skip to main content
10.1145/3017680.3017751acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Distinguished Paper

Examining the Relationship Between Introductory Computing Course Experiences, Self-Efficacy, and Belonging Among First-Generation College Women

Published:08 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computing self-efficacy and sense of belonging are known predictors of motivation and persistence. As such, these psychological states are important to study in order to broaden participation in computing. This study examined the relationship between (a) introductory computing course experiences and (b) self-efficacy and sense of belonging in computing, focusing on differences by gender and college generation status. We found that the relationship between some introductory course experiences and self-efficacy and sense of belonging was strongest among first-generation college women, which reveals the importance of considering women's experiences in light of their additional intersectional identities. Recommendations for best practices in introductory computing courses are discussed.

References

  1. Busch, T. 1995. Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cokley, K. 2002. An investigation of academic self-concept and its relationship to academic achievement in African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 26(2), 148--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Good, C. Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. 2012. Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700--717. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Goodenow, C. 1993. The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Griffin, K. & Museus, S. 2011. Using mixed methods to study intersectionality in higher education: New directions for institutional research. Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurtado, S., Eagan, K., & Sharkness, J. 2009. Thinking and acting like a scientist: Investigating the outcomes of introductory science and math courses. Association of Institutional Research (AIR) 2009 Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Isaac,C., Kaatz, A., Lee, B., & Carnes, M. 2012. An educational intervention designed to increase women's leadership self-efficacy. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 307--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. 1986. Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 265--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. 1999. On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 191--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. National Science Foundation. 2015. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (No. NSF 15--311). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/digest/theme2.cfmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pascarella, E. 1980. Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 545--595. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pascarella, E.T., Pierson, C.T., Wolniak G.C., & Terenzini P.T. 2004. First generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rosser, S. & Taylor, M. 2009. Why are we still worried about women in science? Academe: Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, 95(3) Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/article/why-are-we-still-worried-about-women-science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sax, L., Bryant, A., & Harper, C. 2005. The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 45(6), 642--657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Stout, J. G. & Camp, T. 2014. Now what? Action items from social science research to bridge the gender gap in computing research. SIGCAS Computers in Society: Special Issue on Women in Computing, 44, 5--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Stout, J. G., Tamer, B. & Wright, H. M. 2016. The link between feeling welcomed and achievement among first generation students in computing. Proceedings of the AAAS/NSF symposium on Envisioning the Future of Undergraduate STEM Education: Research and Practice.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Stout, J., G., & Tamer, B. 2016. Collaborative learning eliminates the negative impact of gender stereotypes on women's self-concept. Proceedings for the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Stout. J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn't mean you: gender-exclusive language a form of subtle ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Walton, M. & Cohen. G. L. 2007. A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 92(1), 82--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Examining the Relationship Between Introductory Computing Course Experiences, Self-Efficacy, and Belonging Among First-Generation College Women

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      March 2017
      838 pages
      ISBN:9781450346986
      DOI:10.1145/3017680

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate105of348submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader