skip to main content
10.1145/3292522.3326022acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using the Web for Science in the Classroom: Online Citizen Science Participation in Teaching and Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Citizen involvement in scientific projects has become a way of encouraging curiosity and greater understanding of science whilst providing an unprecedented engagement between professional scientists and the general public. In this paper we specifically focus on the impact of online citizen science (OCS) participation in the science education of primary school age children in New Zealand. Methods: We use four exploratory cases within a broader research project to examine the nature and impact of embedding OCS projects that use web based online crowdsourcing and collaboration tools within classroom environments of primary school science learners. Results & Discussion: Our findings provide insights into primary school teachers' perception of OCS. They offer initial insights into how teachers embed OCS in a classroom environment, and why this improves science learning aptitudes, inquisitiveness and capabilities in primary school age children. We also notice that successfully embedding OCS projects in education is affected by the project context, how the results are disseminated, and inclusivity in socio-cultural aspects.

References

  1. Tinati, R., M. Van Kleek, E. Simperl, M. Luczak-Rösch, R. Simpson, and N. Shadbolt. 2015. Designing for citizen data analysis: A cross-sectional case study of a multi-domain citizen science platform. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM Press, 4069--4078. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tinati, R., M. Luczak-Roesch, E. Simperl, and W. Hall. 2017. An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 527--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jay, C., R. Dunne, D. Gelsthorpe, and M. Vigo. 2016. To sign up, or not to sign up?: maximizing citizen science contribution rates through optional registration. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1827--1832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tinati, R., M. Luczak-Roesch, E. Simperl, and W. Hall. 2016. Because science is awesome: studying participation in a citizen science game. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Oliveira, N., E. Jun, and K. Reinecke. 2017. Citizen Science Opportunities in Volunteer-Based Online Experiments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6800--6812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Law, E., K.Z. Gajos, A. Wiggins, M.L. Gray, and A.C. Williams. 2017. Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research: Implications of Uncertainty. In CSCW. 1544--1561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. What is Curious Minds? Available at: https://www.curiousminds.nz/about/. Last access: 15th February 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2007. Ministry of Education. The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hofstein, A. and V.N. Lunetta. 1982. The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of educational research, 52(2), 201--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofstein, A. and V.N. Lunetta. 2004. The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty?first century. Science education, 88(1), 28--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolstad, R. and R. Hipkins. 2008. Seeing yourself in science. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council For Educational Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tytler, R., D. Symington, V. Kirkwood, and C. Malcolm. 2008. Engaging students in authentic science through school--community links: learning from the rural experience. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 54(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Caygill, R., V. Hanlar, and C. Harris-Miller. 2016. Student attitudes to maths and science: what we know from New Zealand's TIMSS 2014/15 results for Year 5 and Year 9. Retrieved 15th February, 2019 from: http://www.education-counts.govt.nz/publications/series/2571/timss-201415/student-attitudes-to-maths-and-science-what-we-know-from-new-zealands-timss-201415-results-for-year-5-and-year-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Educational Assessment Research Unit and New Zealand Council for Educational Research. W?nangatia te Putanga Tauira National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement Science. 2012. Available at: http://nmssa.otago.ac.nz/-reports/2012_Science_ONLINE.pdf. Last access: 15th February 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Raddick, M.J., G. Bracey, K. Carney, G. Gyuk, K. Borne, J. Wallin, S. Jacoby, and A. Planetarium. 2009. Citizen science: status and research directions for the coming decade. AGB Stars and Related Phenomenastro 2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 2010, 46P.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Raddick, M.J., G. Bracey, P.L. Gay, C.J. Lintott, C. Cardamone, P. Murray, K. Schawinski, A.S. Szalay, and J. Vandenberg. 2013. Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.6886.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowston, K., E. Mitchell, and C. Østerlund. 2018. Coordinating Advanced Crowd Work: Extending Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wiggins, A. and K. Crowston. 2011. From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hassman, K., G. Mugar, C. Østerlund, and C. Jackson. 2013. Learning at the seafloor, looking at the sky: The relationship between individual tasks and collaborative engagement in two citizen science projects. In proceedings for 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nov, O., O. Arazy, and D. Anderson. 2011. Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. ACM, 68--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lewenstein, B.V. 2004. What does citizen science accomplish.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yadav, P. and J. Darlington. 2017. Conceptual Frameworks for Building Online Citizen Science Projects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05084.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Curtis, V. 2014. Online citizen science games: opportunities for the biological sciences. Applied & translational genomics, 3(4), 90--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Raddick, M., G. Bracey, P. Gay, C. Lintott, P. Murray, K. Schawinski, A. Szalay, and J. Vandenberg. 2010. Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Sept. Astronomy Education Review, 9(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yin, R.K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). London and Singapore: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Benbasat, I., D.K. Goldstein, and M. Mead. 1987. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS quarterly, 11(3), 369--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532--550.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yin, R.K. 1994. Case study research: design and methods. 1994. Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Darke, P., G. Shanks, and M. Broadbent. 1998. Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information systems journal, 8(4), 273--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Chambers, D.W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw?a?Scientist Test. Science education, 67(2), 255--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, L.T., Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. 2013: Zed Books Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using the Web for Science in the Classroom: Online Citizen Science Participation in Teaching and Learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WebSci '19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science
          June 2019
          395 pages
          ISBN:9781450362023
          DOI:10.1145/3292522

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 June 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WebSci '19 Paper Acceptance Rate41of130submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader