skip to main content
10.1145/3318396.3318422acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extension of the BiDO Ontology to Represent Scientific Production

Published:02 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The SPAR Ontology Network is a suite of complementary ontology modules to describe the scholarly publishing domain. BiDO Standard Bibliometric Measures is part of its set of ontologies. It allows describing of numerical and categorical bibliometric data such as h-index, author citation count, journal impact factor. These measures may be used to evaluate scientific production of researchers. However, they are not enough. In a previous study, we determined the lack of some terms to provide a more complete representation of scientific production. Hence, we have built an extension using the NeOn Methodology to restructure the BiDO ontology. With this extension, it is possible to represent and measure the number of documents from research, the number of citations from a paper and the number of publications in high impact journals according to its area and discipline.

References

  1. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, "Dublin Core Metadata Initiative," 2012. {Online}. Available: http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, "Dublin Core Metadata Initiative," 2014. {Online}. Available: http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. International Digital Enterprise Alliance, "Publishing Requirements for Industry Standard Metadata Specification," 2009. {Online}. Available: https://www.idealliance.org/specification/prism.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. D'Arcus and F. Giasson, "Bibliographic Ontology Specification," 2009. {Online}. Available: http://bibliontology.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Peroni and D. Shotton, "FaBiO and CiTO: ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations," Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 17, pp. 1--15, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Peroni and D. Shotton, "The SPAR Ontologies," in 17th International Semantic Web Conference, 2018, pp. 119--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Tapia-Leon, J. Chicaiza Espinosa, P. Espinoza Arias, I. Santana-Perez, and O. Corcho, "Using the SPAR Ontology Network to represent the Scientific Production of a University: A Case Study," in 7th World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, 2019. Unpublished.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. del C. Suarez-Figueroa, "NeOn Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: Specification, Scheduling and Reuse," Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Poveda-Villalón, A. Gómez-Pérez, and M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, "OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): An On-line Tool for Ontology Evaluation," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), vol. 10, no. 2, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Piedra Salomón and A. Martínez Rodríguez, "Scientific Production," Ciencias de la Información, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 33--38, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Kling, "The Internet and Unrefereed Scholarly Publishing," Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 38, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Spinak, Diccionario enciclopédico de Bibliometría, Cienciometría e Informetría. Unesco, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Shotton and S. Peroni, "Semantic annotation of publication entities," in Beyond the PDF Workshop, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Shotton and S. Peroni, "FRBR-aligned Bibliographic Ontology (FaBiO)," 2018. {Online}. Available: http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies/fabio.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. F. Osborne, S. Peroni, and E. Motta, "Clustering Citation Distributions for Semantic Categorization and Citation Prediction," in 4th Workshop on Linked Science (LISC), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. C. Suarez-Figueroa, A. Gómez-Pérez, E. Motta, and A. Gangemi, Ontology Engineering in a Networked World. Springer, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Grüninger and M. S. Fox, "Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies," in Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (IJCAI), 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Ciccarese and S. Peroni, "Essential FRBR in OWL2 DL," 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Extension of the BiDO Ontology to Represent Scientific Production

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEIT 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology
      March 2019
      327 pages
      ISBN:9781450362672
      DOI:10.1145/3318396

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 March 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader