. Tian Y. 2019. International trade liberalization and domestic institutional reform: effects of WTO accession on Chinese internal migration policy Work. Pap., Carnegie Mellon Univ Pittsburgh, PA:
143. Topalova PB. 2010. Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: evidence on poverty from India. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:1–41
     [Google Scholar]
144. Topalova PB, Khandelwal A. 2011. Trade liberalization and firm productivity: the case of India. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:995–1009
     [Google Scholar]
145. Tybout JR. 2000. Manufacturing firms in developing countries: How well do they do, and why. J. Econ. Lit. 38:11–44
     [Google Scholar]
146. Ulyssea G. 2018. Firms, informality, and development: theory and evidence from Brazil. Am. Econ. Rev. 108:2015–147
     [Google Scholar]
147. Verhoogen E. 2008. Trade, quality upgrading, and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Q. J. Econ. 123:489–530
     [Google Scholar]
148. Wagner J. 2007. Exports and productivity: a survey of the evidence from firm-level data. World Econ 30:60–82
     [Google Scholar]
149. Wang J. 2013. The economic impact of special economic zones: evidence from Chinese municipalities. J. Dev. Econ. 101:133–47
     [Google Scholar]
150. World Bank 2020. World Development Report: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains Washington, DC: World Bank/Int. Bank Reconstr. Dev.
151. Yang D. 2008a. Integrity for hire: an analysis of a widespread customs reform. J. Law Econ. 51:25–57
     [Google Scholar]
152. Yang D. 2008b. Can enforcement backfire? Crime displacement in the context of customs reform in the Philippines. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90:1–14
     [Google Scholar]