skip to main content
10.1145/3307339.3342177acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Multi-modal Predictive Models of Diabetes Progression

Published:04 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increasing availability of wearable devices, continuous monitoring of individuals' physiological and behavioral patterns has become significantly more accessible. Access to these continuous patterns about individuals' statuses offers an unprecedented opportunity for studying complex diseases and health conditions such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). T2D is a widely common chronic disease that its roots and progression patterns are not fully understood. Predicting the progression of T2D can inform timely and more effective interventions to prevent or manage the disease. In this study, we have used a dataset related to 63 patients with T2D that includes the data from two different types of wearable devices worn by the patients: continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices and activity trackers (ActiGraphs). Using this dataset, we created a model for predicting the levels of four major biomarkers related to T2D after a one-year period. We developed a wide and deep neural network and used the data from the demographic information, lab tests, and wearable sensors to create the model. The deep part of our method was developed based on the long short-term memory (LSTM) structure to process the time-series dataset collected by the wearables. In predicting the patterns of the four biomarkers, we have obtained a root mean square error of ±1.67% for HBA1c, ±6.22 mg/dl for HDL cholesterol, ±10.46 mg/dl for LDL cholesterol, and ±18.38 mg/dl for Triglyceride. Compared to existing models for studying T2D, our model offers a more comprehensive tool for combining a large variety of factors that contribute to the disease.

References

  1. W.H.O World Health Organization (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wu, Y., Ding, Y., Tanaka, Y. and Zhang, W. Risk factors contributing to type 2 diabetes and recent advances in the treatment and prevention. International journal of medical sciences, 11, 11 (2014), 1185--1200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sartore, G., Chilelli, N. C., Burlina, S. and Lapolla, A. Association between glucose variability as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and diabetic retinopathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetologica, 50, 3 (June 01 2013), 437--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. The Relationship of Glycemic Exposure (HbA1c) to the Risk of Development and Progression of Retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes, 44, 8 (1995), 968--983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kavakiotis, I., Tsave, O., Salifoglou, A., Maglaveras, N., Vlahavas, I. and Chouvarda, I. Machine Learning and Data Mining Methods in Diabetes Research. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 15 (01/ 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Desalvo, D. and Buckingham, B. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use and Future Directions. Current diabetes reports, 13 (08/ 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardner, B., Lally, P. and Wardle, J. Making health habitual: The psychology of 'habit-formation' and general practice. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 62 (12/ 2012), 664--666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bagherzadeh Khiabani, F., Ramezankhani, A., Azizi, F., Hadaegh, F., Steyerberg, E. and Khalili, D. A tutorial on variable selection for clinical prediction models: Feature selection methods in data-mining could improve the results. Journal of clinical epidemiology (10/ 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Georga, E. I., Protopappas, V. C., Polyzos, D. and Fotiadis, D. I. Evaluation of short-term predictors of glucose concentration in type 1 diabetes combining feature ranking with regression models. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 53, 12 (Dec/01 2015), 1305--1318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J Simon, G., Schrom, J., Castro, M., Li, P. and J Caraballo, P. Survival Association Rule Mining Towards Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment. AMIA, Annual Symposium proceedings, 2013 (11/ 2013), 1293--1302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Casanova, R., Saldana, S., L. Simpson, S., Lacy, M., R. Subauste, A., Blackshear, C., Wagenknecht, L. and G. Bertoni, A. Prediction of Incident Diabetes in the Jackson Heart Study Using High-Dimensional Machine Learning. PLOS ONE, 11 (10/ 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anderson, A. E., Kerr, W. T., Thames, A., Li, T., Xiao, J. and Cohen, M. S. Electronic health record phenotyping improves detection and screening of type 2 diabetes in the general United States population: A cross-sectional, unselected, retrospective study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 60 (apr/ 2016), 162--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ozcift, A. and Gulten, A. Classifier ensemble construction with rotation forest to improve medical diagnosis performance of machine learning algorithms. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 104 (04/ 2011), 443--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sudharsan, B., Peeples, M. and Shomali, M. Hypoglycemia Prediction Using Machine Learning Models for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 9 (10/ 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. San, P., Ling, S. H. and Nguyen, H. Deep learning framework for detection of hypoglycemic episodes in children with type 1 diabetes, 2016 (2016), 3503--3506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ibrahim, S., Chowriappa, P., Dua, S., Acharya, U. R., Noronha, K., Bhandary, S. and Mugasa, H. Classification of diabetes maculopathy images using data-adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference classifier. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (06/ 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipton, Z., Kale, D., Elkan, C. and Wetzel, R. Learning to Diagnose with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks (11/ 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G, S., R, V. and K.P, S. Diabetes detection using deep learning algorithms. ICT Express, 4, 4 (dec/ 2018), 243--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng, H.-T., Koc, L., Harmsen, J., Shaked, T., Chandra, T., Aradhye, H., Anderson, G., Corrado, G., Chai, W., Ispir, M., Anil, R., Haque, Z., Hong, L., Jain, V., Liu, X. and Shah, H. Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systems. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems (2016), 7--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P. and Brevdo, E. TensorFlow: a system for large-scale machine learning. 12th USENIX conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (2016), 265--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Chollet, F. Keras (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multi-modal Predictive Models of Diabetes Progression

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BCB '19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics
      September 2019
      716 pages
      ISBN:9781450366663
      DOI:10.1145/3307339

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      BCB '19 Paper Acceptance Rate42of157submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate254of885submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader