skip to main content
research-article

MuscleIO: Muscle-Based Input and Output for Casual Notifications

Published:05 July 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Receiving and reacting to notifications on mobile devices can be cumbersome. We propose MuscleIO, the use of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) for notification output and electromyography (EMG) for reacting to notifications. Our approach provides a one-handed, eyes-free, and low-effort way of dealing with notifications. We built a prototype that interleaves muscle input and muscle output signals using the same electrodes. EMS and EMG alternate such that the EMG input signal is measured in the gaps of the EMS output signal, so voluntary muscle contraction is measured during muscle stimulation.

Notifications are represented as EMS signals and are accepted or refused either by a directional or a time-based EMG response. A lab user study with 12 participants shows that the directional EMG response is superior to the time-based response in terms of reaction time, error rate, and user preference. Furthermore, the directional approach is the fastest and the most intuitive for users compared to a button-based smartwatch interface as a baseline.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Christoph Amma, Thomas Krings, Jonas Böer, and Tanja Schultz. 2015. Advancing Muscle-Computer Interfaces with High-Density Electromyography. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 929--938. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anupama. Batra, Sangeeta. Vyas, and Dheeraj. Jeph. 2014. Color difference on simple visual reaction time in young volunteers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Physiology 1, 4 (2014), 311--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Edward Cutrell, Mary Czerwinski, and Eric Horvitz. 2001. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. In Proceedings of Interact 2001 (Interact '01). IFIP, 263--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Linda Di Geronimo, Marica Bertarini, Julia Badertscher, Maria Husmann, and Moira C. Norrie. 2017. MyoShare: Sharing Data Among Devices via Mid-air Gestures. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 48, 3 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tim Duente, Max Pfeiffer, and Michael Rohs. 2016. On-skin Technologies for Muscle Sensing and Actuation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 933--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dylan Ebert and Fillia Makedon. 2017. MyoLearn: Using a Multimodal Armband Sensor for Vocational Safety Problem Identification. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 248--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andrew J Elliot and Henk Aarts. 2011. Perception of the color red enhances the force and velocity of motor output. Emotion 11, 2 (2011), 445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Frederik Funke and Ulf-Dietrich Reips. 2012. Why Semantic Differentials in Web-Based Research Should Be Made from Visual Analogue Scales and Not from 5-Point Scales. Field Methods 24, 3 (2012), 310--327. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12444061Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mahmoud Hassan, Florian Daiber, Frederik Wiehr, Felix Kosmalla, and Antonio Krüger. 2017. FootStriker: An EMS-based Foot Strike Assistant for Running. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT) 1, 1 (2017), 2:1--2:18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mariam Hassib, Max Pfeiffer, Stefan Schneegass, Michael Rohs, and Florian Alt. 2017. Emotion Actuator: Embodied Emotional Feedback Through Electroencephalography and Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6133--6146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2010. Notifications and Awareness: A Field Study of Alert Usage and Preferences. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mark I. Johnson. 2014. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): Research to support clinical practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. http://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780199673278.001.0001/med-9780199673278Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Naoki Kawakami, Taro Maeda, and Susumu Tachi. 1999. Tactile feeling display using functional electrical stimulation. In Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Artificial reality and Telexistence (ICAT'99). Citeseer, 133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Frederic Kerber, Pascal Lessel, and Antonio Krüger. 2015. Same-side Hand Interactions with Arm-placed Devices Using EMG. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1367--1372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Frederic Kerber, Michael Puhl, and Antonio Krüger. 2017. User-independent Real-time Hand Gesture Recognition Based on Surface Electromyography. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 7 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jarrod Knibbe, Paul Strohmeier, Sebastian Boring, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2017. Automatic Calibration of High Density Electric Muscle Stimulation. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 68 (Sept. 2017), 17 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pedro Lopes and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Muscle-propelled Force Feedback: Bringing Force Feedback to Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2577--2580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, Willi Mueller, Daniel Hoffmann, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Proprioceptive Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 939--948. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pedro Lopes, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Affordance++: Allowing Objects to Communicate Dynamic Use. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2515--2524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jess McIntosh, Charlie McNeill, Mike Fraser, Frederic Kerber, Markus Löchtefeld, and Antonio Krüger. 2016. EMPress: Practical Hand Gesture Classification with Wrist-Mounted EMG and Pressure Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2332--2342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Abhinav Mehrotra, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. PrefMiner: Mining User's Preferences for Intelligent Mobile Notification Management. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1223--1234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jun Nishida and Kenji Suzuki. 2017. bioSync: A Paired Wearable Device for Blending Kinesthetic Experience. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3316--3327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Toni Pakkanen, Jani Lylykangas, Jukka Raisamo, Roope Raisamo, Katri Salminen, Jussi Rantala, and Veikko Surakka. 2008. Perception of Low-amplitude Haptic Stimuli when Biking. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 281--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jerome Pasquero, Scott J. Stobbe, and Noel Stonehouse. 2011. A Haptic Wristwatch for Eyes-free Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3257--3266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Max Pfeiffer, Tim Duente, and Michael Rohs. 2016. Let Your Body Move: A Prototyping Toolkit for Wearable Force Feedback with Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 418--427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Max Pfeiffer, Tim Dünte, Stefan Schneegass, Florian Alt, and Michael Rohs. 2015. Cruise Control for Pedestrians: Controlling Walking Direction Using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2505--2514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Max Pfeiffer and Michael Rohs. 2017. Haptic Feedback for Wearables and Textiles Based on Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Smart Textiles: Fundamentals, Design, and Interaction, Stefan Schneegass and Oliver Amft (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 103--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Max Pfeiffer, Stefan Schneegass, Florian Alt, and Michael Rohs. 2014. Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction. In Augmented Human. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Martin Pielot, Karen Church, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2014. An In-situ Study of Mobile Phone Notifications. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 233--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Martin Pielot and Luz Rello. 2017. Productive, Anxious, Lonely: 24 Hours Without Push Notifications. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Henning Pohl, Peter Brandes, Hung Ngo Quang, and Michael Rohs. 2017. Squeezeback: Pneumatic Compression for Notifications. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5318--5330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Henning Pohl, Justyna Medrek, and Michael Rohs. 2016. ScatterWatch: Subtle Notifications via Indirect Illumination Scattered in the Skin. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Henning Pohl and Roderick Murray-Smith. 2013. Focused and Casual Interactions: Allowing Users to Vary Their Level of Engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2223--2232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Thijs Roumen, Simon T. Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2015. NotiRing: A Comparative Study of Notification Channels for Wearable Interactive Rings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2497--2500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale Assessment of Mobile Notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3055--3064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. T. Scott Saponas, Desney S. Tan, Dan Morris, Jim Turner, and James A. Landay. 2010. Making Muscle-computer Interfaces More Practical. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 851--854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. T. Schauer, R. C. Salbert, N.-O. Negård, and J. Raisch. 2004. Detection and Filtering of EMG for Assessing Voluntary Muscle Activity during FES. In Getting FES into clinical practice: Proceedings of IFESS - FESnet 2004 (2004), D. Wood and P. Taylor (Eds.). Bournemouth, United Kingdom, 185--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Stefan Schneegass and Rufat Rzayev. 2016. Embodied Notifications: Implicit Notifications Through Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 954--959. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Stefan Schneegass, Albrecht Schmidt, and Max Pfeiffer. 2016. Creating User Interfaces with Electrical Muscle Stimulation. interactions 24, 1 (2016), 74--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Raafat El-Sayed Shalaby. 2011. Ph.D. Development of an electromyography detection system for the control of functional electrical stimulation in neurological rehabilitation. Dissertation. Technische Universität Berlin. http://www.control.tu-berlin.de/images/d/d7/Shalaby2011b.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Didier Staudenmann, Idsart Kingma, Andreas Daffertshofer, Dick F Stegeman, and Jaap H van Dieën. 2006. Improving EMG-based muscle force estimation by using a high-density EMG grid and principal component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 53, 4 (2006), 712--719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Emi Tamaki, Takashi Miyaki, and Jun Rekimoto. 2010. PossessedHand: A Hand Gesture Manipulation System Using Electrical Stimuli. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference (AH '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 5 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Markus Valtin, Thomas Schauer, Carsten Behling, Michael Daniel, and Matthias Weber. 2012. Combined Stimulation and Measurement System for Array Electrodes.. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices - Volume 1: BIODEVICES, (BIOSTEC 2012). INSTICC, SciTePress, 345--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Dominik Weber. 2017. Towards Smart Notification Management in Multi-device Environments. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 68, 2 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Katrin Wolf and Timm Bäder. 2015. Illusion of Surface Changes Induced by Tactile and Visual Touch Feedback. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1355--1360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Fengpeng Yuan, Xianyi Gao, and Janne Lindqvist. 2017. How Busy Are You?: Predicting the Interruptibility Intensity of Mobile Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5346--5360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Xu Zhang, Xiang Chen, Wen-hui Wang, Ji-hai Yang, Vuokko Lantz, and Kong-qiao Wang. 2009. Hand Gesture Recognition and Virtual Game Control Based on 3D Accelerometer and EMG Sensors. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 401--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MuscleIO: Muscle-Based Input and Output for Casual Notifications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
        Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 2
        June 2018
        741 pages
        EISSN:2474-9567
        DOI:10.1145/3236498
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 July 2018
        • Revised: 1 April 2018
        • Accepted: 1 April 2018
        • Received: 1 February 2018
        Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader