skip to main content
research-article

Automatic Classification of Leading Interactions in a String Quartet

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 March 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to analyze automatically the leading interactions between the musicians of a string quartet, using machine-learning techniques applied to nonverbal features of the musicians’ behavior, which are detected through the help of a motion-capture system. We represent these interactions by a graph of “influence” of the musicians, which displays the relations “is following” and “is not following” with weighted directed arcs. The goal of the machine-learning problem investigated is to assign weights to these arcs in an optimal way. Since only a subset of the available training examples are labeled, a semisupervised support vector machine is used, which is based on a linear kernel to limit its model complexity. Specific potential applications within the field of human-computer interaction are also discussed, such as e-learning, networked music performance, and social active listening.

References

  1. O. Bousquet and A. Elisseeff. 2002. Stability and generalization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2, 499--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Brunner, A. Fischer, K. Luig, and T. Thies. 2012. Pairwise support vector machines and their application to large scale problems. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 2279--2292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Camurri, P. Coletta, G. Varni, and S. Ghisio. 2007. Developing multimodal interactive systems with EyesWeb XMI. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME’07). ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Cortes and M. Mohri. 2007. On transductive regression. In Advances in Neural Information Processing (NIPS), Vol. 19, B. Schölkopf, J. C. Platt, and T. Hoffman (Eds.). 305--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor. 2000. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Dahl, F. Bevilacqua, R. Bresin, M. Clayton, L. Leante, I. Poggi, and N. Rasamimanana. 2009. Gestures in performance. In Musical Gestures. Sound, Movement, and Meaning, M. Leman and R. I. Godoy (Eds.). Routledge, 36--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. W. Davidson. 1993. Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians. Psychology of Music 21, 103--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Feese, B. Arnrich, G. Tröster, B. Meyer, and K. Jonas. 2012. Quantifying behavioral mimicry by automatic detection of nonverbal cues from body motion. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 4th IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (SOCIALCOM). IEEE, 520--525. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Gilboa and M. Tal-Shmotkin. 2012. String quartets as self-managed teams: An interdisciplinary perspective. Psychology of Music 40, 19--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Glowinski, L. Badino, A. D’Ausilio, A. Camurri, and L. Fadiga. 2012. Analysis of leadership in a string quartet. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Behaviour in Music (SBM) at the ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’12). ACM, New York, NY. 6 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Glowinski, F. Dardard, G. Gnecco, S. Piana, and A. Camurri. 2015. Expressive non-verbal interaction in a string quartet: An analysis through head movements. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 9, 55--68. DOI:10.1007/s12193-014-0154-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Hutchinson. 1974. Labanotation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. B. Jayagopi and D. Gatica-Perez. 2009. Discovering group nonverbal conversational patterns with topics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction (ICMI-MLMI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 3--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Khoshhal, H. Aliakbarpour, J. Quintas, P. Drews, and J. Dias. 2010. Probabilistic LMA-based classification of human behaviour understanding using power spectrum technique. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (EICC’10). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Khoshhal, L. Santos, H. Aliakbarpour, and J. Dias. 2012. Parameterizing interpersonal behaviour with Laban movement analysis—Bayesian approach. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Socially Intelligent Surveillance and Monitoring (SISM’12) in CVPR’12. IEEE, 7--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Kim, A. Chang, L. Holland, and A. S. Pentland. 2008. Meeting mediator: Enhancing group collaboration using sociometric feedback. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, NY, 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Laban and L. Ullmann. 1971. The Mastery of Movement. Dance Books Limited, Binsted, Hampstead, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. O. Madani, D. M. Pennock, and G. W. Flake. 2004. Co-Validation: Using model disagreement on unlabeled data to validate classification algorithms. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’04). 873--880.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. P. Maglio, T. Matlock, C. S. Campbell, S. Zhai, and B. A. Smith. 2000. Gaze and speech in attentive user interfaces. In Advances in Multimodal Interfaces, Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI’00). Springer, Berlin, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Opsahla, F. Agneessensb, and J. Skvoretzc. 2010. Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks 35, 245--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. Q. Quiroga, T. Kreuz, and P. Grassberger. 2002. Event synchronization: A simple and fast method to measure synchronicity and time delay patterns. Physical Review E 66, 41904--41909.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. Rett. 2008. Robot-Human interface using Laban movement analysis inside a Bayesian framework. PhD dissertation. University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. Sanchez-Cortes, O. Aran, M. S. Mast, and D. Gatica-Perez. 2010. Identifying emergent leadership in small groups using nonverbal communicative cues. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction (ICMI-MLMI’10). ACM, New York, NY. Article number 39, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. Sanchez-Cortes, O. Aran, M. S. Mast, and D. Gatica-Perez. 2012. A nonverbal behavior approach to identify emergent leaders in small groups. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 14, 816--832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. L. Santos and J. Dias. 2009. Human-robot interaction: Invariant 3-D features for Laban movement analysis shape component. In Proceedings of the 14th IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications (RA’09). 255--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. V. Sindhwani and S. S. Keerthi. 2006. Large scale semi-supervised linear SVMs. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, 477--484. Software available at http://vikas.sindhwani.org/svmlin.html. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. Stiefelhagen. 2002. Tracking focus of attention in meetings. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. IEEE, 273--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. V. Vapnik. 2000. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. G. Varni, M. Mancini, G. Volpe, and A. Camurri. 2011a. A system for mobile active music listening based on social interaction and embodiment. Mobile Networks and Applications 16, 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. G. Varni, G. Volpe, and B. Mazzarino. 2011b. Towards a social retrieval of music content. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 3rd IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (SOCIALCOM). IEEE, 1466--1473.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. L. Zhao. 2002. Synthesis and Acquisition of Laban Movement Analysis Qualitative Parameters for Communicative Gestures. PhD dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. L. Zhao and N. I. Badler. 2005. A nonverbal behavior approach to identify emergent leaders in small groups. Graphical Models 67, 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. X. Zhu and A. B. Goldberg. 2009. Introduction to Semi-Supervised Learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automatic Classification of Leading Interactions in a String Quartet

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
      ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 6, Issue 1
      Special Issue on New Directions in Eye Gaze for Interactive Intelligent Systems (Part 2 of 2), Regular Articles and Special Issue on Highlights of IUI 2015 (Part 1 of 2)
      May 2016
      219 pages
      ISSN:2160-6455
      EISSN:2160-6463
      DOI:10.1145/2896319
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 March 2016
      • Revised: 1 November 2015
      • Accepted: 1 November 2015
      • Received: 1 March 2015
      Published in tiis Volume 6, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader