skip to main content
10.1145/3581961.3609873acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Detaching from the Windshield: Augmented Reality Interfaces for Infotainment in Fully Automated Vehicles

Published:18 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fully automated vehicles (SAE Level 5) will eliminate the need for a human driver, allowing passengers to focus on non-driving activities, such as those provided by infotainment services. There has been previous research on the use of non-driving related content on windshield displays. However, the placement area is limited and the content is likely to be viewable only from a single viewpoint (perspective issues). Therefore, we propose to detach content from the windshield and instead use an augmented reality space to provide infotainment content to passengers. In a within-subject virtual reality user study (N=19), we examined how front seat passengers would place infotainment content windows (and with whatproperties) in the open space using controllers while seated in a fully automated vehicle (within-factor: seating position, driver’ or front passenger’s seat). We also looked at the similarities and differences based on sitting position (left or right). We found that most content was not placed on top of windows/the windshield, with the exception of video content, which raises the question of whether windshield displays are the right medium for fully automated vehicles. In addition, between 40 to 63% of content was placed in mirrored positions when comparing between seating positions.

References

  1. Audi. 2023. Der Audi activesphere concept - Future in the making. http://aiweb.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/content/bworld-robot-control-software/. [Online; accessed 12-June-2023].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Josef Erl. 2022. Augmented Reality: Nreal & Nio show new AR headset. https://mixed-news.com/en/augmented-reality-nreal-nio-show-new-ar-headset/. [Online; accessed 12-June-2023].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael A Gerber, Ronald Schroeter, Li Xiaomeng, and Mohammed Elhenawy. 2020. Self-interruptions of non-driving related tasks in automated vehicles: Mobile vs head-up display. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hongwei Guo, Facheng Zhao, Wuhong Wang, and Xiaobei Jiang. 2014. Analyzing Drivers’ Attitude towards HuD system using a stated Preference survey. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 6 (2014), 380647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Renate Haeuslschmid, Yixin Shou, John O’Donovan, Gary Burnett, and Andreas Butz. 2016. First steps towards a view management concept for large-sized head-up displays with continuous depth. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Renate Häuslschmid, Sven Osterwald, Marcus Lang, and Andreas Butz. 2015. Augmenting the driver’s view with peripheral information on a windshield display. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 311–321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Young Jin Kim and Hoon Sik Yoo. 2021. Analysis of User Preference of AR Head-Up Display Using Attrakdiff. In Intelligent Human Computer Interaction: 12th International Conference, IHCI 2020, Daegu, South Korea, November 24–26, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 12. Springer, 335–345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sebastian Osswald, Daniela Wurhofer, Sandra Trösterer, Elke Beck, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2012. Predicting information technology usage in the car: towards a car technology acceptance model. In AutomotiveUI. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51. https://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hye Sun Park, Min Woo Park, Kwang Hee Won, Kyong-Ho Kim, and Soon Ki Jung. 2013. In-vehicle AR-HUD system to provide driving-safety information. ETRI journal 35, 6 (2013), 1038–1047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kibum Park and Youngjae Im. 2020. Ergonomic guidelines of head-up display user interface during semi-automated driving. Electronics 9, 4 (2020), 611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia. 91–99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2022. Content presentation on 3D augmented reality windshield displays in the context of automated driving. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 543–552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. UEQ Team. 2018. User Experience Questionnaire. https://www.ueq-online.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Unity Technologies. 2022. Unity. https://unity.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (2003), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Philipp Wintersberger, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Tamara von Sawitzky. 2019. Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality. Presence 27, 1 (2019), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. World Medical Association. 2013. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310, 20 (2013), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Detaching from the Windshield: Augmented Reality Interfaces for Infotainment in Fully Automated Vehicles

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AutomotiveUI '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
          September 2023
          382 pages
          ISBN:9798400701122
          DOI:10.1145/3581961

          Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 September 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Work in Progress
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

          Upcoming Conference

        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)131
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format