ABSTRACT
The SPAR Ontology Network is a suite of complementary ontology modules to describe the scholarly publishing domain. BiDO Standard Bibliometric Measures is part of its set of ontologies. It allows describing of numerical and categorical bibliometric data such as h-index, author citation count, journal impact factor. These measures may be used to evaluate scientific production of researchers. However, they are not enough. In a previous study, we determined the lack of some terms to provide a more complete representation of scientific production. Hence, we have built an extension using the NeOn Methodology to restructure the BiDO ontology. With this extension, it is possible to represent and measure the number of documents from research, the number of citations from a paper and the number of publications in high impact journals according to its area and discipline.
- Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, "Dublin Core Metadata Initiative," 2012. {Online}. Available: http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.Google Scholar
- Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, "Dublin Core Metadata Initiative," 2014. {Online}. Available: http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/.Google Scholar
- International Digital Enterprise Alliance, "Publishing Requirements for Industry Standard Metadata Specification," 2009. {Online}. Available: https://www.idealliance.org/specification/prism.Google Scholar
- B. D'Arcus and F. Giasson, "Bibliographic Ontology Specification," 2009. {Online}. Available: http://bibliontology.com/.Google Scholar
- S. Peroni and D. Shotton, "FaBiO and CiTO: ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations," Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 17, pp. 1--15, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Peroni and D. Shotton, "The SPAR Ontologies," in 17th International Semantic Web Conference, 2018, pp. 119--136.Google Scholar
- M. Tapia-Leon, J. Chicaiza Espinosa, P. Espinoza Arias, I. Santana-Perez, and O. Corcho, "Using the SPAR Ontology Network to represent the Scientific Production of a University: A Case Study," in 7th World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, 2019. Unpublished.Google Scholar
- M. del C. Suarez-Figueroa, "NeOn Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: Specification, Scheduling and Reuse," Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2010.Google Scholar
- M. Poveda-Villalón, A. Gómez-Pérez, and M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, "OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): An On-line Tool for Ontology Evaluation," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), vol. 10, no. 2, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Piedra Salomón and A. Martínez Rodríguez, "Scientific Production," Ciencias de la Información, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 33--38, 2007.Google Scholar
- R. Kling, "The Internet and Unrefereed Scholarly Publishing," Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 38, 2003.Google Scholar
- E. Spinak, Diccionario enciclopédico de Bibliometría, Cienciometría e Informetría. Unesco, 1996.Google Scholar
- D. Shotton and S. Peroni, "Semantic annotation of publication entities," in Beyond the PDF Workshop, 2010.Google Scholar
- D. Shotton and S. Peroni, "FRBR-aligned Bibliographic Ontology (FaBiO)," 2018. {Online}. Available: http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies/fabio.Google Scholar
- F. Osborne, S. Peroni, and E. Motta, "Clustering Citation Distributions for Semantic Categorization and Citation Prediction," in 4th Workshop on Linked Science (LISC), 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. C. Suarez-Figueroa, A. Gómez-Pérez, E. Motta, and A. Gangemi, Ontology Engineering in a Networked World. Springer, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Grüninger and M. S. Fox, "Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies," in Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (IJCAI), 1995.Google Scholar
- P. Ciccarese and S. Peroni, "Essential FRBR in OWL2 DL," 2018.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Extension of the BiDO Ontology to Represent Scientific Production
Recommendations
On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact
This article analyzes the effect of interdisciplinarity on the scientific impact of individual articles. Using all the articles published in Web of Science in 2000, we define the degree of interdisciplinarity of a given article as the percentage of its ...
Scientific Production on Web Usability
Interacción '16: Proceedings of the XVII International Conference on Human Computer InteractionScientific literature on Web usability is presented by the bibliometric analysis of published Science and Scopus database articles available on the Web. We analyzed the productivity, temporal distribution and scientific production by authors, ...
Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis
This study aims to identify possible gender inequalities in the scholarly output of researchers in the field of psychology in Spain. A sample of 522 papers and reviews published in 2007 was extracted from the Thomson ISI Web of Science. The presence of ...
Comments