Stephanie Lunn
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Despite increasing demands for skilled workers within the technological domain, there is still a deficit in the number of graduates in computing fields (computer science, information technology, and computer engineering). Understanding the factors that contribute to students’ motivation and persistence is critical to helping educators, administrators, and industry professionals better focus efforts to improve academic outcomes and job placement. This article examines how experiences contribute to a student’s computing identity, which we define by their interest, recognition, sense of belonging, and competence/performance beliefs. In particular, we consider groups underrepresented in these disciplines, women and minoritized racial/ethnic groups (Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx). To delve into these relationships, a survey of more than 1,600 students in computing fields was conducted at three metropolitan public universities in Florida. Regression was used to elucidate which experiences predict computing identity and how social identification (i.e., as female, Black/African American, and/or Hispanic/Latinx) may interact with these experiences. Our results suggest that several types of experiences positively predict a student’s computing identity, such as mentoring others, having a job, or having friends in computing. Moreover, certain experiences have a different effect on computing identity for female and Hispanic/Latinx students. More specifically, receiving academic advice from teaching assistants was more positive for female students, receiving advice from industry professionals was more negative for Hispanic/Latinx students, and receiving help on classwork from students in their class was more positive for Hispanic/Latinx students. Other experiences, while having the same effect on computing identity across students, were experienced at significantly different rates by females, Black/African American students, and Hispanic/Latinx students. The findings highlight experiential ways in which computing programs can foster computing identity development, particularly for underrepresented and marginalized groups in computing.
- [1] . 2007. Inspiring students to pursue computing degrees. Communications of the ACM 50, 10 (2007), 67–71. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [2] . 2010. Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2, 3 (2010), 370–374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [3] . 2003. What is the attraction to computing? Communications of the ACM 46, 9 (2003), 51–55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [4] . 2016. The role of collectivism among Latino American college students. Journal of Latinos and Education 15, 1 (2016), 3–11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [5] . 2016. Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Computing: A Historical and Social Study. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [6] . 2011. Discourse and identity construction. In Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer, New York, NY, 177–199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [7] . 2019. Hiring is broken: What do developers say about technical interviews? In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC’19). IEEE, 1–9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [8] . 1994. The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes 13, 1 (1994), 23–34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [9] . 2017. Special issue: Designing learning environments for equitable disciplinary identification. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26, 3 (2017), 367–375.
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2017.1336021Google Scholar - [10] . 2014. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education 24, 2–3 (2014), 153–192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [11] . 2015. Gender differences in GCSE. Cambridge Assessment Research Report.Google Scholar
- [12] . 2019. U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US.Google Scholar
- [13] . 2006. An Introduction to Social Constructionism. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [14] . 2012. “Computing, we have a problem....” ACM Inroads 3, 4 (2012), 34–40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [15] . 2007. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 44, 8 (2007), 1187–1218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [16] . 2007. Increased retention of early computer science and software engineering students using pair programming. In 20th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET’07). IEEE, 115–122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [17] . 2011. Examining the impact of mathematics identity on the choice of engineering careers for male and female students. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’11). IEEE, F2H–1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [18] . 2014. Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in US computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7, 3 (2014), 166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [19] . 2013. STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Statistical analysis report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- [20] . 2010. Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles 63, 7–8 (2010), 475–488.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [21] . 2013. The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles 69, 1–2 (2013), 58–71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [22] . 2010. Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom. In A Journey in Mathematics Education Research. Springer, 179–195.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [23] . 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- [24] . 2001. Toward improving female retention in the computer science major. Communications of the ACM 44, 5 (2001), 108–114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [25] . 2002. Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 48–52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [26] . 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- [27] . 2015. Establishing an explanatory model for mathematics identity. Child Development 86, 4 (2015), 1048–1062.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [28] . 2006. 5 years of mentoring by the numbers. Presented by Katy Dickinson and Carol Gorski at the TechLeaders Workshop Associated with the 2006 Hopper Conference. http://anitaborg.org/initiatives/techleaders/archive/building-and-sustaining-change-intechnology-cultures/. Also http://research.sun.com/SEED/hopper.presentation.oct06.pdf.Google Scholar
- [29] . 1984. Multivariate Analysismethods and Applications. Number 519.535 D5.Google Scholar
- [30] . 2019. Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science Education 103, 3 (2019), 623–637.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [31] . 2007. Movement expressiveness, solidarity and the (re) shaping of African American students’ scientific identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education 2, 1 (2007), 73–103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [32] . 2005. Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42, 7 (2005), 807–828.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [33] . 2015. “Beards, sandals, and other signs of rugged individualism”: Masculine culture within the computing professions. Osiris 30, 1 (2015), 38–65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [34] . 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 79–83. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [35] . 1997. Undergraduate women in computer science: Experience, motivation and culture. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 29, 1 (1997), 106–110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [36] . 2007. “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education 96, 2 (2007), 103–115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [37] . 2011. Table 301. Bachelor’s degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by sex, race/ethnicity, and field of study: 2009–10. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d11/tables/dt11_301.asp.Google Scholar
- [38] . 1990. Women and computing. Communications of the ACM 33, 11 (1990), 34–46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [39] . 2019. Regression Analysis. An Intuitive Guide for Using and Interpreting Linear Models.ebook.Google Scholar
- [40] . 2018. Examining the computing identity of high-achieving underserved computing students on the basis of gender, field, and year in school. In Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD’18).Google Scholar
- [41] . 2010. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Springer New York, New York, NY, 59–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1270-1_4Google Scholar
- [42] . 2000. Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education 25, 1 (2000), 99–125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [43] . 2020. Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education 109, 3 (2020), 362–383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [44] . 2016. Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education 105, 2 (2016), 312–340.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [45] . 2007. Being the same isn’t enough: Impact of male and female mentors on computer self-efficacy of college students in IT-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research 37, 1 (2007), 19–40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [46] . 2006. Lost in translation: Gender and high school computer science. In Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation, eds J.M. Cohoon & W. Aspray. MIT Press, 89–114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [47] . 2015. Gender differences in technology usage—A literature review. Open Journal of Business and Management 4, 1 (2015), 51–59.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [48] . 2018. “Participating under the influence”: How role models affect the computing discipline, profession, and student population. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’18). IEEE, 1–9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [49] . 2020. Engaging Black and Latinx students through communal learning opportunities: A relevance intervention for middle schoolers in STEM elective classrooms. Contemporary Educational Psychology 60 (2020), 101833.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [50] . 2010. Investing in the future: The importance of faculty mentoring in the development of students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research 2010, 148 (2010), 95–103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [51] . 2016. Disciplinary influences on the professional identity of civil engineering students: Starting the conversation. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [52] . 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: Factors in broadening participation in computing. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. 143–150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [53] . 2012. Improving first-year success and retention through interest-based CS0 courses. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 589–594. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [54] . 1995. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment 7, 3 (1995), 238.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [55] . 2015. Obscuring power structures in the physics classroom: Linking teacher positioning, student engagement, and physics identity development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52, 6 (2015), 735–762.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [56] . 2020. The context dependence of physics identity: Examining the role of performance/competence, recognition, interest, and sense of belonging for lower and upper female physics undergraduates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57, 10 (2020), 1583–1607.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [57] . 2013. The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching 42, 5 (2013), 82–91.Google Scholar
- [58] . 2010. Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47, 8 (2010), 978–1003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [59] . 2010. Measuring high school students’ attitudes toward computing. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 446–450. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [60] . 2010. Face validity. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1–2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [61] . 2020. Alignment of theoretically grounded constructs for the measurement of science and chemistry identity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 21 (2020), 371–386.
DOI: 10.1039/C9RP00193JGoogle ScholarCross Ref - [62] . 2021. The role of recognition in disciplinary identity for girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58, 3 (2021), 420–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21665Google ScholarCross Ref
- [63] . 2013. Better late than never? Identity work, trajectories, and persistence of latecomers to science. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill University. Retrieved from http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R. (2013).Google Scholar
- [64] . 2013. Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50, 7 (2013), 826–857.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [65] . 2011. African American men constructing computing identity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2967–2970. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [66] . 2007. Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education 91, 5 (2007), 805–821.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [67] . 2011. Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). New Directions for Institutional Research 2011, 152 (2011), 75–85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [68] . 2012. Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development 53, 2 (2012), 336–346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [69] . 2019. How Kimberly Bryant Started Black Girls CODE With Her 401(k)—And Taught 14,000 Girls. https://angel.co/blog/how-kimberly-bryant-started-black-girls-code-with-her-401k-and-taught-14.Google Scholar
- [70] . 2014. Investigating forty years of STEM research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 20, 2 (2014), 127–148.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [71] . 1999. Mentoring within a graduate school setting. College Student Journal 33, 1 (1999), 130–130.Google Scholar
- [72] . 2019. Female performance and participation in computer science: A national picture. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2019), 1–28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [73] . 2015. Are females disinclined to tinker in computer science? In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 102–107. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [74] . 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [75] . 2011. Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students. Journal of Vocational Behavior 78, 2 (2011), 184–192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [76] . 2008. Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior 73, 1 (2008), 52–62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [77] . 2019. Alignment of goals and perceptions of computing predicts students’ sense of belonging in computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 11–19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [78] . 2009. The study of disciplinary identity—Some theoretical underpinnings. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies 13, 1 (2009), 80–119.Google Scholar
- [79] . 2004. The role of academic and non-academic factors in improving college retention. ACT Policy Report 1 (2004), 31.Google Scholar
- [80] . 2020. Developing a computing identity framework: Understanding computer science and information technology career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2020), 1–14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [81] . 2009. Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education 93, 3 (2009), 485–510.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [82] . 2019. Evaluation of variance inflation factors in regression models using latent variable modeling methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement 79, 5 (2019), 874–882.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [83] . 2000. The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women’s Studies Quarterly 28, 1/2 (2000), 104–127.Google Scholar
- [84] . 2019. Self-efficacy and STEM career interest in Black and Latino middle school students: A study on the next generation science standards. LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations. 805. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/etd/805Google Scholar
- [85] . 2019. Underrepresented groups threats to belonging in computing. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT’19). IEEE, 1–4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [86] . 2006. Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22, 5 (2006), 335–348.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [87] . 2012. Generation STEM: What girls say about science, technology, engineering, and math. A Report from the Girl Scout Research Institute. Girl Scouts of the USA, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- [88] . 2019. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.Google Scholar
- [89] . 2017. STEM Jobs: 2017 update. ESA Issue Brief# 02-17. US Department of Commerce (2017).Google Scholar
- [90] . 2021. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/.Google Scholar
- [91] . 2011. A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. Journal of Negro Education 80, 4 (2011), 491–504.Google Scholar
- [92] . 2019. Developing software engineers: Investigating the influence of a computer science capstone on professional identity formation. ProQuest LLC.Google Scholar
- [93] . 2005. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2.ERIC.Google Scholar
- [94] . 2016. A review of the literature relevant to engineering identity. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. American Society for Engineering Education.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [95] . 2009. My sister’s keeper: A qualitative examination of mentoring experiences among African American women in graduate and professional schools. Journal of Higher Education 80, 5 (2009), 510–537.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [96] . 2003. Mentoring relationships among African American women in graduate and professional schools. New Directions for Student Services 2003, 104 (2003), 67–78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [97] . 2014. First year computer science and IT students’ experience of participation in the discipline. In 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering. IEEE, 1–8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [98] . 2008. Improving the persistence of first-year undergraduate women in computer science. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 518–522.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352308 Google ScholarDigital Library - [99] . 2014. Investigating the skill gap between graduating students and industry expectations. In Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering. 291–300. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [100] . 1995. Using undergraduates as teaching assistants in introductory programming courses: An update on the Stanford experience. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 27. ACM, 48–52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [101] . 2003. Family or friends: Who plays a greater supportive role for Latino college students? Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 9, 3 (2003), 236.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [102] . 2021. “We’re the unicorns in STEM”: Understanding how academic and social experiences influence sense of belonging for Latina undergraduate students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 14, 3 (2021), 441–455.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [103] . 2020. The intersection of being black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 2 (2020), 1–15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [104] . 2014. The Lavaan tutorial. Department of Data Analysis: Ghent University.Google Scholar
- [105] . 1994. Constructing the social (pp. 213–231).Google Scholar
- [106] . 2008. The Gender Gap in College: Maximizing the Developmental Potential of Women and Men.Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- [107] . 2020. Reframing the representation of black students in undergraduate computing. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 26, 4 (2020), 325–356.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [108] . 1997. Do I/S students value internship experiences? Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Academy for Information Management. 236–241.Google Scholar
- [109] . 2012. Linear Regression Analysis. Vol. 329. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- [110] . 2005. Investigating a measure of computer technology domain identification: A tool for understanding gender differences and stereotypes. Educational and Psychological Measurement 65, 2 (2005), 336–355.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [111] . 2011. Group identities: The social identity perspective. In Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer, 201–224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [112] . 2018. A structural equation model analysis of computing identity sub-constructs and student academic persistence. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’18). IEEE, IEEE, 1–7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [113] . 2019. Exploring computing identity and persistence across multiple groups using structural equation modeling. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [114] . 2005. How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology 14, 5–6 (2005), 483–493.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [115] . 2004. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications.American Psychological Association.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [116] . 2012. Content learning and identity construction: A framework to strengthen African American students’ mathematics and science learning in urban elementary schools. Human Development 55, 5–6 (2012), 319–339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [117] . 2007. Women in computing: The role of geek culture. Science as Culture 16, 4 (2007), 359–376.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [118] . 2009. Gender differences in factors influencing students towards computing. Computer Science Education 19, 1 (2009), 37–49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [119] . 2010. Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students’ perception. Computer Science Education 20, 4 (2010), 301–316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [120] . 2013. The relationship between belonging and ability in computer science. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 65–70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [121] . 2014. What Is and Who Can Do Science? Supporting Practice-linked Identities in Science for Racially/Ethnically Underrepresented Youth. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
- [122] . 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- [123] . 2019. Predicting women’s persistence in computer science-and technology-related majors from high school to college. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2019), 1–16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [124] . 2000. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software 17, 4 (2000), 19–25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [125] . 2016. “I’m good, but not that good”: Digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing. Computer Science Education 26, 4 (2016), 299–317.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [126] . 2018. Technical boys and creative girls: The career aspirations of digitally skilled youths. Cambridge Journal of Education 48, 3 (2018), 301–316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [127] . 2021. Multi-institution study of student demographics and stickiness of computing majors in the USA. Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- How Do Educational Experiences Predict Computing Identity?
Recommendations
The Impact of Technical Interviews, and other Professional and Cultural Experiences on Students' Computing Identity
ITiCSE '21: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1Increasingly companies assess a computing candidate's capabilities using technical interviews (TIs). Yet students struggle to code on demand, and there is already an insufficient amount of computing graduates to meet industry needs. Therefore, it is ...
"You don't have to be a white male that was learning how to program since he was five"
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationMargolis and Fisher's book, Unlocking the Clubhouse (UTC), has long been regarded as seminal to the understanding of the lack of gender diversity in computing. This book found that boys and girls had different experiences with computers in the home and ...
Computing for the social good: engaging Latino/a students in K-12
Computing for the social good is a movement that aims to broaden participation in computing by offering opportunities to apply computer science to social causes in higher education (Buckley, Nordlinger, & Subramanian, 2008; Goldweber et al., 2011). We ...
Comments