skip to main content
research-article

"Point-of-Care Manufacturing": Maker Perspectives on Digital Fabrication in Medical Practice

Published:07 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Maker culture is on the rise in healthcare with the adoption of consumer-grade fabrication technologies. However, little is known about the activities and resources involved in prototyping medical devices to improve patient care. In this paper, we refer to such activity asmedical making to report findings based on a qualitative study of stakeholder engagement in physical prototyping (making) experiences. We examine perspectives from diverse stakeholders including clinicians, engineers, administrators, and medical researchers. Through 18 semi-structured interviews with medical-makers in the US and Canada, we analyze making activity in medical settings. We find that medical makers share strategies to address risks, adopt labor roles, and acquire resources within traditional medical practice. Our findings outline how medical-makers mitigate risks for patient safety, collaborate with local and global stakeholder networks, and overcome constraints of co-location and material practices. We recommend a clinician-aided software system, partially-open repositories, and a collaborative skill-sharing social network to extend their strategies in support of medical making.

References

  1. 2007. GitHub. https://github.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018. 3D Printing of Medical Devices | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/ 3dprintingofmedicaldevices/default.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2018. Instructables -How to make anything. https://www.instructables.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mathieu Acher, Benoit Baudry, Olivier Barais, and Jean-Marc Jezequel. 2014. Customization and 3D Printing: A Challenging Playground for Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference -Volume 1 (SPLC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 142--146. https://doi.org/10.1145/2648511.2648526Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L Albala, T Bober, M Mallozzi, L Koeneke-Hernandez, and B Ku. 2018. Design-Thinking, Making, and Innovating: Fresh Tools for the Physician's Toolbox. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6, 1 (2018), 179--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Morgan G Ames, Jefrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Silvia Lindtner, David A Mellis, and Daniela K Rosner. 2014. Making cultures: empowerment, participation, and democracy-or not. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1087--1092.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jonathan Awori and Joyce M. Lee. 2017. A Maker Movement for Health: A New Paradigm for Health InnovationA Maker Movement for HealthA Maker Movement for Health. JAMA Pediatrics 171, 2 (02 2017), 107--108. https: //doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3747Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jefrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Lilly Irani, Silvia Lindtner, Kaiton Williams, and John Zimmerman. 2016. Boundary Troubles: Here, There, Design, Make, Research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1051--1056. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581. 2886424Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jay M. Baruch. 2017. Doctors as Makers. Academic Medicine 92, 1 (2017). https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2017/01000/Doctors_as_Makers.17.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cynthia L. Bennett, Keting Cen, Katherine M. Steele, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2016. An Intimate Laboratory?: Prostheses As a Tool for Experimenting with Identity and Normalcy. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1745--1756. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858564Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Erin Buehler, Stacy Branham, Abdullah Ali, Jeremy J. Chang, Megan Kelly Hofmann, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 525--534. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Erin Buehler, Niara Comrie, Megan Hofmann, Samantha McDonald, and Amy Hurst. 2016. Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 3 (March 2016), 11:1--11:28. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2870640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Joel Chan, Steven Dang, and Steven P. Dow. 2016. Improving Crowd Innovation with Expert Facilitation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1223--1235. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820023Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jairo Chimento, Nathan Crane, and M. Jason Highsmith. 2011. 3D printed tooling for thermoforming of medical devices. Rapid Prototyping Journal 17, 5 (Aug. 2011), 387--392. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111156513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Anderson Chris. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alain Curodeau, Emanuel Sachs, and Salvatore Caldarise. 2000. Design and fabrication of cast orthopedic implants with freeform surface textures from 3-D printed ceramic shell. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 53, 5 (2000), 525--535. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097--4636(200009)53:5<525::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Williams DeClark. 2018. Who is Liable for a Defective 3D Printed Medical Device? https://www.wdtlaw.org/personalinjury-blog/2018/february/who-is-liable-for-a-defective-3d-printed-medical/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Katrien Dreessen and Selina Schepers. 2018. Three Strategies for Engaging Non-experts in a Fablab. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 482--493. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Frederika Farley. 1938. Improvising Equipment. The American Journal of Nursing (1938), 42s--43s.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Blake Farmer. 2019. FDA Tightening Regulatory Requirements For Some Medical Devices. https://www.wbur.org/npr/689739642/fda-tightening-regulatory-requirements-for-some-medical-devicesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela Rosner. 2015. Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 56--68. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675223Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ian Gibson and Aniruddha Srinath. 2015. Simplifying Medical Additive Manufacturing: Making the Surgeon the Designer. Procedia Technology 20, 237 -- 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.07.038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jose Gomez-Marquez and Anna Young. 2016. A History of Nurse Making and Stealth Innovation. Technical Report. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2778663Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kendall F. Gretsch, Henry D. Lather, Kranti V. Peddada, Corey R. Deeken, Lindley B.Wall, and Charles A. Goldfarb. 2016. Development of novel 3D-printed robotic prosthetic for transradial amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 40, 3 (2016), 400--403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364615579317Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Nevan C. Hanumara, Nikolai D. Begg, Conor Walsh, David Custer, Rajiv Gupta, Lynn R. Osborn, and Alexander H. Slocum. 2013. Classroom to Clinic: Merging Education and Research to Efciently Prototype Medical Devices. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 1 (24 Jul 2013), 4700107--4700107. https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2013.2271897Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Björn Hartmann, Scott Doorley, and Scott R Klemmer. 2008. Hacking, mashing, gluing: Understanding opportunistic design. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 3 (2008), 46--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Megan Hofmann, Julie Burke, Jon Pearlman, Goeran Fiedler, Andrea Hess, Jon Schull, Scott E. Hudson, and Jennifer Mankof. 2016. Clinical and Maker Perspectives on the Design of Assistive Technology with Rapid Prototyping Technologies. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 251--256. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Megan Hofmann, Gabriella Hann, Scott E. Hudson, and Jennifer Mankof. 2018. Greater Than the Sum of Its PARTs: Expressing and Reusing Design Intent in 3D Models. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 301:1--301:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173875Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Megan Hofmann, Jefrey Harris, Scott E Hudson, and Jennifer Mankof. 2016. Helping Hands: Requirements for a Prototyping Methodology for Upper-limb Prosthetics Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1769--1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Megan Hofmann, Kristin Williams, Toni Kaplan, Stephanie Valencia, Gabriella Hann, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankof, and Patrick Carrington. 2019. "Occupational Therapy is Making": Clinical Rapid Prototyping and Digital Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 314, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Nathaniel Hudson, Celena Alcock, and Parmit K. Chilana. 2016. Understanding Newcomers to 3D Printing: Motivations, Workfows, and Barriers of Casual Makers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 384--396. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858266Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Julie S. Hui and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2017. Developing Makerspaces As Sites of Entrepreneurship. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2023--2038. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering Individuals with Do-it-yourself Assistive Technology. In The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049541Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Darrell Hurt, Nick Weber, and Meghan Coakley McCarthy. [n. d.]. About the NIH 3D Print Exchange | NIH 3D Print Exchange. https://3dprint.nih.gov/aboutGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Deepak M. Kalaskar. 2017. 3D Printing in Medicine. Woodhead Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 295--304. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868950Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Dana Lewis, Scott Leibrand, and #OpenAPS Community. 2016. Real-World Use of Open Source Artifcial Pancreas Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10, 6 (10 Aug 2016), 1411--1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816665635Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Eric Lindenfeld. 2016. 3D Printing of Medical Devices: CAD Designers as the Most Realistic Target for Strict, Product Liability Lawsuits. UMKC Law Review 85 (2016), 79--104. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/umkc85&i=87Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Silvia Lindtner, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jefrey Bardzell. 2016. Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1390--1402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Silvia Lindtner, Anna Greenspan, and David Li. 2015. Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai Manufacturing and Maker Entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (CA '15). Aarhus University Press, 85--96. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21265Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Silvia Lindtner, Garnet D. Hertz, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Emerging Sites of HCI Innovation: Hackerspaces, Hardware Startups Incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 439--448. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Thomas Ludwig, Volkmar Pipek, and Peter Tolmie. 2018. Designing for Collaborative Infrastructuring: Supporting Resonance Activities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 113 (Nov. 2018), 29 pages. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3274382Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Hammad H. Malik, Alastair R. J. Darwood, Shalin Shaunak, Priyantha Kulatilake, Abdulrahman A. El-Hilly, Omar Mulki, and Aroon Baskaradas. 2015. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. Journal of Surgical Research 199, 2 (Dec. 2015), 512--522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. David R. Marshall and Deborah A. McGrew. 2017. Creativity and Innovation in Health Care: Opening a Hospital Makerspace. Nurse Leader 15, 1 (2017), 56 -- 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2016.10.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Nicolas Martelli, Carole Serrano, Helene van den Brink, Judith Pineau, Patrice Prognon, Isabelle Borget, and Salma El Batti. 2016. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 159, 6 (2016), 1485--1500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Samantha McDonald, Niara Comrie, Erin Buehler, Nicholas Carter, Braxton Dubin, Karen Gordes, Sandy McCombe-Waller, and Amy Hurst. 2016. Uncovering Challenges and Opportunities for 3D Printing Assistive Technology with Physical Therapists. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Fabio Morreale, Giulio Moro, Alan Chamberlain, Steve Benford, and Andrew P. McPherson. 2017. Building a Maker Community Around an Open Hardware Platform. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6948--6959. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026056Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. S. Mukhopadhyay and R. Poojary. 2018. A review on 3D printing: Advancement in healthcare technology. In 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET). 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET. 2018.8376890Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Aisling Ann O'Kane, Yi Han, and Rosa I. Arriaga. 2016. Varied Bespoke Caregiver Needs: Organizing and Communicating Diabetes Care for Children in the DIY Era. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Pervasive Health '16). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 9--12. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3021319.3021321Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Aisling Ann O'Kane, Amy Hurst, Gerrit Niezen, Nicolai Marquardt, Jon Bird, and Gregory Abowd. 2016. Advances in DIY Health and Wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3453--3460. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Aisling Ann O'Kane, Sun Young Park, Helena Mentis, Ann Blandford, and Yunan Chen. 2016. Turning to Peers: Integrating Understanding of the Self, the Condition, and Others' Experiences in Making Sense of Complex Chronic Conditions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25, 6 (Dec. 2016), 477--501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606016--9260-yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Michael H. Park. 2015. For a New Heart, Just Click Print: The Effect on Medical and Products Liability from 3D Printed Organs Notes. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy 2015 (2015), 187--210. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jltp2015&i=205Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Jeremiah Parry-Hill, Patrick C Shih, Jennifer Mankof, and Daniel Ashbrook. 2017. Understanding Volunteer AT Fabricators: Opportunities and Challenges in DIY-AT for Others in e-NABLE. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6184--6194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Kathleen H. Pine, Claus Bossen, Yunan Chen, Gunnar Ellingsen, Miria Grisot, Melissa Mazmanian, and Naja Holten Møller. 2018. Data Work in Healthcare: Challenges for Patients, Clinicians and Administrators. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 433--439. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3273017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Sharon Prendeville, Grit Hartung, Erica Purvis, Clare Brass, and Ashley Hall. 2016. Makespaces: From Redistributed Manufacturing to a Circular Economy. In Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2016, Rossi Setchi, Robert J. Howlett, Ying Liu, and Peter Theobald (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 577--588.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Halley P. Profta, Abigale Stangl, Laura Matuszewska, Sigrunn Sky, and Shaun K. Kane. 2016. Nothing to Hide: Aesthetic Customization of Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in an Online Community. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 219--227. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982159Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Halley P. Profta, Abigale Stangl, Laura Matuszewska, Sigrunn Sky, Raja Kushalnagar, and Shaun K. Kane. 2018. "Wear It Loud": How and Why Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users Customize Their Devices. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 11, 3, Article 13 (Sept. 2018), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214382Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Beth Ripley. 2017. VA Center Using 3D Printing to Create Devices to Help Veterans Feel Whole. https://www.blogs. va.gov/VAntage/36409/vas-center-innovation-using-3d-printing-create-devices-help-veterans-feel-whole/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. David Roedl, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jefrey Bardzell. 2015. Sustainable Making? Balancing Optimism and Criticism in HCI Discourse. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 3, Article 15 (June 2015), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2699742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Daniela K. Rosner. 2012. The Material Practices of Collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork (CSCW '12). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 1155--1164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145375Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Daniela K. Rosner, Silvia Lindtner, Ingrid Erickson, Laura Forlano, Steven J. Jackson, and Beth Kolko. 2014. Making Cultures: Building Things Building Communities. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing (CSCW Companion '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556852Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Norbert Sparrow. 2014. FDA Tackles Opportunities, Challenges of 3D-printed Medical Devices. https://www.plasticstoday.com/content/fda-tackles-opportunities-challenges-3d-printed-medical-devices/13081585320639Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Susan Leigh Star. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43, 3 (1999), 377--391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Peter Svensson and Rasmus Koss Hartmann. 2017. Policies to Promote User Innovation: The Case of Makerspaces and Clinician Innovation. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5151--15. (August 23 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2701983Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Mike Szczys and Elliot Williams. 2013. Hackaday. https://hackaday.com/about/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Joshua G. Tanenbaum, Amanda M. Williams, Audrey Desjardins, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2013. Democratizing Technology: Pleasure, Utility and Expressiveness in DIY and Maker Practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2603--2612. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2470654.2481360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Austin L. Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jefrey Bardzell. 2015. The Proper Care and Feeding of Hackerspaces: Care Ethics and Cultures of Making. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 629--638. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Erik H. Trainer, Arun Kalyanasundaram, Chalalai Chaihirunkarn, and James D. Herbsleb. 2016. How to Hackathon: Socio-technical Tradeofs in Brief, Intensive Collocation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1118--1130. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2818048.2819946Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. C. Lee Ventola. 2014. Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. Pharmacy and Therapeutics 39, 10 (Oct. 2014), 704--711. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189697/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Sibyl Shalo Wilmont. 2014. Attention DIY Nurses:Workarounds Wanted. The American Journal of Nursing 114, 9 (2014). https://journals.lww.com/ajnonline/Fulltext/2014/09000/Attention_DIY_Nurses___Workarounds_Wanted.18.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Svetlana Yarosh, Tara Matthews, Michelle Zhou, and Kate Ehrlich. 2013. I Need Someone to Help!: A Taxonomy of Helper-finding Activities in the Enterprise. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1375--1386. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441931Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Anna Young. 2015. How the DIY Mindset Can Help Us Build a Culture of Health. TEDMEDBLOG (Nov. 2015). http://blog.tedmed.com/how-the-diy-mindset-can-help-us-build-a-culture-of-health/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Anna Young and Jose Gomez-Marquez. 2008. MakerNurse. http://makernurse.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Alexey Zagalsky, Joseph Feliciano, Margaret-Anne Storey, Yiyun Zhao, and Weiliang Wang. 2015. The Emergence of GitHub As a Collaborative Platform for Education. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1906--1917. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2675133.2675284Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Nizar N Zein, Ibrahim A Hanouneh, Paul D Bishop, Maggie Samaan, Bijan Eghtesad, Cristiano Quintini, Charles Miller, Lisa Yerian, and Ryan Klatte. 2013. Three-dimensional Print of a Liver for Preoperative Planning in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplantation 19, 12 (2013), 1304--1310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "Point-of-Care Manufacturing": Maker Perspectives on Digital Fabrication in Medical Practice

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
          Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 3, Issue CSCW
          November 2019
          5026 pages
          EISSN:2573-0142
          DOI:10.1145/3371885
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 November 2019
          Published in pacmhci Volume 3, Issue CSCW

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader