ABSTRACT
Scaffolding teaching method is a learner-centered teaching method based on constructivism, aiming at cultivating students' problem-solving ability and autonomous learning ability. Lots of researches have studied scaffolding concerning subjects of biology and engineering, what lacks from such researches is the scaffolding designed in English teaching, especially in the support of information technology. In particular, information technology-based scaffolding is also scarce in the foreign language teaching. In order to bridge the gap, this paper introduced the results of a case study in which the students of primary school participate in the making of animation learning resources in English subject by using an animation production tool. Findings suggest that the student participants' perform better after participating in the process of making the situated animation resources. And most importantly, the resources they designed are intended to be reused and restored by facilitating the management and sharing. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings for improving the performance of students. It gives a new thought for the scaffolding from the perspective of students and provides them scaffolding learning experience thus improving learning motivation and cognition.
- Jonassen, D.H., 1991. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research & Development 39, 3, 5--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bodner, G.M., 1986. Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education 63, 10, 873--878.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Young, R.A. and Collin, A., 2004. Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behavior 64, 3, 373--388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ertmer, P.A. and Newby, T.J., 2013. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly 26, 2, 43--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cooper, P.A., 1993. Paradigm Shifts in Designed Instruction: From Behaviorism to Cognitivism to Constructivism. Educational Technology 33, 12--19.Google Scholar
- Gibbons, P., 2002. Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Teaching Second Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom. Diversity, 4, 165.Google Scholar
- Belland, B.R., 2017. Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education.Google Scholar
- Belland, B.R., Kim, C., and Hannafin, M.J., 2013. A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition. Educational Psychologist 48, 4, 243--270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tran, R.T., Thevenot, P., Zhang, Y., Gyawali, D., Tang, L., and Yang, J., 2010. Scaffold Sheet Design Strategy for Soft Tissue Engineering. Nature Materials 3, 2, 1375--1389.Google Scholar
- Babbitt, P.C., 2000. Reengineering the glutathione S-transferase scaffold: A rational design strategy pays off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 19, 10298--10300.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yousefi, A.M., Hoque, M.E., Prasad, R.G., and Uth, N., 2015. Current strategies in multiphasic scaffold design for osteochondral tissue engineering: A review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 103, 7, 2460--2481.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yin, X., Wei, F., Crawford, R., and Hutmacher, D.W., 2017. Biomimic Design of Periosteum: Construction Strategies, Scaffold Design and Cell Sources.Google Scholar
- Brown, J.S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P., 1989. Situated Cognition and Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18, 1, 1765--1768.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Freire, P. and Shor, I., 1987. What Is The 'Dialogical Method' Of Teaching?Google Scholar
- Hüseyin, Hakan, Demiroz, Ahmet, Selcuk, and Akdemir, 2011. A Situated Learning Practice for Language Teaching Classes: Teaching Spoken English With Authentic Sketches. Sino-american English Teaching, 9, 549--555.Google Scholar
- Sandoval, W.A. and Reiser, B.J., 2010. Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education 88, 3, 345--372.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reiser, B.J., 2004. Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work. J Learning Sciences 13, 3, 273--304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chang, H.Y., Quintana, C., and Krajcik, J.S., 2010. The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science Education 94, 1, 73--94.Google Scholar
- Quintana, C., Zhang, M., and Krajcik, J., 2005. A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding. Educational Psychologist 40, 4, 235--244.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tuckman, B.W., 2007. The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes*. Computers & Education 49, 2, 414--422. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bereby-Meyer, Y. and Kaplan, A., 2005. Motivational influences on transfer of problem-solving strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology 30, 1, 1--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., and Gijselaers, W., 2013. Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 1, 285--292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Perkins, D.N. and Salomon, G., 2012. Knowledge to Go: A Motivational and Dispositional View of Transfer. Educational Psychologist 47, 3, 248--258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, M.T. and Eccles, J.S., 2013. School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning & Instruction 28, 3, 12--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., and Winteler, A., 1992. Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research.Google Scholar
- Ames, C., 1992. Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 84, 3, 261--271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hmelo-Silver, C.E., 2004. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review 16, 3, 235--266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Capdeferro, N. and Romero, M., 2012. Are Online Learners Frustrated with Collaborative Learning Experiences? International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning 13, 13, 26--44.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Recker, M.M., Dorward, J., and Nelson, L.M., 2004. Discovery and Use of Online Learning Resources: Case Study Findings. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 7, 2, 93--104.Google Scholar
- Yin, R.K., 2010. Case study research: design and methods. Journal of Advanced Nursing 44, 1, 108--108.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A Case Study of Pupils' Scaffolding Learning Experience Supported by Information Technology
Recommendations
Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice
With the expanding availability and capability of varied technologies, classroom-based problem solving has become an increasingly attainable, yet still elusive, goal. Evidence of technology-enhanced problem-solving teaching and learning in schools has ...
Scaffolding self-regulated learning in student-generated questioning using mobile phones
AbstractFocusing on the sustainability and affordability when using information technology, the mechanism of student-generated questioning (SGQ) and scaffolding for SGQ in reading comprehension tasks were explored within the self-regulated learning ...
Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning
This study investigated the impact of different modes of scaffolding on students who are learning science through a web-based collaborative inquiry project in authentic classroom settings and explored the interaction effects with students' ...
Comments