skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892570acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data Edibilization: Representing Data with Food

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data communication is critical in data science. We propose data edibilization, i.e., encoding data with edible materials, as a novel approach to leverage multiple sensory channels to convey data stories. We conduct a preliminary data tasting workshop to explore how users interact with and interpret data edibilization. Based on the participants' feedback, we summarize the advantages of edibilization in terms of attractiveness, richness, memorability, affectiveness, and sociability. We also identify several challenges with data edibilization. We discuss possible pragmatic processes, enabling technologies, and potential research opportunities to provide insights into the design space of data edibilization and its practicality.

References

  1. 2014. Taste of data. Retrieved June 30, 2015 http://taste-of-data.tumblr.com/. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2016. The center for genomic gastronomy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 http://genomicgastronomy.com/. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3DPI. 2015. 3D printing industry. Retrieved September 2, 2015 from http://3dprintingindustry.com/food/, (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yong-Yeol Ahn, Sebastian E Ahnert, James P Bagrow, and Albert-László Barabási. 2011. Flavor network and the principles of food pairing. Scientific reports 1 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Peter Atkins, Ian Bowler, and others. 2001. Food in society: economy, culture, geography. Arnold, Hodder Headline Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Luigi Atzori, Antonio Iera, and Giacomo Morabito. 2010. The internet of things: A survey. Computer networks 54, 15 (2010), 2787--2805. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tanya Griffiths Brendan P. Bradley Brignell, Catherine and Karin Mogg. 2009. Attentional and approach biases for pictorial food cues: Influence of external eating. Appetite 52, 2 (2009), 299--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gemma Calvert, Charles Spence, and Barry E Stein. 2004. The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Julie Carmigniani, Borko Furht, Marco Anisetti, Paolo Ceravolo, Ernesto Damiani, and Misa Ivkovic. 2011. Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 51, 1 (2011), 341--377. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Austin Carr. 2014. IBM'S Watson Food Truck Brings the Supercomputer to the Kitchen. Retrieved August 10, 2015 from http://www.fastcompany.com/3027446/techforecast/ibms-watson-food-truck-brings-thesupercomputer-to-the-kitchen. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mario G Ceste Sr. 1989. Temperature control system for cooking apparatus. (March 14 1989). US Patent 4,812,625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Helen Charley and Connie Weaver. 1998. Foods: a scientific approach. Merrill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert Collier. 2013. Optical holography. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rob Comber, Eva Ganglbauer, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Jettie Hoonhout, Yvonne Rogers, Kenton O'Hara, and Julie Maitland. 2012. Food and interaction design: designing for food in everyday life. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2767--2770. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alan R Dennis and Joseph S Valacich. 1999. Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. In Systems Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 10--pp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pieter MA Desmet and Hendrik NJ Schifferstein. 2008. Food, memory and meaning: the symbolic and social nature of food events. Appetite 50, 2 (2008), 290--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tanja Döring, Axel Sylvester, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. A design space for ephemeral user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pat Elk. 2013. How hot is too hot when it comes to chillies? http://www.foodies.co.za/how-hot-is-too-hotwhen-it-comes-to-chillies/. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Peter Farb and George Armelagos. 1980. Consuming passions, the anthropology of eating. Houghton Mifflin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ingrid C. Fedoroff, Janet Polivy, and C Peter Herman. 1997. The effect of pre-exposure to food cues on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite 28, 1 (1997), 33--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. David G. Myers and C. Nathan DeWall. 2015. Psychology, 11th Edition. Worth Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. William W. Gaver. 1993. What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology 5, 1 (1993), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Grahame Warwick Gould. 2012. New methods of food preservation. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Andrea Grimes and Richard Harper. 2008. Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jayavardhana Gubbi, Rajkumar Buyya, Slaven Marusic, and Marimuthu Palaniswami. 2013. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems 29, 7 (2013), 1645--1660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Alessandra Imoscopi, Emine Meral Inelmen, Giuseppe Sergi, Fabrizia Miotto, and Enzo Manzato. 2012. Taste loss in the elderly: epidemiology, causes and consequences. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 24, 6 (2012), 570--579.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for data physicalization. In In Proceedings of the 33nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Susanne Jaschko and Moritz Stefaner. 2014a. Data cuisine. http://data-cuisine.net/, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Susanne Jaschko and Moritz Stefaner. 2014b. Data cuisine: Resources and reference projects. Retrieved December 30, 2015 http://data-cuisine.net/resourcesand-reference-projects/. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2004. Olfactory display. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 163--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Daniel Keim and others. 2002. Information visualization and visual data mining. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 8, 1 (2002), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rohit Ashok Khot, Jeewon Lee, Deepti Aggarwal, Larissa Hjorth, and Florian 'Floyd' Mueller. 2015a. TastyBeats: Designing Palatable Representations of Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2933--2942. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rohit Ashok Khot, Ryan Pennings, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2015b. EdiPulse: supporting physical activity with chocolate printed messages. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1391--1396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Gregory Kramer, Bruce Walker, Terri Bonebright, Perry Cook, John H Flowers, Nadine Miner, and John Neuhoff. 2010. Sonification report: Status of the field and research agenda. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Deborah Lupton. 1994. Food, memory and meaning: the symbolic and social nature of food events. The Sociological Review 42, 4 (1994), 664--685.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Taram Madhyastha, Daniel Reed, and others. 1995. Data sonification: Do you see what I hear? Software, IEEE 12, 2 (1995), 45--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. L. Kathleen Mahan and Sylvia Escott-Stump. 2004. Krause's food, nutrition, & diet therapy. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Karin Mogg, Brendan P Bradley, Harpfreet Hyare, and Sui Lee. 1998. Selective attention to food-related stimuli in hunger: are attentional biases specific to emotional and psychopathological states, or are they also found in normal drive states? Behaviour Research and Therapy 36, 2 (1998), 227--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Tamara Munzner. 2008. Process and pitfalls in writing information visualization research papers. In Information visualization. Springer, 134--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Tamara Munzner. 2014. Visualization Analysis and Design. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Takuji Narumi, Yuki Ban, Takashi Kajinami, Tomohiro Tanikawa, and Michitaka Hirose. 2012. Augmented perception of satiety: controlling food consumption by changing apparent size of food with augmented reality. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Marianna Obrist, Rob Comber, Sriram Subramanian, Betina Piqueras-Fiszman, Carlos Velasco, and Charles Spence. 2014a. Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: A framework for design. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2853--2862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Marianna Obrist, Alexandre N Tuch, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2014b. Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology. In Proceedings of the 32rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2843--2852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Nicole Koenig-Lewis Adrian Palmer Organ, Kate and Jane Probert. 2015. Festivals as agents for behaviour change: A study of food festival engagement and subsequent food choices. Tourism Management 48 (2015), 84--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Susan J Paxton, Helena K Schutz, Elenor H Wertheim, and Sharry L Muir. 1999. Friendship clique and peer influences on body image concerns, dietary restraint, extreme weight-loss behaviors, and binge eating in adolescent girls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108, 2 (1999), 255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Donna Pendergast, Susanne Garvis, and Harry Kanasa. 2011. Insight from the public on home economics and formal food literacy. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 39, 4 (2011), 415--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Loshak-A. Backhaus S. Davis J. C. Pereverzev, S. V. and R. E. Packard. 1997. Quantum oscillations between two weakly coupled reservoirs of superfluid 3He. Nature 388 (1997), 449--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. University A DJ Catholique de Louuain Pharmaceutiques. 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonie microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition 125 (1995), 1401--1412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Elizabeth Taylor Quilliam. 2008. Happy meals, happy parents: Food marketing strategies and corporate social responsibility. ProQuest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Nimesha Ranasinghe, Kasun Karunanayaka, Adrian David Cheok, Owen Noel Newton Fernando, Hideaki Nii, and Ponnampalam Gopalakrishnakone. 2011. Digital taste and smell communication. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Body Area Networks. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 78--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. JC Roberts and R Walker. 2010. Using all our senses: the need for a unified theoretical approach to multisensory information visualization. In Workshop on the Role of Theory in Information Visualization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Jonathan C Roberts, Panagiotis D Ritsos, Sriram Karthik Badam, Dominique Brodbeck, Jessie Kennedy, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2014. Visualization beyond the Desktop-the Next Big Thing. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 34, 6 (2014), 26--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Paul Rozin. 1982. "Taste-smell confusion" and the duality of the olfactory sense. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 31, 4 (1982), 397--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Paul Rozin. 1996. Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science (1996), 18--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Chloé Rutzerveld. 2014. Edible growth. Retrieved July 1, 2015 http://www.chloerutzerveld.com/edible-growth2014/. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilbur L Scoville. 1912. Note on capsicums. Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association 1, 5 (1912), 453--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Edgar Soria-Gómez, Luigi Bellocchio, Leire Reguero, Gabriel Lepousez, Claire Martin, Mounir Bendahmane, Sabine Ruehle, Floor Remmers, Tifany Desprez, Isabelle Matias, and others. 2014. The endocannabinoid system controls food intake via olfactory processes. Nature Neuroscience 17, 3 (2014), 407--415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Simon Stusak, Aurélien Tabard, Franziska Sauka, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Andreas Butz. 2014. Activity sculptures: Exploring the impact of physical visualizations on running activity. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 20, 12 (2014), 2201--2210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Jie Sun, Weibiao Zhou, Dejian Huang, Jerry YH Fuh, and Geok Soon Hong. 2015. An Overview of 3D Printing Technologies for Food Fabrication. Food and Bioprocess Technology (2015), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. David E. Sutton. 2001. Remembrance of repasts: an anthropology of food and memory. Berg Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Saiganesh Swaminathan, Conglei Shi, Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Lora A Oehlberg, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. Supporting the design and fabrication of physical visualizations. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3845--3854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Lav R Varshney, Florian Pinel, Kush R Varshney, Debarun Bhattacharjya, Angela Schoergendorfer, and YiMin Chee. 2013. A big data approach to computational creativity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.1213 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Jun Wei, Xiaojuan Ma, and Shengdong Zhao. 2014. Food messaging: using edible medium for social messaging. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2873--2882. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Kyle Wiggers. 2015. Why 3D food printing is more than just a novelty. Retrieved July 8, 2015 from http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/3d-foodprinters-how-they-could-change-what-you-eat/, (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. L Wright, M Hickson, and G Frost. 2006. Eating together is important: using a dining room in an acute elderly medical ward increases energy intake. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 19, 1 (2006), 23--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Data Edibilization: Representing Data with Food

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader