Abstract
Today, mobile devices like smartphones and tablets have become an indispensable part of people's lives, posing many new questions e.g., in terms of interaction methods, but also security. In this paper, we conduct a large scale, long term analysis of mobile device usage characteristics like session length, interaction frequency, and daily usage in locked and unlocked state with respect to location context and diurnal pattern. Based on detailed logs from 29,279 mobile phones and tablets representing a total of 5,811 years of usage time, we identify and analyze 52.2 million usage sessions with some participants providing data for more than four years.
Our results show that context has a highly significant effect on both frequency and extent of mobile device usage, with mobile phones being used twice as much at home compared to in the office. Interestingly, devices are unlocked for only 46 % of the interactions. We found that with an average of 60 interactions per day, smartphones are used almost thrice as often as tablet devices (23), while usage sessions on tablets are three times longer, hence are used almost for an equal amount of time throughout the day. We conclude that usage session characteristics differ considerably between tablets and smartphones. These results inform future approaches to mobile interaction as well as security.
- Matthias Böhmer, Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger, and Gernot Bauer. 2011. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle - A Large Scale Study on Mobile Application Usage. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services - MobileHCI ‘11 January (2011), 47.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guanling Chen and David Kotz. 2000. A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research. Technical Report. Google Scholar
- Alexander De Luca, Marian Harbach, Emanuel von Zezschwitz, Max-Emanuel Maurer, Bernhard Ewald Slawik, Heinrich Hussmann, and Matthew Smith. 2014. Now You See Me, Now You Don't - Protecting Smartphone Authentication from Shoulder Surfers. Sigchi (2014), 2937--2946. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hossein Falaki, Ratul Mahajan, Srikanth Kandula, Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. 2010. Diversity in Smartphone Usage. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services - MobiSys ‘10 (2010), 179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin Finley and Tapio Soikkeli. 2016. Multidevice mobile sessions: A first look. Pervasive and Mobile Computing (in press) (2016).Google Scholar
- Preetinder S Gill, Ashwini Kamath, and Tejkaran Singh Gill. 2012. Distraction: an assessment of smartphone usage in health care work settings. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 5, 1 (2012), 105--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marian Harbach, Alexander De Luca, and Serge Egelman. 2016. The Anatomy of Smartphone Unlocking: A Field Study of Android Lock Screens. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Hintze, Rainhard Dieter Findling, Muhammad Muaaz, Eckhard Koch, and René Mayrhofer. 2015. CORMORANT: Towards Continuous Risk-Aware Multi-Modal Cross-Device Authentication. UbiComp 2015 Adjunct Publication (2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Hintze, Rainhard D Findling, Muhammad Muaaz, Sebastian Scholz, and René Mayrhofer. 2014. Diversity in Locked and Unlocked Mobile Device Usage. In UbiComp 2014 Adjunct Publication. 379--384. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Hintze, Rainhard Dieter Findling, Sebastian Scholz, and René Mayrhofer. 2014. Mobile Device Usage Characteristics: The Effect of Context and Form Factor on Locked and Unlocked Usage. In Proceedings of MoMM 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Hintze, Muhammad Muaaz, Rainhard Dieter Findling, Sebastian Scholz, Eckhard Koch, and René Mayrhofer. 2015. Confidence and Risk Estimation Plugins for Multi-Modal Authentication on Mobile Devices using CORMORANT. In Proceedings of MoMM 2015. 384--388. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Hintze and Andrew Rice. 2016. Picky: Efficient and Reproducible Sharing of Large Datasets Using Merkle-Trees. 2016 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS) (2016), 30--38.Google Scholar
- Borja Jiménez. 2008. Modeling of Mobile End-User Context. Ph.D. Dissertation. Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey H Kuznekoff and Scott Titsworth. 2013. The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education 62, 3 (2013), 233--252.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Min Kwon, Joon-Yeop Lee, Wang-Youn Won, Jae-Woo Park, Jung-Ah Min, Changtae Hahn, Xinyu Gu, Ji-Hye Choi, and Dai-Jin Kim. 2013. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PloS one 8, 2 (2013), e56936.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heyoung Lee, Heejune Ahn, Samwook Choi, and Wanbok Choi. 2014. The SAMS: Smartphone Addiction Management System and Verification. Journal of Medical Systems 38, 1 (2014), 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu-Kang Lee, Chun-Tuan Chang, You Lin, and Zhao-Hong Cheng. 2014. The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior 31 (2014), 373--383. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu-Hsuan Lin, Yu-Cheng Lin, Yang-Han Lee, Po-Hsien Lin, Sheng-Hsuan Lin, Li-Ren Chang, Hsien-Wei Tseng, Liang-Yu Yen, Cheryl C H Yang, and Terry B J Kuo. 2015. Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App). Journal of Psychiatric Research 65 (2015), 139--145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gonçalo M. S. Marques and Rui Pitarma. 2016. Smartphone Application for Enhanced Indoor Health Environments. Journal of Information Systems Engineering 8 Management 1, 4 (2016), 1--9.Google Scholar
- Hendrik Müller, Jennifer Gove, and John Webb. 2012. Understanding Tablet Use - A Multi-Method Exploration. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI'12) (2012), 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Earl Oliver. 2010. The Challenges in Large-Scale Smartphone User Studies. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Hot Topics in Planet-scale Measurement - HotPlanet ‘10 (2010), 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Antti Oulasvirta, Tye Rattenbury, Lingyi Ma, and Eeva Raita. 2011. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 1 (jun 2011), 105--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charlie Pinder, Russell Beale, and Robert J Hendley. 2016. Accept the Banana : Exploring Incidental Cognitive Bias Modification Techniques on Smartphones. CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 2923--2931. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Husnjak Siniša, Peraković Dragan, and Cvitić Ivan. 2016. Relevant Affect Factors of Smartphone Mobile Data Traffic. Promet - Traffic8Transportation 28, 4(2016), 435--444.Google Scholar
- Tapio Soikkeli. 2011. The effect of context on smartphone usage sessions. Master's Thesis. Aalto University School of Science.Google Scholar
- T. Soikkeli, J. Karikoski, and H. Hammainen. 2011. Diversity and End User Context in Smartphone Usage Sessions. 2011 Fifth International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies (Sept 2011), 7--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khai N. Truong, Thariq Shihipar, and Daniel J. Wigdor. 2014. Slide to X: Unlocking the Potential of Smartphone Unlocking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3635--3644. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Theodoros Anagnostopoulos, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Usage Gaps. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 4711--4721. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hannu Verkasalo. 2008. Contextual patterns in mobile service usage. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 5 (mar 2008), 331--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel T. Wagner, Andrew Rice, and Alastair R. Beresford. 2013. Device Analyzer: Large-scale mobile data collection. In Big Data Analytics workshop, ACM Sigmetrics 2013.Google Scholar
- Daniel T. Wagner, Andrew Rice, and Alastair R. Beresford. 2013. Device Analyzer: Understanding smartphone usage. In 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services.Google Scholar
- Susan Wiedenbeck, Jim Waters, Leonardo Sobrado, and Jean-Camille Birget. 2006. Design and evaluation of a shoulder-surfing resistant graphical password scheme. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces - AVI ‘06 (2006), 177. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yafei Yang, Lu Xiao, Yongjin Kim, and David Julian. 2009. Case Study: Trust Establishment in Personal Area Networks. Proceedings of ISWPC 2009 (2009), 1--5. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emanuel Von Zezschwitz, Paul Dunphy, and Alexander De Luca. 2013. Patterns in the Wild: A field study of the usability of pattern and pin-based authentication on Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (2013), 261--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Large-Scale, Long-Term Analysis of Mobile Device Usage Characteristics
Recommendations
Diversity in locked and unlocked mobile device usage
UbiComp '14 Adjunct: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct PublicationWe analyze locked and unlocked mobile device usage of 1 960 Android smartphones. Based on approximately 10TB of mobile device data logs collected by the Device Analyzer project, we derive 6.9 million usage sessions using a screen power state machine ...
Mobile Device Usage Characteristics: The Effect of Context and Form Factor on Locked and Unlocked Usage
MoMM '14: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and MultimediaSmartphones and tablets are an indispensable part of modern communication and people spend considerable time interacting with their devices every day. While substantial research has been conducted concerning smartphone usage, little is known about how ...
Developing mobile apps using cross-platform frameworks: a case study
HCI'13: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-Computer Interaction: human-centred design approaches, methods, tools, and environments - Volume Part IIn last few years, a huge variety of frameworks for the mobile cross-platform development have been released to deliver quick and overall better solutions. Most of them are based on different approaches and technologies; therefore, relying on only one ...
Comments