skip to main content
extended-abstract

Thinking Fast and Slow: Optimization Decomposition Across Timescales

Published:11 October 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Many real-world control systems, such as the smart grid and software defined networks, have decentralized components that react quickly using local information and centralized components that react slowly using a more global view. This work seeks to provide a theoretical framework for how to design controllers that are decomposed across timescales in this way. The framework is analogous to how the network utility maximization framework uses optimization decomposition to distribute a global control problem across independent controllers, each of which solves a local problem; except our goal is to decompose a global problem temporally, extracting a timescale separation. Our results highlight that decomposition of a multi-timescale controller into a fast timescale, reactive controller and a slow timescale, predictive controller can be near-optimal in a strong sense. In particular, we exhibit such a design, named Multi-timescale Reflexive Predictive Control (MRPC), which maintains a per-timestep cost within a constant factor of the offline optimal in an adversarial setting.

References

  1. D. Cai, E. Mallada, and A. Wierman. Distributed optimization decomposition for joint economic dispatch and frequency regulation. In Decision and Control (CDC), 2015 IEEE 54th Annual Conference on, pages 15--22. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Chiang, S. H. Low, A. R. Calderbank, and J. C. Doyle. Layering as optimization decomposition: A mathematical theory of network architectures. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1):255--312, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. Goel, N. Chen, and A. Wierman. Thinking Fast and Slow: Optimization Decomposition Across Timescales. arXiv:1704.07785, Apr. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Kreutz, F. M. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig. Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1):14--76, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. H. Low, F. Paganini, and J. C. Doyle. Internet congestion control. IEEE control systems, 22(1):28--43, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. M. Masters. Renewable and efficient electric power systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. D. Sontag. Mathematical control theory: deterministic finite dimensional systems, volume 6. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Srikant. The mathematics of Internet congestion control. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
    ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 45, Issue 2
    Setember 2017
    131 pages
    ISSN:0163-5999
    DOI:10.1145/3152042
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2017 Authors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 October 2017

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader