skip to main content
10.1145/3316782.3322758acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing a web-based automatic ergonomic assessment using motion data

Published:05 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Manual laborers from the industry sector are often subject to critical physical strain that lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Lifting, poor posture and repetitive movements are among the causes of these disorders. In order to prevent them, several rules and methods have been established to identify ergonomic risks that the worker might be exposed during his/her activities. However, the ergonomic assessment though these methods is not a trivial task and a relevant degree of theoretical knowledge on the part of the analyst is necessary. Therefore in this paper, a web-based automatic ergonomic assessment module is proposed. The proposed module uses segment rotations acquired from inertial measurement units for the assessment and provides as feedback RULA scores, color visualisation and limb angles in a simple, intuitive and meaningful way. RULA is one of the most used observational methods for assessment of occupational risk factors for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. By automatizing RULA an interesting perspective for extracting posture analytics for ergonomic assessment is opened, as well as the inclusion of new features that may complement it. For future work, the use of other features and sensors will be investigated for its implementation on the module.

References

  1. Omid Alemi, Philippe Pasquier, and Chris Shaw. 2014. Mova: Interactive Movement Analytics Platform. In MOCO'14, 37--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. I Balogh, P Ørbæk, K Ohlsson, C Nordander, J Unge, and J Winkel. 2004. Self-assessed and directly measured occupational physical activities --- influence of musculoskeletal complaints, age and gender. Appl. Ergon. 35, 2004 (2004), 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C Berlin and C Adams. 2017. Ergonomics Evaluation Methods. In Production Ergonomics: Designing Work Systems to Support Optimal Human Performance. Ubiquity Press, London, 139--160. DOI:https://doi.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Peter Buckle and Jason Devereux. 1999. Work related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.intGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alex Burdorf and Judith Laan. 1991. Comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load on the back. Scand J Work Env. Heal. 17, 6 (1991), 425--429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G C David. 2005. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup. Med. (Chic. Ill). 55, 2005 (2005), 190--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Patrick G. Dempsey, Raymond W. Mcgorry, and Wayne S. Maynard. 2005. A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists. Appl. Ergon. 36, 2005 (2005), 489--503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sara Dockrell, Eleanor O Grady, Kathleen Bennett, Clare Mullarkey, Rachel Mc Connell, Rachel Ruddy, Seamus Twomey, and Colleen Flannery. 2012. An investigation of the reliability of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) as a method of assessment of children's computing posture. Appl. Ergon. 43, 3 (2012), 632--636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Eurofound. 2017. Sixth European Working Conditions Survey --- Overview report (2017 update). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alan Hedge. 1993. RULA Employee Assessment Worksheet. 24, 91--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sue Hignett and Lynn Mcatamney. 2000. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Appl. Ergon. 31, 2000 (2000), 201--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mohammad Didar Hossain, Afzal Aftab, Mahmudul Hassan, Al Imam, Ilias Mahmud, Imran Ahmed Chowdhury, Razin Iqbal Kabir, and Malabika Sarker. 2018. Prevalence of work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) and ergonomic risk assessment among readymade garment workers of Bangladesh: A cross sectional study. 2, (2018), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Osmo Karhu, Pekka Kansi, and Ilkka Kuorinka. 1977. Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. Appl. Ergon. 8.4, December (1977), 199--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hsin Yi Kathy Cheng, Chen Yi Cheng, and Yan Ying Ju. 2013. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic risk factors in early intervention educators. Appl. Ergon. 44, 1 (2013), 134--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Stefano Elio Lenzi, Carlo Emilio Standoli, Giuseppe Andreoni, Paolo Perego, and Nicola Francesco Lopomo. 2019. Comparison Among Standard Method, Dedicated Toolbox and Kinematic-Based Approach in Assessing Risk of Developing Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders. Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Liberty Mutual Manual Materials Handling Tables. Retrieved February 25, 2019 from https://libertymmhtables.libertymutual.com/CM_LMTablesWeb/taskSelection.do?action=initTaskSelectionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tânia M. Lima and Denis A Coelho. 2018. Ergonomic and psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal complaints in public sector administration e A joint monitoring approach with analysis of association. 66, 2018 (2018), 85--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Vito Modesto Manghisi, Antonio Emmanuele Uva, Michele Fiorentino, Vitoantonio Bevilacqua, Gianpaolo Francesco Trotta, and Giuseppe Monno. 2017. Real time RULA assessment using Kinect v2 sensor. Appl. Ergon. 65, 2017 (2017), 481--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lynn Mcatamney and E Nigel Corlett. 1993. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24, 2 (1993), 91--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Meinard Müller, Tido Röder, Michael Clausen, Bernhard Eberhardt, Björn Krüger, and Andreas Weber. 2007. Documentation Mocap database HDM05. In Computer Graphics Technical Reports, 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nipun D. Nath, Reza Akhavian, and Amir H. Behzadan. 2017. Ergonomic analysis of construction worker's body postures using wearable mobile sensors. Appl. Ergon. 62, (2017), 107--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nipun D. Nath, Theodora Chaspari, and Amir H. Behzadan. 2018. Automated ergonomic risk monitoring using body-mounted sensors and machine learning. Adv. Eng. Informatics 38, August (2018), 514--526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nilüfer Øztürk and Melek Nihal Esin. 2011. Investigation of musculoskeletal symptoms and ergonomic risk factors among female sewing machine operators in Turkey. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 41, 6 (2011), 585--591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sonja Pavlovic-veselinovic, Alan Hedge, and Matija Veselinovic. 2016. An ergonomic expert system for risk assessment of work-related musculo-skeletal disorders. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 53, 2016 (2016), 130--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Pierre Plantard, Hubert P.H. Shum, Anne Sophie Le Pierres, and Franck Multon. 2017. Validation of an ergonomic assessment method using Kinect data in real workplace conditions. Appl. Ergon. 65, (2017), 562--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Laura Punnett. 1999. The costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in automotive manufacturing. 9, 4 (1999), 403--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Alberto Sanchez, Manuel Garcia, Rosario Domingo, and Miguel Angel Sebastian. 2013. Novel Ergonomic Postural Assessment Method (NERPA) Using Product-Process Computer Aided Engineering for Ergonomic Workplace Design. PLoS One 8, 8 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Elke Schneider, Irastorza Xabier, and Sarah Copsey. 2010. OSH in figures: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU --- Facts and figures. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Luxembourg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Esa-Pekka Takala, Irmeli Pehkonen, Mikael Forsman, Gert-Åke Hansson, Svend Erik Mathiassen, W Patrick Neumann, Gisela Sjøgaard, Kaj Bo Veiersted, Rolf H Westgaard, and Jørgen Winkel. 2018. Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. 36, 1 (2018), 3--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas R. Waters, Vern Putz-Anderson, and Arun Garg. 1994. Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. 1--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Xuzhong Yan, Heng Li, Angus R Li, and Hong Zhang. 2017. Automation in Construction Wearable IMU-based real-time motion warning system for construction workers' musculoskeletal disorders prevention. Autom. Constr. 74, (2017), 2--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing a web-based automatic ergonomic assessment using motion data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PETRA '19: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
        June 2019
        655 pages
        ISBN:9781450362320
        DOI:10.1145/3316782

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader