skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300659acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Feeling Fireworks: An Inclusive Tactile Firework Display

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a novel design for a large-scale interactive tactile display. Fast dynamic tactile effects are created at high spatial resolution on a flexible screen, using directable nozzles that spray water jets onto the rear of the screen. The screen further has back-projected visual content and touch interaction. The technology is demonstrated in Feeling Fireworks, a tactile firework show. The goal is to make fireworks more inclusive for the Blind and Low-Vision (BLV) community. A BLV focus group provided input during the development process, and a user study with BLV users showed that Feeling Fireworks is an enjoyable and meaningful experience. A user study with sighted users showed that users could accurately label the correspondence between the designed tactile firework effects and corresponding visual fireworks. Beyond the Feeling Fireworks application, this is a novel approach for scalable tactile displays with potential for broader use.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4945.mp4

mp4

96.1 MB

References

  1. Aira website. 2018. aira.io/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Olivier Bau, Uros Petrevski, and Wendy Mackay. 2009. BubbleWrap: a textile-based electromagnetic haptic display. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. ACM, 3607--3612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. O. Bau, I. Poupyrev, A. Israr, and C. Harrison. 2010. Tesla Touch: Electrovibration for touch surfaces. Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2010), 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jens Bornschein, Denise Bornschein, and Gerhard Weber. 2018. Comparing Computer-Based Drawing Methods for Blind People with RealTime Tactile Feedback. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bristol Braille. 2019. http://www.bristolbraille.co.uk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tom Carter, Sue Ann Seah, Benjamin Long, Bruce Drinkwater, and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. UltraHaptics: multi-point mid-air haptic feedback for touch surfaces. In Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 505--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dot Watch. 2019. https://www.dotincorp.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. eSight. 2017. eSight. https://www.esighteyewear.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Exertion Games Lab. 2019. http://exertiongameslab.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vocal Eye. 2015. FingerWorks. www.vocaleye.ca/fireworksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Follmer, D. Leithinger, A. Olwal, A. Hogge, and H. Ishii. 2013. inFORM: Dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2013), 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sean Follmer, Micah Johnson, Edward Adelson, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2011. deForm: an interactive malleable surface for capturing 2.5 D arbitrary objects, tools and touch. In Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 527--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Nadia Cheng, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2012. Jamming user interfaces: programmable particle stiffness and sensing for malleable and shape-changing devices. In Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. FWsim. 2017. FWsim firework simulation. www.fwsim.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Louis H Goldish and Harry E Taylor. 1974. The Optacon: A Valuable Device for Blind Persons. New Outlook for the Blind 68, 2 (1974), 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Timo Götzelmann. 2016. LucentMaps: 3D printed audiovisual tactile maps for blind and visually impaired people. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Graphiti. 2019. https://www.aph.org/graphiti/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Richa Gupta, M Balakrishnan, and PVM Rao. 2017. Tactile Diagrams for the Visually Impaired. IEEE Potentials 36, 1 (2017), 14--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Junge Symphoniker Hamburg. 2016. Sound Shirt. https://sound-shirt. jimdo.com/english-1/ Feeling Fireworks: An Inclusive Tactile Firework Display CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. John Hardy, Christian Weichel, Faisal Taher, John Vidler, and Jason Alexander. 2015. Shapeclip: towards rapid prototyping with shapechanging displays for designers. In Proc. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Chris Harrison and Scott E Hudson. 2009. Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. HIMS, Inc. 2017. Braille Sense U2 QWERTY. https://hims-inc.com/ products/braille-sense-u2-qwerty/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. HyperBraille. 2019. http://hyperbraille.de/?lang=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Israr and I. Poupyrev. 2011. Tactile Brush: Drawing on skin with a tactile grid display. Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hiroo Iwata, Hiroaki Yano, Fumitaka Nakaizumi, and Ryo Kawamura. 2001. Project FEELEX: adding haptic surface to graphics. In Proc. Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM, 469--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yvonne Jansen, Thorsten Karrer, and Jan Borchers. 2011. MudPad: tactile feedback for touch surfaces. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. ACM, 323-- 328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jingun Jung, Eunhye Youn, and Geehyuk Lee. 2017. PinPad: Touchpad Interaction with Fast and High-Resolution Tactile Output. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2416--2425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jeeeun Kim and Tom Yeh. 2015. Toward 3d-printed movable tactile pictures for children with visual impairments. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2815--2824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Philip Kingsley. 2012. eTable: A haptic elastic table for 3D multi-touch interactions. Master's thesis. University of Bristol.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Espen Knoop and Jonathan Rossiter. 2015. A compliant soft-actuator laterotactile display. Smart Materials and Structures 24, 4 (2015), 045034.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Espen Knoop and Jonathan Rossiter. 2015. The tickler: a compliant wearable tactile display for stroking and tickling. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. ACM, 1133--1138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Gary G. Koch, J. Richard Landis, Jean L. Freeman, Daniel H. Freeman, and Robert G. Lehnen. 1977. A General Methodology for the Analysis of Experiments with Repeated Measurement of Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 133--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ki-Uk Kyung, Jeong Mook Lim, Yo-An Lim, Suntak Park, Seung Koo Park, Inwook Hwang, Seungmoon Choi, Jongman Seo, Sang-Youn Kim, Tae-Heon Yang, et al. 2011. TAXEL: Initial progress toward selfmorphing visio-haptic interface. In World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, 37--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Susan J Lederman and Roberta L Klatzky. 2009. Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 7 (2009), 1439--1459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. B. Long, S. Seah, T. Carter, and S. Subramanian. 2014. Rendering volumetric haptic shapes in mid-air using ultrasound. ACM Transactions on Graphics 33, 6 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Nature News. 2001. Deaf people use 'mind's ear' to process vibrations. http://www.nature.com/news/2001/011127/full/news011129--10.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Claudio Pacchierotti, Stephen Sinclair, Massimiliano Solazzi, Antonio Frisoli, Vincent Hayward, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2017. Wearable haptic systems for the fingertip and the hand: taxonomy, review, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yosra Rekik, Eric Vezzoli, Laurent Grisoni, and Frédéric Giraud. 2017. Localized Haptic Texture: A Rendering Technique based on Taxels for High Density Tactile Feedback. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5006--5015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. D. R. Sahoo, K. Hornbæk, and S. Subramanian. 2016. TableHop: An actuated fabric display using transparent electrodes. Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 3767--3780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Samuel B Schorr and Allison M Okamura. 2017. Fingertip Tactile Devices for Virtual Object Manipulation and Exploration. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3115--3119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lei Shi, Ross McLachlan, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. Magic Touch: Interacting with 3D Printed Graphics. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 329--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. L. Shuai, Y. Kuang, and Z. Zhou. 2005. Research on robot tactile display based on water jet technology. Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). 2005 IEEE Int. Conf. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Daniel Spelmezan, Deepak Ranjan Sahoo, and Sriram Subramanian. 2017. Sparkle: hover feedback with touchable electric arcs. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3705--3717. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Saiganesh Swaminathan, Thijs Roumen, Robert Kovacs, David Stangl, Stefanie Mueller, and Patrick Baudisch. 2016. Linespace: A sensemaking platform for the blind. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2175--2185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Tactile Labs. 2017. Haptuator Mark II. http://tactilelabs.com/products/ haptics/haptuator-mark-ii-v2/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Brandon Taylor, Anind Dey, Dan Siewiorek, and Asim Smailagic. 2016. Customizable 3D printed tactile maps as interactive overlays. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 71--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Giovanni Maria Troiano, Esben Warming Pedersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2014. User-defined gestures for elastic, deformable displays. In Proc. Int. Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Dzmitry Tsetserukou, Alena Neviarouskaya, Helmut Prendinger, Naoki Kawakami, and Susumu Tachi. 2009. Affective haptics in emotional communication. In Int. Conf. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Jessica Tsimeris, Colin Dedman, Michael Broughton, and Tom Gedeon. 2013. ForceForm: a dynamically deformable interactive surface. In Proc. ACM Int. Conf. Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, 175--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Marlon Twyman, Joe Mullenbach, Craig Shultz, J Edward Colgate, and Anne Marie Piper. 2015. Designing wearable haptic information displays for people with vision impairments. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 341--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Thorsten Völkel, Gerhard Weber, and Ulrich Baumann. 2008. Tactile graphics revised: the novel brailledis 9000 pin-matrix device with multitouch input. In Int. Conf. Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 835--842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Rongrong Wang, Francis Quek, James KS Teh, Adrian D Cheok, and Sep Riang Lai. 2010. Design and evaluation of a wearable remote social touch device. In Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Wayfindr. 2017. Wayfindr. https://www.wayfindr.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Be My Eyes website. 2018. www.bemyeyes.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Laura Winfield, John Glassmire, J Edward Colgate, and Michael Peshkin. 2007. T-pad: Tactile pattern display through variable friction reduction. In World Haptics Conference. IEEE, 421--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Cheng Xu, Ali Israr, Ivan Poupyrev, Olivier Bau, and Chris Harrison. 2011. Tactile display for the visually impaired using TeslaTouch. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. ACM, 317--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Juan Jose Zarate, Olexandr Gudozhnik, Anthony Sébastien Ruch, and Herbert Shea. 2017. Keep in Touch. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. ACM Press, 349--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Feeling Fireworks: An Inclusive Tactile Firework Display

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2019
        9077 pages
        ISBN:9781450359702
        DOI:10.1145/3290605

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format