skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376796acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Virtual Field Studies: Conducting Studies on Public Displays in Virtual Reality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Field studies on public displays can be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming. We investigate the feasibility of using virtual reality (VR) as a test-bed to evaluate deployments of public displays. Specifically, we investigate whether results from virtual field studies, conducted in a virtual public space, would match the results from a corresponding real-world setting. We report on two empirical user studies where we compared audience behavior around a virtual public display in the virtual world to audience behavior around a real public display. We found that virtual field studies can be a powerful research tool, as in both studies we observed largely similar behavior between the settings. We discuss the opportunities, challenges, and limitations of using virtual reality to conduct field studies, and provide lessons learned from our work that can help researchers decide whether to employ VR in their research and what factors to account for if doing so.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper667pv.mp4

mp4

20.2 MB

a667-makela-presentation.mp4

mp4

137.9 MB

References

  1. Christopher Ackad, Andrew Clayphan, Martin Tomitsch, and Judy Kay. 2015. An In-the-wild Study of Learning Mid-air Gestures to Browse Hierarchical Information at a Large Interactive Public Display. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1227--1238. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807532Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Christopher Ackad, Martin Tomitsch, and Judy Kay. 2016. Skeletons and Silhouettes: Comparing User Representations at a Gesture-based Large Display. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2343--2347. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858427Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Christopher Ackad, Rainer Wasinger, Richard Gluga, Judy Kay, and Martin Tomitsch. 2013. Measuring Interactivity at an Interactive Public Information Display. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (OzCHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 329--332. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541091Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Philipp Agethen, Viswa Subramanian Sekar, Felix Gaisbauer, Thies Pfeiffer, Michael Otto, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. Behavior Analysis of Human Locomotion in the Real World and Virtual Reality for the Manufacturing Industry. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 15, 3, Article 20 (July 2018), 19 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3230648Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jan Philipp Albrecht. 2016. How the GDPR Will Change the World. European Data Protection Law Review 2, 3 (2016). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21552/EDPL/2016/3/4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Florian Alt, Andreas Bulling, Gino Gravanis, and Daniel Buschek. 2015. GravitySpot: Guiding Users in Front of Public Displays Using On-Screen Visual Cues. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 47--56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807490Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Florian Alt, Andreas Bulling, Lukas Mecke, and Daniel Buschek. 2016. Attention, Please! Comparing Features for Measuring Audience Attention Towards Pervasive Displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 823--828. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901897Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Florian Alt, Thomas Kubitza, Dominik Bial, Firas Zaidan, Markus Ortel, Björn Zurmaar, Tim Lewen, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2011. Digifieds: Insights into Deploying Digital Public Notice Areas in the Wild. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 165--174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2107596.2107618Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Florian Alt, Stefan Schneegaß, Albrecht Schmidt, Jörg Müller, and Nemanja Memarovic. 2012. How to Evaluate Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 17, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2307798.2307815Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Florian Alt, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Thomas Kubitza, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Interaction Techniques for Creating and Exchanging Content with Public Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1709--1718. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466226Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Florian Alt and Julia Vehns. 2016. Opportunistic Deployments: Challenges and Opportunities of Conducting Public Display Research at an Airport. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 106--117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2915020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. John J Barton and Vikram Vijayaraghavan. 2002. Ubiwise, a ubiquitous wireless infrastructure simulation environment. HP Labs (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ben Bedwell and Theresa Caruana. 2012. Encouraging Spectacle to Create Self-sustaining Interactions at Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 15, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2307798.2307813Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gilbert Beyer, Florian Alt, Jörg Müller, Albrecht Schmidt, Karsten Isakovic, Stefan Klose, Manuel Schiewe, and Ivo Haulsen. 2011. Audience Behavior Around Large Interactive Cylindrical Screens. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1021--1030. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979095Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gilbert Beyer, Vincent Binder, Nina Jäger, and Andreas Butz. 2014. The Puppeteer Display: Attracting and Actively Shaping the Audience with an Interactive Public Banner Display. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 935--944. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Harry Brignull and Yvonne Rogers. 2003. Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. In Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT '03: IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1st-5th September 2003, Zurich, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2010. Designing Urban Media FaçAdes: Cases and Challenges. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2277--2286. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753670Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2016. Participation Gestalt: Analysing Participatory Qualities of Interaction in Public Space. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 4435--4446. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858147Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Peter Dalsgaard and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2008. Performing Perception-Staging Aesthetics of Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 3, Article 13 (Dec. 2008), 33 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1453152.1453156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nicholas S. Dalton, Emily Collins, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Display Blindness?: Looking Again at the Visibility of Situated Displays Using Eye-tracking. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3889--3898. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nigel Davies, Sarah Clinch, and Florian Alt. 2014. Pervasive Displays: Understanding the Future of Digital Signage (1st ed.). Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shuchisnigdha Deb, Daniel W. Carruth, Richard Sween, Lesley Strawderman, and Teena M. Garrison. 2017. Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research. Applied Ergonomics 65 (2017), 449 -- 460. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Guiying Du, Auriol Degbelo, and Christian Kray. 2017. Public Displays for Public Participation in Urban Settings: A Survey. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 17, 9 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078825Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ivan Elhart, Marc Langheinrich, Nemanja Memarovic, and Elisa Rubegni. 2016. A Good Balance of Costs and Benefits: Convincing a University Administration to Support the Installation of an Interactive Multi-application Display System on Campus. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 197--203. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2915029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Maia Garau, Mel Slater, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Andrea Brogni, Anthony Steed, and M. Angela Sasse. 2003. The Impact of Avatar Realism and Eye Gaze Control on Perceived Quality of Communication in a Shared Immersive Virtual Environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 529--536. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642703Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vito Gentile, Mohamed Khamis, Salvatore Sorce, and Florian Alt. 2017. They Are Looking at Me!: Understanding How Audience Presence Impacts on Public Display Users. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 11, 7 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078822Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Dominic Gorecky, Mohamed Khamis, and Katharina Mura. 2017. Introduction and Establishment of Virtual Training in the Factory of the Future. International Journal on Computer Integrated Manufacturing 30, 1 (Jan. 2017), 182--190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1067918Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. John Hardy, Enrico Rukzio, and Nigel Davies. 2011. Real World Responses to Interactive Gesture Based Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 33--39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2107596.2107600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eric Harris, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Yvonne Rogers, Sara Price, Ted Phelps, and Cliff Randell. 2004. From Snark to Park: Lessons Learnt Moving Pervasive Experiences from Indoors to Outdoors. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Australasian User Interface - Volume 28 (AUIC '04). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 39--48. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=976310.976316Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904--908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 187--196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--322--80058--9_19Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Simo Hosio, Jorge Goncalves, Hannu Kukka, Alan Chamberlain, and Alessio Malizia. 2014. What's in It for Me: Exploring the Real-World Value Proposition of Pervasive Displays. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 174, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Simo Hosio, Vassilis Kostakos, Hannu Kukka, Marko Jurmu, Jukka Riekki, and Timo Ojala. 2012. From School Food to Skate Parks in a Few Clicks: Using Public Displays to Bootstrap Civic Engagement of the Young. In Pervasive Computing, Judy Kay, Paul Lukowicz, Hideyuki Tokuda, Patrick Olivier, and Antonio Krüger (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 425--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Arief Ernst Hühn, Vassilis-Javed Khan, Andrés Lucero, and Paul Ketelaar. 2012. On the Use of Virtual Environments for the Evaluation of Location-based Applications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2569--2578. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Wendy Ju and David Sirkin. 2010. Animate Objects: How Physical Motion Encourages Public Interaction. In Persuasive Technology, Thomas Ploug, Per Hasle, and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 40--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohamed Khamis, Florian Alt, and Andreas Bulling. 2015. A Field Study on Spontaneous Gaze-based Interaction with a Public Display Using Pursuits. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp/ISWC'15 Adjunct). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 863--872. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2804335Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Mohamed Khamis, Christian Becker, Andreas Bulling, and Florian Alt. 2018. Which One is Me?: Identifying Oneself on Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 287, 12 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Hannu Kukka, Heidi Oja, Vassilis Kostakos, Jorge Gonçalves, and Timo Ojala. 2013. What Makes You Click: Exploring Visual Signals to Entice Interaction on Public Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1699--1708. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Andrés Lucero, Jussi Holopainen, and Tero Jokela. 2012. MobiComics: Collaborative Use of Mobile Phones and Large Displays for Public Expression. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 383--392. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ville Mäkelä, Tomi Heimonen, Matti Luhtala, and Markku Turunen. 2014. Information Wall: Evaluation of a Gesture-controlled Public Display. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 228--231. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2677972.2677998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Paul Marshall, Richard Morris, Yvonne Rogers, Stefan Kreitmayer, and Matt Davies. 2011. Rethinking 'Multi-user': An In-the-wild Study of How Groups Approach a Walk-up-and-use Tabletop Interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3033--3042. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Nemanja Memarovic, Sarah Clinch, and Florian Alt. 2015. Understanding Display Blindness in Future Display Deployments. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 7--14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Nemanja Memarovic, Marc Langheinrich, Keith Cheverst, Nick Taylor, and Florian Alt. 2013. P-LAYERS -- A Layered Framework Addressing the Multifaceted Issues Facing Community-Supporting Public Display Deployments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3, Article 17 (July 2013), 34 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491505Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Daniel Michelis and Jörg Müller. 2011. The Audience Funnel: Observations of Gesture Based Interaction With Multiple Large Displays in a City Center. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 27, 6 (2011), 562--579. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555299Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Mehdi Moussaïd, Mubbasir Kapadia, Tyler Thrash, Robert W Sumner, Markus Gross, Dirk Helbing, and Christoph Hölscher. 2016. Crowd behaviour during high-stress evacuations in an immersive virtual environment. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 13, 122 (2016), 20160414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Jörg Müller, Florian Alt, Daniel Michelis, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. Requirements and Design Space for Interactive Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1285--1294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1873951.1874203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jörg Müller, Gilles Bailly, Thor Bossuyt, and Niklas Hillgren. 2014a. MirrorTouch: Combining Touch and Mid-air Gestures for Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 319--328. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jörg Müller, Dieter Eberle, and Konrad Tollmar. 2014b. Communiplay: A Field Study of a Public Display Mediaspace. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1415--1424. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jörg Müller, Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, Michael Nischt, and Florian Alt. 2012. Looking Glass: A Field Study on Noticing Interactivity of a Shop Window. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 297--306. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Display Blindness: The Effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage. In Pervasive Computing, Hideyuki Tokuda, Michael Beigl, Adrian Friday, A. J. Bernheim Brush, and Yoshito Tobe (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Maximilian Müller, Aris Alissandrakis, and Nuno Otero. 2016. There is More to Come: Anticipating Content on Interactive Public Displays Through Timer Animations. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 247--248. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2940341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Ville Mäkelä, Tomi Heimonen, and Markku Turunen. 2018a. Semi-Automated, Large-Scale Evaluation of Public Displays. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 34, 6 (2018), 491--505. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1367905Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Ville Mäkelä, Mohamed Khamis, Lukas Mecke, Jobin James, Markku Turunen, and Florian Alt. 2018b. Pocket Transfers: Interaction Techniques for Transferring Content from Situated Displays to Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 135, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173709Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ville Mäkelä, Sumita Sharma, Jaakko Hakulinen, Tomi Heimonen, and Markku Turunen. 2017. Challenges in Public Display Deployments: A Taxonomy of External Factors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3426--3475. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025798Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. T. Ojala, V. Kostakos, H. Kukka, T. Heikkinen, T. Linden, M. Jurmu, S. Hosio, F. Kruger, and D. Zanni. 2012. Multipurpose Interactive Public Displays in the Wild: Three Years Later. Computer 45, 5 (May 2012), 42--49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.115Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. T. Ojala, H. Kukka, T. Lindén, T. Heikkinen, M. Jurmu, S. Hosio, and F. Kruger. 2010. UBI-Hotspot 1.0: Large-Scale Long-Term Deployment of Interactive Public Displays in a City Center. In 2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services. 285--294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIW.2010.49Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Néstor Ordaz, David Romero, Dominic Gorecky, and Héctor R. Siller. 2015. Serious Games and Virtual Simulator for Automotive Manufacturing Education & Training. Procedia Computer Science 75 (2015), 267 -- 274. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Callum Parker and Martin Tomitsch. 2017. Bridging the Interaction Gulf: Understanding the Factors That Drive Public Interactive Display Usage. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 482--486. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Gonzalo Parra, Robin De Croon, Joris Klerkx, and Erik Duval. 2014. Quantifying the Interaction Stages of a Public Display Campaign in the Wild. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 757--760. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639216Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It's Mine, Don'T Touch!: Interactions at a Large Multi-touch Display in a City Centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1285--1294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Mark Perry, Steve Beckett, Kenton O'Hara, and Sriram Subramanian. 2010. WaveWindow: Public, Performative Gestural Interaction. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 109--112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1936652.1936672Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Sharif Razzaque, David Swapp, Mel Slater, Mary C. Whitton, and Anthony Steed. 2002. Redirected Walking in Place. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Environments 2002 (EGVE '02). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 123--130. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=509709.509729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Stuart Reeves. 2011. Designing interfaces in public settings: Understanding the role of the spectator in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. W. Reitberger, A. Meschtscherjakov, T. Mirlacher, T. Scherndl, H. Huber, and M. Tscheligi. 2009. A Persuasive Interactive Mannequin for Shop Windows. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Persuasive '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 4, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541954Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. A. Riener and A. Sippl. 2014. Head-Pose-Based Attention Recognition on Large Public Displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 34, 1 (Jan 2014), 32--41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2014.9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Enrico Rukzio, Michael Müller, and Robert Hardy. 2009. Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Public Display for Pedestrian Navigation: The Rotating Compass. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 113--122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2017. Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4, 4 (06/2017 2017), 40--44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Helmut Schrom-Feiertag, Christoph Schinko, Volker Settgast, and Stefan Seer. 2014. Evaluation of Guidance Systems in Public Infrastructures Using Eye Tracking in an Immersive Virtual Environment. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1241 (01 2014), 62--66. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1241/paper13.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Helmut Schrom-Feiertag, Volker Settgast, and Stefan Seer. 2017. Evaluation of indoor guidance systems using eye tracking in an immersive virtual environment. Spatial Cognition & Computation 17, 1--2 (2017), 163--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Valentin Schwind, Pascal Knierim, Nico Haas, and Niels Henze. 2019. Using Presence Questionnaires in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 360, 12 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300590Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Srinivas Sridharan, Reynold Bailey, Ann McNamara, and Cindy Grimm. 2012. Subtle Gaze Manipulation for Improved Mammography Training. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 75--82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2168556.2168568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. O. Storz, A. Friday, N. Davies, J. Finney, C. Sas, and J. Sheridan. 2006. Public Ubiquitous Computing Systems: Lessons from the e-Campus Display Deployments. IEEE Pervasive Computing 5, 3 (July 2006), 40--47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2006.56Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Maurice Ten Koppel, Gilles Bailly, Jörg Müller, and Robert Walter. 2012a. Chained Displays: Configurations of Public Displays Can Be Used to Influence Actor-, Audience-, and Passer-by Behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 317--326. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Maurice Ten Koppel, Gilles Bailly, Jörg Müller, and Robert Walter. 2012b. Chained Displays: Configurations of Public Displays Can Be Used to Influence Actor-, Audience-, and Passer-by Behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 317--326. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Eva Thelisson, Kshitij Sharma, Hanan Salam, and Virginia Dignum. 2018. The General Data Protection Regulation: An Opportunity for the HCI Community?. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Paper W36, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170632Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Martin Tomitsch, Christopher Ackad, Oliver Dawson, Luke Hespanhol, and Judy Kay. 2014. Who Cares About the Content? An Analysis of Playful Behaviour at a Public Display. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 160, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Sam Tregillus and Eelke Folmer. 2016. VR-STEP: Walking-in-Place Using Inertial Sensing for Hands Free Navigation in Mobile VR Environments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1250--1255. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858084Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Paco Underhill. 2009. Why we buy: The science of shopping--updated and revised for the Internet, the global consumer, and beyond. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Nina Valkanova, Robert Walter, Andrew Vande Moere, and Jörg Müller. 2014. MyPosition: Sparking Civic Discourse by a Public Interactive Poll Visualization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1323--1332. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531639Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, and Jörg Müller. 2013. StrikeAPose: Revealing Mid-air Gestures on Public Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 841--850. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470774Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Robert Walter, Andreas Bulling, David Lindlbauer, Martin Schuessler, and Jörg Müller. 2015. Analyzing Visual Attention During Whole Body Interaction with Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1263--1267. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Julie R. Williamson and Daniel Sundén. 2015. Enter the Circle: Blending Spherical Displays and Playful Embedded Interaction in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 195--200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757731Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Niels Wouters, John Downs, Mitchell Harrop, Travis Cox, Eduardo Oliveira, Sarah Webber, Frank Vetere, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2016. Uncovering the Honeypot Effect: How Audiences Engage with Public Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 5--16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901796Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Virtual Field Studies: Conducting Studies on Public Displays in Virtual Reality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        10688 pages
        ISBN:9781450367080
        DOI:10.1145/3313831

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 April 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format