skip to main content
10.1145/3359852.3359865acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesartechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Technical Images and Visual Art in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: From GOFAI to GANs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and art share a common past, where artists employed AI algorithms to generate art. This paper explores the early days of AI-generated images, using Harold Cohen's AARON software as a paradigm of symbolic AI creative systems, and contextualizes the use of modern neural network technologies to create visual artworks. It discusses the methodologies and strategies used to make art using AI in the 1960s, comparing them to new AI algorithms. The discussion focuses on GOFAI (Good Old Fashioned Artificial Intelligence) and GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks) as the main technologies used in distinct historical periods to generate images. Vilém Flusser's conception of technical images provides a conceptual framework for examining the qualities and attributes of AI-generated images.

References

  1. Fabrizio Poltronieri, Alex Heilmair. 2013. Der Zufall und die Symmetriebrechung der synthetischen Bilder. In Michael Hanke, Steffi Winkler. Vom Begriff zum Bild: Medienkultur nach Vilém Flusser, Tectum Wissenschaftsverlag, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Fabrizio Poltronieri. 2018. Visual Theogonies: Chance, control and automation in algorithmic art. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 3 (Oct. 2018), 287--293. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.10.3.287_3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Fabrizio Poltronieri. 2014. Communicology, appatatus, and Post-history:Vilém Flusser's concepts applied to video games and gamification. In Mathias Fuchs et al. Rethinking Gamification, meson press, Lüneburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andriy Burkov. 2019. The Hundred-Page Machine Learning Book. Andriy Burkov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alex J. Champandard. 2019. Super Resolution for images using deep learning. https://github.com/alexjc/neural-enhance original-date: 2016-10-01T13:01:50Z.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Harold Cohen. 2015. Interview with Harold Cohen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hubert L. Dreyfus. 1992. What computers still can't do: a critique of artificial reason. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Luciano Floridi. 1999. Philosophy and computing: an introduction. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Vilém Flusser. 2011. Into the universe of technical images. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vilém Flusser. 2012. Towards a philosophy of photography. Reaktion Books, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin Ford. 2018. Architects of intelligence: the truth about AI from the people building it. Packt Publishing, Birmingham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. John Haugeland. 1993. Artificial intelligence: the very idea (6. print ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yanghua Jin, Jiakai Zhang, Minjun Li, Yingtao Tian, Huachun Zhu, and Zhihao Fang. 2017. Towards the Automatic Anime Characters Creation with Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv:1708.05509 [cs] (Aug. 2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.05509 arXiv: 1708.05509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tero Karras, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2017. Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation. arXiv:1710.10196 [cs, stat] (Oct. 2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10196 arXiv: 1710.10196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. 2018. A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv:1812.04948 [cs, stat] (Dec. 2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04948 arXiv: 1812.04948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ziwei Liu, Ping Luo, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. 2014. Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wild. arXiv:1411.7766 [cs] (Nov. 2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.7766 arXiv: 1411.7766.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kyle McDonald. [n. d.]. How to recognize fake AI generated images. https://medium.com/@kcimc/how-to-recognize-fake-ai-generated-images-4d1f6f9a2842Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D.J. Musliner, J.A. Hendler, A.K. Agrawala, E.H. Durfee, J.K. Strosnider, and C.J. Paul. 1995. The challenges of real-time AI. Computer 28, 1 (Jan. 1995), 58--66. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.362628Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Thomas Schlegl, Philipp Seeböck, Sebastian M. Waldstein, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, and Georg Langs. 2017. Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discovery. arXiv:1703.05921 [cs] (March 2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05921 arXiv: 1703.05921.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Carl Vondrick, Hamed Pirsiavash, and Antonio Torralba. 2016. Generating Videos with Scene Dynamics. arXiv:1609.02612 [cs] (Sept. 2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1609.02612 arXiv: 1609.02612.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Li-Chia Yang, Szu-Yu Chou, and Yi-Hsuan Yang. 2017. MidiNet: A Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network for Symbolic-domain Music Generation. arXiv:1703.10847 [cs] (March2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10847 arXiv:1703.10847.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Technical Images and Visual Art in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: From GOFAI to GANs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ARTECH '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts
          October 2019
          571 pages

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 February 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          ARTECH '19 Paper Acceptance Rate95of174submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate128of238submissions,54%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader