skip to main content
10.1145/3460210.3493586acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Discovering Interpretable Topics by Leveraging Common Sense Knowledge

Published:02 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditional topic modeling approaches generally rely on document-term co-occurrence statistics to find latent topics in a collection of documents. However, relying only on such statistics can yield incoherent or hard to interpret results for the end-users in many applications where the interest lies in interpreting the resulting topics (e.g. labeling documents, comparing corpora, guiding content exploration, etc.). In this work, we propose to leverage external common sense knowledge, i.e. information from the real world beyond word co-occurrence, to find topics that are more coherent and more easily interpretable by humans. We introduce the Common Sense Topic Model (CSTM), a novel and efficient approach that augments clustering with knowledge extracted from the ConceptNet knowledge graph. We evaluate this approach on several datasets alongside commonly used models using both automatic and human evaluation, and we show how it shows superior affinity to human judgement. The code for the experiments as well as the training data and human evaluation are available at https://github.com/D2KLab/CSTM.

References

  1. Mehdi Allahyari, Seyedamin Pouriyeh, Krys Kochut, and Hamid Reza Arabnia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. . A Knowledge-based Topic Modeling Approach for Automatic Topic Labeling. IJACSA 2017 ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dr. Hiteshwar Kumar Azad and A. Deepak. 2019. Query Expansion Techniques for Information Retrieval: a Survey. Inf. Process. Manag. 56 (2019), 1698--1735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DavidMBlei, AndrewY Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. the Journal of machine Learning research 3 (2003), 993--1022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jonathan Chang, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Sean Gerrish, Chong Wang, and David M. Blei. 2009. Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models (NIPS'09). Red Hook, NY, USA, 288--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zhiyuan Chen, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu, Meichun Hsu, Malu Castellanos, and Riddhiman Ghosh. 2013. Discovering Coherent Topics Using General Knowledge. In CIKM '13 (San Francisco, California, USA). New York, NY, USA, 209--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Caitlin Doogan and Wray Buntine. 2021. Topic Model or Topic Twaddle? Reevaluating Semantic Interpretability Measures. In NAACL '21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anjie Fang, Craig Macdonald, Iadh Ounis, and Philip Habel. 2016. Using Word Embedding to Evaluate the Coherence of Topics from Twitter Data. In SIGIR '16 (Pisa, Italy) (SIGIR '16). New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Adriana Ferrugento, Ana Alves, Hugo Gonçalo Oliveira, and Filipe Rodrigues. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930--1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Adriana Ferrugento, Ana Alves, Hugo Gonçalo Oliveira, and Filipe Rodrigues. 2015. Towards the Improvement of a Topic Model with Semantic Knowledge, Vol. 9273. Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 759--770.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Derek Greene and Pádraig Cunningham. 2006. Practical Solutions to the Problem of Diagonal Dominance in Kernel Document Clustering. In ICML 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Antonio Gulli. 2005. AG's corpus of news articles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ismail Harrando and Raphaël Troncy. 2021. Explainable Zero-Shot Topic Extraction Using a Common-Sense Knowledge Graph. In LDK 2021. Dagstuhl, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Pranav Goel, Denis Peskov, Andrew Hian-Cheong, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, and P. Resnik. 2021. Is Automated Topic Model Evaluation Broken?: The Incoherence of Coherence. ArXiv abs/2107.02173 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ming-Hung Hsu, Ming-Feng Tsai, and Hsin-Hsi Chen. 2006. Query Expansion with ConceptNet andWordNet: An Intrinsic Comparison. In Information Retrieval Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Filip Ilievski, Pedro Szekely, and Bin Zhang. 2021. CSKG: The CommonSense Knowledge Graph. Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ken Lang. 1995. Newsweeder: Learning to filter netnews. In 12??? International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). 331--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Natalia Loukachevitch, Michael Nokel, and Kirill Ivanov. 2018. Combining Thesaurus Knowledge and Probabilistic Topic Models. In Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. David Mimno, Hanna M.Wallach, Edmund Talley, Miriam Leenders, and Andrew McCallum. 2011. Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models. In EMNLP '11 (Edinburgh, United Kingdom). Association for Computational Linguistics, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Janna Omeliyanenko, Albin Zehe, Lena Hettinger, and Andreas Hotho. [n. d.]. LM4KG: Improving Common Sense Knowledge Graphs with Language Models. In ISWC 2020. Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Andrew Rosenberg and Julia Hirschberg. 2007. V-Measure: A Conditional Entropy-Based External Cluster Evaluation Measure. In EMNLP-CoNLL '07. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, 410--420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Charlotte Rudnik, Thibault Ehrhart, Olivier Ferret, Denis Teyssou, Raphaël Troncy, and Xavier Tannier. 2019. Searching News Articles Using an Event Knowledge Graph Leveraged by Wikidata. In 5??? Wiki Workshop. 1232--1239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Maarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras, Emily Allaway, Chandra Bhagavatula, Nicholas Lourie, Hannah Rashkin, Brendan Roof, Noah A. Smith, and Yejin Choi. [n. d.]. ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning. In AAAI 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Suzanna Sia, Ayush Dalmia, and Sabrina J. Mielke. 2020. Tired of Topic Models? Clusters of Pretrained Word Embeddings Make for Fast and Good Topics too!. In EMNLP '20. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 1728--1736.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dandan Song, Jingwen Gao, Jinhui Pang, Lejian Liao, and Lifei Qin. 2020. Knowledge Base Enhanced Topic Modeling. In ICKG 2020. 380--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robyn Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. 2017. ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge. 4444--4451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ilaria Tiddi, Mathieu d'Aquin, and Enrico Motta. 2015. Using Linked Data Traversal to Label Academic Communities. In WWW 2015 (Florence, Italy) (WWW '15 Companion). New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hanna M. Wallach, Iain Murray, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and David Mimno. 2009. Evaluation Methods for Topic Models. In ICML '09 (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (ICML '09). New York, NY, USA, 1105--1112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei Xu, Xin Liu, and Yihong Gong. 2003. Document Clustering Based on Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (SIGIR '03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 267--273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Discovering Interpretable Topics by Leveraging Common Sense Knowledge

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      K-CAP '21: Proceedings of the 11th Knowledge Capture Conference
      December 2021
      300 pages
      ISBN:9781450384575
      DOI:10.1145/3460210

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 December 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate55of198submissions,28%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader