skip to main content
10.1145/2993422.2993428acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data mining-based localisation of spatial low-resolution sensors in commercial buildings

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an approach to infer relative position and orientation of ubiquitous building-installed low-resolution spatial sensors using real-life measurements. Commercial buildings accumulate a "zoo" of heterogeneous devices, as new generations of sensors and emerging modalities become available. The increasing number of building sensors pose challenging commissioning and maintenance tasks that require sensor arrangement information. In this work we focus on sensors which can track objects in their field of view, i.e., spatial sensors. Furthermore, our proposed approach is fined tuned for low-resolution spatial sensors, i.e., where objects can be detected but not identified. We exploit user walking trajectories within building spaces and the resulting sensor signatures to identify spatial relations between sensors. We start by tracking objects through each sensor's field of view, then create link rules between pairs of sensors, and finally, based on the mined link rules, infer relative sensor arrangement. We evaluated our mining and sorting approach using thermopile array sensors in four real-life building scenarios: corridor, T-crossing, meeting room, and a foyer, involving different sensor arrangements and network sizes. Based on data acquired over multiple weeks in each scenario, we found that sensor arrangements could be inferred with accuracies ranging from 77% to 100% on the best days, depending on scenario complexity and use. Our approach can be beneficial to derive and maintain heterogeneous spatial sensor networks, independent of the sensor's communication protocol.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p187.mov

mov

491.9 MB

References

  1. J. Aspnes, T. Eren, D. K. Goldenberg, A. S. Morse, W. Whiteley, Y. R. Yang, B. D. Anderson, and P. N. Belhumeur. A theory of network localization. Mob. Comput. IEEE Trans. On, 5(12):1663--1678, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Bodor, P. Schrater, and N. Papanikolopoulos. Multi-camera positioning to optimize task observability. In Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2005. AVSS 2005. IEEE Conference on, pages 552--557. IEEE, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. J. Eronen, V. T. Peltonen, J. T. Tuomi, A. P. Klapuri, S. Fagerlund, T. Sorsa, G. Lorho, and J. Huopaniemi. Audio-based context recognition. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., 14(1):321--329, Jan. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Han and B. Bhanu. Human Activity Recognition in Thermal Infrared Imagery. In IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference - Workshops., pages 17--17. IEEE, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Hevesi, S. Wille, G. Pirkl, N. Wehn, and P. Lukowicz. Monitoring Household Activities and User Location with a Cheap, Unobtrusive Thermal Sensor Array. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '14, pages 141--145, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Jain, L. Hong, and S. Pankanti. Biometric Identification. Commun ACM, 43(2):90--98, Feb. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Jaramillo-Garcia, L. I. Lopera Gonzalez, and O. Amft. Using implicit user feedback to balance energy consumption and user comfort of proximity-controlled computer screens. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 6(2):207--221, Feb. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. L. I. Lopera Gonzalez and O. Amft. Mining relations and physical grouping of building-embedded sensors and actuators. In PerCom 2015: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, pages 2--10. IEEE, Mar. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. I. Lopera Gonzalez and O. Amft. Mining hierarchical relations in building management variables. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 26:91--101, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. I. Lopera Gonzalez, U. Großekathöfer, and O. Amft. An Intervention Study on Automated Lighting Control to Save Energy in Open Space Offices. In PerEnergy 2015: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, pages 317--322. IEEE, Mar. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. I. Lopera Gonzalez, M. Troost, and O. Amft. Using a thermopile matrix sensor to recognize energy-related activities in offices. In SEIT 2013: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Energy Information Technology, Procedia Computer Science, pages 678--685. Elsevier, 2013. Recipient of the Best Paper Award at SEIT 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Mashiyama, J. Hong, and T. Ohtsuki. Activity recognition using low resolution infrared array sensor. In Communications (ICC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pages 495--500, June 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Milenkovic and O. Amft. Recognizing energy-related activities using sensors commonly installed in office buildings. In SEIT 2013: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Energy Information Technology, Procedia Computer Science, pages 669--677. Elsevier, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Nistér. Reconstruction from Uncalibrated Sequences with a Hierarchy of Trifocal Tensors. In Computer Vision - ECCV 2000, number 1842 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 649--663. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, June 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. N. Patwari, J. Ash, S. Kyperountas, A. Hero, R. Moses, and N. Correal. Locating the nodes: Cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. Signal Process. Mag. IEEE, 22(4):54--69, July 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. N. Patwari, A. O. Hero, M. Perkins, N. S. Correal, and R. J. O'dea. Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks. Signal Process. IEEE Trans. On, 51(8):2137--2148, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Payal, C. Rai, and B. Reddy. Analysis of Radial Basis Function network for localization framework in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Confluence The Next Generation Information Technology Summit (Confluence), 2014 5th International Conference -, pages 432--435, Sept. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Y. Rui and Y. Chen. Better proposal distributions: Object tracking using unscented particle filter. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001. CVPR 2001, volume 2, pages II-786--II-793 vol. 2, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. Zetik, S. Crabbe, J. Krajnak, P. Peyerl, J. Sachs, and R. Thomä. Detection and localization of persons behind obstacles using M-sequence through-the-wall radar. volume 6201, pages 62010I--62010I--12, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Zhao and S.-c. Cheung. Multi-camera surveillance with visual tagging and generic camera placement. In Distributed Smart Cameras, 2007. ICDSC'07. First ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 259--266. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    BuildSys '16: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments
    November 2016
    273 pages
    ISBN:9781450342643
    DOI:10.1145/2993422

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 November 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate148of500submissions,30%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader