skip to main content
10.1145/2839509.2844620acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Toward More Gender Diversity in CS through an Artificial Intelligence Summer Program for High School Girls

Published:17 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The field of computer science suffers from a lack of diversity. The Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory's Outreach Summer (SAILORS), a two-week non-residential free summer program, recruits high school girls to computer science, specifically to Artificial Intelligence (AI). The program was organized by graduate student and professor volunteers. The goals of the pilot program are to increase interest in AI, contextualize technically rigorous AI concepts through societal impact, and address barriers that could discourage 10th grade girls from pursuing computer science. In this paper we describe the curriculum designed to achieve these goals. Survey results show students had a statistically significant increase in technical knowledge, interest in pursuing careers in AI, and confidence in succeeding in AI and computer science. Additionally, survey results show that the majority of the students found new role models, faculty support, and a sense of community in AI and computer science.

References

  1. National Center for Women and Information Technology. Women and Information Technology By the Numbers, 2015. Retrieved August 21, 2015 from http://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/btn_04032015_web.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Degrees in computer and information sciences conferred by degree-granting institutions, by level of degree and sex of student: 1970-71 through 2010-11, 2012. Retrieved August 21, 2015 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_349.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jane Margolis, Allan Fisher, and Faye Miller. The Anatomy of Interest: Women in Undergraduate Computer Science. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28(1/2):pp. 104--127, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Greg Scragg and Jesse Smith. A Study of Barriers to Women in Undergraduate Computer Science. SIGCSE Bull., 30(1):82--86, March 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lori Carter. Why students with an Apparent Aptitude for Computer Science Don't Choose to Major in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '06, pages 27--31, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Neil Anderson, Colin Lankshear, Carolyn Timms, and Lyn Courtney. Because it's boring, irrelevant and I don't like computers: Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects. Computers & Education, 50(4):1304 -- 1318, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J.M. Cohoon. Must there be so few? Including women in CS. In Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 25th International Conference on, pages 668--674, May 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kelly R. Cannon, Katherine A. Panciera, and Nikolaos P. Papanikolopoulos. Second annual robotics summer camp for underrepresented students. SIGCSE Bull., 39(3):14--18, June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Inna Pivkina, Enrico Pontelli, Rachel Jensen, and Jessica Haebe. Young women in computing: Lessons learned from an educational & outreach program. SIGCSE Bull., 41(1):509--513, March 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Janet E. Burge, Gerald C. Gannod, Maureen Doyle, and Karen C. Davis. Girls on the Go: A CS summer camp to attract and inspire female high school students. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 615--620, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lori Pollock, Kathleen McCoy, Sandra Carberry, Namratha Hundigopal, and Xiaoxin You. Increasing high school girls' self confidence and awareness of CS through a positive summer experience. SIGCSE Bull., 36(1):185--189, March 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Manual for Observing Patterns of Adaptive Learning (OPAL): A Protocol for Classroom Observations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. H. Loyd and C. P. Gressard. Computer attitude scale. Journal of Computing Research., 15(3):241--259, June 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Brian Dorn and Allison Elliott Tew. Empirical validation and application of the computing attitudes survey. Computer Science Education, 25(1):1--36, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Toward More Gender Diversity in CS through an Artificial Intelligence Summer Program for High School Girls

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education
              February 2016
              768 pages
              ISBN:9781450336857
              DOI:10.1145/2839509

              Copyright © 2016 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 17 February 2016

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              SIGCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate105of297submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

              Upcoming Conference

              SIGCSE Virtual 2024

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader