skip to main content
10.1145/3308560.3317056acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hybrid Human Machine workflows for mobility management

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sustainable mobility is one of the main goals of both European and United Nations plans for 2030. The concept of Smart Cities has arisen as a way to achieve this goal by leveraging IoT interconnected devices to collect and analyse large quantities of data. However, several works have pointed out the importance of including the human factor, and in particular, citizens, to make sense of the collected data and ensure their engagement along the data value chain. This paper presents the design and implementation of two end-to-end hybrid human-machine workflows for solving two mobility problems: modal split estimation, and mapping mobility infrastructure. For modal split, we combine the use of i-Log, an app to collect data and interact with citizens, with reinforcement learning classifiers to continuously improve the accuracy of the classification, aiming at reducing the required interactions from citizens. For mobility infrastructure, we developed a system that uses remote crowdworkers to explore the city looking for Points of Interest, that is more scalable than sending agents on the field. Crowdsourced maps are then fused with existing maps (if available) to create a final map that then is validated on the field by citizens engaged through the i-Log app.

References

  1. Vito Albino, Umberto Berardi, and Rosa Maria Dangelico. 2015. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22, 1 (2015), 3–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tuba Bakıcı, Esteve Almirall, and Jonathan Wareham. 2013. A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4, 2 (01 Jun 2013), 135–148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Paolo Bouquet and Fausto Giunchiglia. 1995. Reasoning about theory adequacy. a new solution to the qualification problem. Fundamenta Informaticae 23, 2, 3, 4 (1995), 247–262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Vincenzo Della Mea, Eddy Maddalena, and Stefano Mizzaro. 2013. Crowdsourcing to Mobile Users: A Study of the Role of Platforms and Tasks.. In DBCrowd. Citeseer, 14–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Oluwaseyi Feyisetan, Elena Simperl, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2015. Improving Paid Microtasks Through Gamification and Adaptive Furtherance Incentives. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web(WWW ’15). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 333–343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fausto Giunchiglia, Enrico Bignotti, and Mattia Zeni. 2017. Personal context modelling and annotation. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 117–122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Daniel Gooch, Annika Wolff, Gerd Kortuem, and Rebecca Brown. 2015. Reimagining the Role of Citizens in Smart City Projects. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers(UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1587–1594. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bin Guo, Zhiwen Yu, Xingshe Zhou, and Daqing Zhang. 2014. From participatory sensing to mobile crowd sensing. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 593–598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Holger Junker, Paul Lukowicz, and Gerhard Troster. 2004. Sampling frequency, signal resolution and the accuracy of wearable context recognition systems. In Wearable Computers, 2004. ISWC 2004. Eighth International Symposium on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 176–177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Aftab Khan, Nils Hammerla, Sebastian Mellor, and Thomas Platz. 2016. Optimising sampling rates for accelerometer-based human activity recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters 73 (2016), 33 – 40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A Tawalbeh Lo’ai, Anas Basalamah, Rashid Mehmood, and Hala Tawalbeh. 2016. Greener and smarter phones for future cities: Characterizing the impact of GPS signal strength on power consumption. IEEE Access 4(2016), 858–868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Eddy Maddalena, Luis Daniel Ibáñez, and Elena Simperl. 2019. On the mapping of Points of Interest through StreetView imagery and paid crowdsourcing. CoRR abs/1901.09264(2019). arxiv:1901.09264http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.09264Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eddy Maddalena, Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, Elena Simperl, Mattia Zeni, Enrico Bignotti, Fausto Giunchiglia, Claus Stadler, Patrick Westphal, Luís PF Garcia, and Jens Lehmann. 2018. QROWD: Because Big Data Integration is Humanly Possible. In Proceedings of the Project Showcase Track of KDD2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo and Sören Auer. 2011. LIMES: A Time-efficient Approach for Large-scale Link Discovery on the Web of Data. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Three(IJCAI’11). AAAI Press, 2312–2317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Adrian Corneliu Prelipcean, Yusak Octavius Susilo, and Gyözö Gidofalvi. 2018. Future directions of research for automatic travel diary collection. In DIVA. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-227256Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniel Sui, Sarah Elwood, and Michael Goodchild. 2012. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. The European Commission. 2018. Transport in the European Union. The European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/2018-transport-in-the-eu-current-trends-and-issues.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dejun Yang, Guoliang Xue, Xi Fang, and Jian Tang. 2012. Crowdsourcing to Smartphones: Incentive Mechanism Design for Mobile Phone Sensing. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking(Mobicom ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173–184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mattia Zeni, Ilya Zaihrayeu, and Fausto Giunchiglia. 2014. Multi-device activity logging. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication. ACM, 299–302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hybrid Human Machine workflows for mobility management
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference
          May 2019
          1331 pages
          ISBN:9781450366755
          DOI:10.1145/3308560

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 May 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format