Jessica Su
ABSTRACT
Online social networks regularly offer users personalized, algorithmic suggestions of whom to connect to. Here we examine the aggregate effects of such recommendations on network structure, focusing on whether these recommendations increase the popularity of niche users or, conversely, those who are already popular. We investigate this issue by empirically and theoretically analyzing abrupt changes in Twitter's network structure around the mid-2010 introduction of its "Who to Follow" feature. We find that users across the popularity spectrum benefitted from the recommendations; however, the most popular users profited substantially more than average. We trace this "rich get richer" phenomenon to three intertwined factors. First, as is typical of network recommenders, the system relies on a "friend-of-friend"-style algorithm, which we show generally results in users being recommended proportional to their degree. Second, we find that the baseline growth rate of users is sublinear in degree. This mismatch between the recommender and the natural network dynamics thus alters the structural evolution of the network. Finally, we find that people are much more likely to respond positively to recommendations for popular users---perhaps because of their greater name recognition---further amplifying the cumulative advantage of well-known individuals.
- M. Al Hasan and M. J. Zaki. A survey of link prediction in social networks. In Social network data analytics, pages 243--275. Springer, 2011. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Anderson. The long tail: how endless choice is creating unlimited demand. Random House, 2007.Google Scholar
- L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 635--644. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Bahmani, A. Chowdhury, and A. Goel. Fast incremental and personalized pagerank. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 4(3):173--184, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Bakshy, S. Messing, and L. Adamic. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook. Science, 2015. Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. science, 286(5439):509--512, 1999.Google Scholar
- P. Boldi, M. Rosa, and S. Vigna. Hyperanf: Approximating the neighbourhood function of very large graphs on a budget. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, pages 625--634. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Chen, W. Geyer, C. Dugan, M. Muller, and I. Guy. Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 201--210. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. M. Daly, W. Geyer, and D. R. Millen. The network effects of recommending social connections. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 301--304. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Dunning. Natural experiments in the social sciences: a design-based approach. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Flajolet, É. Fusy, O. Gandouet, and F. Meunier. Hyperloglog: the analysis of a near-optimal cardinality estimation algorithm. DMTCS Proceedings, 2008.Google Scholar
- S. R. Flaxman, S. Goel, and J. M. Rao. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2016. Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Fleder and K. Hosanagar. Blockbuster culture's next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management science, 55(5):697--712, 2009. Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. G. Goldstein and G. Gigerenzer. Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. Psychological review, 109(1):75, 2002. Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Gupta, A. Goel, J. Lin, A. Sharma, D. Wang, and R. Zadeh. Wtf: The who to follow service at twitter. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 505--514. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. H. Haveliwala. Topic-sensitive pagerank. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 517--526. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Hosanagar, D. Fleder, D. Lee, and A. Buja. Will the global village fracture into tribes? recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Science, 60(4):805--823, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Jannach, M. Zanker, A. Felfernig, and G. Friedrich. Recommender systems: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5):604--632, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link-prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 58(7):1019--1031, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. K. Merton. The matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810):56--63, 1968. Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. A. Myers, A. Sharma, P. Gupta, and J. Lin. Information network or social network?: The structure of the twitter follow graph. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World wide web companion, pages 493--498. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. E. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Physical review E, 64(2):026118, 2001. Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Pariser. The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Sharma, J. M. Hofman, and D. J. Watts. Estimating the causal impact of recommendation systems from observational data. Economics & Computation, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Steck. Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 125--132. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. R. Sunstein. Republic. com 2.0. Princeton University Press, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Ugander, B. Karrer, L. Backstrom, and C. Marlow. The anatomy of the facebook social graph. arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.4503, 2011.Google Scholar
- S. Vargas and P. Castells. Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 109--116. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Zignani, S. Gaito, G. P. Rossi, X. Zhao, H. Zheng, and B. Y. Zhao. Link and triadic closure delay: Temporal metrics for social network dynamics. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2014.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Effect of Recommendations on Network Structure
Recommendations
Disinformation Warfare: Understanding State-Sponsored Trolls on Twitter and Their Influence on the Web
WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web ConferenceOver the past couple of years, anecdotal evidence has emerged linking coordinated campaigns by state-sponsored actors with efforts to manipulate public opinion on the Web, often around major political events, through dedicated accounts, or “trolls.” ...
A sentiment analysis of audiences on twitter: who is the positive or negative audience of popular twitterers?
ICHIT'11: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Convergence and hybrid information technologyMicroblogging is a new informal communication medium of blogging that differs from a traditional blog in which content is much shorter. Microbloggers post about topics that describe their current status. Twitter is a popular microblogging service and ...
The Dynamics of (Not) Unfollowing Misinformation Spreaders
WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024Many studies explore how people "come into" misinformation exposure. But much less is known about how people "come out of" misinformation exposure.Do people organically sever ties to misinformation spreaders? And what predicts doing so? Over six months, ...
Comments