skip to main content
10.1145/2901790.2901848acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access
Honorable Mention

SOLE meets MOOC: Designing Infrastructure for Online Self-organised Learning with a Social Mission

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the design, deployment and evaluation of three configurations of an online learning activity for would-be social innovators and activists, with the aim of understanding the factors that are critical to the design of an infrastructure to support such communities of learners. Our research was inspired and motivated by the example of SOLEs (self-organised learning environments) and builds upon the experiences of early connectivist MOOCs (massive open online courses). Our configurations were used to deliver three pilot courses on the topic of Sustainable Development, in partnership with United World Colleges (an organisation of international schools). Our work is distinctive in putting a focus on civic engagement and the autonomy of student learners throughout the course. Our primary design goals were to enable activist empowerment, self-organized learning, and the creation of social bonds to facilitate a lasting and self-sufficient international activist community. We base our analysis on a sample of 114 active learners and 33 mentors; including data from 223 applications, 705 Facebook posts, 48 participant survey responses and a variety of quantitative metrics.

References

  1. Panagiotis Adamopoulos. 2013. What Makes a Great MOOC? An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Student Retention in Online Courses. Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems: 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jon Baggaley. 2014. MOOC postscript. Distance Education 35, 1: 126--132. http://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.876142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Maha Bali. 2014. MOOC Pedagogy: Gleaning Good Practice from Existing MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10, 1: 44--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Frances Bell. 2011. Connectivism: Its place in Theoryinformed research and innovation in technologyenabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12, 3: 98--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Marta Cuesta, Monica Eklund, Ingegerd Rydin, and Ann-katrin Witt. 2016. Using Facebook as a colearning community in higher education. 9884, January. http://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064952Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alex Cusack, 2014. A Handy Cheat Sheet on MOOCs. Retrieved on September 26, 2015 from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2014-01-10-a-handycheatsheet-on-moocsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Margarita V. Divall and Jennifer L. Kirwin. 2012. Using Facebook to facilitate course-related discussion between students and faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 76, 2: 1--5. http://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe76232Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Paul Dolan, David Leat, Laura Mazzoli Smith, Sugata Mitra, Liz Todd, and Kate Wall. 2014. Self-Organised Learning Environments (SOLEs) in an English School: an example of transformative pedagogy? The Online Educational Research Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stephen Downes. 2012. Creating the Connectivist Course. One Change a Day. Retrieved on September 25, 2015 from http://moocblogcalendar.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/cr eating-the-connectivist-course/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andrea Forte, Niki Kittur, Vanessa Larco, and H Zhu. 2012. Coordination and beyond: social functions of groups in open content production. p. 417--426. http://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145270 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andrea Forte and Amy Bruckman. 2008. Scaling consensus: Increasing decentralization in Wikipedia governance. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: 15--17. http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.383 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Buckminster Fuller, 1962. Education Automation: Freeing the Scholar to Go Back to His Studies. Southern Illinois University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stephanie Garloch, 2015. Is small beautiful? Online education looks beyond the MOOC. Harvard Magazine. Retrieved on August 17, 2015 from: http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/07/is-small-beautifulGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lourdes Guàrdia, Marcelo Maina, and Albert Sangrà. 2013. MOOC Design Principles. A Pedagogical Approach from the Learner's Perspective. eLearning Papers 33, May: 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Christine Greenhow and Cathy Lewin. 2015. Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology 9884, January: 1--25. http://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Noriko Hara and By Huang. 2011. Online social movements. Annual review of information science and Technology: 489--522. http://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Summer Harlow and Dustin Harp. 2012. Collective Action on the Web. Information, Communication & Society 15, 2: 196--216. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.591411Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lindsey Harness. 2011. Virtual Communities: Bowling Alone, Online Together. Quarterly Journal of Speech 97, 1: 117--120. http://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2010.541279Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Harvard Magazine. Harvard Business School Launches HBX. Retrieved on August 22, 2015 from http://harvardmagazine.com/2014/03/harvard-businessschool-launches-online-hbxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Andrew Dean Ho, Isaac Chuang, Justin Reich, et al. 2015. HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10: 1--37. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586847Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Andrew Dean Ho, Justin Reich, Sergiy O Nesterko, et al. 2014. HarvardX and MITx: The First Year of Open Online Courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1: 1--33. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381263Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Philip N Howard, Aiden Duffy, Deen Freelon, Muzammil Hussain, Will Mari, and Mrawa Mazaid. 2011. What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring -- Project on Information Technologu and Political Islam: 1--30. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398014-0173-7.2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeffrey S Juris. 2012. Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist 39, 2: 259--279. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.15481425.2012.01362.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Habibul Haque Khondker. 2011. Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations 8, 5: 675--679. http://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2011.621287Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rita Kop. 2011. The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12, 3: 19--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Rita Kop and Fiona Carroll. 2011. Cloud Computing and Creativity: Learning on a Massive Open Online Course. European Journal of Open, Distance and ELearning: 1--11. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=special&sp=articles&inum= 2&article=457Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rita Kop, Helene Fournier, and John Sui Fai Mak. 2011. A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings' Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12, 7: 74--93. Retrieved on September 26, 2015 from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1018483294?acco untid=14624Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Piotr Konieczny. 2009. Governance, Organization, and Democracy on the Internet: The Iron Law and the Evolution of Wikipedia. Sociological Forum 24, 1: 162--192. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.15737861.2008.01090.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Stacey Kuznetsov. 2006. Motivations of contributors to Wikipedia. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 36, 2: 1--es. http://doi.org/10.1145/1215942.1215943 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Learning in doing 95: 138. http://doi.org/10.2307/2804509Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. The John D, Catherine T Macarthur, and Foundation Series. 2008. Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jenny Mackness, S F J Mak, and Roy Williams. 2010. The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC. Learning 10, December 2011: 266--274. Retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc 2010/abstracts/PDFs/Mackness.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Benjamin Mako Hill. 2013. Almost Wikipedia : Eight Early Encyclopedia Projects and the Mechanisms of Collective Action. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 1--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Martha Mccaughey (Editor), Michael Ayers (Editor). 2004. Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. DOI:10.1080/01972240500253632 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sugata Mitra. 2014. The future of schooling: Children and learning at the edge of chaos. Prospects 44, 4: 547--558. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9327-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Mitra Sugata, Dangwa Ritu, Shiffon Chatterjee, Swati Jha, Ravinder S. Bisht, and Preeti Kapur. 2005. Acquisition of computing literacy on shared public computers: Children and the "hole in the wall." Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21, 3: 407--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sugata Mitra and Ritu Dangwal. 2010. Limits to selforganising systems of learning-the Kalikuppam experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 5: 672--688. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678535.2010.01077.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sugata Mitra and Vivek Rana. 2001. Minimally invasive education in India. British Journal of Educational Technology 32, 2: 221--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Newcastle University, 2014. SOLE Central. Retrieved on August 17, 2015 from: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/solecentral/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Daniel F. O. Onah, Jane Sinclair, and Russell Boyatt. 2014. Dropout rates of massive open online courses?: behavioural patterns. EDULEARN14 Proceedings: 5825--5834. Retrieved on August 17, 2015 from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/65543/1/WRAP_9770711cs-070115-edulearn2014.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Online UWC. Empower Inclusive, Productive and Resilient Cities, Video lecture for Online UWC, broadcast on October 9, 2014, Retried on January 5, 2016: https://plus.google.com/events/c28gb6q0jclfhr8t29avm ids3n0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jenny Preece. 2000. Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Yuqing Ren, Robert Kraut, Sara Kiesler, and Paul Resnick. 2011. Encouraging commitment in online communities. Evidence-based social design: Mining the social sciences to build online communities: 77--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Robert A. Rhoads, Jennifer Berdan, and Brit TovenLindsey. 2013. The Open Courseware Movement in Higher Education: Unmasking Power and Raising Questions about the Movement's Democratic Potential. Educational Theory 63, 1: 87--110. http://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Osvaldo Rodriguez. 2013. The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis 5, 1: 67--73. http://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.42Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Cathy Sandeen. 2013. Assessment's Place in the New MOOC World. Research and Practice in Assessment 8, Summer: 5--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. George Siemens. 2004. Connectivism?: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. elearnspace.org. Retrieved on September 25, 2015 from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. George Siemens. 2005. Learning Development Cycle: Bridging Learning Design and Modern Knowledge Needs. elearnspace.org. Retrieved on September 25, 2015 from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/ldc.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. George Siemens. 2006. Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime of the Self-Amused? elearnspace.org. Retrieved on September 25, 2015 from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism_self -amused.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Carmen Tschofen and Jenny Mackness. 2012. Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13, 1: 124--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Hang Ung and Jean-Michel Dalle. 2010. Project management in the Wikipedia community. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration: 13:1--13:4. http://doi.org/http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1832772.1832 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. United Youth Journalists. Retrived on January 15, 2016 from http://unitedyouthjournalists.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Etienne Wenger. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identitiy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SOLE meets MOOC: Designing Infrastructure for Online Self-organised Learning with a Social Mission

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader