Anthony L. Baker
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Gone are the days of robots solely operating in isolation, without direct interaction with people. Rather, robots are increasingly being deployed in environments and roles that require complex social interaction with humans. The implementation of human-robot teams continues to increase as technology develops in tandem with the state of human-robot interaction (HRI) research. Trust, a major component of human interaction, is an important facet of HRI. However, the ideas of trust repair and trust violations are understudied in the HRI literature. Trust repair is the activity of rebuilding trust after one party breaks the trust of another. These trust breaks are referred to as trust violations. Just as with humans, trust violations with robots are inevitable; as a result, a clear understanding of the process of HRI trust repair must be developed in order to ensure that a human-robot team can continue to perform well after a trust violation. Previous research on human-automation trust and human-human trust can serve as starting places for exploring trust repair in HRI. Although existing models of human-automation and human-human trust are helpful, they do not account for some of the complexities of building and maintaining trust in unique relationships between humans and robots. The purpose of this article is to provide a foundation for exploring human-robot trust repair by drawing upon prior work in the human-robot, human-automation, and human-human trust literature, concluding with recommendations for advancing this body of work.
- Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias: There's software used across the country to predict future criminals. And It's Biased Against Blacks. (May 2016). Retrieved Nov 15th, 2016 from https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.Google Scholar
- Ronald C. Arkin, Patrick Ulam, and Alan R. Wagner. 2012. Moral decision making in autonomous systems: Enforcement, moral emotions, dignity, trust, and deception. Proc. IEEE. 100 (2012), 571--589.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kenneth Arrow. 1974. The Limits of Organization. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
- Wilma A. Bainbridge, Justin Hart, Elizabeth S. Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2008. The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 701--706.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wilma A. Bainbridge, Shunichi Nozawa, Ryohei Ueda, Kei Okada, and Masayuki Inaba. 2011. Robot sensor data as a means to measure human reactions to an interaction. In 2011 11th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (IEEE-RAS), 452--457.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernard Barber. 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
- Christoph Bartneck, Tomohiro Suzuki, Takayuki Kanda, and Tatsuya Nomura. 2007. The influence of people's culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI 8 Society, 21(1-2). 217--230. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deborah Billings, Kristin E. Schaefer, Jessie Y. C. Chen, and Peter A. Hancock. 2012. Human-robot interaction: Developing trust in robots. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 109--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael W. Boyce, Jessie Y. C. Chen, and Anthony R. Selkowitz. 2015. Effects of agent transparency on operator trust. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, ACM, New York, NY, 179--180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maja Hojer Bruun, Signe Hanghøj, and Cathrine Hasse. 2015. Studying social robots in practiced places. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology.Google Scholar
- Janis A. Cannon-Bowers and Clint Bowers. 2011. Team development and functioning. In APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 1: Building and Developing the Organization. APA Handbooks in Psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 597--650.Google Scholar
- Justine Cassell. 2000. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Janne Chung and Gary S. Monroe. 2003. Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics 44, 4 (June 2003), 291--302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Coeckelbergh. 2012. Can we trust robots? Ethics Inf. Technol. 14, 1 (2012), 53--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lauri L. Couch, Jeffrey M. Adams, and Warren H. Jones. 1996. The assessment of trust orientation. Journal of Personality Assessment 67, 2 (1996), 305--323.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kerstin Dautenhahn, Bernard Ogden, and Tom Quick. 2002. From embodied to socially embedded agents: Implications for interaction-aware robots. Cogn. Syst. Res. 3, 3 (2002), 397--428. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robyn M. Dawes. 1994. House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth. Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Munjal Desai, Poornima Kaniarasu, Mikhail Medvedev, Aaron Steinfeld, and Holly Yanco. 2013. Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 251--258. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Munjal Desai, Mikhail Medvedev, Marynel Vázquez, Sean McSheehy, Sofia Gadea-Omelchenko, Christian Bruggeman, Aaron Steinfeld, and Holly Yanco. 2012. Effects of changing reliability on trust of robot systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 73--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Munjal Desai, Kristen Stubbs, Aaron Steinfeld, and Holly Yanco. 2009. Creating trustworthy robots: Lessons and inspirations from automated systems. In Proceedings of the AISB Convention: New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction. SSAISB, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
- Pieter T. M. Desmet, David De Cremer, and Eric van Dijk. 2011. In money we trust? The use of financial compensations to repair trust in the aftermath of distributive harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 114, 2 (March 2011), 75--86.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morton Deutsch. 1960. Trust, trustworthiness, and the F scale. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61, 1 (1960), 138--140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ewart J. de Visser, Frank Krueger, Patrick McKnight, Steven Scheid, Melissa Smith, Stephanie Chalk, and Raja Parasuraman. 2012. The world is not enough: Trust in cognitive agents. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Sage Publications, Washington, DC, 263--267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter de Vries, Cees Midden, and Don Bouwhuis. 2003. The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. Int. J. Hum-Comput. Stud. 58, 6 (June 2003), 719--735. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mary T. Dzindolet, Scott A. Peterson, Regina A. Pomranky, Linda G. Pierce, and Hall P. Beck. 2003. The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. Hum-Comput. Int. 58, 6 (2003), 697--718. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors. 37, 1 (1995), 32--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mica R. Endsley and Esin O. Kiris. 1995. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors. 37, 2 (1995), 381--394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114, 4 (2007), 864--886.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Feil-Seifer and Maja J. Mataric. 2005. Defining socially assistive robotics. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 465--468.Google Scholar
- Eli J. Finkel, Caryl E. Rusbult, Madoka Kumashiro, and Peggy A. Hannon. 2002. Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 6 (2002), 956--974.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy, and Molly Vierhile. 2017. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth 4, 2 (2017).Google Scholar
- Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003a. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42, 3 (2003), 143--166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Terrence Fong and Charles Thorpe. 2002. Robot as partner: Vehicle teleoperation with collaborative control. In Proceedings from the 2002 NRL Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems. Springer, Berlin, 195--202.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Terrence Fong, Charles Thorpe, and Charles Baur. (2003b). Collaboration, dialogue, human-robot interaction. In Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Springer, Berlin, 255--266.Google Scholar
- Amos Freedy, Eward de Visser, Gershon Weltman, and Nicole Coeyman. 2007. Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration. In Collaborative Technologies and Systems. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 106--114.Google Scholar
- Diego Gambetta. 1988. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- General Data Protection Regulation. 2017. Council of the European Union 2016/95/46/EC71Google Scholar
- Jonathan Gratch, Ning Wang, Jillian Gerten, Edward Fast, and Robin Duffy. 2007. Creating rapport with virtual agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4722. Springer, Berlin, 125--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Victoria Groom, Vasant Srinivasan, Cindy L. Bethel, Robin Murphy, Lorin Dole, and Clifford Nass. 2011. Responses to robot social roles and social role framing. In International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS'11). 194--203.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer Goetz, Sara Kiesler, and Aaron Powers. 2003. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In 12th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 55--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter A. Hancock, Deborah R. Billings, and Kristen E. Schaefer. 2011a. Can you trust your robot? Ergon. Design. 19, 3 (2011), 24--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter A. Hancock, Deborah R. Billings, Kristen E. Schaefer, Jessie Y. C. Chen, Ewart de Visser, and Raja Parasuraman. 2011b. A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum. Factors. 53, 5 (2011), 517--527.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter A. Hancock, Gabriella M. Hancock, and Joel S. Warm. 2009. Individuation: The N = 1 revolution. Theor. Issues. Ergon. 10, 5 (2009), 481--488.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael P. Haselhuhn, Maurice E. Schweitzer, and Alison M. Wood. 2010. How implicit beliefs influence trust recovery. Psychological Science 21, 5 (May 2010), 645--648.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcel Heerink, Ben Krose, Vanessa Evers, and Bob Wielinga. 2006. The influence of a robot's social abilities on acceptance by elderly users. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2006).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hee Rin Lee and Selma Šabanović. 2014. Culturally variable preferences for robot design and use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. 17--24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rob High. 2012. The era of cognitive systems: An inside look at IBM Watson and how it works. Retrieved from: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp4955.pdf.Google Scholar
- Kevin A. Hoff and Masooda Bashir. 2015. Trust in automation integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Hum. Factors. 57, 3 (2015), 407--434.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert R. Hoffman, Matthew Johnson, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, and Al Underbrink. 2013. Trust in automation. IEEE Intel. Syst. 28, 1 (2013), 84--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaoru Inoue, Kazuyoshi Wada, and Yuko Ito. 2008. Effective application of paro: Seal type robots for disabled people in according to ideas of occupational therapists. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, Berlin, 1321--1324. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiun-Yin Jian, Ann M. Bisantz, and Colin G. Drury. 2000. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4, 1 (2000), 53--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cynthia Johnson-George and Walter C. Swap. 1982. Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 6 (1982), 1306--1317.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sara Kiesler and Jennifer Goetz. 2002. Mental models of robotic assistants. In Proceedings of the 2002 CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 576--577. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter H. Kim, Cecily D. Cooper, Kurt T. Dirks, and Donald L. Ferrin. 2013. Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups. Org. Behav. Hum. Dec. 120 (2013), 1--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter H. Kim, Kurt T. Dirks, Cecily D. Cooper, and Donald L. Ferrin. 2006. When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. External Attributions for the Repair of Trust After a Competence vs. Integrity-Based Violation. Org. Behav. Hum. Dec. 99, 1 (2006), 49--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter H. Kim, Donald L. Ferrin, Cecily D. Cooper, and Kurt T. Dirks. 2004. Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence versus integrity-based trust violations. J. Appl. Psychol. 89, 1 (2004), 104--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicole Krämer, Stefan Kopp, Christian Becker-Asano, and Nicole Sommer. 2013. Smile and the world will smile with you—The effects of a virtual agent's smile on users” evaluation and behavior. Int. J. Hum-Comput. St. 71, 3 (2013), 335--349. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katherine J. Kuchenbecker, Jamie Gewirtz, William McMahan, Dorsey Standish, Paul Martin, Jonathan Bohren, Pierre J. Mendoza, and David I. Lee. 2010. VerroTouch: High-frequency acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, Berlin, 189--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adrienne Lafrance. 2016. What is a robot? The question is more complicated than it seems. (March 2016). Retrieved November 18th, 2016 from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/03/what-is-a-human/473166/.Google Scholar
- Jeremy D. Larson. 2016. Letter of recommendation: Hasbro Joy for All. (March 2016). Retrieved November 18th, 2016 from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-hasbro-joy-for-all.html?_r=0Google Scholar
- John D. Lee and Neville Moray. 1992. Trust, control strategies, and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics 35, 10 (1992), 1243--1270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors. 46 (2004), 50--80.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sau-lai Lee, Ive Y. M. Lau, Sara Kiesler, and Chi-Yue Chiu. 2005. Human mental models of humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2767--2772.Google Scholar
- Roy J. Lewicki and Edward C. Tomlinson. 2003. The Effects of Reputation and Post Violation Communication on Trust and Distrust. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Retrieved on June 23, 2017 from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=400941.Google Scholar
- Roy J. Lewicki. 2007. Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 92--119.Google Scholar
- Roy J. Lewicki, Daniel J. McAllister, and Robert J. Bies. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23, 3 (1998), 438--458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandru Litoiu, Daniel Ullman, Jason Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2015. Evidence that robots trigger a cheating detector in humans. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 165--172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert B. Lount, Chen-Bo Zhong, Niro Sivanathan, and J. Keith Murnighan. 2008. Getting off on the wrong foot: The timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34, 12 (December 2008), 1601--1612.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niklas Luhmann. 1979. Trust and Power. Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
- Maria Madsen and Shirley Gregor. 2000. Measuring human-computer trust. In 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Citeseer, 6--8.Google Scholar
- Bertram F. Malle, Matthias Scheutz, and Joseph L. Austerweil. 2017. Networks of social and moral norms in human and robot agents. In A World with Robots. Springer International Publishing. 3--17.Google Scholar
- Bertram F. Malle, Matthias Scheutz, Thomas Arnold, John Voiklis, and Corey Cusimano. 2015. Sacrifice one for the good of many? People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 117--124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaitlyn Marinaccio, Spencer Kohn, Raja Parasuraman, and Ewart de Visser. 2015. A framework for rebuilding trust in social automation across health-care domains. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care. Sage Publications, Washington, DC, 201--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roger C. Mayer, James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20 (1995), 709--734.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bill McEvily and Marco Tortoriello. 2011. Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research 1, 1 (April 2011), 23--63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Glen D. Mellinger. 1956. Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 52, 3 (1956), 304--309.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Debra Meyerson, Karl E. Weick, and Roderick M. Kramer. 1996. Swift trust and temporary groups. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Roderick M. Kramer and Tom R. Tyler (Eds.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 166--195.Google Scholar
- Masahiro Mori, Karl F. MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. 2012. The uncanny valley. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19, 2 (2012), 98--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin R. Murphy. 2004. Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cy. C. 34, 2 (2004), 138--153. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Illah R. Nourbakhsh, Katia Sycara, Mary Koes, Mark Yong, Michael Lewis, and Steve Burion. 2005. Human-robot teaming for search and rescue. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 4 (2005), 72--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linda Onnasch, Christopher D. Wickens, Huiyang Li, and Dietrich Manzey. 2014. Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: an integrated meta-analysis. Hum. Factors. 56 (2014), 476--488.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott J. Ososky. 2013. Influence of Task-Role Mental Models on Human Interpretation of Robot Motion Behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Scott J. Ososky, Tracy Sanders, Florian Jentsch, Peter Hancock, and Jessie Y. C. Chen. 2014. Determinants of system transparency and its influence on trust in and reliance on unmanned robotic systems. In SPIE Proceedings 9084. SPIE, Bellingham, Washington.Google Scholar
- Raja Parasuraman and Christopher A. Miller. 2004. Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Commun. ACM, 47, 4 (2004), 51--55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raja Parasuraman, Robert Molloy, and Indramani L. Singh. 1993. Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3, 1 (1993), 1--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors. 39, 2 (1997), 230--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tomislav Pejsa, Sean Andrist, Michael Gleicher, and Bilge Mutlu. 2015. Gaze and attention management for embodied conversational agents. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5, 1 (March 2015), 3:1--3:34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth Phillips, Kristin Schaefer, Deborah R. Billings, Florian Jentsch, and Peter A. Hancock. 2015. Human-animal teams as an analog for future human-robot teams: Influencing design and fostering trust. J. Hum. Robot. Interact. 5, 1 (2015), 100--125. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helmut Prendinger and Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2013. Introducing the cast for social computing: Life-like characters. In Helmut Prendinger and Mitsuru Ishizuka (Eds.), Life-Like Characters: Tools, Affective Functions, and Applications. Springer Science 8 Business Media, 3--16.Google Scholar
- Tom Quick and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 1999. Making embodiment measureable. (June 1999). Retrieved November 10th, 2016 from http://supergoodtech.com/tomquick/phd/kogwis/.Google Scholar
- G. Jagannath Raju, George C. Verghese, and Thomas B. Sheridan. 1989. Design issues in 2-port network models of bilateral remote manipulation. In Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ: 1316--1321.Google Scholar
- Patrick P. L. Rau, Ye Li, and Dingjun Li. 2009. Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 2 (2009), 587--595. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Reason. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
- John K. Rempel, John G. Holmes, and Mark P. Zanna. 1985. Trust in close relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49, 1 (1985), 95--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul Robinette, Ayanna M. Howard, and Alan R. Wagner. 2015. Timing is key for robot trust repair. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer International Publishing, New York, NY, 574--583.Google Scholar
- Paul Robinette, Wenchen Li, Robert Allen, Ayanna M. Howard, and Alan R. Wagner. 2016. Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2016). ACM, New York, NY, 101--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer M. Ross, James L. Szalma, Peter A. Hancock, John S. Barnett, Grant Taylor. 2008. The effect of automation reliability on user automation trust and reliance in a search-and-rescue scenario. In Proceedings of the 2008 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Sage Publications, Washington, DC, 1340--1344.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julian B. Rotter. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Pers. 35 (1967), 651--656.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Denise M. Rousseau, Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald Burt, and Colin Camerer. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Man. Rev. 23 (1998), 393--404.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ericka Rovira, Kathleen McGarry, and Raja Parasuraman. 2007. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human Factors, 49, 76--87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caryl E. Rusbult and John M. Martz. 1995. Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Acad. Man. Rev. 21 (1995), 558--571.Google Scholar
- Maha Salem and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2015. Evaluating trust and safety in HRI: Practical issues and ethical challenges. The Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction.Google Scholar
- Maha Salem, Gabriella Lakatos, Farshid Amirabdollahian, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2015. Towards safe and trustworthy social robots: Ethical challenges and practical issues. In International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR).Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Sally. 1995. Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society 7, 1 (January 1995), 58--92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tracy Sanders, Kristin E. Oleson, Deborah R. Billings, Jessie Y. C. Chen, and Peter A. Hancock. 2011. A model of human-robot trust: Theoretical model development. In Proceedings of the 2011 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Sage Publications, Washington, DC, 1432--1436.Google Scholar
- Jessica Sartori, Barbara D. Adams, Sonya Waldherr, and Kenneth Lee. 2007. Trust violation scenarios. DRDC Toronto No. CR-2007-176. DRDC Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
- Kristin E. Schaefer, Jeffrey K. Adams, Jacquelyn G. Cook, Angela Bardwell-Owens, and Peter A. Hancock. 2015. The future of robotic design: trends from the history of media representations. Ergonomics in Design 23, 1 (2015), 13--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristin E. Schaefer. 2016. Measuring trust in human robot interactions: Development of the “trust perception scale-HRI”. In Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems. Springer, New York, NY, 191--218.Google Scholar
- Kristin E. Schaefer, Tracy L. Sanders, Ryan E. Yordon, Deborah R. Billings, and Peter A. Hancock. 2012. Classification of robot form: Factors predicting perceived trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the 2012 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Sage Publications, Washington, DC, 1548--1552.Google Scholar
- Maurice E. Schweitzer, John C. Hershey, and Eric T. Bradlow. 2006. Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 101 (2006), 1--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elaine Short, Justin Hart, Michelle Vu, and Brian Scassellati. 2010. No fair!!: An interaction with a cheating robot. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 219--226. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Valerie K. Sims, Matthew G. Chin, David Sushil, Daniel J. Barber, Tatiana Ballion, Bryan R. Clark, Keith A. Garfield, Michael J. Dolezal, Randall Shumaker, and Neal Finkelstein. 2005. Anthropomorphism of robotic forms: A response to affordances? In Proceedings of the 2005 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Sage Publications, Washington, DC, 602--605.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Statt. 2016, March 9. Hilton and IBM built a Watson-powered concierge. The Verge. Retrieved from: https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/9/11180418/hilton-ibm-connie-robot-watson-hotel-conciergeGoogle Scholar
- Leila Takayama, Wendy Ju, and Clifford Nass. 2008. Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 25--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adriana Tapus, Maja J. Mataric, and Brian Scassellati. 2007. Socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14, 1 (March 2007), 35 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/hal-00770113Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward C. Tomlinson, Brian R. Dineen and Roy J. Lewicki. 2004. The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. J. Manage. 30, 2 (April 2004), 165--187.Google Scholar
- Cristen Torrey, Susan R. Fussell, and Sara Kiesler. 2013. How a robot should give advice. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 275--282. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jocelyne Troccaz, Michael Peshkin, and Brian Davies. 1997. The use of localizers, robots, and synergistic devices in CAS. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1205. Springer, Berlin (1997), 727--736. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Ullman, Iolanda Leite, Jonathan Phillips, Julia Kim-Cohen, and Brian Scassellati. 2014. Smart human, smarter robot: How cheating affects perceptions of social agency. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2014).Google Scholar
- Daniel Ullman and Bertram F. Malle. 2017. Human-robot trust: Just a button press away. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 309--310. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frank M. F. Verberne, Jaap Ham, and Cees J. H. Midden. 2012. Trust in smart systems sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars. Hum. Factors. 54, 5 (May 2012), 799--810.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan R. Wagner and Ronald C. Arkin. 2011a. Acting deceptively: Providing robots with the capacity for deception. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 1 (Jan. 2011), 5--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan R. Wagner and Ronald C. Arkin. 2011b. Recognizing situations that demand trust. In Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2011). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 7--14.Google Scholar
- Lin Wang, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Vanessa Evers, and Pamela Hinds. 2009. Responsiveness to robots: Effects of ingroup orientation and communication style on HRI in China. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. 247--248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin Wang, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Vanessa Evers, Benjamin Krisper, and Pamela Hinds. 2010. When in Rome: The role of culture and context in adherence to robot recommendations. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. 359--366. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ning Wang, David V. Pynadath, and Susan G. Hill. 2016a. Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ning Wang, David V. Pynadath, and Susan G. Hill. 2016b. The impact of POMDP-generated explanations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents 8 Multiagent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lawrence R. Wheeless and Janis Grotz. 1977. The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research 3, 3 (1977), 250--257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessica Wildman. 2011. Cultural Differences in Forgiveness Fatalism, Trust Violations, and Trust Repair Efforts in Interpersonal Collaboration. Doctoral dissertation. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Jessica L. Wildman, Marissa L. Shuffler, Elizabeth H. Lazzara, Stephen M. Fiore, Shawn C. Burke, Eduardo E. Salas, and Sena Garven. 2012. Trust development in swift starting action teams: A multilevel framework. Group Organ. Manage. 37, 2 (March 2012), 137--170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosemarie E. Yagoda and Douglas J. Gillan. 2012. You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a human-robot interaction trust scale. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4, 3 (August 2012), 235--248.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michelle Yeh and Christopher D. Wickens. 2000. Attention and Trust Biases in the Design of Augmented Reality Displays. Savoy Aviation Research Laboratory Technical Report ARL-00-3/FED-LAB-00-1. Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Toward an Understanding of Trust Repair in Human-Robot Interaction: Current Research and Future Directions
Recommendations
Human-Robot Trust: Just a Button Press Away
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionMany of the benefits promised by human-robot interaction require successful continued interaction between a human and a robot; trust is a key component of such interaction. We investigate whether having a person "n the loop" with a robot---i.e., the ...
Rethinking Trust Repair in Human-Robot Interaction
CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingAs robots become increasingly prevalent in work-oriented collaborations, trust has emerged as a critical factor in their acceptance and effectiveness. However, trust is dynamic and can erode when mistakes are made. Despite emerging research on trust ...
Comments