skip to main content
10.1145/3360322.3360862acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Beyond a House of Sticks: Formalizing Metadata Tags with Brick

Published:13 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current efforts establishing semantic metadata standards for the built environment span academia [3], industry [1] and standards bodies [2, 28]. For these standards to be effective, they must be clearly defined and easily extensible, encourage consistency in their usage, and integrate cleanly with existing industrial standards, such as BACnet. There is a natural tension between informal tag-based systems that rely upon idiom and convention for meaning, and formal ontologies amenable to automated tooling.

We present a qualitative analysis of Project Haystack [1], a popular tagging system for building metadata, and identify a family of inherent interpretability and consistency issues in the tagging model that stem from its lack of a formal definition. To address these issues, we present the design and implementation of the Brick+ ontology, a drop-in replacement for Brick [3] with clear formal semantics that enables the inference of a valid Brick model from an informal Haystack model, and demonstrate this inference across five Haystack models.

References

  1. 2018. Project Haystack. http://project-haystack.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2018. ASHRAE's BACnet Committee, Project Haystack and Brick Schema Collaborating to Provide Unified Data Semantic Modeling Solution. http://web.archive.org/web/20181223045430/https://www.ashrae.org/about/news/2018/ashrae-s-bacnet-committee-project-haystack-and-brick-schema-collaborating-to-provide-unified-data-semantic-modeling-solution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bharathan Balaji, Arka Bhattacharya, Gabriel Fierro, Jingkun Gao, Joshua Gluck, Dezhi Hong, Aslak Johansen, Jason Koh, Joern Ploennigs, Yuvraj Agarwal, et al. 2016. Brick: Towards a unified metadata schema for buildings. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments (BuildSys). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bharathan Balaji, Arka Bhattacharya, Gabriel Fierro, Jingkun Gao, Joshua Gluck, Dezhi Hong, Aslak Johansen, Jason Koh, Joern Ploennigs, Yuvraj Agarwal, et al. 2018. Brick: Metadata schema for portable smart building applications. Applied energy 226 (2018), 1273--1292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bharathan Balaji, Chetan Verma, Balakrishnan Narayanaswamy, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2015. Zodiac: Organizing Large Deployment of Sensors to Create Reusable Applications for Buildings. ACM, 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sean Bechhofer, Frank van Harmelen, Jim Hendler, Ian Horrocks, Deborah L. McGuinness, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Lynn Andrea Stein. 2004. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. Technical Report. W3C, http://www.w3.org/TR/owlref/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Arka A Bhattacharya, Dezhi Hong, David Culler, Jorge Ortiz, Kamin Whitehouse, and Eugene Wu. 2015. Automated metadata construction to support portable building applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments. ACM, 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Alfonso Capozzoli, Marco Savino Piscitelli, Alice Gorrino, Ilaria Ballarini, and Vincenzo Corrado. 2017. Data analytics for occupancy pattern learning to reduce the energy consumption of HVAC systems in office buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society 35 (2017), 191--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Patrick Coffey. 2019. Project Haystack Example Data Models. http://web.archive.org/web/20190626161742/https://patrickcoffey.bitbucket.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gabe Fierro, Marco Pritoni, Moustafa AbdelBaky, Paul Raftery, Therese Peffer, Greg Thomson, and David E Culler. 2018. Mortar: an open testbed for portable building analytics. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments. ACM, 172--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jingkun Gao, Joern Ploennigs, and Mario Berges. 2015. A data-driven meta-data inference framework for building automation systems. ACM, 23--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Birte Glimm, Ian Horrocks, Boris Motik, Giorgos Stoilos, and Zhe Wang. 2014. HermiT: an OWL 2 reasoner. Journal of Automated Reasoning 53, 3 (2014), 245--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ramanathan Guha and Dan Brickley. 2014. RDF Schema 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-schema-20140225/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dave Hardin, Eric G Stephan, Weimin Wang, Charles D Corbin, and Steven E Widergren. 2015. Buildings interoperability landscape. Technical Report. Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), Richland, WA (United States).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dezhi Hong, Hongning Wang, Jorge Ortiz, and Kamin Whitehouse. 2015. The Building Adapter: Towards Quickly Applying Building Analytics at Scale. ACM, 123--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Marco Jahn, Tobias Schwartz, Jonathan Simon, and Marc Jentsch. 2011. EnergyPULSE: tracking sustainable behavior in office environments. In Int. Conf. on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking. ACM, 87--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jason Koh, Bharathan Balaji, Dhiman Sengupta, Julian McAuley, Rajesh Gupta, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2018. Scrabble: transferrable semi-automated semantic metadata normalization using intermediate representation. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments. ACM, 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ora Lassila and Ralph R Swick. 1999. Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Adam Mathes. 2004. Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. (2004), 14. http://adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Natalie Mims, Steven R Schiller, Elizabeth Stuart, Lisa Schwartz, Chris Kramer, and Richard Faesy. 2017. Evaluation of U.S. Building Energy Benchmarking and Transparency Programs: Attributes, Impacts, and Best Practices. (2017). https://doi.org/10.2172/1393621Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. OSTI. 2016. The National Opportunity for Interoperability and its Benefits for a Reliable, Robust, and Future Grid Realized Through Buildings. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.2172/1420233Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alexandre Passant. 2007. Using ontologies to strengthen folksonomies and enrich information retrieval in weblogs. In International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alexandre Passant and Philippe Laublet. 2008. Meaning Of A Tag: A collaborative approach to bridge the gap between tagging and Linked Data. LDOW 369 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mary Ann Piette, Girish Ghatikar, Sila Kiliccote, Ed Koch, Dan Hennage, Peter Palensky, and Charles McParland. 2009. Open automated demand response communications specification (Version 1.0). Technical Report. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (US).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Samuel Privara, Jiří Cigler, Zdeněk Váňa, Frauke Oldewurtel, Carina Sagerschnig, and Eva Žáčeková. 2013. Building modeling as a crucial part for building predictive control. Energy and Buildings 56 (2013), 8--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Project Haystack. 2019. Project Haystack Documentation: Defs. http://web.archive.org/web/20190629183024/https://project-haystack.dev/doc/docHaystack/Defs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Project Haystack. 2019. Project Haystack Documentation: VFDs. http://web.archive.org/web/20190629182856/https://project-haystack.org/doc/VFDs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Christian Anker Hviid, and Jan Karlshøj. 2017. Proposing a central AEC ontology that allows for domain specific extensions. In 2017 Lean and Computing in Construction Congress.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. S Roth. 2014. Open Green Building XML Schema: A Building Information Modeling Solution for Our Green World, gbXML Schema (5.12). (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeffrey Schein, Steven T Bushby, Natascha S Castro, and John M House. 2006. A rule-based fault detection method for air handling units. Energy and Buildings 38, 12 (2006), 1485--1492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. David Sturzenegger, Dimitrios Gyalistras, Manfred Morari, and Roy S Smith. 2012. Semi-automated modular modeling of buildings for model predictive control. ACM, 99--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. W3C. [n.d.]. Punning. https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PunningGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Rudolf Wille. 1992. Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Computers & mathematics with applications 23, 6-9 (1992), 493--515.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Rudolf Wille. 2009. Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis. Springer, 314--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Beyond a House of Sticks: Formalizing Metadata Tags with Brick

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          BuildSys '19: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation
          November 2019
          413 pages
          ISBN:9781450370059
          DOI:10.1145/3360322

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 November 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          BuildSys '19 Paper Acceptance Rate40of131submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate148of500submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader