skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173612acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design Patterns for Data Comics

Published:19 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data comics for data-driven storytelling are inspired by the visual language of comics and aim to communicate insights in data through visualizations. While comics are widely known, few examples of data comics exist and there has not been any structured analysis nor guidance for their creation. We introduce data-comic design-patterns, each describing a set of panels with a specific narrative purpose, that allow for rapid storyboarding of data comics while showcasing their expressive potential. Our patterns are derived from i) analyzing common patterns in infographics, datavideos, and existing data comics, ii) our experiences creating data comics for different scenarios. Our patterns demonstrate how data comics allow an author to combine the best of both worlds: spatial layout and overview from infographics as well as linearity and narration from videos and presentations.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

suppl.mov

Supplemental video

References

  1. 2016. Creativity Cards. online: http://ja-ye.atom2.cz/form/download.ashx?FileId=52. (2016). {last visited: Nov. 29, 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2016. Design with Intend. online: http://designwithintent.co.uk/docs/designwithintent_cards_1.0_draft_rev_sm.pdf. (2016). {last visited: Nov. 29, 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2016. Ideo Cards. online: https://www.ideo.com/work/method-cards. (2016). {last visited: Nov. 29, 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2017. Wikipedia Panel (Comics). online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panel_(comics). (2017). {online: last accessed September 14, 2017}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sajeda Amin, K Austrian, M Chau, K Glazer, E Green, D Stewart, and M Stoner. 2013. The Adolescent Girls Vulnerability Index: Guiding strategic investment in Uganda. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fereshteh Amini, Nathalie Henry Riche, Bongshin Lee, Christophe Hurter, and Pourang Irani. 2015. Understanding data videos: Looking at narrative visualization through the cinematography lens. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 1459--1468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Benjamin Bach, Pierre Dragicevic, Daniel Archambault, Christophe Hurter, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2016a. A Descriptive Framework for Temporal Data Visualizations Based on Generalized Space-Time Cubes. In Computer Graphics Forum. Wiley Online Library. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Benjamin Bach, Natalie Kerracher, Kyle Wm Hall, Sheelagh Carpendale, Jessie Kennedy, and Nathalie Henry Riche. 2016b. Telling stories about dynamic networks with graph comics. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 3670--3682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Benjamin Bach, Emmanuel Pietriga, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. Graphdiaries: Animated transitions andtemporal navigation for dynamic networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 20, 5 (2014), 740--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Benjamin Bach, Nathalie Henry Riche, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2017a. The Emerging Genre of Data Comics. Computer Graphics and Applications (CGA) 38, 3 (2017), 6--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Benjamin Bach, Moritz Stefaner, Jeremy Boy, Steven Drucker, Lyn Bartram, Jo Wood, Paolo Ciuccarelli, Yuri Engelhardt, Ulrike Koeppen, and Barbara Tversky. 2017b. Narrative Design Patterns for Data-Driven Storytelling. (2017). in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Arnd Bernaerts. 2006. Booklet on Naval War changes Climate. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alex Bigelow, Steven Drucker, Danyel Fisher, and Miriah Meyer. 2017. Iterating between tools to create and edit visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 23, 1 (2017), 481--490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Matthew Brehmer, Bongshin Lee, Benjamin Bach, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Tamara Munzner. 2017. Timelines revisited: A design space and considerations for expressive storytelling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 23, 9 (2017), 2151--2164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kieron Brown. 2013. Musical sequences in comics. The Comics Grid: Journal of Comics Scholarship 3, 1 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mike Cisneros. 2011. Is that true? https://public.tableau.com/profile/mikevizneros#!/ vizhome/IsThatRight/IsThatTrue. (2011). online, last accessed Sept., 24, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Neil Cohn. 2013. The Visual Language of Comics: Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images. A&C Black.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gareth Cook and Maria Popova. 2015. The Best American Infographics 2016. Mariner Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas Dykes, Jayne Wallace, Mark Blythe, and James Thomas. 2016. Paper Street View: A Guided Tour of Design and Making Using Comics. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 334--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Will Eisner. 2008. Graphic storytelling and visual narrative. WW Norton & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt. 2016. Oblique Strategies. online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblique_Strategies. (2016). {last visited: Nov. 29, 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Matteo Farinella and Hana Ros. 2014. Neurocomic. Nobrow Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gérard Genette. 1983. Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Cornell University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Katrin Glinka, Christopher Pietsch, and Marian Doerk. 2017. Past Visions and Reconciling Views: Visualizing Time, Texture and Themes in Cultural Collections. Digital Humanities Quarterly 11, 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Melanie C. Green, Jeffrey J. Strange, and Timothy C. Brock. 2003. Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Thierry Groensteen. 1999. The System of Comics. Trans. Bart Beaty and Nick Nguyen. Jackson: UP of Mississippi (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Thierry Groensteen. 2007. The System of Comics. Univ. Press of Mississippi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Thierry Groensteen. 2013. Comics and Narration. Univ. Press of Mississippi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shiqing He and Eytan Adar. 2017. VIZITCARDS: A Card-Based Toolkit for Infovis Design Education. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 1 (2017), 561--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jeffrey Heer and George Robertson. 2007. Animated transitions in statistical data graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 13, 6 (2007), 1240--1247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tim N. Hoffler and Detlev Leutner. 2007. Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 17, 6 (Dec. 2007), 722--738. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0959475207001077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jay Hosler and K. B. Boomer. 2011. Are Comic Books an Effective Way to Engage Nonmajors in Learning and Appreciating Science? CBE Life Sciences Education 10, 3 (2011), 309--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jessica Hullman, Steven Drucker, Nathalie Henry Riche, Bongshin Lee, Danyel Fisher, and Eytan Adar. 2013. A deeper understanding of sequence in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 19, 12 (2013), 2406--2415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Petra Isenberg, Pierre Dragicevic, Wesley Willett, Anastasia Bezerianos, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. Hybrid-image visualization for large viewing environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 19, 12 (2013), 2346--2355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Fanny Chevalier, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Kitty: sketching dynamic and interactive illustrations. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 395--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Nam Wook Kim, Benjamin Bach, Hyejin Im, Sasha Schriber, Markus Gross, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2018. Visualizing Nonlinear Narratives with Story Curves. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Nam Wook Kim, Eston Schweickart, Zhicheng Liu, Mira Dontcheva, Wilmot Li, Jovan Popovic, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2017. Data-driven guides: Supporting expressive design for information graphics. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 1 (2017), 491--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Robert Kosara. 2016. Presentation-Oriented Visualization Techniques. Computer Graphics and Applications (CGA) 36, 1 (2016), 80--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Bongshin Lee, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, and Greg Smith. 2013. SketchStory: Telling more engaging stories with data through freeform sketching. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2416--2425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Bongshin Lee, Nathalie Henry Riche, Petra Isenberg, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2015. More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories. Computer Graphics and Applications (CGA) 35, 5 (2015), 84--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Scott McCloud. 1993. Understanding comics: The invisible art. Northampton, Mass (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott McCloud. 2011. Making comics. Harper Collins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Andrei Molotiu. 2009. Abstract comics: The anthology: 1967--2009. Fantagraphics Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Richard Monastersky and Nick Sousanis. 2015. The fragile framework. Nature 527, 7579 (2015), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. John O'Keefe. 1976. Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat. Experimental Neurology 51, 1 (Jan. 1976), 78--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Severino Ribecca. 2016. The Data Visualization Catalogue. http://www.datavizcatalogue.com. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jon Schwabisch. 2016. The Graphic Continuum -- Flash Cards. https: //policyviz.com/product/graphic-continuum-cards/. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Edward Segel and Jeffrey Heer. 2010. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 16, 6 (2010), 1139--1148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Corry Shores. 2016. Ragged Time'in Intra-panel Comics Rhythms. The Comics Grid: Journal of Comics Scholarship 6 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jeremy C. Short, Brandon Randolph-Seng, and Aaron F. McKenny. 2013. Graphic Presentation An Empirical Examination of the Graphic Novel Approach to Communicate Business Concepts. Business Communication Quarterly 76, 3 (Sept. 2013), 273--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Nick Sousanis. 2015. Unflattening. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Amy N. Spiegel, Julia McQuillan, Peter Halpin, Camillia Matuk, and Judy Diamond. 2013. Engaging Teenagers with Science Through Comics. Research in science education 43, 6 (Dec. 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Mico Tatalovic. 2009. Science comics as tools for science education and communication: a brief, exploratory study. The Journal of Science Communication (JCOM) (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Barbara Tversky, Julie Bauer Morrison, and Mireille Bentracourt. 2002. Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57, 4 (Oct. 2002), 247--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Bret Victor. 2011. Scientific Communication As Sequential Art. http://worrydream.com/#! /ScientificCommunicationAsSequentialArt. (2011). online, last accessed Sept., 24, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Gene Yang. 2008. Graphic novels in the classroom. Language Arts 85, 3 (2008), 185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhenpeng Zhao, Rachael Marr, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2015. Data Comics: Sequential Art for Data-Driven Storytelling. Technical Report. Technical Report. Human Computer Interaction Lab, University of Maryland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design Patterns for Data Comics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader