ABSTRACT
The Science Gateways Community Institute was one of the first two software institutes funded by the National Science Foundation's Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure in August, 2016. The structure of and services offered by the institute were developed as a result of seven years of planning grants that funded focus groups, a 5000-person survey and the development of a strategic plan. Now two years in, we provide an overview of the institute's service offerings and their usage, reflect on the experiences of some early clients, review our approaches to metrics and evaluation, and describe some lessons learned. We also describe the lightweight, adaptive management approach employed by the institute.
SGCI is organized into five service areas: Incubator, Extended Developer Support, Scientific Software Collaborative, Community Engagement and Exchange, and Workforce Development. This paper will highlight early successes in all five areas, from client achievements to conference experiences to our impact on students. We highlight areas where the institute has evolved --- based on community feedback --- from what was originally envisioned. We describe our use of the Entrepreneurial Operating System as a lightweight management approach for a highly adaptive organization. Finally, we include early plans for the execution phase of the institute.
- Lawrence, K. A., Zentner, M., Wilkins-Diehr, N., Wernert, J. A., Pierce, M., Marru, S., & Michael, S. (2015). Science gateways today and tomorrow: positive perspectives of nearly 5000 members of the research community. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 27(16), 4252--4268.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Gesing, N. Wilkins-Diehr, M. Dahan, K. Lawrence, M. Zentner, M. Pierce L. Hayden and S. Marru. 2017. Science Gateways: The Long Road to the Birth of an Institute. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41919.Google Scholar
- Wilkins-Diehr, N., Sanielevici, S., Alameda, J., Cazes, J., Crosby, L., Pierce, M. and Roskies, R., 2015, March. An Overview of the XSEDE Extended Collaborative Support Program. In International Conference on Supercomputing (pp. 3--13). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
- Towns, J., Cockerill, T., Dahan, M., Foster, I., Gaither, K., Grimshaw, A., Hazlewood, V., Lathrop, S., Lifka, D., Peterson, G.D. and Roskies, R., 2014. XSEDE: accelerating scientific discovery. Computing in Science & Engineering, 16(5), pp.62--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gino Wickman. 2012. Traction. BenBella Books. ISBN-13: 978-1936661831.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Science Gateways Community Institute at Two Years
Recommendations
SGCI Incubator and its Role in Workforce Development: Lessons Learned from Training, Consultancy, and Building a Community of Community-Builders for Science Gateways
PEARC '20: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research ComputingWorkforce development is an important topic in distributed computing. While traditional curricula in engineering and computer science focus primarily on disciplinary technical expertise, facilitating research cyberinfrastructures requires a diverse set ...
The Science Gateways Community Institute: Collaborations and efforts on international scale
AbstractThe Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI), opened in August 2016, provides free resources, services, experts, and ideas for creating and sustaining science gateways. It offers five areas of services to the science gateway ...
Highlights- SGCI serves the international science gateway community with a variety of services.
How the Science Gateways Community Institute Supports Those Who Are Creating Websites to Access Shared Resources
PEARC '19: Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning)The Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) serves the gateway community with free, NSF-funded resources, services, experts, and ideas. Our community shares expertise, technologies, and best practices for creating and sustaining gateways. Gateways ...
Comments