skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Passive Haptic Training to Improve Speed and Performance on a Keypad

Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Learning text entry systems is challenging, yet necessary. Many layouts and keyboards exist, but they rely on laborious learning techniques. Passive haptic learning (PHL) has already demonstrated some benefit for learning the Braille text entry system. Could this computing-enabled technique be used to improve desktop keyboard typing skills? It is unknown whether passive haptic training can improve speed on a motor task (as opposed to initial learning). We use a randomized numeric keypad to examine users’ typing performance with or without passive haptic training. When users were prevented from looking at the keyboard, the PHL group demonstrated consistent accuracy (-0.011 KSPC) while those in the control group greatly increased their error (+1.26 KSPC on average). This result is consistent with the finding that PHL users looked significantly less at the keyboard. In a second, longer study, users exposed to PHL were found to significantly improve their typing speed (mean increase of 11 WPM) versus control (mean increase of 2.2 WPM).

References

  1. Xiaojun Bi, Barton A Smith, and Shumin Zhai. 2010. Quasi-qwerty soft keyboard optimization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 283--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Stephen Brewster, Faraz Chohan, and Lorna Brown. 2007. Tactile Feedback for Mobile Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Thomas Allen Bullock, Lorraine C Schmertzing, and D Education Center. 2010. Instructional experiences of fifth grade students with keyboarding instruction. PDF accessed on November 1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Becky Chwirka, Burke Gurney, and Patricia A Burtner. 2002. Keyboarding and visual-motor skills in elementary students: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 16, 2-3 (2002), 39--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Edward Clarkson, James Clawson, Kent Lyons, and Thad Starner. 2005. An empirical study of typing rates on mini-QWERTY keyboards. In CHI extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1288--1291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. William E Cooper. 1983. Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting. Springer Science 8 Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Arindam Das and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2007. A cognitive simulation model for novice text entry on cell phone keypads. In Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore! ACM, 141--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ludovic Dovat, Olivier Lambercy, Roger Gassert, Thomas Maeder, Ted Milner, Teo Chee Leong, and Etienne Burdet. 2008. HandCARE: a cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke. Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 16, 6 (2008), 582--591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. David Feygin, Madeleine Keehner, and R Tendick. 2002. Haptic guidance: Experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. In Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, HAPTICS. IEEE, 40--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Julia K. Harpole. 2015. 5 Things you Should Know Before you Consider Court Reporting School. https://stenofabulous.com/2015/01/5-things-you-should-know-before-you-consider-court-reporting-school. (2015). Accessed: 2017-4-24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lynda S. Hartman. 2005. Handwriting / Keyboarding Rates. http://www.qiat.org/docs/resourcebank/hwriting_kybding_rate_info.pdf, (2005). Accessed: 2017-4-24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lynda S. Hartman. 2005. Typing Agent Keys to Keyboarding Success. http://wis.cromwell.k12.ct.us/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=1919671, (2005). Accessed: 2017-4-24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kevin Huang, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, and Thad Starner. 2008. PianoTouch: A wearable haptic piano instruction system for passive learning of piano skills. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC). IEEE, 41--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kevin Huang, Thad Starner, Ellen Do, Gil Weiberg, Daniel Kohlsdorf, Claas Ahlrichs, and Ruediger Leibrandt. 2010. Mobile music touch: mobile tactile stimulation for passive learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 791--800. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Seungwoo Je, Brendan Rooney, Liwei Chan, and Andrea Bianchi. 2017. tactoRing: A Skin-Drag Discrete Display. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3106--3114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gavin Jenkins. 2015. Hanging Out with America’s Elite, Underappreciated Court Reporters. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/hanging-out-with-americas-elite-underappreciated-court-reporters-812. (2015). Accessed: 2017-4-24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniel Kohlsdorf and Thad Starner. 2010. Mobile music touch: The effect of primary tasks on passively learning piano sequences. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Katherine J Kuchenbecker, Jonathan Fiene, and Günter Niemeyer. 2006. Improving contact realism through event-based haptic feedback. Transactions on visualization and computer graphics 12, 2 (2006), 219--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ville Lehtinen, Antti Oulasvirta, Antti Salovaara, and Petteri Nurmi. 2012. Dynamic tactile guidance for visual search tasks. In Proceedings of the 25th annual symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 445--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Craig Edwin Lewiston. 2008. MaGKeyS: A haptic guidance keyboard system for facilitating sensorimotor training and rehabilitation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenna Lüttgen and Herbert Heuer. 2013. The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing. Journal of motor behavior 45, 3 (2013), 249--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kent Lyons, Daniel Plaisted, and Thad Starner. 2004. Expert chording text entry on the twiddler one-handed keyboard. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), Vol. 1. IEEE, 94--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. I Scott MacKenzie and Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii. 2010. Text entry systems: Mobility, accessibility, universality. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Edgar Matias, I Scott MacKenzie, and William Buxton. 1993. Half-QWERTY: A one-handed keyboard facilitating skill transfer from QWERTY. In Proceedings of the INTERACT and CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 88--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Edgar Matias, I. Scott MacKenzie, and William Buxton. 1996. One-handed Touch Typing on a QWERTY Keyboard. Human-Computer Interact. 11, 1 (March 1996), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Everett M Rogers. 2010. Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Harriet Rogers, Jody Laehn, Anne Lang, Deb OfiLeary, and Mary Sommers. 2003. The status of elementary keyboarding: A longitudinal study. Unpublished research study, Whitewater, WI: UW-Whitewater (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Janet Rogers and Jane Case-Smith. 2002. Relationships between handwriting and keyboarding performance of sixth-grade students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 56, 1 (2002), 34--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jesse Sargent, Stephen Dopkins, John Philbeck, and David Chichka. 2010. Chunking in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition 36, 3 (2010), 576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Caitlyn Seim, John Chandler, Kayla DesPortes, Siddharth Dhingra, Miru Park, and Thad Starner. 2014. Passive haptic learning of Braille typing. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 111--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Caitlyn Seim, Tanya Estes, and Thad Starner. 2015. Towards Passive Haptic Learning of piano songs. In World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 445--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Caitlyn Seim, Saul Reynolds-Haertle, Sarthak Srinivas, and Thad Starner. 2016. Tactile taps teach rhythmic text entry: passive haptic learning of morse code. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 164--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Caitlyn E Seim, David Quigley, and Thad E Starner. 2014. Passive haptic learning of typing skills facilitated by wearable computers. In CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2203--2208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Charles H Shea, Qin Lai, Charles Black, and Jin-Hoon Park. 2000. Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Human movement science 19, 5 (2000), 737--760.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Roland Sigrist, Georg Rauter, Robert Riener, and Peter Wolf. 2013. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin 8 Review 20, 1 (2013), 21--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Daniel Spelmezan, Deepak Ranjan Sahoo, and Sriram Subramanian. 2017. Sparkle: Hover Feedback with Touchable Electric Arcs. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3705--3717. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Evan Strasnick, Jessica R Cauchard, and James A Landay. 2017. BrushTouch: Exploring an Alternative Tactile Method for Wearable Haptics. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3120--3125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jane Bruner Wallace. 2000. The Effects of Color-Coding on Keyboarding Instruction of Third Grade Students. (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Behymer-J. Waner, K. and S. McCrary. 1992. Two points of view on elementary school keyboarding. Business Education Forum, 27--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Bernhard Weber, Simon Schätzle, Thomas Hulin, Carsten Preusche, and Barbara Deml. 2011. Evaluation of a vibrotactile feedback device for spatial guidance. In World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 349--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Camille K Williams and Heather Carnahan. 2014. Motor Learning Perspectives on HapticTraining for the Upper Extremities. Transactions on Haptics 7, 2 (2014), 240--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Xiaoli Yang, Youn K Kim, Qian Wu, and Qing Chen. 2006. Hand function training in haptic virtual environment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. IEEE, 395--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Passive Haptic Training to Improve Speed and Performance on a Keypad
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
      September 2017
      2023 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3139486
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2017
      • Accepted: 1 June 2017
      • Revised: 1 March 2017
      • Received: 1 February 2017
      Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader