skip to main content
research-article

Unobtrusive Assessment of Students' Emotional Engagement during Lectures Using Electrodermal Activity Sensors

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 September 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Modern wearable devices enable the continuous and unobtrusive monitoring of human physiological parameters, including heart rate and electrodermal activity. Through the definition of adequate models these parameters allow to infer the wellbeing, empathy, or engagement of humans in different contexts. In this paper, we show that off-the-shelf wearable devices can be used to unobtrusively monitor the emotional engagement of students during lectures. We propose the use of several novel features to capture students' momentary engagement and use existing methods to characterize the general arousal of students and their physiological synchrony with the teacher. To evaluate our method we collect a data set that -- after data cleaning -- contains data from 24 students, 9 teachers, and 41 lectures. Our results show that non-engaged students can be identified with high reliability. Using a Support Vector Machine, for instance, we achieve a recall of 81% -- which is a 25 percentage points improvement with respect to a Biased Random classifier. Overall, our findings may inform the design of systems that allow students to self-monitor their engagement and act upon the obtained feedback. Teachers could profit of information about non-engaged students too to perform self-reflection and to devise and evaluate methods to (re-)engage students.

References

  1. Mary Ainley. 2012. Students' Interest and Engagement in Classroom Activities. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Douglas G Altman. 1990. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kimberly E Arnold, Brandon Karcher, Casey V Wright, and James McKay. 2017. Student Empowerment, Awareness, and Self-Regulation Through a Quantified-Self Student Tool. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Learning Analytics 8 Knowledge Conference (LAK 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ivon Arroyo, David G. Cooper, Winslow Burleson, Beverly Park Woolf, Kasia Muldner, and Robert Christopherson. 2009. Emotion Sensors Go To School. In Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems That Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling (AIED 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jorn Bakker, Mykola Pechenizkiy, and Natalia Sidorova. 2011. What's Your Current Stress Level? Detection of Stress Patterns from GSR Sensor Data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Christian Beckel, Leyna Sadamori, Thorsten Staake, and Silvia Santini. 2014. Revealing Household Characteristics from Smart Meter Data. Energy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mathias Benedek and Christian Kaernbach. 2010. Decomposition of Skin Conductance Data By Means of Nonnegative Deconvolution. Psychophysiology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Christopher M Bishop. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Brandon Booth, Asem Ali, Ian Bennett, and Shrikanth Narayanan. 2017. Toward Active and Unobtrusive Engagement Assessment of Distance Learners (ACII 2017). In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wolfram Boucsein. 2012. Electrodermal Activity. Springer Science 8 Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Saša Branković. 2012. Assessment of Brain Monoaminergic Signaling Through Mathematical Modeling of Skin Conductance Response. In Neuroscience-Dealing With Frontiers. InTech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John T Cacioppo, Louis G Tassinary, and Gary Berntson. 2007. Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ryan Cain and Victor R Lee. 2016. Measuring Electrodermal Activity to Capture Engagement in an Afterschool Maker Program. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (FabLearn 2016). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Steven Cantrell and Thomas J Kane. 2013. Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching: Culminating Findings from the MET Project's Three-year Study. MET Project Research Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nitesh V Chawla, Kevin W Bowyer, Lawrence O Hall, and W Philip Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jingjing Chen, Bin Zhu, Olle Balter, Jianliang Xu, Weiwen Zou, Anders Hedman, Rongchao Chen, and Mengdie Sang. 2017. FishBuddy: Promoting Student Engagement in Self-Paced Learning through Wearable Sensing. In In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP 2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sandra L Christenson, Amy L Reschly, and Cathy Wylie. 2012. Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science 8 Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik. 1995. Support-Vector Networks. Machine learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Elena Di Lascio, Shkurta Gashi, Danilo Krasic, and Silvia Santini. 2017. In-classroom self-tracking for teachers and students: preliminary findings from a pilot study. In In Proceedings of the Adjunction Publication of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jennifer A Fredricks, Phyllis C Blumenfeld, and Alison H Paris. 2004. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of educational research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jennifer A Fredricks and Wendy McColskey. 2012. The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report instruments. In Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Katsuya Fujii, Plivelic Marian, Dav Clark, Yoshi Okamoto, and Jun Rekimoto. 2018. Sync Class: Visualization System for In-Class Student Synchronization. In Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference (AH 2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Maurizio Garbarino, Matteo Lai, Dan Bender, Rosalind W Picard, and Simone Tognetti. 2014. Empatica E3--A wearable wireless multisensor device for real-time computerized biofeedback and data acquisition. In Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare (MobiHealth 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nitesh Goyal and Susan R Fussell. 2017. Intelligent Interruption Management using Electro Dermal Activity based Physiological Sensor for Collaborative Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Adrián Colomer Granero, Félix Fuentes-Hurtado, Valery Naranjo Ornedo, Jaime Guixeres Provinciale, Jose M Ausín, and Mariano Alcañiz Raya. 2016. A Comparison of Physiological Signal Analysis Techniques and Classifiers for Automatic Emotional Evaluation of Audiovisual Contents. Fontiers in computational neuroscience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Alberto Greco, Gaetano Valenza, Antonio Lanata, Enzo Pasquale Scilingo, and Luca Citi. 2016. cvxEDA: A convex optimization approach to electrodermal activity processing. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mariam Hassib, Stefan Schneegass, Philipp Eiglsperger, Niels Henze, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt. 2017. EngageMeter: A System for Implicit Audience Engagement Sensing Using Electroencephalography. In Proceedings of the Internationalf Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rui Henriques, Ana Paiva, and Claudia Antunes. 2013. Accessing Emotion Patterns from Affective Interactions Using Electrodermal Activity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Humaine Association (ACII 2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Javier Hernandez, Zicheng Liu, Geoff Hulten, Dave DeBarr, Kyle Krum, and Zhengyou Zhang. 2013. Measuring the Engagement Level of TV Viewers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Javier Hernandez, Rob R Morris, and Rosalind W Picard. 2011. Call Center Stress Recognition with Person-specific Models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Javier Hernandez, Ivan Riobo, Agata Rozga, Gregory D Abowd, and Rosalind W Picard. 2014. Using Electrodermal Activity to Recognize Ease of Engagement in Children During Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Marian L. Houser and Caroline Waldbuesser. 2017. Emotional Contagion in the Classroom: The Impact of Teacher Satisfaction and Confirmation on Perceptions of Student Nonverbal Classroom Behavior. College Teaching.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Nathalie Japkowicz and Mohak Shah. 2011. Evaluating Learning Algorithms: A Classification Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Natasha Jaques, Sara Taylor, Asaph Azaria, Asma Ghandeharioun, Akane Sano, and Rosalind Picard. 2015. Predicting Students' Happiness from Physiology, Phone, Mobility, and Behavioral Data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII 2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Celine Latulipe, Erin A Carroll, and Danielle Lottridge. 2011. Love, Hate, Arousal and Engagement: Exploring Audience Responses to Performing Arts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Victor R Lee, Joel R Drake, and Jeffrey L Thayne. 2016. Appropriating Quantified Self Technologies to Support Elementary Statistical Teaching and Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jessica Lin, Eamonn Keogh, Li Wei, and Stefano Lonardi. 2007. Experiencing SAX: a Novel Symbolic Representation of Time Series. Data Mining and knowledge discovery. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. David T Lykken and Peter H Venables. 1971. Direct Measurement of Skin Conductance: A Proposal for Standardization. Psychophysiology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Carl D Marci, Jacob Ham, Erin Moran, and Scott P Orr. 2007. Physiologic Correlates of Perceived Therapist Empathy and Social-Emotional Process During Psychotherapy. The Journal of nervous and mental disease.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. João Maroco, Ana Lúcia Maroco, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos, and Jennifer A Fredricks. 2016. University Student's Engagement: Development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Claudio Martella, Ekin Gedik, Laura Cabrera-Quiros, Gwenn Englebienne, and Hayley Hung. 2015. How Was It?: Exploiting Smartphone Sensing to Measure Implicit Audience Responses to Live Performances. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ICME 2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Akhil Mathur, Nicholas D Lane, and Fahim Kawsar. 2016. Engagement-Aware Computing: Modelling User Engagement from Mobile Contexts. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp 2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Karen S. McNeal, Jacob M. Spry, Ritayan Mitra, and Jamie L. Tipton. 2014. Measuring Student Engagement, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Climate Change in an Introductory Environmental Geology Course. Journal of Geoscience Education.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Abhinav Mehrotra, Veljko Pejovic, Jo Vermeulen, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. My Phone and Me: Understanding People's Receptivity to Mobile Notifications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Regalena Melrose. 2006. Why Students Underachieve: What Educators and Parents Can Do About It. R8L Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hamed Monkaresi, Nigel Bosch, Rafael A. Calvo, and Sydney K. D'Mello. 2017. Automated Detection of Engagement Using Video-Based Estimation of Facial Expressions and Heart Rate. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Timothy P Mottet and Steven A Beebe. 2000. Emotional Contagion in the Classroom: An Examination of How Teacher and Student Emotions Are Related. ERIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kasia Muldner, Michael Wixon, Dovan Rai, Winslow Burleson, Beverly Woolf, and Ivon Arroyo. 2015. Exploring the Impact of a Learning Dashboard on Student Affect. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Andreas C Müller and Sarah Guido. 2016. Introduction to Machine Learning with Python: a Guide for Data Scientists. O'Reilly Media, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Richard V Palumbo, Marisa E Marraccini, Lisa L Weyandt, Oliver Wilder-Smith, Heather A McGee, Siwei Liu, and Matthew S Goodwin. 2017. Interpersonal Autonomic Physiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Phuong Pham and Jingtao Wang. 2015. AttentiveLearner: Improving Mobile MOOC Learning via Implicit Heart Rate Tracking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Rosalind Picard. 1997. Affective computing. Vol. 252. MIT press Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Martin Pielot, Bruno Cardoso, Kleomenis Katevas, Joan Serrà, Aleksandar Matic, and Nuria Oliver. 2017. Beyond Interruptibility: Predicting Opportune Moments to Engage Mobile Phone Users. In Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ming-Zher Poh, Nicholas C Swenson, and Rosalind W Picard. 2010. A wearable Sensor for Unobtrusive, Long-term Assessment of Electrodermal Activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. John P Pollak, Phil Adams, and Geri Gay. 2011. PAM: a Photographic Affect Meter for Frequent, in Situ Measurement of Affect. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kaśka Porayska-Pomsta, Manolis Mavrikis, Sidney D'Mello, Cristina Conati, and Ryan SJd Baker. 2013. Knowledge Elicitation Methods for Affect Modelling in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Pavel Pudil, Jana Novovičová, and Josef Kittler. 1994. Floating Search Methods in Feature Selection. Pattern recognition letters. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Samara Ruiz, Sven Charleer, Maite Urretavizcaya, Joris Klerkx, Isabel Fernández-Castro, and Erik Duval. 2016. Supporting Learning by Considering Emotions: Tracking and Visualization a Case Study. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Learning Analytics 8 Knowledge (LAK 2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Akane Sano and Rosalind W Picard. 2013. Stress Recognition Using Wearable Sensors and Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII 2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Yutaka Sasaki. 2007. The Truth of the F-measure. Teach Tutor mater.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin EP Seligman. 2012. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Fernando Silveira, Brian Eriksson, Anmol Sheth, and Adam Sheppard. 2013. Predicting Audience Responses to Movie Content from Electrodermal Activity Signals. In Proceedings of the ACM international Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp 2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Petr Slovák, Paul Tennent, Stuart Reeves, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2014. Exploring Skin Conductance Synchronisation in Everyday Interactions. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Vasileios Triglianos, Cesare Pautasso, Alessandro Bozzon, and Claudia Hauff. 2016. Inferring Student Attention with ASQ. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (ECTEL 2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Chen Wang and Pablo Cesar. 2014. Do We React in the Same Manner?: Comparing GSR Patterns Across Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Chen Wang and Pablo Cesar. 2015. Physiological Measurement on Students' Engagement in a Distributed Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems (PhyCS 2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Rui Wang, Weichen Wang, Min SH Aung, Dror Ben-Zeev, Rachel Brian, Andrew T Campbell, Tanzeem Choudhury, Marta Hauser, John Kane, Emily A Scherer, et al. 2017. Predicting Symptom Trajectories of Schizophrenia using Mobile Sensing. In Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. J. Whitehill, Z. Serpell, Y-C Lin, A. Foster, and J. Movellan. 2014. The Faces of Engagement: Automatic Recognition of Student Engagement from Facial Expressions. In IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Yuning Zhang, Maysam Haghdan, and Kevin S Xu. 2017. Unsupervised Motion Artifact Detection in Wrist-measured Electrodermal Activity Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.08287 (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Unobtrusive Assessment of Students' Emotional Engagement during Lectures Using Electrodermal Activity Sensors

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
        Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 3
        September 2018
        1536 pages
        EISSN:2474-9567
        DOI:10.1145/3279953
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 September 2018
        • Accepted: 1 September 2018
        • Revised: 1 April 2018
        • Received: 1 February 2018
        Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader