skip to main content
10.1145/3472306.3478367acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Effects of Virtual Humans' Gender and Spoken Accent on Users' Perceptions of Expertise in Mental Wellness Conversations

Published:14 September 2021Publication History

Editorial Notes

The authors have requested minor, non-substantive changes to the VoR and, in accordance with ACM policies, a Corrected VoR was published on September 29, 2021. For reference purposes the VoR may still be accessed via the Supplemental Material section on this page.

ABSTRACT

In the context of mental wellness support, trust and intimacy between a counselor and a patient are necessary to converge healing processes positively. However, convincing students to trust a virtual human for topics regarding mental wellness is a complex problem that requires understanding students' experiences. Based on research that discusses mental health as a concerning topic regarding Computer Science (CS) students, this paper investigates how undergraduate computing-related students perceive virtual humans' expertise on mental wellness support based on demographic resemblance on spoken accent and gender. Four virtual human counselors were developed to conduct the study, as 58 undergraduate computing-related students from two North American universities were recruited and assessed. Our findings suggest that students were less inclined to interact with a male virtual human than a female one. Also, that spoken accents can impact students' perceptions of expertise under students' multilingualism.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. [n.d.]. Counselors. https://datausa.io/profile/soc/counselorsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n.d.]. Speech-to-Text: Automatic Speech Recognition | Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/speech-to-textGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [n.d.]. What's the difference between inklewriter and ink? https://www.inklestudios.com/inkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Aaron T Beck, Norman Epstein, Gary Brown, and Robert A Steer. 1988. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 56, 6 (1988), 893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Aaron T Beck, Robert A Steer, and Margery G Carbin. 1988. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical psychology review 8, 1 (1988), 77--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Adrian J Blow, Tina M Timm, and Ronald Cox. 2008. The role of the therapist in therapeutic change: Does therapist gender matter? Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 20, 1 (2008), 66--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pauline Rose Clance and Maureen Ann OToole. 1987. The imposter phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy 6, 3 (1987), 51--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Leigh Clark, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Emer Gilmartin, Stephan Schlögl, Jens Edlund, Matthew Aylett, João Cabral, Cosmin Munteanu, Justin Edwards, et al. 2019. The state of speech in HCI: Trends, themes and challenges. Interacting with Computers 31, 4 (2019), 349--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Benjamin R Cowan, Derek Gannon, Jenny Walsh, Justin Kinneen, Eanna O'Keefe, and Linxin Xie. 2016. Towards Understanding How Speech Output Affects Navigation System Credibility. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2805--2812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Scotty D Craig and Noah L Schroeder. 2017. Reconsidering the voice effect when learning from a virtual human. Computers & Education 114 (2017), 193--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nils Dahlbäck, QianYing Wang, Clifford Nass, and Jenny Alwin. 2007. Similarity is more important than expertise: Accent effects in speech interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1553--1556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. JFC De Winter and Dimitra Dodou. 2010. Five-point likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Addendum added October 2012). Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 15, 1 (2010), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernard DuBois and John A Burns. 1975. An analysis of the meaning of the question mark response category in attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 35, 4 (1975), 869--884.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Patrick W Edwards, Amos Zeichner, Norma Lawler, and Rachel Kowalski. 1987. A validation study of the Harvey Impostor Phenomenon Scale. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 24, 2 (1987), 256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carol L Flinchbaugh, E Whitney G Moore, Young K Chang, and Douglas R May. 2012. Student well-being interventions: The effects of stress management techniques and gratitude journaling in the management education classroom. Journal of Management Education 36, 2 (2012), 191--219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Alice Foucart, Albert Costa, Luis Morís-Fernández, and Robert J Hartsuiker. 2020. Foreignness or processing fluency? On understanding the negative bias toward foreign-accented speakers. Language Learning 70, 4 (2020), 974--1016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Candice Frances, Albert Costa, and Cristina Baus. 2018. On the effects of regional accents on memory and credibility. Acta psychologica 186 (2018), 63--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis R Goldberg. 1981. Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41, 3 (1981), 517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Esther Grabe. 1997. Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. In Intonation: Theory, models and applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dagmar Hanzlíková and Radek Skarnitzl. 2017. Credibility of native and nonnative speakers of English revisited: Do non-native listeners feel the same? Research in Language 15, 3 (2017), 285--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sherry L Hatcher, Todd K Favorite, Elizabeth A Hardy, Robert L Goode, Linda A DeShetler, and Rosa M Thomas. 2005. An Analogue Study of Therapist Empathic Process: Working With Difference. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 42, 2 (2005), 198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Anna Hatzidaki, Cristina Baus, and Albert Costa. 2015. The way you say it, the way I feel it: emotional word processing in accented speech. Frontiers in psychology 6 (2015), 351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Xiaoming Jiang, Kira Gossack-Keenan, and Marc D Pell. 2020. To believe or not to believe? How voice and accent information in speech alter listener impressions of trust. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73, 1 (2020), 55--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bilge Karacora, Morteza Dehghani, Nicole Kramer-Mertens, and Jonathan Gratch. 2012. The influence of virtual agents' gender and rapport on enhancing math performance. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Peter Khooshabeh, Morteza Dehghani, Angela Nazarian, and Jonathan Gratch. 2017. The cultural influence model: When accented natural language spoken by virtual characters matters. AI & society 32, 1 (2017), 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yanghee Kim, Amy L Baylor, and Entong Shen. 2007. Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23, 3 (2007), 220--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Katherine D Kinzler, Kathleen H Corriveau, and Paul L Harris. 2011. Children's selective trust in native-accented speakers. Developmental science 14, 1 (2011), 106--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Katherine D Kinzler, Emmanuel Dupoux, and Elizabeth S Spelke. 2007. The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 30 (2007), 12577--12580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Nicole C Krämer, Bilge Karacora, Gale Lucas, Morteza Dehghani, Gina Rüther, and Jonathan Gratch. 2016. Closing the gender gap in STEM with friendly male instructors? On the effects of rapport behavior and gender of a virtual agent in an instructional interaction. Computers & Education 99 (2016), 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Catherine Leung and Andor Salga. 2010. Enabling webgl. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. 1369--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shiri Lev-Ari and Boaz Keysar. 2010. Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of experimental social psychology 46, 6 (2010), 1093--1096.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Stephen M Nowlis, Barbara E Kahn, and Ravi Dhar. 2002. Coping with ambivalence: The effect of removing a neutral option on consumer attitude and preference judgments. Journal of Consumer research 29, 3 (2002), 319--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. David Obremski, Jean-Luc Lugrin, Philipp Schaper, and Birgit Lugrin. 2021. Nonnative speaker perception of Intelligent Virtual Agents in two languages: the impact of amount and type of grammatical mistakes. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces (2021), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Deborah Richards, Bayan Alsharbi, and Amal Abdulrahman. 2020. Can I help you? Preferences of young adults for the age, gender and ethnicity of a Virtual Support Person based on individual differences including personality and psychological state. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Adam Rosenstein, Aishma Raghu, and Leo Porter. 2020. Identifying the prevalence of the impostor phenomenon among computer science students. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 30--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Björn Schuller, Stefan Steidl, Anton Batliner, Elmar Nöth, Alessandro Vinciarelli, Felix Burkhardt, Rob Van Son, Felix Weninger, Florian Eyben, Tobias Bocklet, et al. 2015. A survey on perceived speaker traits: Personality, likability, pathology, and the first challenge. Computer speech & language 29, 1 (2015), 100--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Youssef Shiban, Iris Schelhorn, Verena Jobst, Alexander Hörnlein, Frank Puppe, Paul Pauli, and Andreas Mühlberger. 2015. The appearance effect: Influences of virtual agent features on performance and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015), 5--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Lígia Maria Soares Passos, Christian Murphy, Rita Zhen Chen, Marcos Gonçalves de Santana, and Giselle Soares Passos. 2020. The Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms among Brazilian Computer Science Students. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 316--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Ladina Stocker. 2017. The impact of foreign accent on credibility: An analysis of cognitive statement ratings in a Swiss context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46, 3 (2017), 617--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Justyna Swidrak and Grzegorz Pochwatko. 2019. Being Touched by a Virtual Human. Relationships Between Heart Rate, Gender, Social Status, and Compliance.. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 49--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Matthew B Wintersteen, Janell L Mensinger, and Guy S Diamond. 2005. Do gender and racial differences between patient and therapist affect therapeutic alliance and treatment retention in adolescents? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 36, 4 (2005), 400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Mohan Zalake, Alexandre Gomes de Siqueira, Krishna Vaddiparti, Pavlo Antonenko, Felix Hamza-Lup, and Benjamin Lok. 2020. Towards Rapid Development of Conversational Virtual Humans Using Web3D Technologies. In The 25th International Conference on 3D Web Technology (Virtual Event, Republic of Korea) (Web3D '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 34, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3424616.3424727. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Caron Zlotnick, Irene Elkin, and M Tracie Shea. 1998. Does the gender of a patient or the gender of a therapist affect the treatment of patients with major depression? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66, 4 (1998), 655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effects of Virtual Humans' Gender and Spoken Accent on Users' Perceptions of Expertise in Mental Wellness Conversations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IVA '21: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
      September 2021
      238 pages
      ISBN:9781450386197
      DOI:10.1145/3472306

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 September 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate53of196submissions,27%

      Upcoming Conference

      IVA '24
      ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
      September 16 - 19, 2024
      GLASGOW , United Kingdom

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader