skip to main content
10.1145/3148330.3148350acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Geographic Biases are 'Born, not Made': Exploring Contributors' Spatiotemporal Behavior in OpenStreetMap

Published:07 January 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The evolution of contributor behavior in peer production communities over time has been a subject of substantial interest in the social computing community. In this paper, we extend this literature to the geographic domain, exploring contribution behavior in OpenStreetMap using a spatiotemporal lens. In doing so, we observe a geographic version of a 'born, not made' phenomenon: throughout their lifespans, contributors are relatively consistent in the places and types of places that they edit. We show how these 'born, not made' trends may help explain the urban and socioeconomic coverage biases that have been observed in OpenStreetMap. We also discuss how our findings can help point towards solutions to these biases.

References

  1. Alexa. 2010. wikipedia.org Traffic Statistics. Retrieved January 13, 2017 from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wikipedia.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ofer Arazy, Hila Liifshitz-Assaf, Oded Nov, Johannes Daxenberger, Martina Balestra, and Coye Cheshire. 2017. On the "How" and "Why" of Emergent Role Behaviors in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), 2039--2051. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yochai Benkler and others. 2016. Peer production and cooperation. Handbook on the Economics of the Internet 91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS). Retrieved July 4, 2017 from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashley Colley, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Allen Yilun Lin, Donald Degraen, Benjamin Fischman, Jonna Häkkilä, Kate Kuehl, Valentina Nisi, Nuno Jardim Nunes, Nina Wenig, and others. 2017. The Geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and Problematic Effects on Places and Movement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Martin Dittus, Giovanni Quattrone, and Licia Capra. 2017. Mass Participation During Emergency Response: Event-centric Crowdsourcing in Humanitarian Mapping. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), 1290--1303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Melanie Eckle and João Porto de Albuquerque. 2015. Quality Assessment of Remote Mapping in OpenStreetMap for Disaster Management Purposes. In ISCRAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Killian Fox. 2012. OpenStreetMap: "It's the Wikipedia of maps." The Guardian. Retrieved October 25, 2016 from https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2012/feb/18/openstreetmap-world-map-radicalsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Michael F Goodchild. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 4: 211--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Peter Gould and Rodney White. 1986. Mental Maps. Routledge, London; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mark Graham, Matthew Zook, and Andrew Boulton. 2013. Augmented reality in urban places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38, 3: 464--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Simon Gröchenig, Richard Brunauer, and Karl Rehrl. 2014. Estimating Completeness of VGI Datasets by Analyzing Community Activity Over Time Periods. 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mordechai Haklay. 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37, 4: 682--703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A Halfaker, Aaron Halfaker, J T Morgan, and J Riedl. 2013. The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia's Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5: 664--688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Darren Hardy, James Frew, and Michael F Goodchild. 2012. Volunteered geographic information production as a spatial process. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26, 7: 1191--1212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Brent Hecht and Darren Gergle. 2010. On the "localness" of user-generated content. 229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Muki Haklay, Licia Capra, Afra J Mashhadi, Loren Terveen, and Mei-Po Kwan. 2013. Geographic human-computer interaction. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Brent Hecht and Monica Stephens. 2014. A Tale of Cities: Urban Biases in Volunteered Geographic Information. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved October 20, 2016 from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Isaac Johnson and Brent Hecht. 2016. Structural Causes of Bias in Crowd-derived Geographic Information: Towards a Holistic Understanding. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Observational Studies through Social Media and Other Human-Generated Content.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Isaac L. Johnson, Yilun Lin, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Andrew Hall, Aaron Halfaker, Johannes Schöning, and Brent Hecht. 2016. Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide. 13--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Isaac L. Johnson, Connor J McMahon, Johannes Schöning, and Brent Hecht. 2017. The Effect of Population and "Structural" Biases on Social Media-based Algorithms -- A Case Study in Geolocation Inference Across the Urban-Rural Spectrum. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Isaac L. Johnson, Subhasree Sengupta, Johannes Schöning, and Brent Hecht. 2016. The Geography and Importance of Localness in Geotagged Social Media. 515--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Won W. Koo and David Karemera. 1991. Determinants of World Wheat Trade Flows and Policy Analysis. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie 39, 3: 439--455.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Won W. Koo, David Karemera, and Richard Taylor. 1994. A gravity model analysis of meat trade policies. Agricultural Economics 10, 1: 81--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Michael D Lieberman and Jimmy Lin. 2009. You Are Where You Edit: Locating Wikipedia Contributors through Edit Histories. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Linna Li, Michael Goodchild, and Bo Xu. 2013. Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 40, 2: 61--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Olena Medelyan, David Milne, Catherine Legg, and Ian H. Witten. 2009. Mining meaning from Wikipedia. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 9: 716--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. NCHS. 2010. NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme For Counties. Retrieved January 13, 2017 from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. OpenStreetMap. Good practice - OpenStreetMap Wiki. Retrieved October 24, 2016 from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practiceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Katherine Panciera. 2011. User lifecycles in cyclopath. In the 2011 iConference, 741--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Katherine Panciera, Aaron Halfaker, and Loren Terveen. 2009. Wikipedians are born, not made. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference, 51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Adrian Popescu and Gregory Grefenstette. 2009. Deducing Trip Related Information from Flickr. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '09), 1183--1184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong Tony K Lam, Katherine Panciera, Loren Terveen, and John Riedl. 2007. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. In the 2007 international ACM conference, 259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Giovanni Quattrone, Licia Capra, and Pasquale De Meo. 2015. There's No Such Thing As the Perfect Map: Quantifying Bias in Spatial Crowd-sourcing Datasets. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 1021--1032. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Giovanni Quattrone, Davide Proserpio, Daniele Quercia, Licia Capra, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. Who Benefits from the "Sharing" Economy of Airbnb? arXiv:1602.02238 {physics}. Retrieved February 25, 2016 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02238Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Karl Rehrl, Simon Gröechenig, Hartwig Hochmair, Sven Leitinger, Renate Steinmann, and Andreas Wagner. 2013. A Conceptual Model for Analyzing Contribution Patterns in the Context of VGI. In Progress in Location-Based Services, Jukka M. Krisp (ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 373--388. Retrieved July 1, 2017 from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978--3--642--34203--5_21Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Shilad W. Sen, Heather Ford, David R. Musicant, Mark Graham, Oliver S.B. Keyes, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Barriers to the Localness of Volunteered Geographic Information. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 197--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chris Smith, Daniele Quercia, and Licia Capra. 2013. Finger on the Pulse: Identifying Deprivation Using Transit Flow Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 683--692. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2017. Towards a Geographic Understanding of the Sharing Economy: Systemic Biases in UberX and TaskRabbit. ACM TOCHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Dennis Zielstra, Hartwig H. Hochmair, Pascal Neis, and Francesco Tonini. 2014. Areal Delineation of Home Regions from Contribution and Editing Patterns in OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 3, 4: 1211--1233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. 2012. Cartographic guidelines for public health. Retrieved October 6, 2017 from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/13359Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 2017. Reservation poverty. Wikipedia. Retrieved July 4, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reservation_poverty&oldid=776694412Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Apple Maps | OpenStreetMap Blog. Retrieved July 4, 2017 from https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2012/10/02/apple-maps/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. OpenStreetMap Statistics. Retrieved October 6, 2017 from http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Geographic Biases are 'Born, not Made': Exploring Contributors' Spatiotemporal Behavior in OpenStreetMap

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GROUP '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        January 2018
        422 pages
        ISBN:9781450355629
        DOI:10.1145/3148330

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 January 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        GROUP '18 Paper Acceptance Rate22of94submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader