skip to main content
10.1145/3093338.3093374acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespearcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Voice for Bioinformatics

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the challenges to adoption of HPC is the disjunction between those who need it and those who know it. Biology (specifically, genomics) is a growing field for computational use, but the typical biologist does not have an established informatics background. The National Center for Genome Analysis Support (NCGAS) aids users in getting past the initial shock of the command line and guides them toward savvy cluster use. NCGAS is initiating a push to become domain champions alongside Oklahoma State's Brian Cougar. Our position at IU gives us a close relationship with XSEDE and we already fulfill a role in pushing users toward XSEDE resources when our local clusters are ill-suited to the job. We currently act as liaison between biologists and Jetstream, IU and TACC's research computing cloud. Typical issues include: Software installation; Software usage - what parameters do I choose, and how do I interpret the results; Batch job submission; Understanding how queues and job handlers work; Data movement, Spinning up VMs on Jetstream We will discuss how we have structured our support, and illustrate our impact on XSEDE resources.

References

  1. 2016. The Cost of Sequencing a Human Genome-National Human Genome Research Institute. https://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Richard D. LeDuc, Le-Shin Wu, Carrie L. Ganote, Thomas Doak, Philip D. Blood, and Matthew Vaughn. 2013. National Center for Genome Analysis Support Leverages XSEDE to Support Life Science Research. In Proceedings of the Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment: Gateway to Discovery. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Zachary D. Stephens, Skylar Y. Lee, Faraz Faghri, Roy H. Campbell, Chengxiang Zhai, Miles J. Efron, Ravishankar Iyer, Michael C. Schatz, Saurabh Sinha, and Gene E. Robinson. 2015. Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? PLOS Biology 13, 7 (July 2015), E1002195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Craig A. Stewart, William K Barnett, Matthew W. Hahn, and Michael R. Lynch. 2015. ABI Development: National Center for Genome Analysis Support. PTI Technical Report PTI-TR15-009 (December 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Voice for Bioinformatics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PEARC '17: Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2017 on Sustainability, Success and Impact
      July 2017
      451 pages
      ISBN:9781450352727
      DOI:10.1145/3093338
      • General Chair:
      • David Hart

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 July 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      PEARC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate54of79submissions,68%Overall Acceptance Rate133of202submissions,66%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader