skip to main content
10.1145/3608298.3608319acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmhiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

A Study of Healthcare Team Communication Networks using Visual Analytics

Published:18 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cooperation among teams or individuals of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is one of the crucial factors towards patients’ survival outcome. However, it is challenging to uncover and understand such factors in the complex Multiteam System (MTS) communication networks representing daily HCP cooperation. In this paper, we present a study on MTS communication networks constructed with real-world cancer patients’ Electronic Health Record (EHR) access logs. We adopt a visual analytics workflow to extract associations between semantic characteristics of MTS communication networks and the patients’ survival outcomes. The workflow consists of a neural network learning phase to classify the data based on the chosen input and output attributes, a dimensionality reduction and optimization phase to produce a simplified set of results for examination, and finally an interpreting phase conducted by the user through an interactive visualization interface. We provide the insights found using this workflow with two case studies and an expert interview.

References

  1. M. L. Barnett, N. A. Christakis, J. O’Malley, J. P. Onnela, N. L. Keating, and B. E. Landon. 2012. Physician patient-sharing networks and the cost and intensity of care in US hospitals. Med Care 50, 2 (2012), 152–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822dcef7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Eta S. Berner and Tonya J. La Lande. 2016. Overview of Clinical Decision Support Systems. Springer Int. Publishing, Chapter 1, 1–17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Derun Cai, Chenxi Sun, Moxian Song, Baofeng Zhang, Shenda Hong, and Hongyan Li. 2022. Hypergraph contrastive learning for electronic health records. In Proceedings of the 2022 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). SIAM, 127–135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. SIGKDD. 785–794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Jimeng Sun, Joshua Kulas, Andy Schuetz, and Walter Stewart. 2016. RETAIN: An interpretable predictive model for healthcare using reverse time attention mechanism. In Proc. NIPS. 3504–3512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jerome H. Friedman. 2001. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. The Annals of Statistics 29, 5 (2001), 1189–1232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Michael Gleicher. 2013. Explainers: Expert explorations with crafted projections. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 19, 12 (2013), 2042–2051.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rongchen Guo, Takanori Fujiwara, Yiran Li, Kelly M Lima, Soman Sen, Nam K Tran, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2020. Comparative visual analytics for assessing medical records with sequence embedding. Visual Informatics 4, 2 (2020), 72–85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shunan Guo, Zhuochen Jin, David Gotz, Fan Du, Hongyuan Zha, and Nan Cao. 2018. Visual progression analysis of event sequence data. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (2018), 417–426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. F. Hackl, M. Hummer, and G. J. Pruckner. 2015. Old boys’ network in general practitioners’ referral behavior?J Health Econ 43 (2015), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.06.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Leora I. Horwitz and Allan S. Detsky. 2011. Physician Communication in the 21st Century: To Talk or to Text?JAMA 305, 11 (2011), 1128–1129. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. X. Ji, H. Shen, A. Ritter, R. Machiraju, and P. Yen. 2019. Visual Exploration of Neural Document Embedding in Information Retrieval: Semantics and Feature Selection. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 6 (2019), 2181–2192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Zhuochen Jin, Shuyuan Cui, Shunan Guo, David Gotz, Jimeng Sun, and Nan Cao. 2019. CarePre: An Intelligent Clinical Decision Assistance System. ACM Trans. on Computing for Healthcare (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nancy Katz, David Lazer, Holly Arrow, and Noshir Contractor. 2004. Network Theory and Small Groups. Small Group Research 35, 3 (2004), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404264941Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Kilduff and D. J. Brass. 2010. Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates. Academy of Management Annals 4, 1 (2010), 317–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.494827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bum Chul Kwon, Vibha Anand, Kristen A Severson, Soumya Ghosh, Zhaonan Sun, Brigitte I Frohnert, Markus Lundgren, and Kenney Ng. 2019. DPVis: Visual Exploration of Disease Progression Pathways. arXiv:1904.11652 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bum Chul Kwon, Min-Je Choi, Joanne Taery Kim, Edward Choi, Young Bin Kim, Soonwook Kwon, Jimeng Sun, and Jaegul Choo. 2018. RetainVis: Visual analytics with interpretable and interactive recurrent neural networks on electronic medical records. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (2018), 299–309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. E. Landon, N. L. Keating, M. L. Barnett, and et al.2012. Variation in patient-sharing networks of physicians across the united states. JAMA 308, 3 (2012), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.7615Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Oscar Li, Hao Liu, Chaofan Chen, and Cynthia Rudin. 2017. Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains its Predictions. arXiv:1710.04806 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yiran Li, Takanori Fujiwara, Yong K Choi, Katherine K Kim, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2020. A visual analytics system for multi-model comparison on clinical data predictions. Visual Informatics 4, 2 (2020), 122–131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zachary Chase Lipton, David C. Kale, Charles Elkan, and Randall C. Wetzel. 2016. Learning to Diagnose with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zheng Liu, Xiaohan Li, Hao Peng, Lifang He, and S Yu Philip. 2020. Heterogeneous similarity graph neural network on electronic health records. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 1196–1205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Hsiao-Ying Lu, Takanori Fujiwara, Ming-Yi Chang, Yang-chih Fu, Anders Ynnerman, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2023. Visual Analytics of Multivariate Networks with Representation Learning and Composite Variable Construction. Visual Informatics forthcoming (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Proc. NIPS, Vol. 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yao Ming, Panpan Xu, Huamin Qu, and Liu Ren. 2019. Interpretable and Steerable Sequence Learning via Prototypes. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Peter R Monge and Noshir S Contractor. 2003. Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. C. E. Pollack, G. Weissman, J. Bekelman, K. Liao, and K. Armstrong. 2012. Physician social networks and variation in prostate cancer treatment in three cities. Health Serv Res 47, 1 Pt 2 (2012), 380–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01331.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J. Ross Quinlan. 1983. Learning Efficient Classification Procedures and Their Application to Chess End Games. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Springer, 463–482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jen Rogers, Nicholas Spina, Ashley Neese, Rachel Hess, Darrel Brodke, and Alexander Lex. 2018. Composer: Visual Cohort Analysis of Patient Outcomes. In Proceedings of 9th workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. N. D. Soulakis, M. B. Carson, Y. J. Lee, D. H. Schneider, C. T. Skeehan, and D. M. Scholtens. 2015. Visualizing collaborative electronic health record usage for hospitalized patients with heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc 22, 2 (2015), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocu017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Stephen H Taplin, Sallie Weaver, Eduardo Salas, Veronica Chollette, Heather M Edwards, Suanna S Bruinooge, and Michael P Kosty. 2015. Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. Journal of oncology practice 11, 3 (2015), 239–246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Tin Kam Ho. 1995. Random decision forests. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition, Vol. 1. 278–282 vol.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Chun-Fu Wang, Jianping Li, Kwan-Liu Ma, Chih-Wei Huang, and Yu-Chuan Li. 2014. A Visual Analysis Approach to Cohort Study of Electronic Patient Records. In Proceedings of IEEE BIBM (to appear).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Qianwen Wang, Kexin Huang, Payal Chandak, Marinka Zitnik, and Nils Gehlenborg. 2022. Extending the Nested Model for User-Centric XAI: A Design Study on GNN-based Drug Repurposing. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. A. C. Weaver, M. Callaghan, A. L. Cooper, J. Brandman, and K. J. O’Leary. 2015. Assessing Interprofessional Teamwork in Inpatient Medical Oncology Units. J Oncol Pract 11, 1 (2015), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2014.001536Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Robert Wu, Peter Rossos, Sherman Quan, Scott Reeves, Vivian Lo, Brian Wong, Mark Cheung, and Dante Morra. 2011. An evaluation of the use of smartphones to communicate between clinicians: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13, 3 (2011), e59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Tong Wu, Yunlong Wang, Yue Wang, Emily Zhao, Yilian Yuan, and Zhi Yang. 2019. Representation learning of ehr data via graph-based medical entity embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02574 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Daokun Zhang, Jie Yin, Xingquan Zhu, and Chengqi Zhang. 2018. Network representation learning: A survey. IEEE Trans Big Data 6, 1 (2018), 3–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Study of Healthcare Team Communication Networks using Visual Analytics
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICMHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics
            May 2023
            386 pages
            ISBN:9798400700712
            DOI:10.1145/3608298

            Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 October 2023

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)108
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format